H.R. 9437

119 HR 9437 IH: Right to Vote Act
 U.S. House of Representatives
 2026-06-24
 text/xml
 EN
 Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
 I  119th CONGRESS  2d Session  H. R. 9437  IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES   June 24, 2026   Ms. Lee of Pennsylvania  (for herself,  Mr. Neguse ,  Mr. Krishnamoorthi ,  Ms. Tlaib ,  Ms. Norton ,  Mrs. Ramirez ,  Mr. García of Illinois ,  Mr. Deluzio ,  Mr. Thanedar ,  Mr. Johnson of Georgia ,  Ms. Simon ,  Mr. Peters ,  Mr. Evans of Pennsylvania ,  Mrs. Watson Coleman ,  Mr. Jackson of Illinois ,  Mr. Carson ,  Mr. Casar ,  Mr. Frost ,  Ms. Craig ,  Ms. McClellan ,  Ms. Pressley ,  Mr. Veasey ,  Ms. Omar , and  Mr. Green of Texas ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the  Committee on the Judiciary    A BILL
Protecting the right to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the   Right to Vote Act  .
2.
Undue burdens on the ability to vote in elections for Federal office prohibited
(a)
In general
Every citizen of legal voting age shall have the fundamental right to vote in elections for Federal office.
(b)
Retrogression
A government may not diminish the ability to vote in an election for Federal office unless the law, rule, standard, practice, procedure, or other governmental action causing the diminishment is the least restrictive means of significantly furthering an important, particularized government interest.
(c)
Substantial impairment
A government may not substantially impair the ability to vote in an election for Federal office unless the law, rule, standard, practice, procedure, or other governmental action causing the impairment significantly furthers an important, particularized governmental interest. A substantial impairment is a non-trivial impairment that makes it more difficult to vote than if the law, rule, standard, practice, procedure, or other governmental action had not been adopted or implemented. An impairment may be substantial even if the voter or other similarly situated voters are able to vote notwithstanding the impairment.
3.
Judicial review
(a)
Civil action
An action challenging a violation of the rights created by this Act may be brought in the district court for the District of Columbia, or the district court for the district in which the violation took place or where any defendant resides or does business, at the selection of the plaintiff, to obtain all appropriate relief, whether declaratory or injunctive, or facial or as-applied. Process may be served in any district where a defendant resides, does business, or may be found.
(b)
Standards To be applied
Courts adjudicating actions brought to enforce the rights created by this Act shall apply the following standards:
(1)
Retrogression
(A)
A plaintiff establishes a prima facie case of retrogression by demonstrating by a preponderance of the evidence that a rule, standard, practice, procedure, or other governmental action diminishes the ability, or otherwise makes it more difficult, to vote.
(B)
Once a plaintiff establishes a prima facie case as described in subparagraph (A), the government shall be provided an opportunity to demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that the diminishment is necessary to significantly further an important, particularized governmental interest.
(C)
If the government meets its burden under subparagraph (B), the challenged rule, standard, practice, procedure, or other governmental action shall nonetheless be deemed invalid if the plaintiff demonstrates by a preponderance of the evidence that the government could adopt or implement a less-restrictive means of furthering the particular important governmental interest.
(2)
Substantial Impairment
(A)
A plaintiff establishes a prima facie case of substantial impairment by demonstrating by a preponderance of the evidence that a rule, standard, practice, procedure, or other governmental action substantially impairs the ability, or makes it substantially difficult, to vote.
(B)
Once a plaintiff establishes a prima facie case as described in subparagraph (A), the government shall be provided an opportunity to demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that the impairment significantly furthers an important, particularized governmental interest.
(c)
Duty To expedite
It shall be the duty of the court to advance on the docket and to expedite to the greatest reasonable extent the disposition of the action and appeal under this section.
(d)
Attorney’s fees
Section 722(b) of the Revised Statutes ( 42 U.S.C. 1988(b) ) is amended—
(1)
by striking  or section 40302  and inserting  section 40302 ; and
(2)
by striking  , the court  and inserting  , or the  Right to Vote Act , the court .
4.
Definitions
In this Act—
(1)
the term  covered entity  means the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and each territory and possession of the United States;
(2)
the terms  election  and  Federal office  have the meanings given such terms in section 301 of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 ( 52 U.S.C. 30101 );
(3)
the term  government  includes a branch, department, agency, instrumentality, and official (or other person acting under color of law) of the United States, of any State, of any covered entity, or of any political subdivision of any State or covered entity; and
(4)
the term  vote  means all actions necessary to make a vote effective, including registration or other action required by law as a prerequisite to voting, casting a ballot, and having such ballot counted and included in the appropriate totals of votes cast with respect to candidates for public office for which votes are received in an election.
5.
Rules of construction
(a)
Burdens not authorized
Nothing in this Act may be construed to authorize a government to burden the right to vote in elections for Federal office.
(b)
Other rights and remedies
Nothing in this Act shall be construed as indicating an intent on the part of Congress to alter any rights existing under a State constitution or the Constitution of the United States, or to limit any remedies for any other violations of Federal, State, or local law.
6.
Severability
If any provision of this Act or the application of such provision to any citizen or circumstance is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder of this Act and the application of the provisions of such to any citizen or circumstance shall not be affected thereby.
7.
Effective dates
(a)
Actions brought for retrogression
Subsection (b) of section 2 shall apply to any law, rule, standard, practice, procedure, or other governmental action that was not in effect during the November 2024 general election for Federal office but that will be in effect with respect to elections for Federal office occurring on or after September 1, 2026, even if such law, rule, standard, practice, procedure, or other governmental action is already in effect as of the date of enactment of this Act.
(b)
Actions brought for substantial impairment
Subsection (c) of section 2 shall apply to any law, rule, standard, practice, procedure, or other governmental action in effect with respect to elections for Federal office occurring on or after September 1, 2026.