- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- Administration
- Agriculture
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry
- Appropriations
- Armed Services
- Banking, Housing, And Urban Affairs
- Budget
- Commerce, Science, And Transportation
- Education and Workforce
- Energy And Commerce
- Energy And Natural Resources
- Environment And Public Works
- Ethics
- Finance
- Financial Services
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Relations
- Health, Education, Labor, And Pensions
- Homeland Security
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…
- Indian Affairs
- Indian and Insular Affairs
- Intelligence
- Judiciary
- Natural Resources
- Oversight And Government Reform
- Permanent Select Intelligence
- Rules
- Rules And Administration
- Science, Space, And Technology
- Select Intelligence
- Small Business
- Small Business And Entrepreneurship
- Subcommittee on Aviation
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…
- Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…
- Subcommittee on Federal Lands
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…
- Subcommittee on Health
- Subcommittee on Highways and Transit
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…
- Transportation And Infrastructure
- Veterans' Affairs
- Ways And Means

H.R. 1929
U.S. House•In House Committee
Summary
H.R. 1929, the JUDGES Act of 2025, was introduced in the House on Mar 6, 2025 by Rep. Henry Johnson (D) with 3 co-sponsors. It was referred to Judiciary, and last saw action on Mar 6, 2025: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Record
Text
H.R. 1929 has 3 co-sponsors.
hb1929/introduced-in-house.txt119 HR 1929 IH: Judicial Understaffing Delays Getting Emergencies Solved Act of 2025U.S. House of Representatives2025-03-06text/xmlENPursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1929 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES March 6, 2025 Mr. Johnson of Georgia (for himself, Mr. Raskin , and Mr. Nadler ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary A BILLTo authorize additional district judges for the district courts and convert temporary judgeships.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Judicial Understaffing Delays Getting Emergencies Solved Act of 2025 or the JUDGES Act of 2025 .2.FindingsCongress finds the following:(1)Article III of the Constitution of the United States gives Congress the power to establish judgeships in the district courts of the United States.(2)Congress has not created a new district court judgeship since 2003 and has not enacted comprehensive judgeship legislation since 1990.(3)This represents the longest period of time since district courts of the United States were established in 1789 that Congress has not authorized any new permanent district court judgeships.(4)By the end of fiscal year 2022, filings in the district courts of the United States had increased by 30 percent since the last comprehensive judgeship legislation.(5)As of March 31, 2023, there were 686,797 pending cases in the district courts of the United States, with an average of 491 weighted case filings per judgeship over a 12-month period.(6)To deal with increased filings in the district courts of the United States, the Judicial Conference of the United States requested the creation of 66 new district court judgeships in its 2023 report.3.Additional district judges for the district courts(a)Additional judgeships(1)2029(A)In generalThe President shall appoint, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate—(i)1 additional district judge for the central district of California;(ii)1 additional district judge for the eastern district of California;(iii)1 additional district judge for the northern district of California;(iv)1 additional district judge for the district of Delaware;(v)1 additional district judge for the middle district of Florida;(vi)1 additional district judge for the southern district of Indiana;(vii)1 additional district judge for the northern district of Iowa;(viii)1 additional district judge for the district of New Jersey;(ix)1 additional district judge for the southern district of New York;(x)1 additional district judge for the eastern district of Texas; and(xi)1 additional district judge for the southern district of Texas.(B)TablesThe table contained in section 133(a) of title 28, United States Code, is amended—(i)by striking the items relating to California and inserting the following:California: Northern 15 Eastern 7 Central 28 Southern 13 ;(ii)by striking the item relating to Delaware and inserting the following:Delaware 5 ;(iii)by striking the items relating to Florida and inserting the following:Florida: Northern 4 Middle 16 Southern 17 ;(iv)by striking the items relating to Indiana and inserting the following:Indiana: Northern 5 Southern 6 ;(v)by striking the items relating to Iowa and inserting the following:Iowa: Northern 3 Southern 3 ;(vi)by striking the item relating to New Jersey and inserting the following:New Jersey 18 ;(vii)by striking the items relating to New York and inserting the following:New York: Northern 5 Southern 29 Eastern 15 Western 4 ; and(viii)by striking the items relating to Texas and inserting the following:Texas: Northern 12 Southern 20 Eastern 8 Western 13 .(C)Effective dateThis paragraph shall take effect on January 21, 2029.(2)2031(A)In generalThe President shall appoint, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate—(i)1 additional district judge for the district of Arizona;(ii)2 additional district judges for the central district of California;(iii)1 additional district judge for the eastern district of California;(iv)1 additional district judge for the northern district of California;(v)1 additional district judge for the middle district of Florida;(vi)1 additional district judge for the southern district of Florida;(vii)1 additional district judge for the northern district of Georgia;(viii)1 additional district judge for the district of Idaho;(ix)1 additional district judge for the northern district of Texas; and(x)1 additional district judge for the southern district of Texas.(B)TablesThe table contained in section 133(a) of title 28, United States Code, as amended by paragraph (1) of this subsection, is amended—(i)by striking the item relating to Arizona and inserting the following:Arizona 13 ;(ii)by striking the items relating to California and inserting the following:California: Northern 16 Eastern 8 Central 30 Southern 13 ;(iii)by striking the items relating to Florida and inserting the following:Florida: Northern 4 Middle 17 Southern 18 ;(iv)by striking the items relating to Georgia and inserting the following:Georgia: Northern 12 Middle 4 Southern 3 ;(v)by striking the item relating to Idaho and inserting the following:Idaho 3 ; and(vi)by striking the items relating to Texas and inserting the following:Texas: Northern 13 Southern 21 Eastern 8 Western 13 .(C)Effective dateThis paragraph shall take effect on January 21, 2031.(3)2033(A)In generalThe President shall appoint, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate—(i)1 additional district judge for the central district of California;(ii)1 additional district judge for the eastern district of California;(iii)1 additional district judge for the northern district of California;(iv)1 additional district judge for the district of Colorado;(v)1 additional district judge for the district of Delaware;(vi)1 additional district judge for the district of Nebraska;(vii)1 additional district judge for the eastern district of New York;(viii)1 additional district judge for the northern district of Oklahoma;(ix)1 additional district judge for the eastern district of Texas;(x)1 additional district judge for the southern district of Texas; and(xi)1 additional district judge for the western district of Texas.(B)TablesThe table contained in section 133(a) of title 28, United States Code, as amended by paragraph (2) of this subsection, is amended—(i)by striking the items relating to California and inserting the following:California: Northern 17 Eastern 9 Central 31 Southern 13 ;(ii)by striking the item relating to Colorado and inserting the following:Colorado 8 ;(iii)by striking the item relating to Delaware and inserting the following:Delaware 6 ;(iv)by striking the item relating to Nebraska and inserting the following:Nebraska 4 ;(v)by striking the items relating to New York and inserting the following:New York: Northern 5 Southern 29 Eastern 16 Western 4 ;(vi)by striking the items relating to Oklahoma and inserting the following:Oklahoma: Northern 4 Eastern 1 Western 6 Northern, Eastern, and Western 1 ; and(vii)by striking the items relating to Texas and inserting the following:Texas: Northern 13 Southern 22 Eastern 9 Western 14 .(C)Effective dateThis paragraph shall take effect on January 21, 2033.(4)2035(A)In generalThe President shall appoint, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate—(i)1 additional district judge for the district of Arizona;(ii)1 additional district judge for the central district of California;(iii)1 additional district judge for the eastern district of California;(iv)1 additional district judge for the northern district of California;(v)1 additional district judge for the southern district of California;(vi)1 additional district judge for the middle district of Florida;(vii)1 additional district judge for the southern district of Florida;(viii)1 additional district judge for the district of New Jersey;(ix)1 additional district judge for the western district of New York; and(x)2 additional district judges for the western district of Texas.(B)TablesThe table contained in section 133(a) of title 28, United States Code, as amended by paragraph (3) of this subsection, is amended—(i)by striking the item relating to Arizona and inserting the following:Arizona 14 ;(ii)by striking the items relating to California and inserting the following:California: Northern 18 Eastern 10 Central 32 Southern 14 ;(iii)by striking the items relating to Florida and inserting the following:Florida: Northern 4 Middle 18 Southern 19 ;(iv)by striking the item relating to New Jersey and inserting the following:New Jersey 19 ;(v)by striking the items relating to New York and inserting the following:New York: Northern 5 Southern 29 Eastern 16 Western 5 ; and(vi)by striking the items relating to Texas and inserting the following:Texas: Northern 13 Southern 22 Eastern 9 Western 16 .(C)Effective dateThis paragraph shall take effect on January 21, 2035.(5)2037(A)In generalThe President shall appoint, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate—(i)2 additional district judges for the central district of California;(ii)1 additional district judge for the northern district of California;(iii)1 additional district judge for the district of Colorado;(iv)1 additional district judge for the middle district of Florida;(v)1 additional district judge for the northern district of Florida;(vi)1 additional district judge for the northern district of Georgia;(vii)1 additional district judge for the southern district of New York;(viii)1 additional district judge for the eastern district of Oklahoma;(ix)1 additional district judge for the southern district of Texas; and(x)1 additional district judge for the western district of Texas.(B)TablesThe table contained in section 133(a) of title 28, United States Code, as amended by paragraph (4) of this subsection, is amended—(i)by striking the items relating to California and inserting the following:California: Northern 19 Eastern 10 Central 34 Southern 14 ;(ii)by striking the item relating to Colorado and inserting the following:Colorado 9 ;(iii)by striking the items relating to Florida and inserting the following:Florida: Northern 5 Middle 19 Southern 19 ;(iv)by striking the items relating to Georgia and inserting the following:Georgia: Northern 13 Middle 4 Southern 3 ;(v)by striking the items relating to New York and inserting the following:New York: Northern 5 Southern 30 Eastern 16 Western 5 ;(vi)by striking the items relating to Oklahoma and inserting the following:Oklahoma: Northern 4 Eastern 2 Western 6 Northern, Eastern, and Western 1 ; and(vii)by striking the items relating to Texas and inserting the following:Texas: Northern 13 Southern 23 Eastern 9 Western 17 .(C)Effective dateThis paragraph shall take effect on January 21, 2037.(6)2039(A)In generalThe President shall appoint, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate—(i)2 additional district judges for the central district of California;(ii)1 additional district judge for the northern district of California;(iii)1 additional district judge for the southern district of California;(iv)1 additional district judge for the middle district of Florida;(v)1 additional district judge for the southern district of Florida;(vi)1 additional district judge for the district of New Jersey;(vii)1 additional district judge for the eastern district of New York; and(viii)2 additional district judges for the western district of Texas.(B)TablesThe table contained in section 133(a) of title 28, United States Code, as amended by paragraph (5) of this subsection, is amended—(i)by striking the items relating to California and inserting the following:California: Northern 20 Eastern 10 Central 36 Southern 15 ;(ii)by striking the items relating to Florida and inserting the following:Florida: Northern 5 Middle 20 Southern 20 ;(iii)by striking the item relating to New Jersey and inserting the following:New Jersey 20 ;(iv)by striking the items relating to New York and inserting the following:New York: Northern 5 Southern 30 Eastern 17 Western 5 ; and(v)by striking the items relating to Texas and inserting the following:Texas: Northern 13 Southern 23 Eastern 9 Western 19 .(C)Effective dateThis paragraph shall take effect on January 21, 2039.(b)Temporary judgeships(1)In generalThe President shall appoint, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, 1 additional district judge for the eastern district of Oklahoma.(2)Vacancies not filledThe first vacancy in the office of district judge in each of the offices of district judge authorized by this subsection, occurring 5 years or more after the confirmation date of the judge named to fill the temporary district judgeship created in the applicable district by this subsection, shall not be filled.(3)Effective dateThis subsection shall take effect on January 21, 2029.(c)Authorization of appropriations(1)In generalThere is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section and the amendments made by this section—(A)for each of fiscal years 2029 and 2030, $12,965,330;(B)for each of fiscal years 2031 and 2032, $23,152,375;(C)for each of fiscal years 2033 and 2034, $32,413,325;(D)for each of fiscal years 2035 and 2036, $42,600,370;(E)for each of fiscal years 2037 and 2038, $51,861,320; and(F)for fiscal year 2039 and each fiscal year thereafter, $61,122,270.(2)Inflation adjustmentFor each fiscal year described in paragraph (1), the amount authorized to be appropriated for such fiscal year shall be increased by the percentage by which—(A)the Consumer Price Index for the previous fiscal year, exceeds(B)the Consumer Price Index for the fiscal year preceding the fiscal year described in subparagraph (A).(3)DefinitionIn this subsection, the term Consumer Price Index means the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (all items, United States city average), published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the Department of Labor.4.Organization of Texas district courtsSection 124(b)(2) of title 28, United States Code, is amended, in the matter preceding paragraph (3), by inserting and College Station before the period at the end.5.Organization of California district courtsSection 84(d) of title 28, United States Code, is amended by inserting and El Centro after at San Diego .6.GAO reports(a)Judicial caseloadsNot later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and make publicly available reports—(1)evaluating—(A)the accuracy and objectiveness of case-related workload measures and methodologies used by the Administrative Office of the United States Courts for district courts of the United States and courts of appeals of the United States;(B)the impact of non-case-related activities of judges of the district courts of the United States and courts of appeals of the United States on judicial caseloads; and(C)the effectiveness and efficiency of the policies of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts regarding senior judges; and(2)providing any recommendations of the Comptroller General with respect to the matters described in paragraph (1).(b)Detention spaceThe Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives a report on an assessment of—(1)a determination of the needs of Federal agencies for detention space;(2)efforts by Federal agencies to acquire detention space; and(3)any challenges in determining and acquiring detention space.7.Public accessibility of the article III judgeship recommendations of the Judicial Conference of the United States report(a)In generalThe Administrative Office of the United States Courts, in consultation with the Judicial Conference of the United States, shall make publicly available on their website, free of charge, the biennial report entitled Article III Judgeship Recommendations of the Judicial Conference of the United States .(b)ContentsThe report described in subsection (a) should be released not less frequently than biennially and contain the summaries and all related appendixes supporting the judgeship recommendations of the Judicial Conference of the United States, including—(1)the process used by the Judicial Conference in developing the recommendations;(2)any caseload and methodology changes;(3)judgeship surveys with recommendations; and(4)specific information about each court for which the Judicial Conference recommends additional judgeships.(c)Submission to CongressThe Administrative Office of the United States Courts shall submit to the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives copies of the report described in subsection (a).
Tracker
The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.
- Introduced2025-03-06
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- Conference
- To President
- Became Law
CRS Summary
The summaries are the Congressional Research Service’s, one per stage. Read them in full.
Introduced in House Mar 6, 2025
hb1929/introduced-in-house.mdShown Here:
Introduced in House (03/06/2025)
Judicial Understaffing Delays Getting Emergencies Solved Act of 2025 or the JUDGES Act of 2025
This bill creates 64 U.S. district court judgeships—63 permanent and 1 temporary—and expands the jurisdictional coverage of two district courts.
Specifically, the bill creates 63 new permanent judgeships across 14 states over a 10-year period beginning in 2029. The state and total number of judgeships added over the 10-year period are as follows:
- Arizona (1),
- California (20),
- Colorado (2),
- Delaware (2),
- Florida (9),
- Georgia (2),
- Idaho (1),
- Indiana (1),
- Iowa (1),
- Nebraska (1),
- New Jersey (3),
- New York (5),
- Oklahoma (2), and
- Texas (13).
Additionally, the bill creates one temporary judgeship in the Eastern District of Oklahoma in 2029.
Finally, the bill adds locations where court must be held in two district courts—one in California and one in Texas. Specifically, the bill adds College Station to the list of places where court must be held in the Houston Division of the Southern District of Texas. Also, the bill adds El Centro to the list of places where court must be held in the Southern District of California.
The bill directs the Government Accountability Office to submit reports to Congress on judicial caseloads and detention space.
The bill also directs the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts to make available on its website the biennial report by the Judicial Conference of the United States on judgeship recommendations.
Sponsors
Rep. Henry Johnson (D) sponsors H.R. 1929, and 3 members have co-sponsored it, 2 of them from the day it was introduced.
Committees
H.R. 1929 went before 1 committee: Judiciary.
Actions
H.R. 1929 has taken 2 actions since Mar 6, 2025.
| Chamber | Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 6, 2025 | House | Introduced in House | ||
Mar 6, 2025 | House | Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.Judiciary Committee |
Votes
H.R. 1929 has not gone to a roll call.
Related bills
3 bills are related to H.R. 1929.
HR 1702JUDGES Act of 2025Mar 5, 2025 · Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 16 - 11. · Related bill
HR 625LACA of 2026Aug 27, 2026 · Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 685. · Related bill
S 32LACAAug 31, 2026 · Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection. · Related billTitles
H.R. 1929 goes by 4 titles, 2 of them short titles.
- JUDGES Act of 2025 — Display Title
- JUDGES Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
- Judicial Understaffing Delays Getting Emergencies Solved Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
- To authorize additional district judges for the district courts and convert temporary judgeships. — Official Title as Introduced
Lobbying
5 clients hired 5 firms and 53 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 1929 in 20 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.
Filed under Government Issues, Budget/Appropriations, Natural Resources, Taxation/Internal Revenue Code, Financial Institutions/Investments/Securities, Science/Technology, Automotive Industry, Consumer Issues/Safety/Products.
Clients
Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.
| Client | Business | State | Firms | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 7 | — |
| FEDERAL BAR ASSOCIATION | National bar association focused on the federal legal system | Virginia | 1 | 6 | $360K |
| LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 4 | — |
| EARTHJUSTICE ACTION | nonprofit advocacy organization | District of Columbia | 1 | 2 | — |
| REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 1 | — |
Firms
Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.
| Registrant | Clients | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE | 1 | 7 | — |
| ARENTFOX SCHIFF LLP | 1 | 6 | $360K |
| LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS | 1 | 4 | — |
| EARTHJUSTICE ACTION | 1 | 2 | — |
| REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL | 1 | 1 | — |
Lobbyists
Named on the filings that cite the bill. The 20 named most often, of 53.
| Lobbyist | Firms | Clients | Filings |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHARLOTTE MCBIRNEY | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| DANIEL HINKLE | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| HEATHER SAGER | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| JULIA DUNCAN | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| LINDA LIPSEN | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| SUSAN STEINMAN | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| VICTOR DIAZ | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| CISSY JACKSON | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| DAN RENBERG | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| JUSTICE ESTRADA | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| STARSHINE CHUN | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| THEODORE NASTASE | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| BYRON DORGAN | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| AMERICA FITZPATRICK | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| DARIEN DAVIS | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| DAVID SHADBURN | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| DOUGLAS LINDNER | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| ELIANA KOSOVA | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| ELIZABETH FARRAR | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| FRANCESCA GOVERNALI | 1 | 1 | 4 |
Filings
The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.
| Client | Registrant | Period | Reported | Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE | AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE | 2026 second_quarter | $1.8M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE | AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE | 2025 fourth_quarter | $1.8M | 4th Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE | AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE | 2026 first_quarter | $1.5M | 1st Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE | AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE | 2025 first_quarter | $1.4M | 1st Quarter - Amendme… |
| AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE | AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE | 2025 first_quarter | $1.4M | 1st Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE | AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE | 2025 second_quarter | $1.4M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE | AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE | 2025 third_quarter | $1.4M | 3rd Quarter - Report |
| LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS | LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS | 2025 second_quarter | $290K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS | LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS | 2025 fourth_quarter | $280K | 4th Quarter - Report |
| LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS | LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS | 2025 third_quarter | $190K | 3rd Quarter - Report |
| EARTHJUSTICE ACTION | EARTHJUSTICE ACTION | 2025 second_quarter | $179.6K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS | LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS | 2025 first_quarter | $170K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| EARTHJUSTICE ACTION | EARTHJUSTICE ACTION | 2025 first_quarter | $92.6K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| FEDERAL BAR ASSOCIATION | ARENTFOX SCHIFF LLP | 2026 second_quarter | $60K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| FEDERAL BAR ASSOCIATION | ARENTFOX SCHIFF LLP | 2026 first_quarter | $60K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| FEDERAL BAR ASSOCIATION | ARENTFOX SCHIFF LLP | 2025 fourth_quarter | $60K | 4th Quarter - Report |
| FEDERAL BAR ASSOCIATION | ARENTFOX SCHIFF LLP | 2025 third_quarter | $60K | 3rd Quarter - Report |
| FEDERAL BAR ASSOCIATION | ARENTFOX SCHIFF LLP | 2025 second_quarter | $60K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| FEDERAL BAR ASSOCIATION | ARENTFOX SCHIFF LLP | 2025 first_quarter | $60K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL | REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL | 2025 first_quarter | $50K | 1st Quarter - Report |
Classification
The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 1929 under Law, one of its 31 policy areas, and gives it 20 legislative subjects.
CRS Subjects
CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 1929’s is Law.
hr1929/policy-areas.txtLegislative Subjects
H.R. 1929 carries 20 of CRS’s legislative subjects, from Arizona to Utah.
hr1929/subjects.txtConstitutional authority
The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 1929, as entered in the Congressional Record.
[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 43 (Thursday, March 6, 2025)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia:H.R. 1929.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:Article I Section 1.[Page H1040]
Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com