- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- Administration
- Agriculture
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry
- Appropriations
- Armed Services
- Banking, Housing, And Urban Affairs
- Budget
- Commerce, Science, And Transportation
- Education and Workforce
- Energy And Commerce
- Energy And Natural Resources
- Environment And Public Works
- Ethics
- Finance
- Financial Services
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Relations
- Health, Education, Labor, And Pensions
- Homeland Security
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…
- Indian Affairs
- Indian and Insular Affairs
- Intelligence
- Judiciary
- Natural Resources
- Oversight And Government Reform
- Permanent Select Intelligence
- Rules
- Rules And Administration
- Science, Space, And Technology
- Select Intelligence
- Small Business
- Small Business And Entrepreneurship
- Subcommittee on Aviation
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…
- Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…
- Subcommittee on Federal Lands
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…
- Subcommittee on Health
- Subcommittee on Highways and Transit
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…
- Transportation And Infrastructure
- Veterans' Affairs
- Ways And Means

H.R. 6048
U.S. House•In House Committee
Summary
H.R. 6048, the NDO Fairness Act of 2025, was introduced in the House on Nov 17, 2025 by Rep. Scott Fitzgerald (R) with 1 co-sponsor. It last saw action on Aug 31, 2026: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Record
Text
H.R. 6048 has 1 co-sponsor.
hb6048/engrossed-in-house.txt[Congressional Bills 119th Congress][From the U.S. Government Publishing Office][H.R. 6048 Engrossed in House (EH)]<DOC>119th CONGRESS2d SessionH. R. 6048_______________________________________________________________________AN ACTTo amend title 18, United States Code, to modify delayed noticerequirements, and for other purposes.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of theUnited States of America in Congress assembled,SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.This Act may be cited as the ``NDO Fairness Act of 2025''.SEC. 2. PRECLUSION OF NOTICE.(a) In General.--Section 2705(b) of title 18, United States Code,is amended to read as follows:``(b) Preclusion of Notice.--``(1) Application.--``(A) In general.--A governmental entity that isseeking a warrant, order, or subpoena under section2703, when it is not required to notify the customer orsubscriber, or to the extent that it may delay suchnotice pursuant to subsection (a), may apply to a courtfor an order, subject to paragraph (6), directing aprovider of electronic communications service or remotecomputing service to which a warrant, order, orsubpoena under section 2703 is directed not to notifyany other person of the existence of the warrant,order, or subpoena.``(B) Length.--An order granted under subparagraph(A) shall be in effect--``(i) for a period of not more than 1 yearif the nature of the offense for which thegovernmental entity is seeking a warrant,order, or subpoena pertains to childpornography, as defined in section 2256, sexualexploitation of children under section 2251, orany Federal, State, Tribal, or military offensethat is the substantial equivalent; or``(ii) for a period of not more than 90days for all other investigations.``(C) Other requirements.--``(i) In general.--An application for anorder under subparagraph (A) shall state, tothe best of the applicant's knowledge, whetherthe named customer or subscriber whoseinformation is sought by the warrant, order, orsubpoena under section 2703--``(I) is aware of the warrant,order, subpoena, or underlyinginvestigation; and``(II) is suspected of involvementin the commission of the crime underinvestigation.``(ii) Orders.--An order granted under thisparagraph may not direct, or otherwise require,a provider of electronic communications serviceor remote computing service to providenotification of the expiration of order to thecourt or government entity that sought theorder.``(2) Determination.--``(A) In general.--The court may not grant arequest for an order made under paragraph (1), or anextension of such order requested by the governmentalentity pursuant to paragraph (3), unless--``(i) the court issues a writtendetermination, based on specific andarticulable facts, and including writtenfindings of fact and conclusions of law, thatit is likely that not granting the request willresult in--``(I) endangering the life orphysical safety of an individual;``(II) flight from prosecution;``(III) destruction of or tamperingwith evidence;``(IV) intimidation of potentialwitnesses; or``(V) otherwise seriouslyjeopardizing an investigation or undulydelaying a trial; and``(ii) the order is narrowly tailored andthere is no less restrictive alternative,including notification to an individual ororganization within or providing legalrepresentation to the named customer orsubscriber, that is not likely to result in anadverse result as described in subclauses (I)through (V) of subparagraph (A)(i); and``(iii) the court has reviewed theindividual warrant, order, or subpoena undersection 2703 to which the order issued underthis paragraph applies.``(B) Nature of the offense.--``(i) In general.--Subject to clause (ii),the court may consider the nature of theoffense in issuing a determination undersubparagraph (A).``(ii) Presumption.--If the courtdetermines there is a reasonable belief thenature of the offense pertains to childpornography, as defined in section 2256, orsexual exploitation of children, as describedin section 2251, or any Federal, includingmilitary, State, or tribal offense that is thesubstantial equivalent, the court may presumethat one or more of the adverse resultsdescribed in subclauses (I) through (V) ofsubparagraph (A)(i) are met and may issue anorder consistent with this subsection without awritten decision under subparagraph (A)(i).``(3) Extension.--A governmental entity may request one ormore extensions of an order granted under paragraph (1) of notmore than 90 days for each such extension. The court may onlygrant such an extension if the court makes a writtendetermination required under paragraph (2)(A).``(4) Notification of changed circumstances.--If the needfor the order issued under paragraph (1) changes materially,the governmental entity that requested the order shall notifythe court within a reasonable period of time (not to exceed 14days) of the changed circumstances, and the court shallreassess the order and modify or vacate as appropriate.``(5) Opportunity to be heard.--``(A) In general.--Upon an application, petition,or motion by a provider of electronic communicationsservice or remote computing service or person acting onbehalf of the provider to which an order underparagraph (1) (or an extension under paragraph (3)) hasbeen issued, the court may modify or vacate the orderif--``(i) the order does not meet requirementsprovided in paragraph (2) or (3); or``(ii) compliance with the order isunreasonable or otherwise unlawful.``(B) Stay of disclosure of named customer orsubscriber communications or records.--A provider'sobligation to disclose the information requested in thewarrant, order, or subpoena to which the order inparagraph (1) applies is stayed for a period of 72hours upon the filing of the application, petition, ormotion under this paragraph, unless the court withjurisdiction over the challenge determines, based on ashowing by the provider or the governmental entity,that the stay should be extended or lifted in whole orin part prior to resolution of the application,petition, or motion.``(C) Finality of order.--The decision of thecourt resolving an application, petition, or motionunder this paragraph shall constitute a final,appealable order.``(6) Exception.--A provider of electronic communicationsservice or remote computing service to which an order underparagraph (1) applies, or an officer, employee, or agentthereof, may disclose information otherwise subject to anyapplicable nondisclosure requirement to--``(A) those persons to whom disclosure is necessaryin order to comply with the warrant, order, orsubpoena;``(B) an attorney in order to obtain legal adviceor assistance regarding the order issued underparagraph (1) or the warrant, order, or subpoena towhich the order applies; and``(C) any person the court determines can benotified of the warrant, order, or subpoena.``(7) Scope of nondisclosure.--Any person to whomdisclosure is made under paragraph (6) (other than thegovernmental entity) shall be subject to the nondisclosurerequirements applicable to the person to whom the order isissued. Any recipient authorized under this subsection todisclose to a person information otherwise subject to anondisclosure requirement shall notify the person of theapplicable nondisclosure requirement.``(8) Supporting documentation.--Upon serving a provider ofelectronic communications service or remote computing servicewith an order granted under paragraph (1), or an extension ofsuch order granted under paragraph (3), the governmental entityshall include a copy of the warrant, order, or subpoena towhich the nondisclosure order applies.``(9) Expiration of order precluding notice.--Uponexpiration of an order issued under paragraph (1) or, if anextension has been granted under paragraph (3), expiration ofthe extension, the governmental entity shall deliver to thenamed customer or subscriber, by at least 2 methods, whichshall be personal service, registered or first-class mail,electronic mail, or other means approved by the court asreasonably calculated to reach the named customer or subscriberwithin 5 business days of the expiration of the order--``(A) a copy of the warrant, order, or subpoena;and``(B) notice that informs the named customer orsubscriber--``(i) of the nature of the law enforcementinquiry with reasonable specificity;``(ii) that information maintained for suchcustomer or subscriber by the provider ofelectronic communications service or remotecomputing service to which the warrant, order,or subpoena under section 2703, was directedwas supplied to or requested by the governmententity;``(iii) that notification of such customeror subscriber was precluded by court order;``(iv) of the identity of the courtauthorizing the preclusion of notice;``(v) of the provision of this chapterunder which the preclusion of notice wasauthorized; and``(vi) that the government will, uponrequest by the customer or subscriber madewithin 180 days after receiving notificationunder this paragraph, provide the namedcustomer or subscriber with a copy of theinformation that was disclosed in response tothe warrant, order or subpoena, or in the eventthat no information was disclosed, a writtencertification that no information wasdisclosed.``(10) Copy of information disclosed.--Upon expiration ofthe order precluding notice issued under paragraph (1) or (3)of this subsection, and at the request of the named customer orsubscriber made within 180 days of receiving notification underparagraph (9), the governmental entity shall promptly providethe named customer or subscriber--``(A) with a copy of the information that wasdisclosed in response to the warrant, order or subpoenaexcept--``(i) illicit records;``(ii) records or materials pertaining tochild pornography, as defined in section 2256,or sexual exploitation of children, asdescribed in section 2251, or any Federal,including military, State, tribal, or offensethat is the substantial equivalent; or``(iii) other illegal material; or``(B) in the event that no information wasdisclosed, a written certification that no informationwas disclosed.``(11) Redactions.--Any information disclosed pursuant toparagraphs (9) and (10) may be redacted only if a court findssuch redactions necessary to preserve the secrecy or integrityof an investigation.''.(b) Additional Provisions Regarding Delayed Notice.--Section 2705of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end thefollowing:``(c) Annual Report.--``(1) In general.--On an annual basis, the Attorney Generalshall provide to the Committee on the Judiciary of the House ofRepresentatives, the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate,and the Director of the Administrative Office of the UnitedStates Courts, which the Attorney General shall publish on thewebsite of the Department of Justice, in a manner consistentwith protection of national security, a report setting forthwith respect to the preceding calendar year, for each Federaljudicial district--``(A) the number of named customers or subscriberswith respect to whom, in that calendar year, a warrant,subpoena, or court order was issued pursuant to section2703;``(B) the aggregate number of applicationsrequesting delay of notification pursuant to subsection(a)(1), preclusion of notice pursuant to subsection(b)(1), and extensions pursuant to subsection (b)(3);``(C) the aggregate number of orders under thissection either granting, extending, or denying arequest for delay of notification or preclusion ofnotice;``(D) the aggregate number of orders under thissection affecting a member of the news media, includingany conduct related to activities protected under theFirst Amendment; and``(E) the aggregate number of arrests, trials, andconvictions, resulting from investigations in whichorders under this section were obtained, including theoffenses for which individuals were arrested, tried, orconvicted.``(2) Process.--The Attorney General shall include in thereport under this subsection a description of the process andthe information used to determine the numbers for each ofsubparagraphs (A) through (E) or paragraph (1).''.Passed the House of Representatives August 31, 2026.Attest:Clerk.119th CONGRESS2d SessionH. R. 6048_______________________________________________________________________AN ACTTo amend title 18, United States Code, to modify delayed noticerequirements, and for other purposes.
Tracker
The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.
- Introduced2025-11-17
- Passed House2026-08-31
- Passed Senate
- Conference
- To President
- Became Law
CRS Summary
The summaries are the Congressional Research Service’s, one per stage. Read them in full.
Introduced in House Nov 17, 2025
hb6048/introduced-in-house.mdShown Here:
Introduced in House (11/17/2025)
NDO Fairness Act
This bill increases the requirements the government must meet to obtain a nondisclosure order (NDO) under the Stored Communications Act (SCA).
The SCA generally prohibits providers of remote computing services or electronic communication services (providers) from disclosing stored electronic communications or records (e.g., emails) or information pertaining to customers or subscribers. However, the SCA authorizes the government seek a warrant, order, or subpoena to compel providers to disclose electronic communications or records or information pertaining to customers or subscribers during an investigation. Providers may notify customers and subscribers of the warrant, order, or subpoena unless the government obtains a court order—an NDO—that delays the notification.
This bill raises the standard the government must meet to obtain (or extend) an NDO. The bill also requires the court, before issuing an NDO, to issue a written determination that the standard was met based on specific and articulable facts, and to review the underlying warrant, order, or subpoena.
The bill requires NDOs to be narrowly tailored. It also limits their duration to 90 days for most investigations, though it permits a duration of up to one year for investigations pertaining to an offense involving child pornography or sexual exploitation of children.
Finally, the bill requires the Department of Justice to report annually on data related to NDOs, including the number of customers or subscribers targeted; applications for orders; orders granted, extended, or denied; and orders targeting members of the media or conduct related to certain protected activities.
Sponsors
Rep. Scott Fitzgerald (R) sponsors H.R. 6048, and 1 member has co-sponsored it from the day it was introduced.
Committees
H.R. 6048 went before 1 committee: Judiciary.
Actions
H.R. 6048 has taken 13 actions since Nov 17, 2025, the latest on Aug 31, 2026.
| Chamber | Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Aug 31, 202616:29 | House | Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection. | ||
Aug 31, 202616:29 | House | On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. | ||
Aug 31, 202616:29 | House | On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H5266-5267) | ||
Aug 31, 202616:29 | — | Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. | ||
Aug 31, 202616:16 | House | DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 6048. |
Votes
H.R. 6048 has not gone to a roll call.
Related bills
1 bill is related to H.R. 6048.
Titles
H.R. 6048 goes by 5 titles, 2 of them short titles.
- NDO Fairness Act of 2025 — Display Title
- NDO Fairness Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Passed House
- To amend title 18, United States Code, to modify delayed notice requirements, and for other purposes. — Official Titles from EH (Engrossed in House) bill text
- NDO Fairness Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
- To amend title 18, United States Code, to modify delayed notice requirements, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced
Lobbying
6 clients hired 8 firms and 39 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 6048 in 16 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.
Filed under Civil Rights/Civil Liberties, Computer Industry, Law Enforcement/Crime/Criminal Justice, Homeland Security, Intelligence, Trade (domestic/foreign), Copyright/Patent/Trademark, Defense.
Clients
Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.
| Client | Business | State | Firms | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PROJECT FOR PRIVACY AND SURVEILLANCE ACCOUNTABILITY, INC. | Non-profit advocacy | District of Columbia | 2 | 4 | $290K |
| MICROSOFT CORPORATION | Multinational Technology Conglomerate. | District of Columbia | 2 | 4 | $280K |
| META PLATFORMS, INC. AND VARIOUS SUBSIDIARIES | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 3 | — |
| BUSINESS SOFTWARE ALLIANCE | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 2 | — |
| ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION | not-for-profit advocacy and litigation organization | California | 1 | 2 | — |
| REFORM GOVERNMENT SURVEILLANCE | Coalition of technology companies | District of Columbia | 1 | 1 | $140K |
Firms
Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.
| Registrant | Clients | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| META PLATFORMS, INC. AND VARIOUS SUBSIDIARIES | 1 | 3 | — |
| AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD | 1 | 2 | $100K |
| BUSINESS SOFTWARE ALLIANCE | 1 | 2 | — |
| ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION | 1 | 2 | — |
| GOODLATTE GROUP, LLC F.K.A. ROBERT GOODLATTE | 1 | 2 | $100K |
| SCHAERR JAFFE LLP | 1 | 2 | $190K |
| TIBER CREEK GROUP | 1 | 2 | $180K |
| MONUMENT ADVOCACY | 1 | 1 | $140K |
Lobbyists
Named on the filings that cite the bill. The 20 named most often, of 39.
| Lobbyist | Firms | Clients | Filings |
|---|---|---|---|
| BRIAN RICE | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| CHRISTOPHER HERNDON | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| CHRISTOPHER RANDLE | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| ELIZABETH CARROLL | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| JOHN BRANSCOME | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| KEVIN MARTIN | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| MYRIAH JORDAN | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| RITIKA ROBERTSON | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| SANDRA LUFF | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| SHELLY MARC | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| SONIA GILL | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| ANA MONTANEZ | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| BRUCE MILLER | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| CHRISTOPHER TREANOR | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| CRAIG ALBRIGHT | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| DANIELLE BROWN | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| DUSTIN CARMACK | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| ED PAGANO | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GENE SCHAERR | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| INDIA MCKINNEY | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Filings
The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.
| Client | Registrant | Period | Reported | Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| META PLATFORMS, INC. AND VARIOUS SUBSIDIARIES | META PLATFORMS, INC. AND VARIOUS SUBSIDIARIES | 2026 first_quarter | $7.1M | 1st Quarter - Report |
| META PLATFORMS, INC. AND VARIOUS SUBSIDIARIES | META PLATFORMS, INC. AND VARIOUS SUBSIDIARIES | 2025 fourth_quarter | $6.5M | 4th Quarter - Report |
| META PLATFORMS, INC. AND VARIOUS SUBSIDIARIES | META PLATFORMS, INC. AND VARIOUS SUBSIDIARIES | 2026 second_quarter | $6M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| BUSINESS SOFTWARE ALLIANCE | BUSINESS SOFTWARE ALLIANCE | 2026 first_quarter | $470K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| BUSINESS SOFTWARE ALLIANCE | BUSINESS SOFTWARE ALLIANCE | 2026 second_quarter | $320K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| REFORM GOVERNMENT SURVEILLANCE | MONUMENT ADVOCACY | 2026 second_quarter | $140K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| PROJECT FOR PRIVACY AND SURVEILLANCE ACCOUNTABILITY, INC. | SCHAERR JAFFE LLP | 2026 second_quarter | $120K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| MICROSOFT CORPORATION | TIBER CREEK GROUP | 2026 second_quarter | $90K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| MICROSOFT CORPORATION | TIBER CREEK GROUP | 2026 first_quarter | $90K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| PROJECT FOR PRIVACY AND SURVEILLANCE ACCOUNTABILITY, INC. | SCHAERR JAFFE LLP | 2026 first_quarter | $70K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| MICROSOFT CORPORATION | AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD | 2026 second_quarter | $50K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| PROJECT FOR PRIVACY AND SURVEILLANCE ACCOUNTABILITY, INC. | GOODLATTE GROUP, LLC F.K.A. ROBERT GOODLATTE | 2026 second_quarter | $50K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| MICROSOFT CORPORATION | AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD | 2026 first_quarter | $50K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| PROJECT FOR PRIVACY AND SURVEILLANCE ACCOUNTABILITY, INC. | GOODLATTE GROUP, LLC F.K.A. ROBERT GOODLATTE | 2026 first_quarter | $50K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION | ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION | 2026 first_quarter | $30K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION | ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION | 2025 fourth_quarter | $10K | 4th Quarter - Report |
Classification
The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 6048 under Crime and Law Enforcement, one of its 31 policy areas, and gives it 9 legislative subjects.
CRS Subjects
CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 6048’s is Crime and Law Enforcement.
hr6048/policy-areas.txtLegislative Subjects
H.R. 6048 carries 9 of CRS’s legislative subjects, from Business records to Telephone and wireless communication.
hr6048/subjects.txtConstitutional authority
The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 6048, as entered in the Congressional Record.
[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 193 (Monday, November 17, 2025)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Mr. FITZGERALD:H.R. 6048.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:clause 18 of section 8 of article I of the Constitution.[Page H4705]
Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com
