Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

S. 1574

U.S. SenateIn Senate Committee

Summary

S. 1574, the Tribal Access to Electronic Evidence Act, was introduced in the Senate on May 1, 2025 by Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto (D) with 4 co-sponsors. It was referred to Judiciary, and last saw action on May 1, 2025: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.


Record

Text

S. 1574 has 4 co-sponsors.

sb1574/introduced-in-senate.txt
90 S1574 IS: Tribal Access to Electronic Evidence Act
U.S. Senate
2025-05-01
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
II 119th CONGRESS 1st Session S. 1574 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES May 1, 2025 Ms. Cortez Masto (for herself and Mr. Rounds ) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary A BILL
To amend the Stored Communications Act to include Tribal courts as courts of competent jurisdiction.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Tribal Access to Electronic Evidence Act .
2.
Tribal courts as courts of competent jurisdiction under Stored Communications Act
(a)
Definitions
Section 2711 of title 18, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (3)—
(A)
in subparagraph (B), by striking or at the end;
(B)
by redesignating subparagraph (C) as subparagraph (D); and
(C)
by inserting after subparagraph (B) the following:
(C)
a Tribal court; or
; and
(2)
by striking paragraph (4) and inserting the following:
(4)
the term governmental entity means a department or agency of—
(A)
the United States;
(B)
any State or political subdivision thereof; or
(C)
any Indian Tribe or political subdivision thereof;
(5)
the term Indian Tribe means any Indian or Alaska Native tribe, band, nation, pueblo, village, community, component band, or component reservation individually identified (including parenthetically) on the most recent list published by the Secretary of the Interior under section 104 of the Federally Recognized Indian Tribe List Act of 1994 ( 25 U.S.C. 5131 ); and
(6)
the term Tribal court means a court of general criminal jurisdiction of an Indian Tribe authorized by the law of that Indian Tribe to issue search warrants.
.
(b)
Required disclosure of customer communications or records
Section 2703 of title 18, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in subsection (a), by striking the first sentence and inserting the following:
(1)
In storage 180 days or less
A governmental entity may require the disclosure by a provider of electronic communication service of the contents of a wire or electronic communication, that is in electronic storage in an electronic communications system for 180 days or less, only pursuant to a warrant issued by a court of competent jurisdiction—
(A)
issued using the procedures described in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure;
(B)
in the case of a State court, issued using State warrant procedures;
(C)
in the case of a court-martial or other proceeding under chapter 47 of title 10 (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), issued under section 846 of that title, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the President); or
(D)
in the case of a Tribal court, issued using the warrant procedures described in section 202(a)(2) of Public Law 90–284 (commonly known as the Indian Civil Rights Act of 1968 ) ( 25 U.S.C. 1302(a)(2) ).
(2)
In storage more than 180 days
;
(2)
in subsection (b)(1)—
(A)
in subparagraph (A), by striking using the procedures described in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and all that follows through prescribed by the President) and inserting in accordance with subsection (a)(1) ; and
(B)
in subparagraph (B)(i), by inserting , Tribal, after a Federal each place it appears; and
(3)
in subsection (c)—
(A)
in paragraph (1)(A), by striking using the procedures described in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and all that follows through prescribed by the President) and inserting in accordance with subsection (a)(1) ; and
(B)
in paragraph (2), in the undesignated matter following subparagraph (F), by inserting , Tribal, after a Federal each place it appears.
(c)
Delayed notice
Section 2705(a)(1)(B) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting , Tribal, after a Federal each place it appears.
(d)
Civil action
Section 2707(g) of title 18, United States Code, is amended, in the second sentence, by inserting Tribal, after State, .
(e)
Wrongful disclosure of video tape rental or sale records
Section 2710 of title 18, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in subsection (b)(2)(C), by inserting after an equivalent State warrant, the following: a warrant issued by a Tribal court using the warrant procedures described in section 202(a)(2) of Public Law 90–284 (commonly known as the Indian Civil Rights Act of 1968 ) ( 25 U.S.C. 1302(a)(2) ), ; and
(2)
in subsection (d), by striking or a political subdivision of a State and inserting a political subdivision of a State, or an Indian Tribe .

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2025-05-01
  2. Passed Senate
  3. Passed House
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

CRS Summary

The summaries are the Congressional Research Service’s, one per stage. Read them in full.

Introduced in Senate May 1, 2025

sb1574/introduced-in-senate.md

Shown Here:
Introduced in Senate (05/01/2025)

Tribal Access to Electronic Evidence Act

This bill allows tribal courts to execute warrants for electronic material.

The Stored Communications Act (SCA) generally prohibits providers of electronic communication services (e.g., cell phone providers, email providers, or social media platforms) and remote computing services (e.g., cloud computing providers) from knowingly disclosing stored electronic communications or records (e.g., emails) or information pertaining to customers or subscribers. However, the SCA authorizes governmental entities to compel service providers to disclose electronic communication information through a court-issued warrant, a court order, or an administrative subpoena.

This bill gives tribal courts the same authority as other governmental entities (e.g., state courts) to compel service providers to disclose stored electronic communication information through court-issued warrants, court orders, or administrative subpoenas.

Sponsors

Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto (D) sponsors S. 1574, and 4 members have co-sponsored it, 1 of them from the day it was introduced.

Committees

S. 1574 went before 1 committee: Judiciary.

Judiciary
Judiciary
Referred To · May 1, 2025

Actions

S. 1574 has taken 2 actions since May 1, 2025.

ChamberAction
May 1, 2025
Senate
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.Judiciary Committee
May 1, 2025
Introduced in Senate

Votes

S. 1574 has not gone to a roll call.

2 bills are related to S. 1574.

Titles

S. 1574 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.

  • Tribal Access to Electronic Evidence Act — Display Title
  • A bill to amend the Stored Communications Act to include Tribal courts as courts of competent jurisdiction. — Official Title as Introduced
  • Tribal Access to Electronic Evidence Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced

Lobbying

3 clients hired 3 firms and 11 registered lobbyists who named S. 1574 in 8 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Budget/Appropriations, Health Issues, Indian/Native American Affairs, Medicare/Medicaid, Veterans, Pharmacy.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
THE CONFEDERATED SALISH AND KOOTENAI TRIBESTribal GovernmentMontana14$120K
AMERICAN COUNSELING ASSOCIATIONNon-profit membership organization representing professional counselorsVirginia13$130K
EXACT CARE PHARMACYExactCare helps people with an easier, safer way to take multiple medications to manage chOhio11

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill.

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
AMERICAN COUNSELING ASSOCIATIONARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP2025 third_quarter$50K3rd Quarter - Report
AMERICAN COUNSELING ASSOCIATIONARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP2025 second_quarter$40K2nd Quarter - Report
AMERICAN COUNSELING ASSOCIATIONARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP2025 first_quarter$40K1st Quarter - Report
THE CONFEDERATED SALISH AND KOOTENAI TRIBESSONOSKY, CHAMBERS, SACHSE, ENDRESON & PERRY, LLP2026 second_quarter$30K2nd Quarter - Report
THE CONFEDERATED SALISH AND KOOTENAI TRIBESSONOSKY, CHAMBERS, SACHSE, ENDRESON & PERRY, LLP2026 first_quarter$30K1st Quarter - Report
THE CONFEDERATED SALISH AND KOOTENAI TRIBESSONOSKY, CHAMBERS, SACHSE, ENDRESON & PERRY, LLP2025 fourth_quarter$30K4th Quarter - Report
THE CONFEDERATED SALISH AND KOOTENAI TRIBESSONOSKY, CHAMBERS, SACHSE, ENDRESON & PERRY, LLP2025 third_quarter$30K3rd Quarter - Report
EXACT CARE PHARMACYHEALTHSPERIEN2025 first_quarter1st Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files S. 1574 under Native Americans, one of its 31 policy areas.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; S. 1574’s is Native Americans.

s1574/policy-areas.txt
Native AmericansAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com