- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- Administration
- Agriculture
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry
- Appropriations
- Armed Services
- Banking, Housing, And Urban Affairs
- Budget
- Commerce, Science, And Transportation
- Education and Workforce
- Energy And Commerce
- Energy And Natural Resources
- Environment And Public Works
- Ethics
- Finance
- Financial Services
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Relations
- Health, Education, Labor, And Pensions
- Homeland Security
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…
- Indian Affairs
- Indian and Insular Affairs
- Intelligence
- Judiciary
- Natural Resources
- Oversight And Government Reform
- Permanent Select Intelligence
- Rules
- Rules And Administration
- Science, Space, And Technology
- Select Intelligence
- Small Business
- Small Business And Entrepreneurship
- Subcommittee on Aviation
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…
- Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…
- Subcommittee on Federal Lands
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…
- Subcommittee on Health
- Subcommittee on Highways and Transit
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…
- Transportation And Infrastructure
- Veterans' Affairs
- Ways And Means

S. 3399
U.S. Senate•In Senate Committee
Summary
S. 3399, the Digital Trade Promotion Act of 2025, was introduced in the Senate on Dec 9, 2025 by Sen. Todd Young (R) with 3 co-sponsors. It was referred to Finance, and last saw action on Dec 9, 2025: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Record
Text
S. 3399 has 3 co-sponsors.
sb3399/introduced-in-senate.txt119 S3399 IS: Digital Trade Promotion Act of 2025U.S. Senate2025-12-09text/xmlENPursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.II 119th CONGRESS 1st Session S. 3399 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES December 9, 2025 Mr. Young (for himself, Mr. Coons , Mr. Moran , and Mr. Bennet ) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance A BILLTo authorize the President to enter into digital trade agreements, and for other purposes.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Digital Trade Promotion Act of 2025 .2.Findings; sense of Congress(a)FindingsCongress makes the following findings:(1)The Bureau of Economic Analysis found that the digital economy contributed roughly 10 percent of United States gross domestic product and supported approximately 8,900,000 United States jobs in 2022.(2)In 2023, United States exports of digital services surpassed $655,000,000,000, accounting for more than half of all United States services exports and generating a digital services trade surplus for the United States of roughly $266,800,000,000.(3)Digital trade bolsters the economy by enabling the sale of goods and the supply of services across borders.(4)Digital trade has become increasingly vital to United States workers and businesses of all sizes, including manufacturers, farmers, industrial facilities, service suppliers, and countless small and medium-sized enterprises that use digital technology to produce and export goods and services across the world.(5)Digital trade is crucial for the global competitiveness of the United States, as United States industry relies on free and secure cross-border data flows to deploy cutting-edge technology essential to innovation and productivity.(6)Digital innovation has provided new opportunities for economic development, entrepreneurship, and growth in developing countries around the world.(7)Countries have negotiated international rules governing digital trade in various bilateral and plurilateral agreements, but those rules remain fragmented.(8)The United States, through free trade agreements and trade negotiations, has been a leader in developing rules and standards governing digital trade and electronic commerce that have helped the United States and partners of the United States unlock the economic potential of digital innovation.(9)Certain countries, including the People’s Republic of China, are advancing discriminatory digital policies that undermine United States companies and workers by enabling censorship, surveillance, forced technology transfers, and data flow restrictions at the expense of human rights, the rule of law, privacy, and an open internet.(b)Sense of CongressIt is the sense of Congress that—(1)there is a need for agreements on digital trade, as Congress recognized by its support for a robust digital trade chapter in the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, which has been of critical importance to all sectors of the economy;(2)negotiating strong digital trade principles and commitments with countries across the globe enables the United States to unite like-minded countries around common standards and ensure that principles of democracy, rule of law, freedom of speech, human and worker rights, privacy, and a free and open internet are at the very core of digital governance; and(3)even as domestic statutes and regulations governing the digital economy continue to develop and evolve, the United States should cooperate with its allies and trading partners to advance global digital trade rules that reflect United States interests and values.3.DefinitionsIn this Act:(1)Appropriate committees of CongressThe term appropriate committees of Congress means—(A)the Committee on Finance of the Senate; and(B)the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives.(2)CountryThe term country means any foreign country or territory, including any overseas dependent territory or possession of a foreign country.(3)Trade RepresentativeThe term Trade Representative means the United States Trade Representative.(4)Digital trade agreementThe term digital trade agreement means an agreement with one or more trusted trade partners entered into under section 4.4.Authority to enter into digital trade agreements(a)In generalThe President may, subject to the requirements under section 5, negotiate, enter into, and enforce a digital trade agreement with a country or countries.(b)ConsiderationsIn determining whether to enter into negotiations for a digital trade agreement with a country pursuant to subsection (a), the President shall take into account whether the government of the country has—(1)expressed a desire to enter into such an agreement;(2)adhered to and implemented the commitments and obligations under any existing free trade agreements to which that country and the United States are parties;(3)implemented measures to reduce or eliminate unnecessary trade barriers and distorting practices affecting electronic commerce;(4)maintained the rule of law by enacting and enforcing laws and regulations in a clear, publicized, transparent, and nondiscriminatory manner; and(5)adopted and enforced laws that provide adequate and effective protection of intellectual property rights reflecting a standard of protection similar to that found under United States law.(c)Content of digital trade agreementsA digital trade agreement shall apply to all sectors of the economy and provide for—(1)nondiscriminatory treatment of digital products and digital services;(2)prohibition of discriminatory taxes on digital services;(3)the free flow of data across borders and the prohibition of data localization requirements;(4)frameworks for the secure transfer and sharing of industrial data and other sensitive data that bolster data security, including through the promotion and protection of end-to-end encryption;(5)the protection of consumers engaged in electronic commerce, including the promotion of interoperability mechanisms, such as the Cross-Border Privacy Rules of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, or successor frameworks, to facilitate international data transfers while ensuring the protection of the privacy of personal information;(6)prohibition of forced transfer or disclosure of source code, algorithms, cryptographic technology, trade secrets, and other proprietary technology as a condition of market access;(7)cooperation to advance interoperable, risk-based frameworks for the development, deployment, and cross-border trade in emerging digital technologies, including artificial intelligence and quantum computing;(8)cooperation in addressing cybersecurity threats and adherence to risk-based approaches to mitigating cybersecurity threats, including sharing of information and coordination on incident response and best practices based on consensus standards;(9)prohibition of customs duties on electronic transmissions, including on content transmitted electronically;(10)promotion of voluntary, international standards for digital technologies and services;(11)promotion of alignment on export controls, sanctions, and investment review mechanisms that impact digital trade;(12)greater transparency in domestic regulation of services;(13)promotion of risk-based approaches to government procurement of hardware and software to support secure digital infrastructure;(14)other provisions that, in the judgment of the Trade Representative, would advance the national interests of the United States with respect to digital trade; and(15)exceptions to the provisions described in paragraphs (1) through (14) to allow for the protection of legitimate public policy objectives and national security.5.Congressional oversight, notice, consultations, access to information, and review(a)NoticeNot later than 60 days before initiating negotiations with a country under section 4(a) for a digital trade agreement, the President shall submit to Congress written notice of the intention of the President to enter into the negotiations, which shall include the date on which negotiations will begin and the country with which the President seeks to enter into the agreement.(b)Consultation with members of Congress(1)Consultation during negotiations and access to informationIn the course of negotiations under section 4(a) for a digital trade agreement, the Trade Representative shall—(A)meet upon request with the appropriate committees of Congress regarding negotiating objectives, the status of negotiations in progress, and potential effects to the laws of the United States resulting from the agreement;(B)upon request by the appropriate committees of Congress, provide access to pertinent documents relating to the negotiations; and(C)consult closely and on a timely basis with, and keep fully apprised of the negotiations, the appropriate committees of Congress.(2)Consultation before entry into agreementBefore entering into a digital trade agreement under section 4, the Trade Representative shall consult with—(A)the appropriate committees of Congress; and(B)each other committee of the Senate and the House of Representatives, and each joint committee of Congress, that has jurisdiction over legislation involving a subject matter that would be affected by the agreement.(c)Consultation with Federal agenciesIn the course of negotiations under section 4(a) for a digital trade agreement, the Trade Representative shall inform and consult with any Federal agency having expertise in the matters being negotiated.(d)Report to CongressNot later than 60 days before the date on which the President enters into a digital trade agreement with a country under section 4, the President shall submit to Congress a report describing—(1)the nature and scope of the agreement;(2)the proposed duration of the agreement;(3)how and to what extent the agreement will achieve the applicable purposes, policies, priorities, and objectives of this Act;(4)whether sufficient evidence exists demonstrating that the country satisfies the conditions under section 4(b); and(5)the proposed implementation of the agreement, including the general effect of the agreement on existing laws.(e)Congressional right To review and disapprove(1)In generalA digital trade agreement shall not take effect until—(A)the proposed agreement and the report required by subsection (d) with respect to that agreement have been submitted to Congress; and(B)the review period required by paragraph (2) following the date on which the proposed agreement has been submitted to Congress under subparagraph (A) has been exhausted, during which period a joint resolution is not enacted under paragraph (4).(2)Review(A)Initial reviewUnless extended under subparagraph (B) or (C), the review period under this paragraph with respect to a digital trade agreement is 30 days, during which time Congress shall review—(i)the proposed agreement; and(ii)whether—(I)the President failed or refused to provide notice with respect to the agreement in accordance with subsection (a);(II)the President failed or refused to consult with respect to the agreement in accordance with subsections (b) and (c);(III)the President failed or refused to submit to Congress a report with respect to the agreement in accordance with subsection (d); or(IV)the President failed or refused to demonstrate that the agreement would achieve the applicable purposes, policies, priorities, and objectives of this Act.(B)Further reviewIf, during the 30-day period under subparagraph (A) with respect to a digital trade agreement, one House of Congress adopts a resolution stating that the House of Congress wishes to further review the proposed agreement, the review period under this paragraph with respect to the proposed agreement shall be extended by a period of 60 days, during which time the appropriate committees of Congress shall engage the President with respect to the proposed agreement and the failures or refusals of the President specified under subparagraph (A).(C)Additional periodIf, during the 60-day period under subparagraph (B) with respect to a digital trade agreement, one House of Congress adopts a resolution stating that the House of Congress wishes to further review the proposed agreement, the review period under this paragraph with respect to the proposed agreement shall be further extended by a period of 30 days.(3)Procedures for considering resolutionsA resolution under subparagraph (B) or (C) of paragraph (2)—(A)in the Senate—(i)may be introduced by any Member of the Senate;(ii)shall be referred to the Committee on Finance; and(iii)may not be amended;(B)in the House of Representatives—(i)may be introduced by any Member of the House;(ii)shall be referred to the Committee on Ways and Means or the Committee on Rules; and(iii)may not be amended by either Committee; and(C)the vote on passage of the resolution shall occur immediately following the conclusion of the debate on the digital trade agreement at issue and a single quorum call at the conclusion of the debate.(4)DisapprovalIf, during the review period required under paragraph (2) with respect to a digital trade agreement, a joint resolution is enacted stating that Congress does not favor the agreement, the agreement shall not take effect.6.Monitoring and enforcement of continued compliance with digital trade agreements(a)MonitoringThe Trade Representative shall periodically monitor compliance by a country with the commitments and obligations of the country under a digital trade agreement.(b)Actions in response to failure To comply(1)Determination and report of trade representativeIf the Trade Representative determines that a country has failed to satisfactorily implement, maintain, and enforce the commitments and obligations of the country under a digital trade agreement, the Trade Representative shall submit to the President a report setting forth—(A)the determination and the findings that support the determination; and(B)based on such findings, the recommendations of the Trade Representative for action or inaction under this subsection.(2)Determination of PresidentNot later than 30 days after receiving a report under paragraph (1) with respect to a country, the President shall—(A)determine whether the President concurs with the determination of the Trade Representative set forth in the report; and(B)if the President concurs, determine whether—(i)to suspend, withdraw, or prevent the application of the digital trade agreement with the country;(ii)to enter into a binding agreement with the country that commits the country—(I)to eliminate any burden or restriction on the United States resulting from the failure of the country to comply with the commitments and obligations of the country under a digital trade agreement; and(II)to provide the United States with such compensatory trade benefits as are negotiated between the Trade Representative and the country; or(iii)to take such other actions as the Trade Representative considers necessary to encourage the country to adhere to the commitments and obligations of the country under a digital trade agreement.(3)Timeline for actionIf the President determines under paragraph (2)(B) to take action, the President shall implement that action by not later than the date that is 15 days after the day on which the President determines to take action under that paragraph.
Tracker
The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.
- Introduced2025-12-09
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- Conference
- To President
- Became Law
A bill to authorize the President to enter into digital trade agreements, and for other purposes.
Sponsors
Sen. Todd Young (R) sponsors S. 3399, and 3 members have co-sponsored it, all of them from the day it was introduced.
Committees
S. 3399 went before 1 committee: Finance.
Actions
S. 3399 has taken 2 actions since Dec 9, 2025.
| Chamber | Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 9, 2025 | Senate | Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.Finance Committee | ||
Dec 9, 2025 | — | Introduced in Senate |
Votes
S. 3399 has not gone to a roll call.
Titles
S. 3399 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.
- Digital Trade Promotion Act of 2025 — Display Title
- Digital Trade Promotion Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
- A bill to authorize the President to enter into digital trade agreements, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced
Lobbying
3 clients hired 3 firms and 109 registered lobbyists who named S. 3399 in 7 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.
Filed under Defense, Education, Trade (domestic/foreign), Copyright/Patent/Trademark, Law Enforcement/Crime/Criminal Justice, Aerospace, Budget/Appropriations, Energy/Nuclear.
Clients
Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.
| Client | Business | State | Firms | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUSINESS SOFTWARE ALLIANCE | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 3 | — |
| CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A. | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 3 | — |
| INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY COUNCIL | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 1 | — |
Firms
Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.
| Registrant | Clients | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| BUSINESS SOFTWARE ALLIANCE | 1 | 3 | — |
| CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A. | 1 | 3 | — |
| INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY COUNCIL | 1 | 1 | — |
Lobbyists
Named on the filings that cite the bill. The 20 named most often, of 109.
| Lobbyist | Firms | Clients | Filings |
|---|---|---|---|
| ABELARDO TORRES | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| ALEXA BRANSON | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| AMANDA MAYS | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| ANDREA PORWOLL | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| ASHLEY GUM | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| BRADLEY WATTS | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| BRINCE MANNING | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| BROOKE MILLER | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| BRUCE MILLER | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| CASSIA CARVALHO | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| CHAD WHITEMAN | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| CHANTEL SHEAKS | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| CHRISTOPHER CRENSHAW | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| CHRISTOPHER EYLER | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| CHRISTOPHER GUITH | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| CHRISTOPHER ROBERTI | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| CLARK JACKSON | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| CRAIG ALBRIGHT | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| DAN BYERS | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| DANIELLE BROWN | 1 | 1 | 3 |
Filings
The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.
| Client | Registrant | Period | Reported | Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A. | CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A. | 2026 first_quarter | $19.8M | 1st Quarter - Amendme… |
| CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A. | CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A. | 2026 first_quarter | $19.8M | 1st Quarter - Report |
| CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A. | CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A. | 2025 fourth_quarter | $18M | 4th Quarter - Report |
| INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY COUNCIL | INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY COUNCIL | 2026 second_quarter | $720K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| BUSINESS SOFTWARE ALLIANCE | BUSINESS SOFTWARE ALLIANCE | 2025 fourth_quarter | $530K | 4th Quarter - Report |
| BUSINESS SOFTWARE ALLIANCE | BUSINESS SOFTWARE ALLIANCE | 2026 first_quarter | $470K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| BUSINESS SOFTWARE ALLIANCE | BUSINESS SOFTWARE ALLIANCE | 2026 second_quarter | $320K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
Classification
The Congressional Research Service files S. 3399 under Foreign Trade and International Finance, one of its 31 policy areas.
CRS Subjects
CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; S. 3399’s is Foreign Trade and International Finance.
s3399/policy-areas.txtSource: congress.gov · legiscan.com