- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- Administration
- Agriculture
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry
- Appropriations
- Armed Services
- Banking, Housing, And Urban Affairs
- Budget
- Commerce, Science, And Transportation
- Education and Workforce
- Energy And Commerce
- Energy And Natural Resources
- Environment And Public Works
- Ethics
- Finance
- Financial Services
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Relations
- Health, Education, Labor, And Pensions
- Homeland Security
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…
- Indian Affairs
- Indian and Insular Affairs
- Intelligence
- Judiciary
- Natural Resources
- Oversight And Government Reform
- Permanent Select Intelligence
- Rules
- Rules And Administration
- Science, Space, And Technology
- Select Intelligence
- Small Business
- Small Business And Entrepreneurship
- Subcommittee on Aviation
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…
- Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…
- Subcommittee on Federal Lands
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…
- Subcommittee on Health
- Subcommittee on Highways and Transit
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…
- Transportation And Infrastructure
- Veterans' Affairs
- Ways And Means

H.R. 1788
U.S. House•In House Committee
Summary
H.R. 1788, the Fair Grocery Pricing Act, was introduced in the House on Mar 3, 2025 by Rep. Maxwell Frost (D) with 17 co-sponsors. It was referred to Judiciary, and last saw action on Mar 3, 2025: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Record
Text
H.R. 1788 has 17 co-sponsors.
hb1788/introduced-in-house.txt119 HR 1788 IH: Fair Grocery Pricing ActU.S. House of Representatives2025-03-03text/xmlENPursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1788 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES March 3, 2025 Mr. Frost introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary A BILLTo prohibit the use of algorithmic systems by food producers to artificially inflate the price or reduce the supply of their foods.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Fair Grocery Pricing Act .2.DefinitionsIn this Act:(1)ChairThe term Chair means the Chair of the Commission.(2)CommissionThe term Commission means the Federal Trade Commission.(3)Consciously parallel pricing coordinationThe term consciously parallel pricing coordination means a tacit agreement between 2 or more food producers to raise, lower, change, maintain, or manipulate pricing for the purchase or sale of reasonably interchangeable food products.(4)Coordinating functionThe term coordinating function means—(A)collecting historical or contemporaneous food product prices or supply levels from 2 or more food producers;(B)analyzing or processing of the information described in subparagraph (A) using a system, software, or process that uses computation, including by using that information to train an algorithm; and(C)recommending food prices, supply or output, or other commercial term to a food producer.(5)CoordinatorThe term coordinator means any person that operates a software or data analytics service that performs a coordinating function for any food producer, including a food producer performing a coordinating function for their own benefit.(6)FoodThe term food has the meaning given the term in the 321st section of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act ( 21 U.S.C. 321 ).(7)Food producerThe term food producer means any individual, corporation, or entity engaged in the manufacturing, processing, or production of food products for commercial distribution.(8)PersonThe term person has the meaning given the term in the 1st section of the Clayton Act ( 15 U.S.C. 12 ).(9)Pre-dispute arbitration agreementThe term pre-dispute arbitration agreement means an agreement between 2 or more parties to arbitrate a dispute between the parties that is made before any dispute has arisen.(10)Pre-dispute joint action waiverThe term pre-dispute joint action waiver means an agreement between 2 or more parties, which may be part of a pre-dispute arbitration agreement, that—(A)would prohibit or waive the right of a party to participate in a joint, class, or collective action in a judicial, arbitral, administrative, or other forum relating to a dispute between parties; and(B)is made before any dispute has arisen.(11)StateThe term State means any of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any territory or possession of the United States.3.Unlawful conduct(a)In general(1)Contract or conspiracy in restraint of tradeIt is unlawful for a food producer, in or affecting commerce, or any agent or subcontractor thereof, to subscribe to, contract with, or otherwise exchange anything of value or use in return for the services of a coordinator, and such action shall be deemed to be a per se violation of the Sherman Act ( 15 U.S.C. 1 et seq. ).(2)FacilitationIt is unlawful for a coordinator, in or affecting commerce, to facilitate an agreement among food producers to not compete with respect to food prices, supply or output, or other commercial term, including by performing a coordinating function.4.Enforcement(a)Enforcement(1)In general(A)Federal trade commissionThe Commission shall enforce this Act in the same manner, by the same means, and with the same jurisdiction, powers, and duties as though all applicable terms of the Federal Trade Commission Act ( 15 U.S.C. 41 et seq. ) were incorporated into and made a part of this Act.(B)Attorney generalThe Attorney General shall enforce this Act in the same manner, by the same means, and with the same jurisdiction, powers, and duties as though all applicable terms of the Sherman Act ( 15 U.S.C. 1 et seq. ), Clayton Act ( 15 U.S.C. 12 et seq. ), and Antitrust Civil Process Act ( 15 U.S.C. 1311 et seq. ) were incorporated into and made a part of this Act.(C)State attorneys generalAny attorney general of a State shall enforce this Act in the same manner, by the same means, and with the same jurisdiction, powers, and duties as though all applicable terms of the Sherman Act ( 15 U.S.C. 1 et seq. ) and the Clayton Act ( 15 U.S.C. 12 et seq. ) were incorporated into and made a part of this Act.(2)Unfair methods of competitionA violation of this Act shall also constitute an unfair method of competition under section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act ( 15 U.S.C. 45 ).(3)Independent litigation authorityIf the Commission has reason to believe that a person violated this Act, the Commission may commence a civil action, in its own name by any of its attorneys designated by it for such purpose, to recover a civil penalty and seek other appropriate relief in any district court of the United States.(4)Standards of pleadingIn a civil action under this subsection, a complaint—(A)plausibly pleads a violation of section 1 or 3(a) of the Sherman Act ( 15 U.S.C. 1 , 3(a)) if the complaint contains factual allegations, including allegations of consciously parallel pricing coordination, demonstrating that the existence of a contract, or conspiracy in restraint of trade or commerce is among the realm of plausible possibilities; and(B)need not allege facts tending to exclude the possibility of independent action.(b)Civil actions by injured persons(1)Civil action authorizedAny person who is aggrieved by a violation of this Act may bring a civil action in an appropriate district court of the United States, without respect to the amount in controversy, to recover an amount described in paragraph (2).(2)Award amount(A)In generalThe court shall award to the plaintiff threefold the damages sustained by the plaintiff and the reasonable cost of litigation, including a reasonable attorney fee.(B)Interest on damagesPursuant to a motion by the plaintiff promptly made, the court may award simple interest on actual damages sustained by the plaintiff for the period beginning on the date of service of the pleading of the plaintiff setting forth a claim under this Act and ending on the date of judgment, or for any shorter period therein.(3)Invalidity of pre-dispute arbitration agreements and pre-dispute joint action waiversAt the election of the plaintiff in an action authorized under paragraph (1), a pre-dispute arbitration agreement or pre-dispute joint action waiver relating to a violation of this Act shall be invalid or unenforceable.5.Relationship to Federal antitrust lawsNothing in this Act, or any amendment made by this Act, shall be construed to modify, impair, or supersede the operation of any of the antitrust laws6.Relationship to State and local lawsNothing in this Act may be construed to preempt any State, Tribal, city, or local law, regulation, or ordinance that supplements this Act.7.SeverabilityIf any provision of this Act, or the application of such a provision to any person or circumstance, is held to be unconstitutional, the remaining provisions of this Act, and the application of such provisions to any person or circumstance shall not be affected thereby.
Tracker
The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.
- Introduced2025-03-03
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- Conference
- To President
- Became Law
To prohibit the use of algorithmic systems by food producers to artificially inflate the price or reduce the supply of their foods.
Sponsors
Rep. Maxwell Frost (D) sponsors H.R. 1788, and 17 members have co-sponsored it.

Rep. · D–FL-10 · Sponsor
Introduced Mar 3, 2025

Rep. · D–DC-0 · Co-sponsor
Joined Mar 4, 2025

Rep. · D–FL-20 · Co-sponsor
Joined Mar 4, 2025

Rep. · D–LA-6 · Co-sponsor
Joined Mar 4, 2025

Rep. · D–MA-2 · Co-sponsor
Joined Mar 4, 2025

Rep. · D–MI-12 · Co-sponsor
Joined Mar 4, 2025

Rep. · D–IL-14 · Co-sponsor
Joined Mar 6, 2025

Rep. · D–CA-43 · Co-sponsor
Joined Mar 6, 2025

Rep. · D–WI-2 · Co-sponsor
Joined Mar 11, 2025

Rep. · D–IN-7 · Co-sponsor
Joined Mar 24, 2025
Committees
H.R. 1788 went before 1 committee: Judiciary.
Actions
H.R. 1788 has taken 2 actions since Mar 3, 2025.
| Chamber | Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 3, 2025 | House | Introduced in House | ||
Mar 3, 2025 | House | Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.Judiciary Committee |
Votes
H.R. 1788 has not gone to a roll call.
Titles
H.R. 1788 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.
- Fair Grocery Pricing Act — Display Title
- Fair Grocery Pricing Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
- To prohibit the use of algorithmic systems by food producers to artificially inflate the price or reduce the supply of their foods. — Official Title as Introduced
Lobbying
1 client hired 1 firm and 1 registered lobbyist who named H.R. 1788 in 4 quarterly filings, 2025. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.
Filed under Animals.
Clients
Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.
| Client | Business | State | Firms | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS | Non-profit organization preventing animal cruelty | New York | 1 | 4 | $82.5K |
Firms
Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.
| Registrant | Clients | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| BRUMIDI GROUP | 1 | 4 | $82.5K |
Lobbyists
Named on the filings that cite the bill.
| Lobbyist | Firms | Clients | Filings |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHARLES COOPER | 1 | 1 | 4 |
Filings
The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.
| Client | Registrant | Period | Reported | Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS | BRUMIDI GROUP | 2025 fourth_quarter | $22.5K | 4th Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS | BRUMIDI GROUP | 2025 third_quarter | $20K | 3rd Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS | BRUMIDI GROUP | 2025 second_quarter | $20K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS | BRUMIDI GROUP | 2025 first_quarter | $20K | 1st Quarter - Report |
Classification
The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 1788 under Commerce, one of its 31 policy areas.
CRS Subjects
CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 1788’s is Commerce.
hr1788/policy-areas.txtSource: congress.gov · legiscan.com