Big Pivots: We can’t build our way out of this ‘drought’ — Some of those on the campaign trail call for more storage. They need to visit Green Mountain Reservoir. | SteamboatToday.com
Big Pivots: We can’t build our way out of this ‘drought’ — Some of those on the campaign trail call for more storage.
steamboatpilot.com · Allen Best · September 8, 2026
Big Pivots: We can’t build our way out of this ‘drought’ — Some of those on the campaign trail call for more storage. They need to visit Green Mountain Reservoir. | SteamboatToday.com
# Big Pivots: We can’t build our way out of this ‘drought’ — Some of those on the campaign trail call for more storage. They need to visit Green Mountain Reservoir.
News News | Sep 8, 2026
Allen Best Big Pivots
The water level of the Green Mountain Reservoir s alarming, to say the least, as seen in this photograph taken Sept. 3. The reservoir between Silverthorne and Kremmling was 14% full as of Labor Day weekend, according to the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. John F. Russell/Private collection
No place in Colorado that I have visited offers such blunt testimony to the warming, drying climate than Green Mountain Reservoir. It also poses a question to those politicians whose answer to non-winters and ever-hotter summers is more dams and reservoirs.
The reservoir between Silverthorne and Kremmling was 14% full during Labor Day weekend, according to the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, the operator. Put another way, it was 86% empty.
That’s worse even than the roughly 78% empty at Lake Powell, the reservoir located roughly 700 river miles downstream from Green Mountain.
Green Mountain was part of Colorado’s mission begun in the 19 th century to put water to “beneficial use,” a central axiom of state water law. Pioneer settlers did an admirable job of this, in the beginning using nothing more than horses, oxen and human labor.
In 1902, the federal government became a partner, creating the Bureau of Reclamation. Over the next roughly 90 years, the federal treasury was visited repeatedly to prevent any “waste” of any portion of the Colorado River flowing into the Pacific Ocean.
Construction of Green Mountain Dam was part of that work. During the hot, dry 1930s,
farmers in the Fort Collins-Longmont-Greeley area wanted to import water from the Colorado River headwaters near Grand Lake. Western Slope irrigators objected. Farms in the Grand Junction area would lose late-season water needed to get their crops and orchards across the finish line.
Green Mountain was the compromise. And it has worked out well. A pool of 66,000 acre-feet of water was reserved for down-stream irrigators in the Grand Junction area. Deliveries in this canal usually continue through October, sometimes later.
This year was different. For the first time in 110-plus years, deliveries ended in late August.
In April, the Glenwood Springs-based Colorado River Water Conservation District issued a warning. Green Mountain was the lowest it had been since filling during World War II. This jeopardized the late-summer flows to irrigators who took delivery of water from the Government Highline Canal. The canal diverts water from the Colorado River at the Roller Dam, a short distance upstream from Palisade. It then distributes water to farms and orchards for 55 miles, nearly to the Utah border.
This year, in a testament to cooperation, the Colorado River District and Colorado Water Conservation Board ponied up more than $1 million to buy use of water. Water was tapped from headwaters reservoirs, most notably Wolford and Williams Fork, near Kremmling, and Ruedi, near Basalt. Others, including Front Range diverters, helped.
Irrigators got only 50% of their normal water. In response, many switched crops to varieties of plants that could survive with less water.
Even so, by late August, the water was running out. The Grand Valley Water Users Association, operator of the canal, stopped deliveries on September 3. Maybe monsoon rains will deliver water to resume operations, but that’s the story for now.
Once again, the idea that we just need to store more is entirely too simplistic. Yes, saving for a rainy day is always good, but this idea that we can build our way to more water defies ample evidence about the warming, drying climate.
We can have droughts, yes. They come and go. But the science clearly shows that these hot, dry years of the 21 st century will not be ephemeral. They have been driven by a warming climate caused by accumulating greenhouse gas emissions.
In the 20 th century, the Colorado River delivered about 15.2 million acre-feet. In this century, the annual flows have declined to 12.2 million acre-feet. Since 2020, average flows have declined even more, to 10 million acre-feet. And this recent span included a very, very big snow year, in 2022-23, a three-wire winter like those of old. But the spring was like those of the 21 st century, early and uncommonly warm.
The pitiful storage in Green Mountain testifies to this warming, drying climate. So does the canal near Grand Junction where deliveries were cut off last week for the first time in 110 years. And then we have near doubling of 95 degree-plus days in Denver during last 30 years as compared to the three decades before as reported by KUSA.
Might we figure out better infrastructure? Maybe. The idea of storing water underground, as Greeley began doing several years ago, intrigues. It requires more energy but greatly reduces evaporative loss.
The federal government in its documents has excised climate change. So have many politicians in Colorado speaking on the stump, hewing to the recent version of political correctness.
If there are ideas for storing water that don’t assume a return to the climate of the 20 th century, I’m all for hearing them. But to think this is just another drought defies tons of evidence.