Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

H.R. 4137

U.S. HouseIn House Committee

Summary

H.R. 4137, the Transparency in Security Clearance Denials Act, was introduced in the House on Jun 25, 2025 by Rep. Ted Lieu (D) with 1 co-sponsor. It was referred to Foreign Affairs, and last saw action on Jun 25, 2025: Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.


Record

Text

H.R. 4137 has 1 co-sponsor.

hb4137/introduced-in-house.txt
119 HR 4137 IH: Transparency in Security Clearance Denials Act
U.S. House of Representatives
2025-06-25
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 4137 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES June 25, 2025 Mr. Lieu (for himself and Mr. Castro of Texas ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs A BILL
To require the Secretary of State to report annually on adverse security clearance adjudications, and for other purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Transparency in Security Clearance Denials Act .
2.
Annual report by Secretary of State on certain adverse security clearance adjudications
(a)
Report
Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the Secretary of State shall submit to the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a report that contains, with respect to the 1-year period ending on the date of the submission of the report, the following:
(1)
For each type of covered adjudicative outcome, the number of individuals who received such outcome from the Assistant Secretary of State for Diplomatic Security.
(2)
The number of individuals who submitted to the Assistant Secretary of State for Diplomatic Security an appeal with respect to a covered adjudicative outcome, disaggregated by whether the appeal related to assignment restrictions or assignment reviews.
(3)
The success rate of such appeals.
(4)
A description of the considerations and criteria used by such employees to determine whether a covered adjudicative outcome is warranted.
(b)
Disaggregation of data
The data specified in paragraphs (1) through (3) of subsection (a) shall also be disaggregated by the following:
(1)
Position held by the individual, including by the following:
(A)
Foreign Service officer.
(B)
Civil service employee.
(C)
Other position.
(2)
Ethnicity, national origin, and race, to the extent such information is available.
(3)
Gender, to the extent such information is available.
(c)
Initial report scope
Notwithstanding the 1-year period described in subsection (a), the first report submitted pursuant to the requirements of that section shall be with respect to the period beginning on January 1, 2024, and ending on the date of the submission of such first report.
(d)
Definitions
In this section:
(1)
Continuous vetting
The term continuous vetting has the meaning given that term in section 6601 of the Damon Paul Nelson and Matthew Young Pollard Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 2018, 2019, and 2020 ( 50 U.S.C. 3352 ).
(2)
Covered adjudicative outcome
The term covered adjudicative outcome means the following:
(A)
With respect to an initial security clearance background investigation, an adjudication that was unfavorable and resulted in a denial, suspension, or revocation of a security clearance.
(B)
With respect to a periodic reinvestigation, an adjudication that was unfavorable and resulted in a denial, suspension, or revocation of a security clearance.
(C)
With respect to a program of continuous vetting, a denial, suspension, or revocation of a security clearance taken by an authorized adjudicative agency as a result of such continuous vetting.
(3)
Periodic reinvestigation
The term periodic reinvestigation has the meaning given that terms in section 3001 of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 ( 50 U.S.C. 3341 ).

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2025-06-25
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

To require the Secretary of State to report annually on adverse security clearance adjudications, and for other purposes.

Sponsors

Rep. Ted Lieu (D) sponsors H.R. 4137, and 1 member has co-sponsored it from the day it was introduced.

Committees

H.R. 4137 went before 1 committee: Foreign Affairs.

Foreign Affairs
Foreign Affairs
Referred To · Jun 25, 2025 · 658 Bills

Actions

H.R. 4137 has taken 2 actions since Jun 25, 2025.

ChamberAction
Jun 25, 2025
House
Introduced in House
Jun 25, 2025
House
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.Foreign Affairs Committee

Votes

H.R. 4137 has not gone to a roll call.

Titles

H.R. 4137 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.

  • Transparency in Security Clearance Denials Act — Display Title
  • Transparency in Security Clearance Denials Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • To require the Secretary of State to report annually on adverse security clearance adjudications, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 4137 under Government Operations and Politics, one of its 31 policy areas.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 4137’s is Government Operations and Politics.

hr4137/policy-areas.txt
Government Operations and PoliticsAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com