Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

S. 526

U.S. SenateIn Senate Committee

Summary

S. 526, the Pharmacy Benefit Manager Transparency Act of 2025, was introduced in the Senate on Feb 11, 2025 by Sen. Chuck Grassley (R) with 14 co-sponsors. It was referred to Commerce, Science, And Transportation, and last saw action on Feb 11, 2025: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.


Record

Text

S. 526 has 14 co-sponsors.

sb526/introduced-in-senate.txt
119 S526 IS: Pharmacy Benefit Manager Transparency Act of 2025
U.S. Senate
2025-02-11
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
II 119th CONGRESS 1st Session S. 526 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES February 11, 2025 Mr. Grassley (for himself, Ms. Cantwell , Ms. Ernst , Mr. Welch , Mrs. Capito , Mrs. Shaheen , Mr. Marshall , Mr. Heinrich , Mr. Moran , Mrs. Hyde-Smith , Mr. Tillis , and Mr. Rounds ) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation A BILL
To prevent unfair and deceptive acts or practices and the dissemination of false information related to pharmacy benefit management services for prescription drugs, and for other purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Pharmacy Benefit Manager Transparency Act of 2025 .
2.
Prohibition on unfair or deceptive prescription drug pricing practices
(a)
Conduct prohibited
Except as provided in subsection (b), it shall be unlawful for any pharmacy benefit manager (or affiliate, subsidiary, or agent of a pharmacy benefit manager), directly or indirectly, to engage in any of the following activities related to pharmacy benefit management services:
(1)
Charge a health plan or payer a different amount for a prescription drug’s ingredient cost or dispensing fee than the amount the pharmacy benefit manager reimburses a pharmacy for the prescription drug’s ingredient cost or dispensing fee where the pharmacy benefit manager retains the amount of any such difference.
(2)
Arbitrarily, unfairly, or deceptively, by contract or any other means, reduce, rescind, or otherwise claw back any reimbursement payment, in whole or in part, to a pharmacist or pharmacy for a prescription drug's ingredient cost or dispensing fee, unless—
(A)
the original claim was submitted fraudulently;
(B)
the original claim payment was inconsistent with the reimbursement terms in the contract; or
(C)
the pharmacist services were not rendered by the pharmacy or pharmacist.
(3)
Arbitrarily, unfairly, or deceptively, by contract or any other means, increase fees or lower reimbursement to a pharmacy in order to offset reimbursement changes instructed by the Federal Government under any health plan funded by the Federal Government.
(b)
Exceptions
A pharmacy benefit manager shall not be in violation of paragraph (1) or (3) of subsection (a) if the pharmacy benefit manager meets the following conditions:
(1)
The pharmacy benefit manager, affiliate, subsidiary, or agent passes along or returns 100 percent of any price concession to a health plan or payer, including any rebate, discount, or other price concession.
(2)
The pharmacy benefit manager, affiliate, subsidiary, or agent provides full and complete disclosure of—
(A)
the cost, price, and reimbursement of a prescription drug to each health plan, payer, and pharmacy with which the pharmacy benefit manager, affiliate, subsidiary, or agent has a contract or agreement to provide pharmacy benefit management services;
(B)
each fee, markup, and discount charged or imposed by the pharmacy benefit manager, affiliate, subsidiary, or agent to each health plan, payer, and pharmacy with which the pharmacy benefit manager, affiliate, subsidiary, or agent has a contract or agreement for pharmacy benefit management services; or
(C)
the aggregate amount of all remuneration the pharmacy benefit manager receives from a prescription drug manufacturer for a prescription drug, including any rebate, discount, administration fee, and any other payment or credit obtained or retained by the pharmacy benefit manager, or affiliate, subsidiary, or agent of the pharmacy benefit manager, pursuant to a contract or agreement for pharmacy benefit management services to a health plan, payer, or any Federal agency (upon the request of the agency).
3.
Prohibition on false information
It shall be unlawful for any person to report information related to pharmacy benefit management services to a Federal department or agency if—
(1)
the person knew, or reasonably should have known, the information to be false or misleading;
(2)
the information was required by law to be reported; and
(3)
the false or misleading information reported by the person would affect analysis or information compiled by the Federal department or agency for statistical or analytical purposes with respect to the market for pharmacy benefit management services.
4.
Transparency
(a)
Reporting by pharmacy benefit managers
Subject to subsection (d), not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, each pharmacy benefit manager (or affiliate, subsidiary, or agent of a pharmacy benefit manager) shall report to the Commission and the Secretary of Health and Human Services the following information:
(1)
The aggregate amount of the difference between the amount the pharmacy benefit manager was paid by each health plan and the amount that the pharmacy benefit manager paid each pharmacy on behalf of the health plan for prescription drugs.
(2)
The aggregate amount of any—
(A)
generic effective rate fee charged to each pharmacy;
(B)
direct and indirect remuneration fee charged or other price concession to each pharmacy; and
(C)
payment rescinded or otherwise clawed back from a reimbursement made to each pharmacy.
(3)
If, during the reporting year, the pharmacy benefit manager moved or reassigned a prescription drug to a formulary tier that has a higher cost, higher copayment, higher coinsurance, or higher deductible to a consumer, or a lower reimbursement to a pharmacy, an explanation of the reason why the drug was moved or reassigned from 1 tier to another, including whether the move or reassignment was determined or requested by a prescription drug manufacturer or other entity.
(4)
With respect to any pharmacy benefit manager that owns, controls, or is affiliated with a pharmacy, a report regarding any difference in reimbursement rates or practices, direct and indirect remuneration fees or other price concessions, and clawbacks between a pharmacy that is owned, controlled, or affiliated with the pharmacy benefit manager and any other pharmacy.
(b)
Report to Congress
(1)
In general
Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the Commission shall submit to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives a report that addresses, at a minimum—
(A)
the number actions brought by the Commission during the reporting year to enforce this Act and the outcome of each such enforcement action;
(B)
the number of open investigations or inquiries into potential violations of this Act as of the time the report is submitted;
(C)
the number and nature of complaints received by the Commission relating to an allegation of a violation of this Act during the reporting year;
(D)
an anonymized summary of the reports filed with the Commission pursuant to subsection (a) for the reporting year;
(E)
an analysis of the requirements of this Act and whether the implementation of such requirements leads to mergers (including horizontal mergers or vertical mergers) amongst any pharmacy benefit managers, or any pharmacy benefit manager that owns, controls, or is affiliated with a pharmacy, or any pharmacy benefit manager that owns, controls, or is affiliated with a health plan, and the effect of such merger (including the likelihood of a substantial decrease in competition or the potential for a monopoly); and
(F)
policy or legislative recommendations to strengthen any enforcement action relating to a violation of this Act, including recommendations to include additional prohibited conduct in section 2(a), and recommendations to encourage more competition and decrease the likelihood of a monopoly in the pharmaceutical supply chain.
(2)
Formulary design or placement practices
Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Commission shall submit to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate, the Committee on Finance of the Senate, the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate, the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives a report that addresses the policies, practices, and role of pharmacy benefit managers (including their affiliates, subsidiaries, and agents) regarding formulary design or placement, including—
(A)
whether pharmacy benefit managers (including their affiliates, subsidiaries, and agents) use formulary design or placement to increase their gross revenue without an accompanying increase in patient access or decrease in patient cost; or
(B)
recommendations to Congress for legislative action addressing such policies, practices, and role of pharmacy benefit managers (including their affiliates, subsidiaries, and agents).
(3)
Construction
Nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing the Commission to disclose any information that is a trade secret or confidential information described in section 552(b)(4) of title 5, United States Code, except as necessary to enforce this Act.
(4)
Confidentiality
The Commission may disclose the information in a form which does not disclose the identity of a specific pharmacy benefit manager, pharmacy, or health plan for the following purposes:
(A)
To permit the Comptroller General of the United States to review the information provided to carry out this Act.
(B)
To permit the Director of the Congressional Budget Office to review the information provided.
(c)
GAO study
Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, the Committee on Finance, and the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate and to the Committee on Ways and Means and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives a report that—
(1)
addresses, at minimum—
(A)
the role that pharmacy benefit managers play in the pharmaceutical supply chain;
(B)
the state of competition among pharmacy benefit managers, including the market share for the Nation's 10 largest pharmacy benefit managers;
(C)
the use of rebates and fees by pharmacy benefit managers, including data for each of the 10 largest pharmacy benefit managers that reflects, for each drug in the formulary of each such pharmacy benefit manager—
(i)
the amount of the rebate passed on to patients;
(ii)
the amount of the rebate passed on to payors;
(iii)
the amount of the rebate kept by the pharmacy benefit manager; and
(iv)
the role of fees charged by the pharmacy benefit manager;
(D)
whether pharmacy benefit managers structure their formularies in favor of high-rebate prescription drugs over lower-cost, lower-rebate alternatives;
(E)
the average prior authorization approval time for each of the 10 largest pharmacy benefit managers;
(F)
factors affecting the use of step therapy in each of the 10 largest pharmacy benefit managers;
(G)
the extent to which the price that pharmacy benefit managers charge payors, such as the Medicare program under title XXVIII of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1395 et seq. ), State Medicaid programs under title XIX of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1396 et seq. ), the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program under chapter 89 of title 5, United States Code, or private payors, for a drug is more than such pharmacy benefit managers pay the pharmacy for the drug; and
(H)
the competitive impact of pharmacy benefit managers' business practices, including the impact that such business practices have on the cost of health plan premiums or prescription drugs for consumers; and
(2)
provides recommendations for legislative action to lower the cost of prescription drugs for consumers and payors, improve the efficiency of the pharmaceutical supply chain by lowering intermediary costs, improve competition in pharmacy benefit management, and provide transparency in pharmacy benefit management.
(d)
Privacy requirements
Any entity shall provide information under subsection (a) in a manner consistent with the privacy, security, and breach notification regulations promulgated under section 264(c) of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 ( 42 U.S.C. 1320d–2 note) (or any successor regulation), and shall restrict the use and disclosure of such information according to such regulations.
5.
Whistleblower protections
(a)
In general
A pharmacy benefit manager, health plan, pharmaceutical manufacturer, pharmacy, or any affiliate, subsidiary, or agent thereof shall not, directly or indirectly, discharge, demote, suspend, diminish, or withdraw benefits from, threaten, harass, or in any other manner discriminate against or adversely impact a covered individual because—
(1)
the covered individual, or anyone perceived as assisting the covered individual, takes (or is suspected to have taken or will take) a lawful action in providing to Congress, an agency of the Federal Government, the attorney general of a State, a State regulator with authority over the distribution or insurance coverage of prescription drugs, or a law enforcement agency relating to any act or omission that the covered individual reasonably believes to be a violation of this Act;
(2)
the covered individual provides information that the covered individual reasonably believes evidences such a violation to—
(A)
a person with supervisory authority over the covered individual at the pharmacy benefit manager, health plan, pharmaceutical manufacturer, pharmacy, or any affiliate, subsidiary, or agent thereof; or
(B)
another individual working for the pharmacy benefit manager, health plan, pharmaceutical manufacturer, pharmacy, or any affiliate, subsidiary, or agent thereof who the covered individual reasonably believes has the authority to investigate, discover, or terminate the violation or to take any other action to address the violation;
(3)
the covered individual testifies (or it is suspected that the covered individual will testify) in an investigation or judicial or administrative proceeding concerning such a violation; or
(4)
the covered individual assists or participates (or it is expected that the covered individual will assist or participate) in such an investigation or judicial or administrative proceeding.
(b)
Enforcement
An individual who alleges any adverse action in violation of subsection (a) may bring an action for a jury trial in the appropriate district court of the United States for the following relief:
(1)
Temporary relief while the case is pending.
(2)
Reinstatement with the same seniority status that the individual would have had, but for the discharge or discrimination.
(3)
Twice the amount of back pay otherwise owed to the individual, with interest.
(4)
Consequential and compensatory damages, and compensation for litigation costs, expert witness fees, and reasonable attorneys’ fees.
(c)
Waiver of rights and remedies
The rights and remedies provided for in this section shall not be waived by any policy form or condition of employment, including by a predispute arbitration agreement.
(d)
Predispute arbitration agreements
No predispute arbitration agreement shall be valid or enforceable if the agreement requires arbitration of a dispute arising under this section.
6.
Enforcement
(a)
Enforcement by the Commission
(1)
Unfair and deceptive acts or practices
A violation of this Act shall be treated as a violation of a rule defining an unfair or deceptive act or practice under section 18(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Trade Commission Act ( 15 U.S.C. 57a(a)(1)(B) ).
(2)
Powers of the Commission
(A)
In general
Except as provided in subparagraph (C), the Commission shall enforce this Act in the same manner, by the same means, and with the same jurisdiction, powers, and duties as though all applicable terms and provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act ( 15 U.S.C. 41 et seq. ) were incorporated into and made a part of this Act.
(B)
Privileges and immunities
Subject to paragraph (3), any person who violates this Act shall be subject to the penalties and entitled to the privileges and immunities provided in the Federal Trade Commission Act ( 15 U.S.C. 41 et seq. ).
(C)
Nonprofit organizations and insurance
Notwithstanding section 4 or 6 of the Federal Trade Commission Act ( 15 U.S.C. 44 , 46), section 2 of McCarran-Ferguson Act ( 15 U.S.C. 1012 ), or any other jurisdictional limitation of the Commission, the Commission shall also enforce this Act, in the same manner provided in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of this paragraph, with respect to—
(i)
organizations not organized to carry on business for their own profit or that of their members; and
(ii)
the business of insurance, and persons engaged in such business.
(D)
Authority preserved
Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the authority of the Commission under any other provision of law.
(3)
Penalties
(A)
Additional civil penalty
In addition to any penalty applicable under the Federal Trade Commission Act ( 15 U.S.C. 41 et seq. ), any person that violates this Act shall be liable for a civil penalty of not more than $1,000,000.
(B)
Method
The penalties provided by subparagraph (A) shall be obtained in the same manner as civil penalties imposed under section 18(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 57a(a(1)(B).
(C)
Multiple offenses; mitigating factors
In assessing a penalty under subparagraph (A)—
(i)
each day of a continuing violation shall be considered a separate violation; and
(ii)
the court shall take into consideration, among other factors—
(I)
the seriousness of the violation;
(II)
the efforts of the person committing the violation to remedy the harm caused by the violation in a timely manner; and
(III)
whether the violation was intentional.
(b)
Enforcement by States
(1)
In general
If the attorney general of a State has reason to believe that an interest of the residents of the State has been or is being threatened or adversely affected by a practice that violates this Act, the attorney general of the State may bring a civil action on behalf of the residents of the State in an appropriate district court of the United States to obtain appropriate relief.
(2)
Rights of the Commission
(A)
Notice to the Commission
(i)
In general
Except as provided in clause (iii), the attorney general of a State, before initiating a civil action under paragraph (1), shall provide written notification to the Commission that the attorney general intends to bring such civil action.
(ii)
Contents
The notification required under clause (i) shall include a copy of the complaint to be filed to initiate the civil action.
(iii)
Exception
If it is not feasible for the attorney general of a State to provide the notification required under clause (i) before initiating a civil action under paragraph (1), the attorney general shall notify the Commission immediately upon instituting the civil action.
(B)
Intervention by the Commission
The Commission may—
(i)
intervene in any civil action brought by the attorney general of a State under paragraph (1); and
(ii)
upon intervening—
(I)
be heard on all matters arising in the civil action; and
(II)
file petitions for appeal of a decision in the civil action.
(3)
Construction
(A)
Powers conferred on the attorney general of a State
Nothing in this subsection may be construed to prevent the attorney general of a State from exercising the powers conferred on the attorney general by the laws of the State to conduct investigations, to administer oaths or affirmations, or to compel the attendance of witnesses or the production of documentary or other evidence.
(B)
ERISA
No civil action brought pursuant to this subsection shall conflict with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ( 29 U.S.C. 1001 et seq. ).
(4)
Venue; service of process
(A)
Venue
Any action brought under paragraph (1) may be brought in—
(i)
the district court of the United States that meets applicable requirements relating to venue under section 1391 of title 28, United States Code; or
(ii)
another court of competent jurisdiction.
(B)
Service of process
In an action brought under paragraph (1), process may be served in any district in which—
(i)
the defendant is an inhabitant, may be found, or transacts business; or
(ii)
venue is proper under section 1391 of title 28, United States Code.
(5)
Actions by other State officials
(A)
In general
If an attorney general lacks appropriate jurisdiction to bring a civil action under paragraph (1), any other officer of a State who is authorized by the State to do so may bring a civil action under paragraph (1), subject to the same requirements and limitations that apply under this subsection to civil actions brought by attorneys general.
(B)
Clarification of authority
The authority provided by subparagraph (A) shall supplant, and not supplement, the authorities of State attorneys general under paragraph (1).
(C)
Savings provision
Nothing in this subsection may be construed to prohibit an authorized official of a State from initiating or continuing any proceeding in a court of the State for a violation of any civil or criminal law of the State.
(c)
Affirmative defense
(1)
In general
In an action brought under this section to enforce section 2, it shall be an affirmative defense, on which the defendant has the burden of persuasion by a preponderance of the evidence, that the conduct alleged to be a violation of section 2 was nonpretextual and reasonably necessary to—
(A)
prevent a violation of, or comply with, Federal or State law;
(B)
protect patient safety; or
(C)
protect patient access.
(2)
Clarification
Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to prohibit a defendant from raising any other affirmative defense available.
7.
Protection of personal health information
In making any disclosure or report required by this Act, a pharmacy benefit manager (including their affiliates, subsidiaries, and agents) shall not include any information that would identify a patient or a provider that issued a prescription.
8.
Effect on State laws
Nothing in this Act shall be construed to preempt, displace, or supplant any State laws, rules, regulations, or requirements, or the enforcement thereof.
9.
Definitions
In this Act:
(1)
Commission
The term Commission means the Federal Trade Commission.
(2)
Covered individual
The term covered individual means a current or former employee, contractor, subcontractor, service provider, or agent of a pharmacy benefit manager, health plan, pharmaceutical manufacturer, pharmacy, or any affiliate, subsidiary, or agent thereof.
(3)
Health plan
The term health plan means any group or individual health insurance plan or coverage, including any health insurance plan or coverage sponsored or funded by the Federal Government or the government of any State, Territory, or subdivision thereof.
(4)
Pharmacy benefit manager
The term pharmacy benefit manager means any entity that provides pharmacy benefit management services on behalf of a health plan, a payer, or health insurance issuer.
(5)
Pharmacy benefit management services
The term pharmacy benefit management services means, pursuant to a written agreement with a payer or health plan offering group or individual health insurance coverage, directly or through an intermediary, the service of—
(A)
negotiating terms and conditions, including rebates and price concessions, with respect to a prescription drug on behalf of the health plan, coverage, or payer; or
(B)
managing the prescription drug benefits provided by the health plan, coverage, or payer, which may include formulary management the processing and payment of claims for prescription drugs, the performance of drug utilization review, the processing of drug prior authorization requests, the adjudication of appeals or grievances related to the prescription drug benefit, contracting with network pharmacies, or the provision of related services.
(6)
Prescription drug
The term prescription drug means—
(A)
a drug, as that term is defined in section 201(g) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act ( 21 U.S.C. 321(g) ), that is—
(i)
approved by the Food and Drug Administration under section 505 of such Act ( 21 U.S.C. 355 ); and
(ii)
subject to the requirements of section 503(b)(1) of such Act ( 21 U.S.C. 353(b)(1) );
(B)
a biological product as that term is defined in section 351 of the Public Health Service Act ( 42 U.S.C. 262(i)(1) ); or
(C)
a product that is biosimilar to, or interchangeable with, a biologic product under section 351 of the Public Health Service Act ( 42 U.S.C. 262(i) ).

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2025-02-11
  2. Passed Senate
  3. Passed House
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

A bill to prevent unfair and deceptive acts or practices and the dissemination of false information related to pharmacy benefit management services for prescription drugs, and for other purposes.

Sponsors

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R) sponsors S. 526, and 14 members have co-sponsored it, 11 of them from the day it was introduced.

Committees

S. 526 went before 1 committee: Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

Commerce, Science, and Transportation
Commerce, Science, and Transportation
Referred To · Feb 11, 2025 · 458 Bills

Actions

S. 526 has taken 2 actions since Feb 11, 2025.

ChamberAction
Feb 11, 2025
Senate
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee
Feb 11, 2025
Introduced in Senate

Votes

S. 526 has not gone to a roll call.

Titles

S. 526 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.

  • Pharmacy Benefit Manager Transparency Act of 2025 — Display Title
  • Pharmacy Benefit Manager Transparency Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • A bill to prevent unfair and deceptive acts or practices and the dissemination of false information related to pharmacy benefit management services for prescription drugs, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced

Lobbying

24 clients hired 24 firms and 214 registered lobbyists who named S. 526 in 105 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Health Issues, Medicare/Medicaid, Pharmacy, Budget/Appropriations, Taxation/Internal Revenue Code, Labor Issues/Antitrust/Workplace, Defense, Trade (domestic/foreign).

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill. The 20 that filed most often, of 24.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATIONDistrict of Columbia110
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATIONDistrict of Columbia18
ELEVANCE HEALTH, INC.District of Columbia17
PHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATIONno changeDistrict of Columbia17
THE CIGNA GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES (FORMERLY CIGNA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES)District of Columbia17
AMAC ACTION, INC.Seniors OrganizationNew York16$240K
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RHEUMATOLOGYGeorgia16
AMERICA'S HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS INC (AHIP)District of Columbia16
ASSOCIATION FOR CLINICAL ONCOLOGYVirginia16
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHAIN DRUG STORESVirginia16
NATIONAL COMMUNITY PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATIONVirginia16
BIOTECHNOLOGY INNOVATION ORGANIZATIONDistrict of Columbia14
PRIME THERAPEUTICSMinnesota14
AMERICAN PHARMACIES, INC.Independent pharmacy services groupTexas13$180K
INDEPENDENT PHARMACY COOPERATIVENational GPO and drug distribution services for independent pharmacies.Wisconsin13
STEALTH BIOTHERAPEUTICS INC.Developing therapies to treat mitochondrial dysfunction.Massachusetts13
SOLENO THERAPEUTICS, INC.Soleno is focused on development of novel therapeutics for treatment of rare diseases.California12$100K
THE CIGNA GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES (FKA CIGNA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES)Health Care ServicesDistrict of Columbia12$40K
AARPDistrict of Columbia12
ALBERTSONS COMPANIES, INC.Idaho12

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill. The 20 named most often, of 214.

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATIONAMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION2025 first_quarter$8M1st Quarter - Report
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATIONAMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION2026 first_quarter$8M1st Quarter - Amendme…
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATIONAMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION2026 first_quarter$8M1st Quarter - Report
AMERICAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATIONAMERICAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION2025 first_quarter$7M1st Quarter - Report
AARPAARP2025 first_quarter$6.6M1st Quarter - Amendme…
AARPAARP2025 first_quarter$6.6M1st Quarter - Report
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATIONAMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION2025 fourth_quarter$5.5M4th Quarter - Report
AMERICA'S HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS INC (AHIP)AMERICA'S HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS, INC. (AHIP)2026 first_quarter$5.3M1st Quarter - Report
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATIONAMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION2026 second_quarter$5.1M2nd Quarter - Amendme…
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATIONAMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION2025 second_quarter$5M2nd Quarter - Report
AMERICA'S HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS INC (AHIP)AMERICA'S HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS, INC. (AHIP)2025 first_quarter$4.8M1st Quarter - Report
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANYBRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY2025 second_quarter$4.8M2nd Quarter - Report
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATIONAMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION2025 third_quarter$4.6M3rd Quarter - Report
AMERICA'S HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS INC (AHIP)AMERICA'S HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS, INC. (AHIP)2025 third_quarter$4.2M3rd Quarter - Report
AMERICA'S HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS INC (AHIP)AMERICA'S HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS, INC. (AHIP)2025 fourth_quarter$4.1M4th Quarter - Report
PHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATIONPHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION2025 first_quarter$4.1M1st Quarter - Report
AMERICA'S HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS INC (AHIP)AMERICA'S HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS, INC. (AHIP)2025 second_quarter$4.1M2nd Quarter - Report
THE CIGNA GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES (FORMERLY CIGNA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES)THE CIGNA GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES (FORMERLY CIGNA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES)2026 first_quarter$3.5M1st Quarter - Report
THE CIGNA GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES (FORMERLY CIGNA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES)THE CIGNA GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES (FORMERLY CIGNA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES)2025 first_quarter$3.5M1st Quarter - Report
PHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATIONPHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION2025 second_quarter$3.4M2nd Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files S. 526 under Health, one of its 31 policy areas, and gives it 9 legislative subjects.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; S. 526’s is Health.

s526/policy-areas.txt
HealthAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Legislative Subjects

S. 526 carries 9 of CRS’s legislative subjects, from Civil actions and liability to Supply chain.

s526/subjects.txt
Civil actions and liabilityCongressional oversightGovernment information and archivesGovernment studies and investigationsHealth care costs and insuranceMedical ethicsPrescription drugsState and local government operationsSupply chain

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com