- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- Administration
- Agriculture
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry
- Appropriations
- Armed Services
- Banking, Housing, And Urban Affairs
- Budget
- Commerce, Science, And Transportation
- Education and Workforce
- Energy And Commerce
- Energy And Natural Resources
- Environment And Public Works
- Ethics
- Finance
- Financial Services
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Relations
- Health, Education, Labor, And Pensions
- Homeland Security
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…
- Indian Affairs
- Indian and Insular Affairs
- Intelligence
- Judiciary
- Natural Resources
- Oversight And Government Reform
- Permanent Select Intelligence
- Rules
- Rules And Administration
- Science, Space, And Technology
- Select Intelligence
- Small Business
- Small Business And Entrepreneurship
- Subcommittee on Aviation
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…
- Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…
- Subcommittee on Federal Lands
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…
- Subcommittee on Health
- Subcommittee on Highways and Transit
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…
- Transportation And Infrastructure
- Veterans' Affairs
- Ways And Means

S. 3663
U.S. Senate•In Senate Committee
Summary
S. 3663, the NDO Fairness Act of 2026, was introduced in the Senate on Jan 15, 2026 by Sen. Christopher Coons (D) with 5 co-sponsors. It was referred to Judiciary, and last saw action on Jan 15, 2026: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Record
Text
S. 3663 has 5 co-sponsors.
sb3663/introduced-in-senate.txt119 S3663 IS: NDO Fairness Act of 2026U.S. Senate2026-01-15text/xmlENPursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.II 119th CONGRESS 2d Session S. 3663 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES January 15, 2026 Mr. Coons (for himself and Mr. Lee ) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary A BILLTo amend title 18, United States Code, to modify delayed notice requirements, and for other purposes.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the NDO Fairness Act of 2026 .2.Preclusion of notice(a)In generalSubsection (b) of section 2705 of title 18, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:(b)Preclusion of Notice(1)Application(A)In generalA governmental entity that is seeking a warrant, order, or subpoena under section 2703, when it is not required to notify the customer or subscriber, or to the extent that it may delay such notice pursuant to subsection (a), may apply to a court for an order, subject to paragraph (6), directing a provider of electronic communications service or remote computing service to which a warrant, order, or subpoena under section 2703 is directed not to notify any other person of the existence of the warrant, order, or subpoena.(B)LengthAn order granted under subparagraph (A) shall be in effect—(i)for a period of not more than 1 year if the nature of the offense for which the governmental entity is seeking the warrant, order, or subpoena pertains to child pornography under section 2256, sexual exploitation of children under section 2251, or any Federal, State, Tribal, or military offense that is the substantial equivalent; or(ii)for a period of not more than 90 days for all other investigations.(C)Other requirements(i)In generalAn application for an order under subparagraph (A) shall state, to the best of the applicant’s knowledge, whether the named customer or subscriber whose information is sought by the warrant, order, or subpoena under section 2703—(I)is aware of the warrant, order, subpoena, or underlying investigation; and(II)is suspected of involvement in the commission of the crime under investigation.(ii)OrdersAn order granted under subparagraph (A) may not direct, or otherwise require, a provider of electronic communications service or remote computing service to provide notification of the expiration of the order to the court or government entity that sought the order.(2)Determination(A)In generalThe court may not grant a request for an order made under paragraph (1), or an extension of such order requested by the governmental entity pursuant to paragraph (3), unless—(i)the court issues a written determination, based on specific and articulable facts, and including written findings of fact and conclusions of law, that it is likely that not granting the request will result in—(I)endangering the life or physical safety of an individual;(II)flight from prosecution;(III)destruction of or tampering with evidence;(IV)intimidation of potential witnesses; or(V)otherwise seriously jeopardizing an investigation or unduly delaying a trial;(ii)the order is narrowly tailored and there is no less restrictive alternative, including notification to an individual or organization within or providing legal representation to the named customer or subscriber, that is not likely to result in an adverse result as described in subclauses (I) through (V) of clause (i); and(iii)the court has reviewed the individual warrant, order, or subpoena under section 2703 to which the order issued under paragraph (1) applies.(B)Nature of the offense(i)In generalSubject to clause (ii), the court may consider the nature of the offense in issuing a determination under subparagraph (A).(ii)PresumptionIf the court determines there is a reasonable belief the nature of the offense pertains to child pornography, as defined in section 2256, or sexual exploitation of children, as described in section 2251, or any Federal, State, Tribal, or military offense that is the substantial equivalent, the court may presume that 1 or more of the adverse results described in subclauses (I) through (V) of subparagraph (A)(i) are met and may issue an order consistent with this subsection without a written decision under subparagraph (A)(i).(3)ExtensionA governmental entity may request 1 or more extensions of an order granted under paragraph (1) of not more than 90 days for each such extension. The court may only grant such an extension if the court issues the written determination required under paragraph (2)(A).(4)Notification of changed circumstancesIf the need for the order issued under paragraph (1) or extended under paragraph (3) changes materially, the governmental entity that requested the order or extension shall notify the court within a reasonable period of time (not to exceed 14 days) of the changed circumstances, and the court shall reassess the order and modify or vacate as appropriate.(5)Opportunity to be heard(A)In generalUpon an application, petition, or motion by a provider of electronic communications service or remote computing service or person acting on behalf of the provider to which an order under paragraph (1) has been issued, including any extension of such order under paragraph (3), the court may modify or vacate the order if—(i)the order does not meet requirements under this subsection; or(ii)compliance with the order is unreasonable or otherwise unlawful.(B)Stay of disclosure of named customer or subscriber communications or recordsA provider's obligation to disclose the information requested in the warrant, order, or subpoena to which the order in paragraph (1) applies is stayed upon the filing of the application, petition, or motion under this paragraph pending resolution of the application, petition, or motion, unless the court with jurisdiction over the challenge determines based on a showing by the governmental entity that the stay should be lifted in whole or in part prior to resolution.(C)Finality of orderThe decision of the court resolving an application, petition, or motion under this paragraph shall constitute a final, appealable order.(6)ExceptionA provider of electronic communications service or remote computing service to which an order under paragraph (1), including any extension of such order under paragraph (3), applies, or an officer, employee, or agent thereof, may disclose information otherwise subject to any applicable nondisclosure requirement to—(A)those persons to whom disclosure is necessary in order to comply with the warrant, order, or subpoena;(B)an attorney in order to obtain legal advice or assistance regarding the order issued under paragraph (1), including any extension of such order under paragraph (3), or the warrant, order, or subpoena to which the order applies; and(C)any person the court determines can be notified of the warrant, order, or subpoena.(7)Scope of nondisclosureAny person to whom disclosure is made under paragraph (6) (other than the governmental entity) shall be subject to the nondisclosure requirements applicable to the person to whom the order is issued. Any recipient authorized under this subsection to disclose to a person information otherwise subject to a nondisclosure requirement shall notify the person of the applicable nondisclosure requirement.(8)Supporting documentationUpon serving a provider of electronic communications service or remote computing service with an order granted under paragraph (1), including any extension of such order under paragraph (3), the governmental entity shall include a copy of the warrant, order, or subpoena to which the nondisclosure order applies.(9)Expiration of order precluding noticeUpon expiration of an order issued under paragraph (1) or, if an extension has been granted under paragraph (3), expiration of the extension, the governmental entity shall deliver to the named customer or subscriber, by at least 2 methods, which shall be personal service, registered or first-class mail, electronic mail, or other means approved by the court as reasonably calculated to reach the named customer or subscriber within 5 business days of the expiration of the order—(A)a copy of the warrant, order, or subpoena; and(B)notice that informs the named customer or subscriber—(i)of the nature of the law enforcement inquiry with reasonable specificity;(ii)that information maintained for such customer or subscriber by the provider of electronic communications service or remote computing service to which the warrant, order, or subpoena under section 2703, was directed, supplied to, or requested by the government entity;(iii)that notification of such customer or subscriber was precluded by court order;(iv)of the identity of the court authorizing the preclusion of notice;(v)of the provision of this chapter under which the preclusion of notice was authorized; and(vi)that the government will, upon request by the customer or subscriber made within 180 days after receiving notification under this paragraph, provide the named customer or subscriber with a copy of the information that was disclosed in response to the warrant, order, or subpoena, or in the event that no information was disclosed, a written certification that no information was disclosed.(10)Copy of information disclosedUpon expiration of the order precluding notice issued under paragraph (1), including any extension of such order under paragraph (3), and at the request of the named customer or subscriber made within 180 days of receiving notification under paragraph (9), the governmental entity shall promptly provide the named customer or subscriber—(A)with a copy of the information that was disclosed in response to the warrant, order, or subpoena except—(i)illicit records;(ii)records or materials pertaining to child pornography, as defined in section 2256, or sexual exploitation of children, as described in section 2251, or any Federal, State, Tribal, or military offense that is the substantial equivalent; or(iii)other illegal material; or(B)in the event that no information was disclosed, a written certification that no information was disclosed.(11)RedactionsAny information disclosed pursuant to paragraph (9) or (10) may be redacted only if a court finds such redactions necessary to preserve the secrecy or integrity of an investigation..(b)Additional provisions regarding delayed noticeSection 2705 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:(c)Annual report(1)In generalOn an annual basis, the Attorney General shall provide to the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate , the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives , and the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, which the Attorney General shall publish on the website of the Department of Justice, in a manner consistent with protection of national security, a report setting forth with respect to the preceding calendar year, for each Federal judicial district—(A)the number of named customers or subscribers with respect to whom, in that calendar year, a warrant, subpoena, or court order was issued pursuant to section 2703;(B)the aggregate number of applications requesting delay of notification pursuant to subsection (a)(1), preclusion of notice pursuant to subsection (b)(1), and extensions pursuant to subsection (b)(3);(C)the aggregate number of orders under this section either granting, extending, or denying a request for delay of notification or preclusion of notice;(D)the aggregate number of orders under this section affecting a member of the news media, including any conduct related to activities protected under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; and(E)the aggregate number of arrests, trials, and convictions, resulting from investigations in which orders under this section were obtained, including the offenses for which individuals were arrested, tried, or convicted.(2)ProcessThe Attorney General shall include in the report under this subsection a description of the process and the information used to determine the numbers for each of subparagraphs (A) through (E) of paragraph (1)..
Tracker
The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.
- Introduced2026-01-15
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- Conference
- To President
- Became Law
CRS Summary
The summaries are the Congressional Research Service’s, one per stage. Read them in full.
Introduced in Senate Jan 15, 2026
sb3663/introduced-in-senate.mdShown Here:
Introduced in Senate (01/15/2026)
NDO Fairness Act of 2026
This bill increases the requirements the government must meet to obtain a nondisclosure order (NDO) under the Stored Communications Act (SCA).
The SCA generally prohibits providers of remote computing services or electronic communication services (providers) from disclosing stored electronic communications or records (e.g., emails) or information pertaining to customers or subscribers. However, the SCA authorizes the government seek a warrant, order, or subpoena to compel providers to disclose electronic communications or records or information pertaining to customers or subscribers during an investigation. Providers may notify customers and subscribers of the warrant, order, or subpoena unless the government obtains a court order—an NDO—that delays the notification.
This bill raises the standard the government must meet to obtain (or extend) an NDO. The bill also requires the court, before issuing an NDO, to issue a written determination that the standard was met based on specific and articulable facts, and to review the underlying warrant, order, or subpoena.
The bill requires NDOs to be narrowly tailored. It also limits their duration to 90 days for most investigations, though it permits a duration of up to one year for investigations pertaining to an offense involving child pornography or sexual exploitation of children.
Finally, the bill requires the Department of Justice to report annually on NDO-related data, including the number of customers or subscribers targeted; applications for orders; orders granted, extended, or denied; and orders targeting members of the media or conduct related to certain protected activities.
Sponsors
Sen. Christopher Coons (D) sponsors S. 3663, and 5 members have co-sponsored it, 1 of them from the day it was introduced.

Sen. · D–DE · Sponsor
Introduced Jan 15, 2026

Sen. · R–UT · Co-sponsor
Joined Jan 15, 2026 · Original

Sen. · R–TN · Co-sponsor
Joined Feb 9, 2026

Sen. · R–TX · Co-sponsor
Joined Feb 9, 2026

Sen. · D–VT · Co-sponsor
Joined Feb 11, 2026

Sen. · D–IL · Co-sponsor
Joined Mar 5, 2026
Committees
S. 3663 went before 1 committee: Judiciary.
Actions
S. 3663 has taken 2 actions since Jan 15, 2026.
| Chamber | Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 15, 2026 | Senate | Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.Judiciary Committee | ||
Jan 15, 2026 | — | Introduced in Senate |
Votes
S. 3663 has not gone to a roll call.
Related bills
1 bill is related to S. 3663.
Titles
S. 3663 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.
- NDO Fairness Act of 2026 — Display Title
- NDO Fairness Act of 2026 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
- A bill to amend title 18, United States Code, to modify delayed notice requirements, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced
Lobbying
11 clients hired 13 firms and 64 registered lobbyists who named S. 3663 in 31 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.
Filed under Copyright/Patent/Trademark, Taxation/Internal Revenue Code, Telecommunications, Law Enforcement/Crime/Criminal Justice, Computer Industry, Civil Rights/Civil Liberties, Science/Technology, Communications/Broadcasting/Radio/TV.
Clients
Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.
| Client | Business | State | Firms | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DIRECTV | Telecommunications and Media Company | California | 1 | 6 | $300K |
| NEWS MEDIA ALLIANCE | — | Virginia | 1 | 5 | — |
| PROJECT FOR PRIVACY AND SURVEILLANCE ACCOUNTABILITY, INC. | Non-profit advocacy | District of Columbia | 2 | 4 | $290K |
| MICROSOFT CORPORATION | Multinational Technology Conglomerate. | District of Columbia | 2 | 4 | $280K |
| AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 4 | — |
| MICROSOFT | technology | Washington | 1 | 2 | $52.5K |
| BUSINESS SOFTWARE ALLIANCE | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 2 | — |
| FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS ASSOCIATION | Law enforcement membership organization | Maryland | 1 | 1 | $40K |
| VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 1 | $20K |
| DIRECTV, LLC | Multi-channel video programming distributor | California | 1 | 1 | — |
| VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC AND VARIOUS SUBSIDIARIES | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 1 | — |
Firms
Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.
| Registrant | Clients | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| FARRAGUT PARTNERS LLP | 1 | 6 | $300K |
| NEWS MEDIA ALLIANCE | 1 | 5 | — |
| AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION | 1 | 4 | — |
| AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD | 1 | 2 | $100K |
| BUSINESS SOFTWARE ALLIANCE | 1 | 2 | — |
| GOODLATTE GROUP, LLC F.K.A. ROBERT GOODLATTE | 1 | 2 | $100K |
| SCHAERR JAFFE LLP | 1 | 2 | $190K |
| TIBER CREEK GROUP | 1 | 2 | $180K |
| TRACTION STRATEGIC | 1 | 2 | $52.5K |
| DIRECTV, LLC | 1 | 1 | — |
| LONGBOW PUBLIC POLICY GROUP, LLC | 1 | 1 | $40K |
| MERCURY STRATEGIES, LLC | 1 | 1 | $20K |
| VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND VARIOUS SUBSIDIARIES | 1 | 1 | — |
Lobbyists
Named on the filings that cite the bill. The 20 named most often, of 64.
| Lobbyist | Firms | Clients | Filings |
|---|---|---|---|
| DYLAN MOORE | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| EDWARD WHITFIELD | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| JEFFERY MORTIER | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| JEFF MACKINNON | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| JODY GALE | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| SARAH WALTER | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| WILLIAM KRIEGER | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| CONSTANTINE HINGSON | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| DANIELLE COFFEY | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| EMILY EMERY | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| GREG ORLANDO | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| HOLLY LUBART | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| NEIL QUINTER | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| CHRISTOPHER ANDERS | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| ELLEN FLENNIKEN | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| KATE VOIGT | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| KEYARMIN HAMADANCHY | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| KIMBERLY CONWAY | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| MADISON ROBERTS | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| NAUREEN SHAH | 1 | 1 | 4 |
Filings
The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.
| Client | Registrant | Period | Reported | Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC AND VARIOUS SUBSIDIARIES | VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND VARIOUS SUBSIDIARIES | 2026 second_quarter | $3.1M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION | AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION | 2026 first_quarter | $720K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION | AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION | 2026 second_quarter | $670K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| NEWS MEDIA ALLIANCE | NEWS MEDIA ALLIANCE | 2025 second_quarter | $560K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION | AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION | 2025 fourth_quarter | $520K | 4th Quarter - Report |
| NEWS MEDIA ALLIANCE | NEWS MEDIA ALLIANCE | 2025 third_quarter | $520K | 3rd Quarter - Report |
| NEWS MEDIA ALLIANCE | NEWS MEDIA ALLIANCE | 2025 fourth_quarter | $480K | 4th Quarter - Report |
| NEWS MEDIA ALLIANCE | NEWS MEDIA ALLIANCE | 2026 second_quarter | $475K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| BUSINESS SOFTWARE ALLIANCE | BUSINESS SOFTWARE ALLIANCE | 2026 first_quarter | $470K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION | AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION | 2025 third_quarter | $400K | 3rd Quarter - Report |
| DIRECTV, LLC | DIRECTV, LLC | 2025 third_quarter | $370K | 3rd Quarter - Report |
| NEWS MEDIA ALLIANCE | NEWS MEDIA ALLIANCE | 2026 first_quarter | $330K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| BUSINESS SOFTWARE ALLIANCE | BUSINESS SOFTWARE ALLIANCE | 2026 second_quarter | $320K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| PROJECT FOR PRIVACY AND SURVEILLANCE ACCOUNTABILITY, INC. | SCHAERR JAFFE LLP | 2026 second_quarter | $120K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| MICROSOFT CORPORATION | TIBER CREEK GROUP | 2026 second_quarter | $90K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| MICROSOFT CORPORATION | TIBER CREEK GROUP | 2026 first_quarter | $90K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| PROJECT FOR PRIVACY AND SURVEILLANCE ACCOUNTABILITY, INC. | SCHAERR JAFFE LLP | 2026 first_quarter | $70K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| MICROSOFT CORPORATION | AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD | 2026 second_quarter | $50K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| DIRECTV | FARRAGUT PARTNERS LLP | 2026 second_quarter | $50K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| PROJECT FOR PRIVACY AND SURVEILLANCE ACCOUNTABILITY, INC. | GOODLATTE GROUP, LLC F.K.A. ROBERT GOODLATTE | 2026 second_quarter | $50K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
Classification
The Congressional Research Service files S. 3663 under Crime and Law Enforcement, one of its 31 policy areas.
CRS Subjects
CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; S. 3663’s is Crime and Law Enforcement.
s3663/policy-areas.txtSource: congress.gov · legiscan.com
