- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- Administration
- Agriculture
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry
- Appropriations
- Armed Services
- Banking, Housing, And Urban Affairs
- Budget
- Commerce, Science, And Transportation
- Education and Workforce
- Energy And Commerce
- Energy And Natural Resources
- Environment And Public Works
- Ethics
- Finance
- Financial Services
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Relations
- Health, Education, Labor, And Pensions
- Homeland Security
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…
- Indian Affairs
- Indian and Insular Affairs
- Intelligence
- Judiciary
- Natural Resources
- Oversight And Government Reform
- Permanent Select Intelligence
- Rules
- Rules And Administration
- Science, Space, And Technology
- Select Intelligence
- Small Business
- Small Business And Entrepreneurship
- Subcommittee on Aviation
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…
- Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…
- Subcommittee on Federal Lands
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…
- Subcommittee on Health
- Subcommittee on Highways and Transit
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…
- Transportation And Infrastructure
- Veterans' Affairs
- Ways And Means

H.R. 3447
U.S. House•In House Committee
Summary
H.R. 3447, the Chip Security Act, was introduced in the House on May 15, 2025 by Rep. Bill Huizenga (R) with 41 co-sponsors. It last saw action on Mar 26, 2026: Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 42 - 0.
Record
Text
H.R. 3447 has 41 co-sponsors.
hb3447/introduced-in-house.txt119 HR 3447 IH: Chip Security ActU.S. House of Representatives2025-05-15text/xmlENPursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 3447 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES May 15, 2025 Mr. Huizenga (for himself, Mr. Foster , Mr. Moolenaar , Mr. Krishnamoorthi , Mr. Crawford , Mr. Lieu , Mr. LaHood , and Mr. Gottheimer ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs A BILLTo require the Secretary of Commerce to issue standards with respect to chip security mechanisms for integrated circuit products, and for other purposes.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Chip Security Act .2.Sense of congressIt is the sense of Congress that—(1)technology developed in the United States should serve as the foundation for the global ecosystem of artificial intelligence to advance the foreign policy and national security objectives of the United States and allies and partners of the United States;(2)the United States can foster goodwill, strengthen relationships, and support innovative research around the world by providing allies and partners of the United States with advanced computing capabilities;(3)advanced integrated circuits and computing hardware that is exported from the United States must be protected from diversion, theft, and other unauthorized use or exploitation in order to bolster the competitiveness of the United States and protect the national security of the United States;(4)implementing chip security mechanisms will improve compliance with the export control laws of the United States, assist allies and partners with guarding computing hardware, and enhance protections from bad actors looking to access, divert, or tamper with advanced integrated circuits and computing hardware; and(5)implementing chip security mechanisms may help with the detection of smuggling or exploitation of advanced integrated circuits and computing hardware, thereby allowing for increased flexibility in export controls and opening the door for more international partners to receive streamlined and larger shipments of advanced computing hardware.3.DefinitionsIn this Act:(1)Appropriate congressional committeesThe term appropriate congressional committees means—(A)the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate; and(B)the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.(2)Chip security mechanismThe term chip security mechanism means a software-, firmware-, or hardware-enabled security mechanism or a physical security mechanism.(3)Covered integrated circuit productThe term covered integrated circuit product means—(A)an integrated circuit classified under Export Control Classification Number 3A090 or 3A001.z;(B)a computer or other product classified under Export Control Classification Number 4A090 or 4A003.z; or(C)an integrated circuit or computer or a product containing an integrated circuit or computer that is classified under an Export Control Classification Number that is a successor or substantially similar to the numbers listed in subparagraphs (A) and (B).(4)ExportThe term export has the meaning given that term in section 1742(3) of the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 ( 50 U.S.C. 4801(3) ).(5)In-country transferThe term in-country transfer has the meaning given that term in section 1742(6) of the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 ( 50 U.S.C. 4801(6) ).(6)ReexportThe term reexport has the meaning given that term in section 1742(9) of the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 ( 50 U.S.C. 4801(9) ).(7)SecretaryThe term Secretary means the Secretary of Commerce.4.Requirements for security mechanisms for export of integrated circuit products(a)Primary requirements for chip security mechanisms(1)In generalNot later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall require any covered integrated circuit product to be outfitted with chip security mechanisms that implement location verification, using techniques that are feasible and appropriate on such date of enactment, before it is exported, reexported, or in-country transferred to or in a foreign country.(2)Notification requirementNot later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall require any person that has received a license or other authorization under the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 ( 50 U.S.C. 4811 et seq. ) to export, reexport, or in-country transfer a covered integrated circuit product to promptly report to the Under Secretary of Industry and Security, if the person obtains credible information that the product—(A)is in a location other than the location specified in the application for the license or other authorization;(B)has been diverted to a user other than the user specified in the application; or(C)has been subjected to tampering or an attempt at tampering, including efforts to disable, spoof, manipulate, mislead or circumvent location verification mechanisms or other chip security mechanisms.(b)Development of secondary requirements for chip security mechanisms(1)Assessment(A)In generalNot later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall—(i)conduct an assessment to identify what additional mechanisms, if any, should be added to the primary chip security mechanisms required under subsection (a)(1)—(I)to enhance compliance with the requirements of the Export Control Reform Act of 2018;(II)to prevent, hinder, and detect the unauthorized use, access, or exploitation of covered integrated circuit products;(III)to identify and monitor smuggling intermediaries; and(IV)to achieve any national security or foreign policy objective of the United States that the Secretary considers appropriate; and(ii)if the Secretary identifies any such mechanism, develop requirements for outfitting covered integrated circuit products with that mechanism.(B)ElementsThe assessment required by paragraph (1) shall include—(i)an examination of the feasibility, reliability, and effectiveness of—(I)methods and strategies that prevent the tampering, disabling, or other manipulating of covered integrated circuit products;(II)workload verification methods;(III)methods to modify the functionality of covered integrated circuit products that have been illicitly acquired; and(IV)any other method the Secretary determines appropriate for the prevention of unauthorized use, access, or exploitation of covered integrated circuit products;(ii)an analysis of—(I)the potential costs associated with implementing each method examined under clause (i), including an analysis of—(aa)the potential impact of the method on the performance of covered integrated circuit products; and(bb)the potential for the introduction of new vulnerabilities into the products;(II)the potential benefits of implementing the methods examined under clause (i), including an analysis of the potential increase—(aa)in compliance of covered integrated circuit products with the requirements of the Export Control Reform Act of 2018; and(bb)in detecting, hindering, and preventing unauthorized use, access, or exploitation of the products; and(III)the susceptibility of the methods examined under clause (i) to tampering, disabling, or other forms of manipulation; and(iii)an estimate of the expected costs to implement at-scale methods to tamper with, disable, or manipulate a covered integrated circuit product, or otherwise circumvent the methods examined under clause (i).(2)Report to congress(A)In generalNot later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the results of the assessment required by paragraph (1), including—(i)an identification of the chip security mechanisms, if any, to be included in the requirements for secondary chip security mechanisms; and(ii)if applicable, a roadmap for the timely implementation of the secondary chip security mechanisms.(B)FormThe report required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classified annex.(3)Implementation(A)In generalIf any mechanisms are determined by the Secretary to be appropriate, the Secretary shall, not later than 2 years after the date on which the Secretary completes the assessment required by paragraph (1), require any covered integrated circuit product to be outfitted with the secondary chip security mechanisms identified pursuant to paragraph (1)(A) before the product is exported, reexported, or in-country transferred to or in a foreign country.(B)PrivacyIn implementing requirements for secondary chip security mechanisms under subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall prioritize confidentiality.(c)Enforcement authorityIn carrying out this section, the Secretary may—(1)verify, in a manner the Secretary determines appropriate, the ownership and location of a covered integrated circuit product that has been exported, reexported, or in-country transferred to or in a foreign country;(2)maintain a record of covered integrated circuit products and include in the record the location and current end-user of each such product; and(3)require any person who has been granted a license or other authorization under the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 to export, reexport, or in-country transfer a covered integrated circuit product to provide the information needed to maintain the record.(d)Annual assessment and report on new chip security mechanismsNot later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter for 3 years, the Secretary shall—(1)conduct an assessment of new chip security mechanisms that have been developed in the year preceding the date of the assessment; and(2)submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that includes—(A)a summary of the results of the assessment required by paragraph (1);(B)an evaluation of whether any of the new mechanisms assessed under paragraph (1) should be added to or replace any of the existing requirements for secondary chip security mechanisms developed under subsection (b)(1); and(C)any recommendations for modifications to relevant export controls to allow for more flexibility with respect to the countries to or in which covered integrated circuit products may be exported, reexported, or in-country transferred if the products include chip security mechanisms that meet the requirements developed under subsection (b)(1).
Tracker
The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.
- Introduced2025-05-15
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- Conference
- To President
- Became Law
CRS Summary
The summaries are the Congressional Research Service’s, one per stage. Read them in full.
Introduced in House May 15, 2025
hb3447/introduced-in-house.mdShown Here:
Introduced in House (05/15/2025)
Chip Security Act
This bill requires covered integrated circuit products (e.g., advanced computing chips) to incorporate certain security mechanisms.
Specifically, the bill directs the Department of Commerce to require any covered integrated circuit product to have chip security mechanisms that implement location verification before the product is exported, reexported, or in-country transferred to or in a foreign country.
Commerce must require any person that has received a license or other authorization under the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 to export, reexport, or in-country transfer a covered product to promptly report to Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security if the person obtains credible information that the product has been diverted away from its intended location or has been subjected to tampering.
Additionally, Commerce must conduct an assessment and report to Congress on whether additional chip security mechanisms should be adopted. If Commerce determines additional security measures are necessary, then Commerce must require any covered product to include the secondary chip security mechanisms before the product is exported, reexported, or in-country transferred to or in a foreign country.
The bill authorizes Commerce to take certain enforcement actions, such as verifying the ownership and location of a covered product that has been exported, reexported, or in-country transferred to or in a foreign country.
Commerce must, within two years of the bill's enactment and annually thereafter for three years, assess new chip security mechanisms and report to Congress.
Sponsors
Rep. Bill Huizenga (R) sponsors H.R. 3447, and 41 members have co-sponsored it, 7 of them from the day it was introduced.

Rep. · R–MI-4 · Sponsor
Introduced May 15, 2025

Rep. · R–AR-1 · Co-sponsor
Joined May 15, 2025 · Original

Rep. · D–IL-11 · Co-sponsor
Joined May 15, 2025 · Original

Rep. · D–NJ-5 · Co-sponsor
Joined May 15, 2025 · Original

Rep. · D–IL-8 · Co-sponsor
Joined May 15, 2025 · Original

Rep. · R–IL-16 · Co-sponsor
Joined May 15, 2025 · Original

Rep. · D–CA-36 · Co-sponsor
Joined May 15, 2025 · Original

Rep. · R–MI-2 · Co-sponsor
Joined May 15, 2025 · Original

Rep. · R–NY-17 · Co-sponsor
Joined Jun 6, 2025

Rep. · D–CA-32 · Co-sponsor
Joined Jun 6, 2025
Committees
H.R. 3447 went before 1 committee: Foreign Affairs.
Actions
H.R. 3447 has taken 4 actions since May 15, 2025, the latest on Mar 26, 2026.
| Chamber | Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 26, 2026 | House | Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session HeldForeign Affairs Committee | ||
Mar 26, 2026 | House | Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 42 - 0.Foreign Affairs Committee | ||
May 15, 2025 | House | Introduced in House | ||
May 15, 2025 | House | Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.Foreign Affairs Committee |
Votes
H.R. 3447 has not gone to a roll call.
Related bills
1 bill is related to H.R. 3447.
Titles
H.R. 3447 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.
- Chip Security Act — Display Title
- Chip Security Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
- To require the Secretary of Commerce to issue standards with respect to chip security mechanisms for integrated circuit products, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced
Cost estimate
The Congressional Budget Office has filed 1 estimate for H.R. 3447, the latest on May 1, 2026.
- H.R. 3447, Chip Security Act — 2026-05-01As ordered reported by the House Committee on Foreign Affairs on March 26, 2026
Lobbying
38 clients hired 41 firms and 324 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 3447 in 145 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.
Filed under Trade (domestic/foreign), Taxation/Internal Revenue Code, Science/Technology, Defense, Budget/Appropriations, Telecommunications, Immigration, Labor Issues/Antitrust/Workplace.
Clients
Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill. The 20 that filed most often, of 38.
| Client | Business | State | Firms | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORPORATION | Full stack computing infrastructure company with data center scale offerings | California | 2 | 11 | $360K |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | Semiconductor Company | Texas | 2 | 9 | $320K |
| SYNOPSYS, INC. | electronic design automation (EDA) and intellectual property (IP) | California | 2 | 9 | $240K |
| INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY COUNCIL | Advocacy and policy on behalf of innovation and technology companies | District of Columbia | 2 | 8 | $150K |
| CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A. | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 6 | — |
| SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 6 | — |
| TSMC ARIZONA | Semiconductor Manufacturing Company | Arizona | 2 | 5 | $250K |
| AMERICAN SECURITY FUND | Nonprofit advocating for artificial intelligence safety and biosecurity | Virginia | 1 | 5 | $150K |
| THE ALLIANCE FOR SECURE AI ACTION | Nonprofit organization that educates the public about the implications of advanced AI | District of Columbia | 2 | 5 | $60K |
| CENTER FOR AI SAFETY ACTION FUND, INC. | Nonprofit corporation with a social welfare purpose who engages in social advocacy efforts | California | 1 | 5 | — |
| DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 5 | — |
| FDD ACTION | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 5 | — |
| GOOGLE CLIENT SERVICES LLC | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 5 | — |
| INTEL CORPORATION | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 5 | — |
| SK AMERICAS, INC. | Semiconductors, Energy, Life Sciences | New York | 1 | 5 | — |
| ARM HOLDINGS PLC | Semiconductor and software design company. | — | 1 | 4 | $480K |
| DELL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. | Provides technology solutions, services and support. | District of Columbia | 1 | 4 | $320K |
| ARM INC | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 4 | — |
| HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE COMPANY & AFFILIATES | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 4 | — |
| LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. | Consumer electronics manufacturer | North Carolina | 1 | 4 | — |
Firms
Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.
Lobbyists
Named on the filings that cite the bill. The 20 named most often, of 324.
| Lobbyist | Firms | Clients | Filings |
|---|---|---|---|
| TYLER STEPHENS | 2 | 2 | 8 |
| ZACHARY ISAKOWITZ | 2 | 2 | 8 |
| DAVID SHAHOULIAN | 2 | 2 | 7 |
| NED FINKLE | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| STEWART BARBER | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| ABELARDO TORRES | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| ALEXA BRANSON | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| ALEXANDER PERKINS | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| ANDREA PORWOLL | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| ANNIE WOLF | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| ASHLEY GUM | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| BRADLEY WATTS | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| BRINCE MANNING | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| BROOKE MILLER | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| BRUCE MEHLMAN | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| CASSIA CARVALHO | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| CHAD WHITEMAN | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| CHANTEL SHEAKS | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| CHRISTOPHER CRENSHAW | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| CHRISTOPHER EYLER | 1 | 1 | 6 |
Filings
The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.
| Client | Registrant | Period | Reported | Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A. | CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A. | 2026 first_quarter | $19.8M | 1st Quarter - Amendme… |
| CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A. | CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A. | 2026 first_quarter | $19.8M | 1st Quarter - Report |
| CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A. | CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A. | 2025 second_quarter | $19.3M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A. | CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A. | 2025 fourth_quarter | $18M | 4th Quarter - Report |
| CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A. | CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A. | 2026 second_quarter | $17M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A. | CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE U.S.A. | 2025 third_quarter | $13.7M | 3rd Quarter - Report |
| CTIA-THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION | CTIA-THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION | 2025 third_quarter | $3.9M | 3rd Quarter - Report |
| GOOGLE CLIENT SERVICES LLC | GOOGLE CLIENT SERVICES LLC | 2026 second_quarter | $3.6M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| GOOGLE CLIENT SERVICES LLC | GOOGLE CLIENT SERVICES LLC | 2025 third_quarter | $3.6M | 3rd Quarter - Report |
| GOOGLE CLIENT SERVICES LLC | GOOGLE CLIENT SERVICES LLC | 2025 fourth_quarter | $3.4M | 4th Quarter - Report |
| GOOGLE CLIENT SERVICES LLC | GOOGLE CLIENT SERVICES LLC | 2025 second_quarter | $3.2M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| GOOGLE CLIENT SERVICES LLC | GOOGLE CLIENT SERVICES LLC | 2026 first_quarter | $2.9M | 1st Quarter - Report |
| ORACLE CORPORATION | ORACLE CORPORATION | 2026 second_quarter | $2M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| NVIDIA CORPORATION | NVIDIA CORPORATION | 2025 third_quarter | $2M | 3rd Quarter - Amendme… |
| NVIDIA CORPORATION | NVIDIA CORPORATION | 2025 third_quarter | $1.9M | 3rd Quarter - Report |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 2025 fourth_quarter | $1.7M | 4th Quarter - Report |
| DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC | DELL TECHNOLOGIES INC. | 2026 first_quarter | $1.6M | 1st Quarter - Report |
| SK AMERICAS, INC. | SK AMERICAS, INC. | 2026 first_quarter | $1.6M | 1st Quarter - Report |
| SK AMERICAS, INC. | SK AMERICAS, INC. | 2025 fourth_quarter | $1.6M | 4th Quarter - Amendme… |
| SK AMERICAS, INC. | SK AMERICAS, INC. | 2025 fourth_quarter | $1.6M | 4th Quarter - Report |
Classification
The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 3447 under Foreign Trade and International Finance, one of its 31 policy areas, and gives it 5 legislative subjects.
CRS Subjects
CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 3447’s is Foreign Trade and International Finance.
hr3447/policy-areas.txtLegislative Subjects
H.R. 3447 carries 5 of CRS’s legislative subjects, from Advanced technology and technological innovations to Trade restrictions.
hr3447/subjects.txtConstitutional authority
The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 3447, as entered in the Congressional Record.
[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 82 (Thursday, May 15, 2025)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Mr. HUIZENGA:H.R. 3447.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:Article I, Section 8, the Necessary and Proper Clause[Page H2105]
Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com
