Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

S. 527

U.S. SenateSenate Floor Calendar

Summary

S. 527, the Prescription Pricing for the People Act of 2025, was introduced in the Senate on Feb 11, 2025 by Sen. Chuck Grassley (R) with 13 co-sponsors. It last saw action on Apr 10, 2025: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 42.


Record

Text

S. 527 has 13 co-sponsors.

sb527/introduced-in-senate.txt
119 S527 IS: Prescription Pricing for the People Act of 2025
U.S. Senate
2025-02-11
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
II 119th CONGRESS 1st Session S. 527 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES February 11, 2025 Mr. Grassley (for himself, Ms. Cantwell , Mr. Marshall , Mr. Welch , Mr. Tuberville , Mr. Coons , Mr. Tillis , Mr. Blumenthal , Mrs. Capito , Ms. Hirono , and Mr. Lankford ) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary A BILL
To require the Federal Trade Commission to study the role of intermediaries in the pharmaceutical supply chain and provide Congress with appropriate policy recommendations, and for other purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Prescription Pricing for the People Act of 2025 .
2.
Definitions
In this Act:
(1)
Appropriate committees of congress
The term appropriate committees of Congress means—
(A)
the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate; and
(B)
the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives.
(2)
Commission
The term Commission means the Federal Trade Commission.
3.
Study of pharmaceutical supply chain intermediaries and merger activity
(a)
Report
Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Commission shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report that—
(1)
addresses at minimum—
(A)
whether pharmacy benefit managers—
(i)
charge payers a higher price than the reimbursement rate at which the pharmacy benefit managers reimburse pharmacies owned by the pharmacy benefit manager and pharmacies not owned by the pharmacy benefit manager;
(ii)
steer patients for competitive advantage to any pharmacy, including a retail, mail-order, or any other type of pharmacy, in which the pharmacy benefit managers have an ownership interest;
(iii)
audit or review proprietary data, including acquisition costs, patient information, or dispensing information, of pharmacies not owned by the pharmacy benefit manager and use such proprietary data to increase revenue or market share for competitive advantage; or
(iv)
use formulary designs to increase the market share of higher cost prescription drugs or depress the market share of lower cost prescription drugs (each net of rebates and discounts);
(B)
trends or observations on the state of competition in the healthcare supply chain, particularly with regard to intermediaries and their integration with other intermediaries, suppliers, or payers of prescription drug benefits;
(C)
how companies and payers assess the benefits, costs, and risks of contracting with intermediaries, including pharmacy services administrative organizations, and whether more information about the roles of intermediaries should be available to consumers and payers;
(D)
whether there are any specific legal or regulatory obstacles the Commission currently faces in enforcing the antitrust and consumer protection laws in the pharmaceutical supply chain, including the pharmacy benefit manager marketplace and pharmacy services administrative organizations; and
(E)
whether there are any specific legal or regulatory obstacles that contribute to the cost of prescription drug prices; and
(2)
provides—
(A)
observations or conclusions drawn from the November 2017 roundtable entitled Understanding Competition in Prescription Drug Markets: Entry and Supply Chain Dynamics and any similar efforts;
(B)
specific actions the Commission intends to take as a result of the November 2017 roundtable, and any similar efforts, including a detailed description of relevant forthcoming actions, additional research or roundtable discussions, consumer education efforts, or enforcement actions; and
(C)
policy or legislative recommendations to—
(i)
improve transparency and competition in the pharmaceutical supply chain;
(ii)
prevent and deter anticompetitive behavior in the pharmaceutical supply chain; and
(iii)
best ensure that consumers benefit from any cost savings or efficiencies that may result from mergers and consolidations.
(b)
Interim report
Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Commission shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress an interim report on the progress of the report required by subsection (a), along with preliminary findings and conclusions based on information collected to that date.
4.
Report
The Commission shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report that includes—
(1)
the number and nature of complaints received by the Commission relating to an allegation of anticompetitive conduct by a manufacturer of a sole-source drug;
(2)
the ability of the Commission to bring an enforcement action against a manufacturer of a sole-source drug; and
(3)
policy or legislative recommendations to strengthen enforcement actions relating to anticompetitive behavior.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2025-02-11
  2. Passed Senate
  3. Passed House
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

CRS Summary

The summaries are the Congressional Research Service’s, one per stage. Read them in full.

Introduced in Senate Feb 11, 2025

sb527/introduced-in-senate.md

Shown Here:
Introduced in Senate (02/11/2025)

Prescription Pricing for the People Act of 2025

This bill requires the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to report about anticompetitive practices and other trends within the pharmaceutical supply chain that may impact the cost of prescription drugs.

The report must address whether pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) (1) reimburse pharmacies owned by the PBM at a higher price than other pharmacies, and (2) implement formulary designs to increase the market share of higher-cost prescription drugs or depress the market share of lower-cost prescription drugs.

The FTC also must provide recommendations to increase transparency in the supply chain, prevent anticompetitive practices, and ensure that consumers benefit from cost savings or efficiencies that result from mergers and consolidations.

Additionally, the FTC must report the number and nature of complaints the FTC receives relating to an allegation of anticompetitive conduct by a manufacturer of a sole-source drug.

Sponsors

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R) sponsors S. 527, and 13 members have co-sponsored it, 10 of them from the day it was introduced.

Committees

S. 527 went before 1 committee: Judiciary.

Judiciary
Judiciary
Reported By · Apr 10, 2025

Actions

S. 527 has taken 5 actions since Feb 11, 2025, the latest on Apr 10, 2025.

ChamberAction
Apr 10, 2025
Senate
Committee on the Judiciary. Reported by Senator Grassley without amendment. Without written report.Judiciary Committee
Apr 10, 2025
Senate
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 42.
Apr 3, 2025
Senate
Committee on the Judiciary. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.Judiciary Committee
Feb 11, 2025
Senate
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.Judiciary Committee
Feb 11, 2025
Introduced in Senate

Votes

S. 527 has not gone to a roll call.

Titles

S. 527 goes by 4 titles, 2 of them short titles.

  • Prescription Pricing for the People Act of 2025 — Display Title
  • Prescription Pricing for the People Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Reported to Senate
  • Prescription Pricing for the People Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • A bill to require the Federal Trade Commission to study the role of intermediaries in the pharmaceutical supply chain and provide Congress with appropriate policy recommendations, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced

Cost estimate

The Congressional Budget Office has filed 1 estimate for S. 527, the latest on Aug 8, 2025.


Lobbying

14 clients hired 14 firms and 126 registered lobbyists who named S. 527 in 68 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Medicare/Medicaid, Health Issues, Budget/Appropriations, Copyright/Patent/Trademark, Pharmacy, Taxation/Internal Revenue Code, Trade (domestic/foreign), Labor Issues/Antitrust/Workplace.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATIONDistrict of Columbia18
COUNCIL FOR INNOVATION PROMOTION (C4IP)A coalition dedicated to promoting strong IP rights that drive innovation.District of Columbia18
VIATRIS (MYLAN, INC)Generics and specialty pharmaceutical companyPennsylvania16$360K
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICArepresents biopharmaceutical research companiesDistrict of Columbia16$310K
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RHEUMATOLOGYGeorgia16
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHAIN DRUG STORESVirginia16
NATIONAL COMMUNITY PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATIONVirginia16
BIOTECHNOLOGY INNOVATION ORGANIZATIONDistrict of Columbia15
KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INCCalifornia15
INDEPENDENT PHARMACY COOPERATIVENational GPO and drug distribution services for independent pharmacies.Wisconsin13
PHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATIONno changeDistrict of Columbia13
CONSERVATIVES FOR PROPERTY RIGHTSCoalitionSouth Carolina12$125K
SOLENO THERAPEUTICS, INC.Soleno is focused on development of novel therapeutics for treatment of rare diseases.California12$100K
AARPDistrict of Columbia12

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill. The 20 named most often, of 126.

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATIONAMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION2025 first_quarter$8M1st Quarter - Report
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATIONAMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION2026 first_quarter$8M1st Quarter - Amendme…
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATIONAMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION2026 first_quarter$8M1st Quarter - Report
AARPAARP2025 first_quarter$6.6M1st Quarter - Amendme…
AARPAARP2025 first_quarter$6.6M1st Quarter - Report
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATIONAMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION2025 fourth_quarter$5.5M4th Quarter - Report
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATIONAMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION2026 second_quarter$5.1M2nd Quarter - Amendme…
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATIONAMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION2025 second_quarter$5M2nd Quarter - Report
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATIONAMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION2025 third_quarter$4.6M3rd Quarter - Report
PHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATIONPHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION2025 first_quarter$4.1M1st Quarter - Report
PHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATIONPHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION2025 second_quarter$3.4M2nd Quarter - Report
PHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATIONPHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION2025 third_quarter$2.9M3rd Quarter - Report
BIOTECHNOLOGY INNOVATION ORGANIZATIONBIOTECHNOLOGY INNOVATION ORGANIZATION2026 second_quarter$2.4M2nd Quarter - Report
BIOTECHNOLOGY INNOVATION ORGANIZATIONBIOTECHNOLOGY INNOVATION ORGANIZATION2026 first_quarter$1.6M1st Quarter - Report
BIOTECHNOLOGY INNOVATION ORGANIZATIONBIOTECHNOLOGY INNOVATION ORGANIZATION2025 fourth_quarter$1.5M4th Quarter - Report
BIOTECHNOLOGY INNOVATION ORGANIZATIONBIOTECHNOLOGY INNOVATION ORGANIZATION2025 third_quarter$1.4M3rd Quarter - Report
BIOTECHNOLOGY INNOVATION ORGANIZATIONBIOTECHNOLOGY INNOVATION ORGANIZATION2025 first_quarter$890K1st Quarter - Report
KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INCKAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC.2025 fourth_quarter$730K4th Quarter - Amendme…
KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INCKAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC.2025 fourth_quarter$730K4th Quarter - Amendme…
KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INCKAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC.2025 fourth_quarter$690K4th Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files S. 527 under Commerce, one of its 31 policy areas, and gives it 11 legislative subjects.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; S. 527’s is Commerce.

s527/policy-areas.txt
CommerceAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Legislative Subjects

S. 527 carries 11 of CRS’s legislative subjects, from Business ethics to Supply chain.

s527/subjects.txt
Business ethicsBusiness recordsCompetition and antitrustCongressional oversightConsumer affairsHealth care costs and insuranceHealth information and medical recordsInflation and pricesPrescription drugsRetail and wholesale tradesSupply chain

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com