Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

H.R. 3447

U.S. HouseIn House Committee

Summary

H.R. 3447, the Chip Security Act, was introduced in the House on May 15, 2025 by Rep. Bill Huizenga (R) with 41 co-sponsors. It last saw action on Mar 26, 2026: Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 42 - 0.


Record

Text

H.R. 3447 has 41 co-sponsors.

hb3447/introduced-in-house.txt
119 HR 3447 IH: Chip Security Act
U.S. House of Representatives
2025-05-15
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 3447 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES May 15, 2025 Mr. Huizenga (for himself, Mr. Foster , Mr. Moolenaar , Mr. Krishnamoorthi , Mr. Crawford , Mr. Lieu , Mr. LaHood , and Mr. Gottheimer ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs A BILL
To require the Secretary of Commerce to issue standards with respect to chip security mechanisms for integrated circuit products, and for other purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Chip Security Act .
2.
Sense of congress
It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
technology developed in the United States should serve as the foundation for the global ecosystem of artificial intelligence to advance the foreign policy and national security objectives of the United States and allies and partners of the United States;
(2)
the United States can foster goodwill, strengthen relationships, and support innovative research around the world by providing allies and partners of the United States with advanced computing capabilities;
(3)
advanced integrated circuits and computing hardware that is exported from the United States must be protected from diversion, theft, and other unauthorized use or exploitation in order to bolster the competitiveness of the United States and protect the national security of the United States;
(4)
implementing chip security mechanisms will improve compliance with the export control laws of the United States, assist allies and partners with guarding computing hardware, and enhance protections from bad actors looking to access, divert, or tamper with advanced integrated circuits and computing hardware; and
(5)
implementing chip security mechanisms may help with the detection of smuggling or exploitation of advanced integrated circuits and computing hardware, thereby allowing for increased flexibility in export controls and opening the door for more international partners to receive streamlined and larger shipments of advanced computing hardware.
3.
Definitions
In this Act:
(1)
Appropriate congressional committees
The term appropriate congressional committees means—
(A)
the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate; and
(B)
the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.
(2)
Chip security mechanism
The term chip security mechanism means a software-, firmware-, or hardware-enabled security mechanism or a physical security mechanism.
(3)
Covered integrated circuit product
The term covered integrated circuit product means—
(A)
an integrated circuit classified under Export Control Classification Number 3A090 or 3A001.z;
(B)
a computer or other product classified under Export Control Classification Number 4A090 or 4A003.z; or
(C)
an integrated circuit or computer or a product containing an integrated circuit or computer that is classified under an Export Control Classification Number that is a successor or substantially similar to the numbers listed in subparagraphs (A) and (B).
(4)
Export
The term export has the meaning given that term in section 1742(3) of the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 ( 50 U.S.C. 4801(3) ).
(5)
In-country transfer
The term in-country transfer has the meaning given that term in section 1742(6) of the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 ( 50 U.S.C. 4801(6) ).
(6)
Reexport
The term reexport has the meaning given that term in section 1742(9) of the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 ( 50 U.S.C. 4801(9) ).
(7)
Secretary
The term Secretary means the Secretary of Commerce.
4.
Requirements for security mechanisms for export of integrated circuit products
(a)
Primary requirements for chip security mechanisms
(1)
In general
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall require any covered integrated circuit product to be outfitted with chip security mechanisms that implement location verification, using techniques that are feasible and appropriate on such date of enactment, before it is exported, reexported, or in-country transferred to or in a foreign country.
(2)
Notification requirement
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall require any person that has received a license or other authorization under the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 ( 50 U.S.C. 4811 et seq. ) to export, reexport, or in-country transfer a covered integrated circuit product to promptly report to the Under Secretary of Industry and Security, if the person obtains credible information that the product—
(A)
is in a location other than the location specified in the application for the license or other authorization;
(B)
has been diverted to a user other than the user specified in the application; or
(C)
has been subjected to tampering or an attempt at tampering, including efforts to disable, spoof, manipulate, mislead or circumvent location verification mechanisms or other chip security mechanisms.
(b)
Development of secondary requirements for chip security mechanisms
(1)
Assessment
(A)
In general
Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall—
(i)
conduct an assessment to identify what additional mechanisms, if any, should be added to the primary chip security mechanisms required under subsection (a)(1)—
(I)
to enhance compliance with the requirements of the Export Control Reform Act of 2018;
(II)
to prevent, hinder, and detect the unauthorized use, access, or exploitation of covered integrated circuit products;
(III)
to identify and monitor smuggling intermediaries; and
(IV)
to achieve any national security or foreign policy objective of the United States that the Secretary considers appropriate; and
(ii)
if the Secretary identifies any such mechanism, develop requirements for outfitting covered integrated circuit products with that mechanism.
(B)
Elements
The assessment required by paragraph (1) shall include—
(i)
an examination of the feasibility, reliability, and effectiveness of—
(I)
methods and strategies that prevent the tampering, disabling, or other manipulating of covered integrated circuit products;
(II)
workload verification methods;
(III)
methods to modify the functionality of covered integrated circuit products that have been illicitly acquired; and
(IV)
any other method the Secretary determines appropriate for the prevention of unauthorized use, access, or exploitation of covered integrated circuit products;
(ii)
an analysis of—
(I)
the potential costs associated with implementing each method examined under clause (i), including an analysis of—
(aa)
the potential impact of the method on the performance of covered integrated circuit products; and
(bb)
the potential for the introduction of new vulnerabilities into the products;
(II)
the potential benefits of implementing the methods examined under clause (i), including an analysis of the potential increase—
(aa)
in compliance of covered integrated circuit products with the requirements of the Export Control Reform Act of 2018; and
(bb)
in detecting, hindering, and preventing unauthorized use, access, or exploitation of the products; and
(III)
the susceptibility of the methods examined under clause (i) to tampering, disabling, or other forms of manipulation; and
(iii)
an estimate of the expected costs to implement at-scale methods to tamper with, disable, or manipulate a covered integrated circuit product, or otherwise circumvent the methods examined under clause (i).
(2)
Report to congress
(A)
In general
Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the results of the assessment required by paragraph (1), including—
(i)
an identification of the chip security mechanisms, if any, to be included in the requirements for secondary chip security mechanisms; and
(ii)
if applicable, a roadmap for the timely implementation of the secondary chip security mechanisms.
(B)
Form
The report required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.
(3)
Implementation
(A)
In general
If any mechanisms are determined by the Secretary to be appropriate, the Secretary shall, not later than 2 years after the date on which the Secretary completes the assessment required by paragraph (1), require any covered integrated circuit product to be outfitted with the secondary chip security mechanisms identified pursuant to paragraph (1)(A) before the product is exported, reexported, or in-country transferred to or in a foreign country.
(B)
Privacy
In implementing requirements for secondary chip security mechanisms under subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall prioritize confidentiality.
(c)
Enforcement authority
In carrying out this section, the Secretary may—
(1)
verify, in a manner the Secretary determines appropriate, the ownership and location of a covered integrated circuit product that has been exported, reexported, or in-country transferred to or in a foreign country;
(2)
maintain a record of covered integrated circuit products and include in the record the location and current end-user of each such product; and
(3)
require any person who has been granted a license or other authorization under the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 to export, reexport, or in-country transfer a covered integrated circuit product to provide the information needed to maintain the record.
(d)
Annual assessment and report on new chip security mechanisms
Not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter for 3 years, the Secretary shall—
(1)
conduct an assessment of new chip security mechanisms that have been developed in the year preceding the date of the assessment; and
(2)
submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that includes—
(A)
a summary of the results of the assessment required by paragraph (1);
(B)
an evaluation of whether any of the new mechanisms assessed under paragraph (1) should be added to or replace any of the existing requirements for secondary chip security mechanisms developed under subsection (b)(1); and
(C)
any recommendations for modifications to relevant export controls to allow for more flexibility with respect to the countries to or in which covered integrated circuit products may be exported, reexported, or in-country transferred if the products include chip security mechanisms that meet the requirements developed under subsection (b)(1).

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2025-05-15
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

CRS Summary

The summaries are the Congressional Research Service’s, one per stage. Read them in full.

Introduced in House May 15, 2025

hb3447/introduced-in-house.md

Shown Here:
Introduced in House (05/15/2025)

Chip Security Act

This bill requires covered integrated circuit products (e.g., advanced computing chips) to incorporate certain security mechanisms.

Specifically, the bill directs the Department of Commerce to require any covered integrated circuit product to have chip security mechanisms that implement location verification before the product is exported, reexported, or in-country transferred to or in a foreign country.

Commerce must require any person that has received a license or other authorization under the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 to export, reexport, or in-country transfer a covered product to promptly report to Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security if the person obtains credible information that the product has been diverted away from its intended location or has been subjected to tampering.

Additionally, Commerce must conduct an assessment and report to Congress on whether additional chip security mechanisms should be adopted. If Commerce determines additional security measures are necessary, then Commerce must require any covered product to include the secondary chip security mechanisms before the product is exported, reexported, or in-country transferred to or in a foreign country.

The bill authorizes Commerce to take certain enforcement actions, such as verifying the ownership and location of a covered product that has been exported, reexported, or in-country transferred to or in a foreign country.

Commerce must, within two years of the bill's enactment and annually thereafter for three years, assess new chip security mechanisms and report to Congress.

Sponsors

Rep. Bill Huizenga (R) sponsors H.R. 3447, and 41 members have co-sponsored it, 7 of them from the day it was introduced.

Committees

H.R. 3447 went before 1 committee: Foreign Affairs.

Foreign Affairs
Foreign Affairs
Markup By · Mar 26, 2026 · 658 Bills

Actions

H.R. 3447 has taken 4 actions since May 15, 2025, the latest on Mar 26, 2026.

ChamberAction
Mar 26, 2026
House
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session HeldForeign Affairs Committee
Mar 26, 2026
House
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 42 - 0.Foreign Affairs Committee
May 15, 2025
House
Introduced in House
May 15, 2025
House
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.Foreign Affairs Committee

Votes

H.R. 3447 has not gone to a roll call.

1 bill is related to H.R. 3447.

Titles

H.R. 3447 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.

  • Chip Security Act — Display Title
  • Chip Security Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • To require the Secretary of Commerce to issue standards with respect to chip security mechanisms for integrated circuit products, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced

Cost estimate

The Congressional Budget Office has filed 1 estimate for H.R. 3447, the latest on May 1, 2026.


Lobbying

38 clients hired 41 firms and 324 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 3447 in 145 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Trade (domestic/foreign), Taxation/Internal Revenue Code, Science/Technology, Defense, Budget/Appropriations, Telecommunications, Immigration, Labor Issues/Antitrust/Workplace.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill. The 20 that filed most often, of 38.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
NVIDIA CORPORATIONFull stack computing infrastructure company with data center scale offeringsCalifornia211$360K
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.Semiconductor CompanyTexas29$320K
SYNOPSYS, INC.electronic design automation (EDA) and intellectual property (IP)California29$240K
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY COUNCILAdvocacy and policy on behalf of innovation and technology companiesDistrict of Columbia28$150K
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A.District of Columbia16
SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY ASSOCIATIONDistrict of Columbia16
TSMC ARIZONASemiconductor Manufacturing CompanyArizona25$250K
AMERICAN SECURITY FUNDNonprofit advocating for artificial intelligence safety and biosecurityVirginia15$150K
THE ALLIANCE FOR SECURE AI ACTIONNonprofit organization that educates the public about the implications of advanced AIDistrict of Columbia25$60K
CENTER FOR AI SAFETY ACTION FUND, INC.Nonprofit corporation with a social welfare purpose who engages in social advocacy effortsCalifornia15
DELL TECHNOLOGIES INCDistrict of Columbia15
FDD ACTIONDistrict of Columbia15
GOOGLE CLIENT SERVICES LLCDistrict of Columbia15
INTEL CORPORATIONDistrict of Columbia15
SK AMERICAS, INC.Semiconductors, Energy, Life SciencesNew York15
ARM HOLDINGS PLCSemiconductor and software design company.14$480K
DELL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.Provides technology solutions, services and support.District of Columbia14$320K
ARM INCDistrict of Columbia14
HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE COMPANY & AFFILIATESDistrict of Columbia14
LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC.Consumer electronics manufacturerNorth Carolina14

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill. The 20 named most often, of 324.

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A.CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A.2026 first_quarter$19.8M1st Quarter - Amendme…
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A.CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A.2026 first_quarter$19.8M1st Quarter - Report
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A.CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A.2025 second_quarter$19.3M2nd Quarter - Report
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A.CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A.2025 fourth_quarter$18M4th Quarter - Report
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A.CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A.2026 second_quarter$17M2nd Quarter - Report
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A.CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A.2025 third_quarter$13.7M3rd Quarter - Report
CTIA-THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATIONCTIA-THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION2025 third_quarter$3.9M3rd Quarter - Report
GOOGLE CLIENT SERVICES LLCGOOGLE CLIENT SERVICES LLC2026 second_quarter$3.6M2nd Quarter - Report
GOOGLE CLIENT SERVICES LLCGOOGLE CLIENT SERVICES LLC2025 third_quarter$3.6M3rd Quarter - Report
GOOGLE CLIENT SERVICES LLCGOOGLE CLIENT SERVICES LLC2025 fourth_quarter$3.4M4th Quarter - Report
GOOGLE CLIENT SERVICES LLCGOOGLE CLIENT SERVICES LLC2025 second_quarter$3.2M2nd Quarter - Report
GOOGLE CLIENT SERVICES LLCGOOGLE CLIENT SERVICES LLC2026 first_quarter$2.9M1st Quarter - Report
ORACLE CORPORATIONORACLE CORPORATION2026 second_quarter$2M2nd Quarter - Report
NVIDIA CORPORATIONNVIDIA CORPORATION2025 third_quarter$2M3rd Quarter - Amendme…
NVIDIA CORPORATIONNVIDIA CORPORATION2025 third_quarter$1.9M3rd Quarter - Report
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.2025 fourth_quarter$1.7M4th Quarter - Report
DELL TECHNOLOGIES INCDELL TECHNOLOGIES INC.2026 first_quarter$1.6M1st Quarter - Report
SK AMERICAS, INC.SK AMERICAS, INC.2026 first_quarter$1.6M1st Quarter - Report
SK AMERICAS, INC.SK AMERICAS, INC.2025 fourth_quarter$1.6M4th Quarter - Amendme…
SK AMERICAS, INC.SK AMERICAS, INC.2025 fourth_quarter$1.6M4th Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 3447 under Foreign Trade and International Finance, one of its 31 policy areas, and gives it 5 legislative subjects.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 3447’s is Foreign Trade and International Finance.

hr3447/policy-areas.txt
Foreign Trade and International FinanceAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Legislative Subjects

H.R. 3447 carries 5 of CRS’s legislative subjects, from Advanced technology and technological innovations to Trade restrictions.

hr3447/subjects.txt
Advanced technology and technological innovationsComputer security and identity theftCongressional oversightLicensing and registrationsTrade restrictions

Constitutional authority

The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 3447, as entered in the Congressional Record.

[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 82 (Thursday, May 15, 2025)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Mr. HUIZENGA:H.R. 3447.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:Article I, Section 8, the Necessary and Proper Clause[Page H2105]

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com