Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

H.R. 6009

U.S. HouseIn House Committee

Summary

H.R. 6009, the Defense Biotechnology Strategy Act, was introduced in the House on Nov 10, 2025 by Rep. Chrissy Houlahan (D) with 2 co-sponsors. It was referred to Armed Services, and last saw action on Nov 10, 2025: Referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.


Record

Text

H.R. 6009 has 2 co-sponsors.

hb6009/introduced-in-house.txt
119 HR 6009 IH: Defense Biotechnology Strategy Act
U.S. House of Representatives
2025-11-10
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 6009 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES November 10, 2025 Ms. Houlahan (for herself and Mr. Sessions ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services , and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs , for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned A BILL
To direct the Secretary of Defense to develop a strategy on the national security implications of emerging biotechnologies, and for other purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Defense Biotechnology Strategy Act .
2.
Department of Defense biotechnology strategy
(a)
In general
Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall, in coordination with the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a strategy on the national security implications of emerging biotechnologies, including the future role that biotechnology will play in defense, and means to improve industry, interagency, and international relationships in this sector.
(b)
Elements
The strategy required pursuant to subsection (a) shall include the following elements:
(1)
How the Department of Defense will develop and expand a network of commercial facilities for the biomanufacture of products that are critical for defense needs.
(2)
Review and update of military specifications in order to better incorporate or substitute current products with biotechnology-based products.
(3)
Updated plans and policies for the Department to enter into advance market commitments and offtake agreements for biotechnology products that have defense applications.
(4)
A description of how the Department could better incorporate military-relevant applications of emerging biotechnology into wargaming exercises, tabletop exercises, or other net assessment analyses.
(5)
The benefits and costs of issuing a research grand challenge, or a series of challenges, that focus on making biotechnology predictably engineerable and how the Department would implement such research grand challenge, or challenges.
(6)
Development of a biotechnology regulation science and technology program within the Department, including development of digital infrastructure to support simplified regulation and the development of biometrology tools.
(7)
Updated plans and policies for inter-governmental support that the Department could provide in encouraging member countries of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) to aggregate demand and pool purchasing power for biotechnology products.
(8)
Review of plans and guidance on how the Department can work to develop, integrate, and disseminate biotechnology research initiatives across member countries of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, and how the Department might coordinate with international stakeholders to utilize the combined research capabilities of such member countries to drive a biotechnology development approach.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2025-11-10
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

To direct the Secretary of Defense to develop a strategy on the national security implications of emerging biotechnologies, and for other purposes.

Sponsors

Rep. Chrissy Houlahan (D) sponsors H.R. 6009, and 2 members have co-sponsored it, 1 of them from the day it was introduced.

Committees

H.R. 6009 went before 2 committees: Foreign Affairs and Armed Services.

Foreign Affairs
Foreign Affairs
Referred To · Nov 10, 2025 · 658 Bills
Armed Services
Armed Services
Referred To · Nov 10, 2025 · 581 Bills

Actions

H.R. 6009 has taken 2 actions since Nov 10, 2025.

ChamberAction
Nov 10, 2025
House
Introduced in House
Nov 10, 2025
House
Referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.Armed Services Committee

Votes

H.R. 6009 has not gone to a roll call.

3 bills are related to H.R. 6009.

Titles

H.R. 6009 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.

  • Defense Biotechnology Strategy Act — Display Title
  • Defense Biotechnology Strategy Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • To direct the Secretary of Defense to develop a strategy on the national security implications of emerging biotechnologies, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced

Lobbying

1 client hired 1 firm and 3 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 6009 in 7 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Budget/Appropriations, Energy/Nuclear, Environment/Superfund, Homeland Security, Natural Resources, Taxation/Internal Revenue Code, Transportation.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
ENBRIDGE (U.S.) INCTexas17

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

RegistrantClientsFilingsReported
ENBRIDGE (U.S.) INC17

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill.

LobbyistFirmsClientsFilings
DEVIN HOTZEL117
PETER HOLRAN117
PETER SHEFFIELD117

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
ENBRIDGE (U.S.) INCENBRIDGE (U.S.) INC2026 second_quarter$412K2nd Quarter - Report
ENBRIDGE (U.S.) INCENBRIDGE (U.S.) INC2026 first_quarter$412K1st Quarter - Report
ENBRIDGE (U.S.) INCENBRIDGE (U.S.) INC2025 first_quarter$341K1st Quarter - Report
ENBRIDGE (U.S.) INCENBRIDGE (U.S.) INC2026 second_quarter$320K2nd Quarter - Amendme…
ENBRIDGE (U.S.) INCENBRIDGE (U.S.) INC2025 second_quarter$320K2nd Quarter - Report
ENBRIDGE (U.S.) INCENBRIDGE (U.S.) INC2025 fourth_quarter$308K4th Quarter - Report
ENBRIDGE (U.S.) INCENBRIDGE (U.S.) INC2025 third_quarter$200K3rd Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 6009 under Armed Forces and National Security, one of its 31 policy areas.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 6009’s is Armed Forces and National Security.

hr6009/policy-areas.txt
Armed Forces and National SecurityAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com