- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- Administration
- Agriculture
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry
- Appropriations
- Armed Services
- Banking, Housing, And Urban Affairs
- Budget
- Commerce, Science, And Transportation
- Education and Workforce
- Energy And Commerce
- Energy And Natural Resources
- Environment And Public Works
- Ethics
- Finance
- Financial Services
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Relations
- Health, Education, Labor, And Pensions
- Homeland Security
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…
- Indian Affairs
- Indian and Insular Affairs
- Intelligence
- Judiciary
- Natural Resources
- Oversight And Government Reform
- Permanent Select Intelligence
- Rules
- Rules And Administration
- Science, Space, And Technology
- Select Intelligence
- Small Business
- Small Business And Entrepreneurship
- Subcommittee on Aviation
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…
- Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…
- Subcommittee on Federal Lands
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…
- Subcommittee on Health
- Subcommittee on Highways and Transit
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…
- Transportation And Infrastructure
- Veterans' Affairs
- Ways And Means

S. 1875
U.S. Senate•In Senate Committee
Summary
S. 1875, the Streamlining Federal Cybersecurity Regulations Act of 2025, was introduced in the Senate on May 22, 2025 by Sen. Gary Peters (D) with 1 co-sponsor. It was referred to Homeland Security And Governmental Affairs, and last saw action on May 22, 2025: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Record
Text
S. 1875 has 1 co-sponsor.
sb1875/introduced-in-senate.txt119 S1875 IS: Streamlining Federal Cybersecurity Regulations Act of 2025U.S. Senate2025-05-22text/xmlENPursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.II119th CONGRESS1st SessionS. 1875IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATESMay 22, 2025Mr. Peters (for himself and Mr. Lankford ) introduced the following bill; whichwas read twice and referred to the Committeeon Homeland Security and Governmental AffairsA BILLTo establish an interagency committee to harmonize regulatory regimes in theUnited States relating to cybersecurity, and for other purposes.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Streamlining Federal Cybersecurity Regulations Act of 2025 .2.DefinitionsIn this Act:(1)AgencyThe term agency has the meaning given that term in section 3502 of title 44, United States Code.(2)Appropriate congressional committeesThe term appropriate congressional committees means—(A)the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate;(B)the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of the House of Representatives;(C)each committee of Congress with jurisdiction over the activities of a regulatory agency; and(D)each committee of Congress with jurisdiction over the activities of a Sector Risk Management Agency with respect to a sector regulated by a regulatory agency.(3)CommitteeThe term Committee means the Harmonization Committee established under section 3(a).(4)Cybersecurity requirementThe term cybersecurity requirement means a regulation or supervisory activity, including an examination or binding guidance, that includes administrative, technical, or physical requirements relating to information security, security of information technology or operational technology, cybersecurity, or cyber risk or resilience.(5)Harmonization(A)DefinitionThe term harmonization means the process of aligning cybersecurity requirements issued by regulatory agencies such that the requirements consist of—(i)a common set of minimum requirements that may apply across sectors and that can be updated periodically to address new or evolving risks relating to information security or cybersecurity; and(ii)sector-specific requirements, which may include performance-based requirements, that—(I)are necessary to address sector-specific risks that are not adequately addressed by the minimum requirements described in clause (i);(II)are substantially similar, where appropriate, to other requirements in that sector or a similar sector; and(III)align with international standards, where appropriate.(B)Rule of constructionNothing in this definition shall be construed to exempt regulatory agencies from any otherwise applicable processes or laws relating to promulgating or amending regulations, including subchapter II of chapter 5, and chapter 7, of title 5, United States Code (commonly known as the Administrative Procedure Act ).(6)HeadThe term head includes, in the case of an agency directed by multiple individuals, such as a commission, a representative selected by such individuals from among such individuals.(7)Independent regulatory agencyThe term independent regulatory agency has the meaning given that term in section 3502 of title 44, United States Code.(8)ReciprocityThe term reciprocity means the recognition or acceptance by 1 regulatory agency of an assessment, determination, examination, finding, or conclusion of another regulatory agency for determining that a regulated entity has complied with a cybersecurity requirement.(9)Regulatory agencyThe term regulatory agency means—(A)any independent regulatory agency that has the statutory authority to issue or enforce any mandatory cybersecurity requirement; or(B)any other agency that has the statutory authority to issue or enforce any cybersecurity requirement.(10)Regulatory frameworkThe term regulatory framework means the framework developed under section 3(e)(1).(11)Sector risk management agencyThe term Sector Risk Management Agency has the meaning given that term in section 2200 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 ( 6 U.S.C. 650 ).3.Establishment of interagency committee to harmonize regulatory regimes in theUnited States relating to cybersecurity(a)Harmonization Committee(1)In generalThe National Cyber Director shall establish an interagency committee to be known as the Harmonization Committee to enhance the harmonization and reciprocity of cybersecurity requirements that are applicable within the United States, including the formulation of baseline and sector-specific requirements that are risk-based.(2)SupportThe National Cyber Director shall provide the Committee with administrative and management support as appropriate.(b)Members(1)In generalThe Committee shall be composed of—(A)the National Cyber Director;(B)the head of each regulatory agency, including the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency and the National Institute of Standards and Technology;(C)the head of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs of the Office of Management and Budget; and(D)the head of other appropriate agencies, as determined by the chair of the Committee.(2)Publication of list of membersThe Committee shall maintain, on a publicly available website, a list of the agencies that are represented on the Committee as determined by the chair of the Committee, and shall update the list as members are added or removed.(c)ChairThe National Cyber Director shall be the chair of the Committee.(d)CharterThe Committee shall develop, deliver to Congress, and make publicly available a charter, which shall—(1)include the processes and rules of the Committee; and(2)detail—(A)the objective and scope of the Committee; and(B)other items as necessary.(e)Regulatory framework for harmonization(1)In general(A)DevelopmentNot later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Committee shall develop a regulatory framework for achieving harmonization of the cybersecurity requirements of each regulatory agency.(B)ContentsThe regulatory framework developed under clause (i) shall—(i)include a common set of baseline cybersecurity requirements across sectors; and(ii)outline common approaches and language for applying cybersecurity requirements promulgated or amended following passage of this Act.(C)Public commentThe process for developing such regulatory framework shall include the opportunity for public comment and consultation with industry experts and other stakeholders.(D)FactorsIn developing the framework under subparagraph (A), the Committee shall account for existing sector-specific cybersecurity requirements that are identified as unique or critical to a sector.(2)Minimum requirementsThe framework shall contain, at a minimum, processes for—(A)establishing a reciprocal compliance mechanism for minimum requirements relating to information security or cybersecurity for entities regulated by more than 1 regulatory agency;(B)identifying cybersecurity requirements that are overly burdensome, inconsistent, or contradictory, as determined by the Committee;(C)developing recommendations for updating regulations, guidance, and examinations to address overly burdensome, inconsistent, or contradictory cybersecurity requirements identified under subparagraph (B) to achieve harmonization; and(D)drafting baseline requirements and regulatory language for covered agencies to use, as appropriate.(3)PublicationUpon completion of the regulatory framework, the Committee shall publish the regulatory framework in the Federal Register.(f)Pilot program on implementation of regulatory framework(1)In generalNot later than 90 days after the publication of the framework developed under subsection (e), not fewer than 3 regulatory agencies but not more than 5 regulatory agencies, selected by the Committee, shall carry out a pilot program to implement the regulatory framework with respect to not fewer than 3 cybersecurity requirements but not more than 6 cybersecurity requirements, with at least 1 requirement from each regulatory agency.(2)DurationThe duration of the pilot program shall be determined by the Harmonization Committee in coordination with the pilot program participants.(3)Participation by regulatory agencies and regulated entities(A)Regulatory agenciesParticipation in the pilot program by a regulatory agency shall be voluntary and subject to the consent of the regulatory agency following selection by the Committee under paragraph (1).(B)Regulated entitiesParticipation in the pilot program by a regulated entity shall be voluntary.(4)Selection of cybersecurity requirementsCybersecurity requirements selected for the pilot program under paragraph (1) shall contain substantially similar or substantially related requirements such that not fewer than 2 of the selected cybersecurity requirements govern the same regulated entity with substantially similar or substantially related requirements relating to information security or cybersecurity.(5)Waivers(A)In generalNotwithstanding any provision of subchapter II of chapter 5, and chapter 7, of title 5, United States Code (commonly known as the Administrative Procedure Act ) and subject to the consent of any participating regulated entity, in implementing the pilot program under paragraph (1), a regulatory agency participating in the pilot program shall have the authority, as the regulatory agency determines appropriate, to both issue waivers and establish alternative procedures for regulated entities participating in the pilot program with respect to the cybersecurity requirements included under the pilot program.(B)ComplianceA regulated entity that notifies a regulatory agency of the entity’s participation in a pilot program shall be deemed in compliance with the waived requirements to the extent that the entity complies with requirements of the pilot program.(C)TerminationWaivers issued and alternative procedures established under this paragraph shall terminate on the date on which the pilot program terminates.(6)Subsequent pilot programThe Committee may only authorize an additional pilot program after the later of—(A)the date of the conclusion of all of the initial pilot programs under paragraph (1); and(B)the date of submission of all reports required under subsection (i) for each initial pilot program.(7)SunsetThe pilot program shall terminate on the date that is 7 years after the date on which the pilot program began under paragraph (1).(g)Consultation with the Committee(1)In generalNotwithstanding any other provision of law—(A)except when an exigent circumstance described in paragraph (3) exists, before promulgating or amending a cybersecurity requirement, a regulatory agency shall consult with the Committee regarding such requirement and the regulatory framework;(B)independent regulatory agencies, when promulgating or amending a cybersecurity requirement, shall consult the Committee during the development of the updated cybersecurity requirement or the new cybersecurity requirement to ensure that the requirement is aligned to the greatest extent possible with the regulatory framework; and(C)such consultation should be integrated with existing interagency review and input processes administered by the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs of the Office of Management and Budget.(2)Consultation reportFollowing a consultation under paragraph (1), the Committee, in coordination with the Office of Management and Budget as necessary, shall provide to the agency a report that shall be advisory in nature and shall—(A)include to what degree the proposed cybersecurity requirement or update to the cybersecurity requirement aligns with the regulatory framework, taking into consideration the authorities of the agency; and(B)provide a list of recommendations to improve the cybersecurity requirement and to align the cybersecurity requirement with the regulatory framework.(3)Exigent circumstancesIn the case of an exigent circumstance where an agency is authorized by law to act expeditiously, the agency shall notify the Committee as soon as possible.(h)Consultation with sector risk management agenciesThe Committee shall consult with appropriate Sector Risk Management Agencies in the development of the regulatory framework and the implementation of the pilot program under subsection (f) and shall consult with members of industry and critical infrastructure, as appropriate, for the development of the regulatory framework and pilot program.(i)Reports(1)Annual reportNot later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter until the date on which the pilot program terminates, the Committee shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report including—(A)information about member participation in Committee activities, including the rationale for any nonparticipation by Committee members;(B)information about the application of the regulatory framework, once developed, on cybersecurity requirements, including consultations or discussions with regulators;(C)a general summary of reports made under subsection (g)(2); and(D)an analysis of the efficiency of the regulatory framework.(2)Pilot program reportNot later than 1 year after the date on which a pilot program under subsection (f) begins, the Committee shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report detailing—(A)the cybersecurity requirements selected for the program, including—(i)the reasons that the regulatory agency and cybersecurity requirement were selected;(ii)a list of the pilot programs considered by the Committee; and(iii)the rationale for selecting the pilot program;(B)the information learned from the program;(C)any obstacles encountered during the program; and(D)an assessment of the applicability of expanding the program to other agencies and cybersecurity requirements.4.Coordination with Federal agencies and international bodies(a)In generalNot later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall, in consultation with the Committee, issue guidance to Federal agencies, including the Cyber Incident Reporting Council, on coordination with the Committee.(b)Guidance(1)In generalNot later than 1 year after the completion of the initial pilot program and submission of the pilot program report, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall, in coordination with the Committee, issue guidance to all agencies to ensure cybersecurity requirements are consistent with the framework developed under subsection (e), incorporating the results and lessons learned from the pilot program.(2)ContentsThe guidance issued under paragraph (1) shall, at a minimum—(A)include updates to the regulatory review process, as appropriate, for proposed cybersecurity requirements;(B)provide draft regulatory language for covered agencies to use when preparing cybersecurity requirements;(C)provide guidance and procedures for covered agencies to resolve inconsistencies with the framework; and(D)provide a template for covered agencies on how to use the guidance, including recommended procedures for implementation.(c)ReportingAll agencies shall report to appropriate congressional committees on the status of implementing the guidance issued under subsection (a).(d)Assistance(1)Foreign entitiesThe Committee, with the concurrence of the Secretary of State, and in coordination with the National Institute of Standards and Technology, may provide expertise or technical assistance on harmonization and reciprocity of cyber requirements to a foreign government, an international organization, or an international entity, as appropriate.(2)Local entitiesThe Committee may provide expertise or technical assistance on harmonization and reciprocity of cyber requirements to State, local, Tribal, and territorial governments, as appropriate.5.Rule of constructionNothing in this Act shall be construed—(1)to expand or alter the existing authorities of any agency, including any independent regulatory agency, except for exemptions under section 3(f) to implement the pilot program established under that section;(2)to provide any such agency any new or additional authorities, except for exemptions under section 3(f) to implement the pilot program established under that section; or(3)to affect, augment, or diminish the authority of the Secretary of State or any other officer of the Federal Government.
Tracker
The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.
- Introduced2025-05-22
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- Conference
- To President
- Became Law
CRS Summary
The summaries are the Congressional Research Service’s, one per stage. Read them in full.
Introduced in Senate May 22, 2025
sb1875/introduced-in-senate.mdShown Here:
Introduced in Senate (05/22/2025)
Streamlining Federal Cybersecurity Regulations Act of 2025
This bill establishes an interagency committee to review and align cybersecurity regulations and requirements imposed by executive agencies.
The committee, to be led and administered by the Office of the National Cyber Director, must include the heads of each executive agency with statutory authority to enforce mandatory cybersecurity requirements. Agencies must generally consult with the committee before promulgating or amending cybersecurity requirements.
The committee must develop a regulatory framework for the harmonization of agencies’ cybersecurity requirements. Under the bill, harmonization means the alignment of cybersecurity requirements to consist of a common set of minimum requirements that are applicable across sectors and sector-specific requirements as necessary. Specifically, the framework must contain processes for (1) establishing a reciprocal compliance mechanism for minimum requirements applicable to entities regulated by more than one agency; and (2) identifying and developing recommendations to address cybersecurity requirements that are overly burdensome, inconsistent, or contradictory. In developing this framework, the committee must seek public comment and consult with industry experts and stakeholders.
Once the framework is developed and published, the committee must select agencies to carry out a pilot program to apply the framework to a sampling of their cybersecurity requirements.
In consultation with the committee, the Office of Management and Budget must issue guidance to federal agencies on coordinating with the committee and, after the pilot program is complete, on ensuring cybersecurity requirements are consistent with the framework and lessons learned from the pilot program.
Sponsors
Sen. Gary Peters (D) sponsors S. 1875, and 1 member has co-sponsored it from the day it was introduced.
Committees
S. 1875 went before 1 committee: Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

Actions
S. 1875 has taken 2 actions since May 22, 2025.
| Chamber | Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
May 22, 2025 | Senate | Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee | ||
May 22, 2025 | — | Introduced in Senate |
Votes
S. 1875 has not gone to a roll call.
Titles
S. 1875 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.
- Streamlining Federal Cybersecurity Regulations Act of 2025 — Display Title
- Streamlining Federal Cybersecurity Regulations Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
- A bill to establish an interagency committee to harmonize regulatory regimes in the United States relating to cybersecurity, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced
Lobbying
20 clients hired 21 firms and 169 registered lobbyists who named S. 1875 in 73 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.
Filed under Taxation/Internal Revenue Code, Budget/Appropriations, Homeland Security, Energy/Nuclear, Environment/Superfund, Transportation, Telecommunications, Defense.
Clients
Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.
| Client | Business | State | Firms | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDISON ELECTRIC INSTITUTE | General business - investor owned electric utilities | District of Columbia | 2 | 9 | $90K |
| PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC | — | Oregon | 1 | 6 | — |
| VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 5 | $100K |
| AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC. AND AFFILIATED CORPORATIONS | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 5 | — |
| CMS ENERGY CORP | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 5 | — |
| PPL CORPORATION | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 5 | — |
| VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC AND VARIOUS SUBSIDIARIES | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 5 | — |
| XCEL ENERGY INC | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 5 | — |
| ITC HOLDINGS CORP | — | Michigan | 1 | 4 | — |
| PINNACLE WEST CAPITAL CORPORATION | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 4 | — |
| PUGET SOUND ENERGY | — | Washington | 1 | 4 | — |
| CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A. | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 3 | — |
| FIRSTENERGY CORP | — | Ohio | 1 | 3 | — |
| RED HAT INC | — | North Carolina | 1 | 3 | — |
| CENTERPOINT ENERGY | — | Indiana | 1 | 2 | — |
| AMERICAN TRANSACTION PROCESSORS COALITION | Coalition to promote and educate issues on the payment processing industry and FinTech | Georgia | 1 | 1 | $50K |
| NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL NURSES | Specialty nursing | Maryland | 1 | 1 | $10K |
| BASF CORPORATION | — | New Jersey | 1 | 1 | — |
| ENTERGY SERVICES LLC | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 1 | — |
| INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY COUNCIL | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 1 | — |
Firms
Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.
Lobbyists
Named on the filings that cite the bill. The 20 named most often, of 169.
| Lobbyist | Firms | Clients | Filings |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHARLES JACKSON | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| ERIC GREY | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| JAMIE PAINTER | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| KRISTEN SIEGELE | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| LEE KWAME CANTY | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| ANDREW FIELDS | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| ANNE-MARIE KELLEY | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| BROOKS BRUNSON-PITTS | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| CHRISTINA MASON | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| DANIEL O'NEILL | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| EMILY DUNCAN | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| GABRIEL TERRY | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| HANK KILGORE | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| JAMES GREEN | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| JOSHUA LYNCH | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| KENNETH LYNCH | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| LINDSAY BISCARDI | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| MARCELA ZAMORA | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| MARK MULLET | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| MARTIN DOERN | 1 | 1 | 5 |
Filings
The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.
| Client | Registrant | Period | Reported | Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A. | CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A. | 2025 second_quarter | $19.3M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A. | CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A. | 2025 fourth_quarter | $18M | 4th Quarter - Report |
| CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A. | CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A. | 2025 third_quarter | $13.7M | 3rd Quarter - Report |
| VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC AND VARIOUS SUBSIDIARIES | VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND VARIOUS SUBSIDIARIES | 2026 first_quarter | $3.4M | 1st Quarter - Report |
| VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC AND VARIOUS SUBSIDIARIES | VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND VARIOUS SUBSIDIARIES | 2025 fourth_quarter | $3.4M | 4th Quarter - Report |
| VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC AND VARIOUS SUBSIDIARIES | VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND VARIOUS SUBSIDIARIES | 2026 second_quarter | $3.1M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC AND VARIOUS SUBSIDIARIES | VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND VARIOUS SUBSIDIARIES | 2025 second_quarter | $3M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC AND VARIOUS SUBSIDIARIES | VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND VARIOUS SUBSIDIARIES | 2025 third_quarter | $3M | 3rd Quarter - Report |
| EDISON ELECTRIC INSTITUTE | EDISON ELECTRIC INSTITUTE | 2026 first_quarter | $2.6M | 1st Quarter - Amendme… |
| EDISON ELECTRIC INSTITUTE | EDISON ELECTRIC INSTITUTE | 2026 first_quarter | $2.6M | 1st Quarter - Report |
| EDISON ELECTRIC INSTITUTE | EDISON ELECTRIC INSTITUTE | 2025 fourth_quarter | $2.3M | 4th Quarter - Report |
| EDISON ELECTRIC INSTITUTE | EDISON ELECTRIC INSTITUTE | 2025 second_quarter | $2M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| EDISON ELECTRIC INSTITUTE | EDISON ELECTRIC INSTITUTE | 2025 third_quarter | $2M | 3rd Quarter - Report |
| EDISON ELECTRIC INSTITUTE | EDISON ELECTRIC INSTITUTE | 2026 second_quarter | $1.7M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC. AND AFFILIATED CORPORATIONS | AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC. AND AFFILIATED CORPORATIONS | 2026 first_quarter | $1.2M | 1st Quarter - Report |
| XCEL ENERGY INC | XCEL ENERGY, INC | 2026 first_quarter | $960K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY COUNCIL | INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY COUNCIL | 2026 first_quarter | $720K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| ENTERGY SERVICES LLC | ENTERGY SERVICES, LLC | 2025 fourth_quarter | $710K | 4th Quarter - Report |
| XCEL ENERGY INC | XCEL ENERGY, INC | 2025 second_quarter | $560K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| BASF CORPORATION | BASF CORPORATION | 2025 second_quarter | $560K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
Classification
The Congressional Research Service files S. 1875 under Science, Technology, Communications, one of its 31 policy areas.
CRS Subjects
CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; S. 1875’s is Science, Technology, Communications.
s1875/policy-areas.txtSource: congress.gov · legiscan.com