Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

H.R. 9462

U.S. HouseIn House Committee

Summary

H.R. 9462, the Investor Choice Act of 2026, was introduced in the House on Jun 25, 2026 by Rep. Bill Foster (D) with 1 co-sponsor. It was referred to Financial Services, and last saw action on Jun 25, 2026: Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.


Record

Text

H.R. 9462 has 1 co-sponsor.

hb9462/introduced-in-house.txt
119 HR 9462 IH: Investor Choice Act of 2026
U.S. House of Representatives
2026-06-25
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
I 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 9462 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES June 25, 2026 Mr. Foster (for himself and Ms. Velázquez ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services A BILL
To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to prohibit mandatory pre-dispute arbitration agreements, and for other purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Investor Choice Act of 2026 .
2.
Findings
Congress finds the following:
(1)
Investor confidence in fair and equitable recourse is essential to the health and stability of the securities markets and to the participation of retail investors in those markets.
(2)
Issuers, brokers, dealers, and investment advisers hold powerful advantages over investors, and mandatory arbitration clauses, including contracts that force investors to submit claims to arbitration or to waive the right of investors to participate in a class action lawsuit, leverage those advantages to severely restrict the ability of defrauded investors to seek redress.
(3)
Investors should be free to—
(A)
choose arbitration to resolve disputes if they judge that arbitration truly offers them the best opportunity to efficiently and fairly settle disputes; and
(B)
pursue remedies in court should they view that option as superior to arbitration.
3.
Arbitration agreements in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(a)
In general
The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ( 15 U.S.C. 78a et seq. ) is amended—
(1)
in section 6(b) ( 15 U.S.C. 78f(b) ), by adding at the end the following:
(11)
The rules of the exchange prohibit the listing of any security if the issuer of the security, in the bylaws of the issuer, other governing documents, or any contract with a shareholder relating to the parties as issuer and shareholder, mandates arbitration for any dispute between the issuer and the shareholders of the issuer, without regard to whether such a provision in the bylaws, documents, or contract is otherwise permissible under title 9, United States Code.
; and
(2)
in section 15 ( 15 U.S.C. 78o ), by amending subsection (o) to read as follows:
(o)
Limitations on pre-Dispute agreements
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, including any provision of title 9, United States Code, it shall be unlawful for any broker, dealer, funding portal, or municipal securities dealer to enter into, modify, or extend an agreement with customers or clients of that entity with respect to a future dispute between the parties that—
(1)
mandates arbitration for that dispute;
(2)
restricts, limits, or conditions the ability of a customer or client of that entity to select or designate a forum for resolution of that dispute; or
(3)
restricts, limits, or conditions the ability of a customer or client of that entity to pursue a claim relating to that dispute in an individual or representative capacity or on a class action or consolidated basis.
.
(b)
Application to existing agreements
(1)
In general
With respect to an agreement described in section 15(o) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ( 15 U.S.C. 78o(o) ), as amended by subsection (a) of this section, that was entered into before the date of enactment of this Act, any provision of that agreement that is prohibited by such section 15(o), as amended by subsection (a) of this section, is void.
(2)
Ongoing arbitration
A provision of an agreement prohibited by section 15(o) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ( 15 U.S.C. 78o(o) ), as amended by subsection (a) of this section, shall not be void under paragraph (1) if arbitration required by that provision was initiated by any party on or before the date of enactment of this Act.
4.
Arbitration agreements in the Securities Act of 1933
Section 6 of the Securities Act of 1933 ( 15 U.S.C. 77f ) is amended by adding at the end the following:
(f)
Limitation on arbitration requirements
A security may not be registered with the Commission if the issuer of the security, in the bylaws of the issuer, other governing documents, or any contract with a shareholder relating to the parties as issuer and shareholder, mandates arbitration for any dispute between the issuer and the shareholders of the issuer, without regard to whether such a provision in the bylaws, documents, or contract is otherwise permissible under title 9, United States Code.
.
5.
Arbitration agreements in the Investment Advisers Act of 1940
(a)
In general
Section 205(f) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 ( 15 U.S.C. 80b–5(f) ) is amended to read as follows:
(f)
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, including any provision of title 9, United States Code, it shall be unlawful for any investment adviser to enter into, modify, or extend an agreement with customers or clients of the investment adviser with respect to a future dispute between the parties to that agreement that—
(1)
mandates arbitration for that dispute;
(2)
restricts, limits, or conditions the ability of a customer or client of the investment adviser to select or designate a forum for resolution of that dispute; or
(3)
restricts, limits, or conditions the ability of a customer or client of the investment adviser to pursue a claim relating to that dispute in an individual or representative capacity or on a class action or consolidated basis.
.
(b)
Application to existing agreements
(1)
In general
With respect to an agreement described in section 205(f) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 ( 15 U.S.C. 80b–5(f) ), as amended by subsection (a) of this section, that was entered into before the date of enactment of this Act, any provision prohibited by such section 205(f), as amended by subsection (a) of this section, is void.
(2)
Ongoing arbitration
A provision of an agreement prohibited by section 205(f) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 ( 15 U.S.C. 80b–5(f) ), as amended by subsection (a) of this section, shall not be void under paragraph (1) if arbitration required by that provision was initiated by any party on or before the date of enactment of this Act.
6.
Application
Except as otherwise stated, the amendments made by this Act shall apply with respect to any agreement entered into, modified, or extended after the date of enactment of this Act.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2026-06-25
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to prohibit mandatory pre-dispute arbitration agreements, and for other purposes.

Sponsors

Rep. Bill Foster (D) sponsors H.R. 9462, and 1 member has co-sponsored it from the day it was introduced.

Committees

H.R. 9462 went before 1 committee: Financial Services.

Financial Services
Financial Services
Referred To · Jun 25, 2026 · 559 Bills

Actions

H.R. 9462 has taken 2 actions since Jun 25, 2026.

ChamberAction
Jun 25, 2026
House
Introduced in House
Jun 25, 2026
House
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.Financial Services Committee

Votes

H.R. 9462 has not gone to a roll call.

1 bill is related to H.R. 9462, as Identical bill.

Titles

H.R. 9462 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.

  • Investor Choice Act of 2026 — Display Title
  • Investor Choice Act of 2026 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to prohibit mandatory pre-dispute arbitration agreements, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced

Lobbying

1 client hired 1 firm and 2 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 9462 in 1 quarterly filing, 2025. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Financial Institutions/Investments/Securities, Insurance, Retirement, Taxation/Internal Revenue Code.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
INSURED RETIREMENT INSTITUTEDistrict of Columbia11

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

RegistrantClientsFilingsReported
INSURED RETIREMENT INSTITUTE11

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill.

LobbyistFirmsClientsFilings
JOHN JENNINGS111
PAUL RICHMAN111

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
INSURED RETIREMENT INSTITUTEINSURED RETIREMENT INSTITUTE2025 first_quarter$170K1st Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 9462 under Finance and Financial Sector, one of its 31 policy areas.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 9462’s is Finance and Financial Sector.

hr9462/policy-areas.txt
Finance and Financial SectorAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Constitutional authority

The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 9462, as entered in the Congressional Record.

[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 107 (Thursday, June 25, 2026)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Mr. FOSTER:H.R. 9462.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:This bill is enacted pursuant to the power granted toCongress under Article I, Section 8, Clauses 1 and 18 of theUnited States Constitution.[Page H4263]

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com