Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

H.R. 1788

U.S. HouseIn House Committee

Summary

H.R. 1788, the Fair Grocery Pricing Act, was introduced in the House on Mar 3, 2025 by Rep. Maxwell Frost (D) with 17 co-sponsors. It was referred to Judiciary, and last saw action on Mar 3, 2025: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.


Record

Text

H.R. 1788 has 17 co-sponsors.

hb1788/introduced-in-house.txt
119 HR 1788 IH: Fair Grocery Pricing Act
U.S. House of Representatives
2025-03-03
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 1788 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES March 3, 2025 Mr. Frost introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary A BILL
To prohibit the use of algorithmic systems by food producers to artificially inflate the price or reduce the supply of their foods.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Fair Grocery Pricing Act .
2.
Definitions
In this Act:
(1)
Chair
The term Chair means the Chair of the Commission.
(2)
Commission
The term Commission means the Federal Trade Commission.
(3)
Consciously parallel pricing coordination
The term consciously parallel pricing coordination means a tacit agreement between 2 or more food producers to raise, lower, change, maintain, or manipulate pricing for the purchase or sale of reasonably interchangeable food products.
(4)
Coordinating function
The term coordinating function means—
(A)
collecting historical or contemporaneous food product prices or supply levels from 2 or more food producers;
(B)
analyzing or processing of the information described in subparagraph (A) using a system, software, or process that uses computation, including by using that information to train an algorithm; and
(C)
recommending food prices, supply or output, or other commercial term to a food producer.
(5)
Coordinator
The term coordinator means any person that operates a software or data analytics service that performs a coordinating function for any food producer, including a food producer performing a coordinating function for their own benefit.
(6)
Food
The term food has the meaning given the term in the 321st section of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act ( 21 U.S.C. 321 ).
(7)
Food producer
The term food producer means any individual, corporation, or entity engaged in the manufacturing, processing, or production of food products for commercial distribution.
(8)
Person
The term person has the meaning given the term in the 1st section of the Clayton Act ( 15 U.S.C. 12 ).
(9)
Pre-dispute arbitration agreement
The term pre-dispute arbitration agreement means an agreement between 2 or more parties to arbitrate a dispute between the parties that is made before any dispute has arisen.
(10)
Pre-dispute joint action waiver
The term pre-dispute joint action waiver means an agreement between 2 or more parties, which may be part of a pre-dispute arbitration agreement, that—
(A)
would prohibit or waive the right of a party to participate in a joint, class, or collective action in a judicial, arbitral, administrative, or other forum relating to a dispute between parties; and
(B)
is made before any dispute has arisen.
(11)
State
The term State means any of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any territory or possession of the United States.
3.
Unlawful conduct
(a)
In general
(1)
Contract or conspiracy in restraint of trade
It is unlawful for a food producer, in or affecting commerce, or any agent or subcontractor thereof, to subscribe to, contract with, or otherwise exchange anything of value or use in return for the services of a coordinator, and such action shall be deemed to be a per se violation of the Sherman Act ( 15 U.S.C. 1 et seq. ).
(2)
Facilitation
It is unlawful for a coordinator, in or affecting commerce, to facilitate an agreement among food producers to not compete with respect to food prices, supply or output, or other commercial term, including by performing a coordinating function.
4.
Enforcement
(a)
Enforcement
(1)
In general
(A)
Federal trade commission
The Commission shall enforce this Act in the same manner, by the same means, and with the same jurisdiction, powers, and duties as though all applicable terms of the Federal Trade Commission Act ( 15 U.S.C. 41 et seq. ) were incorporated into and made a part of this Act.
(B)
Attorney general
The Attorney General shall enforce this Act in the same manner, by the same means, and with the same jurisdiction, powers, and duties as though all applicable terms of the Sherman Act ( 15 U.S.C. 1 et seq. ), Clayton Act ( 15 U.S.C. 12 et seq. ), and Antitrust Civil Process Act ( 15 U.S.C. 1311 et seq. ) were incorporated into and made a part of this Act.
(C)
State attorneys general
Any attorney general of a State shall enforce this Act in the same manner, by the same means, and with the same jurisdiction, powers, and duties as though all applicable terms of the Sherman Act ( 15 U.S.C. 1 et seq. ) and the Clayton Act ( 15 U.S.C. 12 et seq. ) were incorporated into and made a part of this Act.
(2)
Unfair methods of competition
A violation of this Act shall also constitute an unfair method of competition under section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act ( 15 U.S.C. 45 ).
(3)
Independent litigation authority
If the Commission has reason to believe that a person violated this Act, the Commission may commence a civil action, in its own name by any of its attorneys designated by it for such purpose, to recover a civil penalty and seek other appropriate relief in any district court of the United States.
(4)
Standards of pleading
In a civil action under this subsection, a complaint—
(A)
plausibly pleads a violation of section 1 or 3(a) of the Sherman Act ( 15 U.S.C. 1 , 3(a)) if the complaint contains factual allegations, including allegations of consciously parallel pricing coordination, demonstrating that the existence of a contract, or conspiracy in restraint of trade or commerce is among the realm of plausible possibilities; and
(B)
need not allege facts tending to exclude the possibility of independent action.
(b)
Civil actions by injured persons
(1)
Civil action authorized
Any person who is aggrieved by a violation of this Act may bring a civil action in an appropriate district court of the United States, without respect to the amount in controversy, to recover an amount described in paragraph (2).
(2)
Award amount
(A)
In general
The court shall award to the plaintiff threefold the damages sustained by the plaintiff and the reasonable cost of litigation, including a reasonable attorney fee.
(B)
Interest on damages
Pursuant to a motion by the plaintiff promptly made, the court may award simple interest on actual damages sustained by the plaintiff for the period beginning on the date of service of the pleading of the plaintiff setting forth a claim under this Act and ending on the date of judgment, or for any shorter period therein.
(3)
Invalidity of pre-dispute arbitration agreements and pre-dispute joint action waivers
At the election of the plaintiff in an action authorized under paragraph (1), a pre-dispute arbitration agreement or pre-dispute joint action waiver relating to a violation of this Act shall be invalid or unenforceable.
5.
Relationship to Federal antitrust laws
Nothing in this Act, or any amendment made by this Act, shall be construed to modify, impair, or supersede the operation of any of the antitrust laws
6.
Relationship to State and local laws
Nothing in this Act may be construed to preempt any State, Tribal, city, or local law, regulation, or ordinance that supplements this Act.
7.
Severability
If any provision of this Act, or the application of such a provision to any person or circumstance, is held to be unconstitutional, the remaining provisions of this Act, and the application of such provisions to any person or circumstance shall not be affected thereby.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2025-03-03
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

To prohibit the use of algorithmic systems by food producers to artificially inflate the price or reduce the supply of their foods.

Sponsors

Rep. Maxwell Frost (D) sponsors H.R. 1788, and 17 members have co-sponsored it.

Committees

H.R. 1788 went before 1 committee: Judiciary.

Judiciary
Judiciary
Referred To · Mar 3, 2025 · 2,181 Bills

Actions

H.R. 1788 has taken 2 actions since Mar 3, 2025.

ChamberAction
Mar 3, 2025
House
Introduced in House
Mar 3, 2025
House
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.Judiciary Committee

Votes

H.R. 1788 has not gone to a roll call.

Titles

H.R. 1788 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.

  • Fair Grocery Pricing Act — Display Title
  • Fair Grocery Pricing Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • To prohibit the use of algorithmic systems by food producers to artificially inflate the price or reduce the supply of their foods. — Official Title as Introduced

Lobbying

1 client hired 1 firm and 1 registered lobbyist who named H.R. 1788 in 4 quarterly filings, 2025. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Animals.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALSNon-profit organization preventing animal crueltyNew York14$82.5K

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

RegistrantClientsFilingsReported
BRUMIDI GROUP14$82.5K

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill.

LobbyistFirmsClientsFilings
CHARLES COOPER114

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALSBRUMIDI GROUP2025 fourth_quarter$22.5K4th Quarter - Report
AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALSBRUMIDI GROUP2025 third_quarter$20K3rd Quarter - Report
AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALSBRUMIDI GROUP2025 second_quarter$20K2nd Quarter - Report
AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALSBRUMIDI GROUP2025 first_quarter$20K1st Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 1788 under Commerce, one of its 31 policy areas.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 1788’s is Commerce.

hr1788/policy-areas.txt
CommerceAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com