Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

H.R. 32

U.S. HouseIn House Committee

Summary

H.R. 32, the No Bailout for Sanctuary Cities Act, was introduced in the House on Jan 3, 2025 by Rep. Nick LaLota (R) with 21 co-sponsors. It was referred to Judiciary, and last saw action on Jan 3, 2025: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.


Record

Text

H.R. 32 has 21 co-sponsors.

hb32/introduced-in-house.txt
119 HR 32 IH: No Bailout for Sanctuary Cities Act
U.S. House of Representatives
2025-01-03
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 32 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES January 3, 2025 Mr. LaLota (for himself, Mr. Feenstra , Mrs. Houchin , Mr. McCaul , and Mr. Nunn of Iowa ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary A BILL
To provide that sanctuary jurisdictions that provide benefits to aliens who are present in the United States without lawful status under the immigration laws are ineligible for Federal funds intended to benefit such aliens.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the No Bailout for Sanctuary Cities Act .
2.
Sanctuary jurisdiction defined
(a)
In general
Except as provided under subsection (b), for purposes of this Act, the term sanctuary jurisdiction means any State or political subdivision of a State that has in effect a statute, ordinance, policy, or practice that prohibits or restricts any government entity or official from—
(1)
sending, receiving, maintaining, or exchanging with any Federal, State, or local government entity information regarding the citizenship or immigration status (lawful or unlawful) of any individual; or
(2)
complying with a request lawfully made by the Department of Homeland Security under section 236 or 287 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1226 and 1357) to comply with a detainer for, or notify about the release of, an individual.
(b)
Exception
A State or political subdivision of a State shall not be deemed a sanctuary jurisdiction based solely on its having a policy whereby its officials will not share information regarding, or comply with a request made by the Department of Homeland Security under section 236 or 287 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1226 and 1357) to comply with a detainer regarding, an individual who comes forward as a victim or a witness to a criminal offense.
3.
Sanctuary jurisdictions ineligible for certain Federal funds
Beginning on the earlier of the date that is 60 days after the date of enactment of this Act or the first day of the fiscal year that begins after the date of enactment of this Act, a sanctuary jurisdiction is ineligible to receive any Federal funds that the sanctuary jurisdiction intends to use for the benefit (including the provision of food, shelter, healthcare services, legal services, and transportation) of aliens who are present in the United States without lawful status under the immigration laws (as such terms are defined in section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act).
4.
Report on noncompliance
Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit to the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate a report that includes a list of States, and political subdivisions of States, that have failed to comply with requests described in section 2(a)(2).

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2025-01-03
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

CRS Summary

The summaries are the Congressional Research Service’s, one per stage. Read them in full.

Introduced in House Jan 3, 2025

hb32/introduced-in-house.md

Shown Here:
Introduced in House (01/03/2025)

No Bailout for Sanctuary Cities Act

This bill makes a state or political subdivision of a state ineligible for any federal funds that the jurisdiction intends to use to benefit non-U.S. nationals (i.e., aliens under federal law) who are unlawfully present if the jurisdiction withholds information about citizenship or immigration status or does not cooperate with immigration detainers.

Specifically, such funds are denied to any jurisdiction that has a law, policy, or practice that prohibits or restricts any government entity from

  • maintaining, sending, or receiving information regarding the citizenship or immigration status of any individual;
  • exchanging information regarding an individual's citizenship or immigration status with a federal, state, or local government entity;
  • complying with a valid immigration detainer from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS); or
  • notifying DHS about an individual's release from custody.

The funding restriction does not apply to a law, policy, or practice that only applies to an individual who comes forward as a victim of or a witness to a criminal offense.

DHS must annually provide to specified congressional committees a list of jurisdictions that have failed to comply with a DHS detainer or have failed to notify DHS of an individual’s release.

The funding restriction begins 60 days after the bill's enactment or on the first day of the fiscal year following the bill's enactment, whichever is earlier.

Sponsors

Rep. Nick LaLota (R) sponsors H.R. 32, and 21 members have co-sponsored it, 4 of them from the day it was introduced.

Committees

H.R. 32 went before 1 committee: Judiciary.

Judiciary
Judiciary
Referred To · Jan 3, 2025 · 2,181 Bills

Actions

H.R. 32 has taken 2 actions since Jan 3, 2025.

ChamberAction
Jan 3, 2025
House
Introduced in House
Jan 3, 2025
House
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.Judiciary Committee

Votes

H.R. 32 has not gone to a roll call.

Titles

H.R. 32 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.

  • No Bailout for Sanctuary Cities Act — Display Title
  • No Bailout for Sanctuary Cities Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • To provide that sanctuary jurisdictions that provide benefits to aliens who are present in the United States without lawful status under the immigration laws are ineligible for Federal funds intended to benefit such aliens. — Official Title as Introduced

Lobbying

26 clients hired 23 firms and 114 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 32 in 50 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Immigration, Civil Rights/Civil Liberties, Budget/Appropriations, Government Issues, Health Issues, Education, Family issues/Abortion/Adoption, Labor Issues/Antitrust/Workplace.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill. The 20 that filed most often, of 26.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNIONProtecting civil libertiesDistrict of Columbia27$300K
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMENDistrict of Columbia16
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF THE U.S.District of Columbia15
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTERCivil Rights and Economic Justice OrganizationAlabama14$200K
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNIONDistrict of Columbia12$180K
LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE ON CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTSCivil rights organization.District of Columbia12$110K
COUNTY OF MONTEREY, CAlocal governmentCalifornia12$70K
CONFERENCE OF PROVINCIALS OF NORTH AMERICAMissouri12$40K
AMERICAN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATIONDistrict of Columbia12
FRIENDS COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL LEGISLATIONDistrict of Columbia12
WOMEN IN NEED, INC.WIN runs 14 shelters and over 400 supportive housing units across New York City.New York11$40K
AMERICAS VOICECommunications and immigrant rights advocacy non profit organizationDistrict of Columbia11$30K
COMMUNITY CHANGE ACTIONEconomic justice, immigration reform, retirement security and affordable housing.District of Columbia11$30K
SERGEANTS BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK CITYLabor organizationNew York11$30K
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PEDIATRIC NURSE PRACTITIONERSNational professional association for pediatric nurse practitionersNew Jersey11$24K
AFL-CIODistrict of Columbia11
ALLIANCE FOR EXCELLENT EDUCATIONDistrict of Columbia11
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEESDistrict of Columbia11
AMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATEDistrict of Columbia11
CASA, INC.Immigrant right and services organizationMaryland11

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill. The 20 named most often, of 114.

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
FRIENDS COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL LEGISLATIONFRIENDS COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL LEGISLATION2025 second_quarter$1M2nd Quarter - Report
FRIENDS COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL LEGISLATIONFRIENDS COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL LEGISLATION2025 first_quarter$1M1st Quarter - Report
AFL-CIOAFL-CIO2025 first_quarter$760K1st Quarter - Report
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNIONAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION2025 second_quarter$640K2nd Quarter - Report
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEESAMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES2025 first_quarter$630K1st Quarter - Report
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNIONAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION2025 first_quarter$560K1st Quarter - Report
LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERSLEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS2025 first_quarter$170K1st Quarter - Report
KIDS IN NEED OF DEFENSEKIDS IN NEED OF DEFENSE2025 first_quarter$150K1st Quarter - Report
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF THE U.S.LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF THE U.S.2025 third_quarter$140K3rd Quarter - Report
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF THE U.S.LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF THE U.S.2025 second_quarter$130K2nd Quarter - Report
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INCPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA, INC.2025 first_quarter$109.5K1st Quarter - Report
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF THE U.S.LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF THE U.S.2026 first_quarter$100K1st Quarter - Report
INT'L ASSOCIATION OF BRIDGE STRUCTURAL ORNAMENTAL & REINFORCING IRON WORKERSINT'L. ASSOCIATION OF BRIDGE, STRUCTURAL, ORNAMENTAL & REINFORCING IRON WORKERS2025 first_quarter$100K1st Quarter - Report
AMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATEAMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE2025 first_quarter$100K1st Quarter - Report
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF THE U.S.LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF THE U.S.2025 first_quarter$100K1st Quarter - Report
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNIONNVG, LLC2025 fourth_quarter$90K4th Quarter - Report
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNIONNVG, LLC2025 third_quarter$90K3rd Quarter - Report
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF THE U.S.LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF THE U.S.2026 second_quarter$80K2nd Quarter - Report
HUMAN RIGHTS FIRSTHUMAN RIGHTS FIRST2025 first_quarter$67.5K1st Quarter - Report
LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE ON CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTSNVG, LLC2025 fourth_quarter$60K4th Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 32 under Immigration, one of its 31 policy areas, and gives it 5 legislative subjects.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 32’s is Immigration.

hr32/policy-areas.txt
ImmigrationAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Legislative Subjects

H.R. 32 carries 5 of CRS’s legislative subjects, from Border security and unlawful immigration to State and local government operations.

hr32/subjects.txt
Border security and unlawful immigrationCongressional oversightImmigration status and proceduresState and local financeState and local government operations

Constitutional authority

The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 32, as entered in the Congressional Record.

[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 1 (Friday, January 3, 2025)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Mr. LaLOTA:H.R. 32.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:Article 1, Section 8 of the United States Constitution.The single subject of this legislation is:To provide that sanctuary jurisdictions that providebenefits to aliens who are present in the United Stateswithout lawful status under the immigration laws areineligible for Federal funds intended to benefit such aliens.[Page H36]

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com