Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

H.R. 9102

U.S. HouseIn House Committee

Summary

H.R. 9102, the BINSA Act, was introduced in the House on Jun 2, 2026 by Rep. John Moolenaar (R) with 1 co-sponsor. It was referred to Financial Services, and last saw action on Jun 2, 2026: Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.


Record

Text

H.R. 9102 has 1 co-sponsor.

hb9102/introduced-in-house.txt
119 HR 9102 IH: Biotech Investment National Security Act of 2026
U.S. House of Representatives
2026-06-02
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
I 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 9102 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES June 2, 2026 Mr. Moolenaar (for himself and Mrs. Dingell ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services A BILL
To amend title VIII of the Defense Production Act of 1950 to alter the definitions of prohibited technology and notifiable technology , and for other purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited at the Biotech Investment National Security Act of 2026 or the BINSA Act .
2.
Findings
The Congress finds the following:
(1)
China has pursued a deliberate, state-directed strategy to dominate global biotechnology, including pharmaceutical development, biologics manufacturing, and clinical research and development capabilities.
(2)
United States capital flowing to Chinese biotechnology companies through licensing agreements, joint ventures, and equity investments is accelerating China’s acquisition of pharmaceutical intellectual property and clinical development capabilities in a manner that creates strategic dependency risks for the United States.
(3)
Cross-border out-licensing transactions between United States and European pharmaceutical companies and Chinese biotechnology firms totaled approximately $136,000,000,000 in 2025, representing a rapid and accelerating transfer of pharmaceutical innovation capacity to entities subject to the direction and control of the People’s Republic of China.
(4)
Biotechnology, including pharmaceutical development and biologics manufacturing, has civil-military dual-use applications and presents strategic dependency risks for the United States comparable to those presented by semiconductors, artificial intelligence, and other technologies already covered under title VIII of the Defense Production Act of 1950.
(5)
The BIOSECURE Act, enacted as part of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026, recognized that biotechnology is both a national security asset and a strategic vulnerability, and that the People’s Republic of China seeks to dominate biotechnology as an industry of the future.
(6)
Consistent application of outbound investment screening to biotechnology is necessary to prevent United States capital and intellectual property from accelerating China’s dominance of the pharmaceutical innovation supply chain in a manner that will create long-term strategic dependency risks analogous to those the United States now faces in rare earth elements and semiconductors.
3.
Amendments
Section 809 of the Defense Production Act of 1950 ( 50 U.S.C. 4589 ) is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (10)(A), by adding at the end the following:
(vi)
Biotechnology, meaning the research, development, manufacturing, or commercialization of—
(I)
pharmaceutical products (which has the meaning given the term drug in section 201(g)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act ( 21 U.S.C. 321(g)(1) ));
(II)
biological products (as such term is defined in section 351(i) of the Public Health Service Act ( 42 U.S.C. 262(i) )); and
(III)
therapeutic compounds, including drug discovery platforms, clinical research and development capabilities, biologics manufacturing, and intellectual property and know-how relating to therapeutic compounds,
;
(2)
in paragraph (7)(A), by adding at the end the following:
(vi)
Biotechnology, meaning the research, development, manufacturing, or commercialization of—
(I)
pharmaceutical products (which has the meaning given the term drug in section 201(g)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act ( 21 U.S.C. 321(g)(1) ));
(II)
biological products (as such term is defined in section 351(i) of the Public Health Service Act ( 42 U.S.C. 262(i) )); and
(III)
therapeutic compounds, including drug discovery platforms, clinical research and development capabilities, biologics manufacturing, and intellectual property and know-how relating to therapeutic compounds,
; and
(3)
in paragraph (4)(A), by adding at the end the following:
(ix)
licensing a prohibited technology from a covered foreign person.
.
4.
Rulemaking
(a)
In general
The Secretary of the Treasury shall, not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, issue a rule to further define the parameters of the area of biotechnology as it is used in paragraphs (7)(A) and (10)(A) of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended by this Act.
(b)
Requirements
When defining the parameters of the area of biotechnology pursuant to subsection (a), the Secretary of the Treasury shall—
(1)
consult with the Secretary of Health and Human Services, the Secretary of Defense, and the Director of National Intelligence;
(2)
give particular consideration to transactions involving the licensing of intellectual property, drug discovery platforms, clinical research and development capabilities, and biologics manufacturing know-how to covered foreign persons (as such term is defined in section 809 of the Defense Production Act of 1950);
(3)
give particular consideration to licensing transactions, joint ventures, and equity investments involving drug discovery platforms, clinical development capabilities, and biologics manufacturing as priority categories for both the prohibited and notifiable technology tiers within the biotechnology sector;
(4)
consider the degree to which a transaction would transfer pharmaceutical innovation capacity, clinical development capabilities, or manufacturing know-how to entities subject to the direction or control of the People’s Republic of China;
(5)
define the biotechnology sector to include the research, development, manufacturing, and commercialization of pharmaceutical products, biological products, and therapeutic compounds, including drug discovery platforms, clinical research and development capabilities, biologics manufacturing, and related intellectual property and know-how transfers; and
(6)
not define the biotechnology sector in a manner that includes or could be construed to include agricultural biotechnology, industrial fermentation unrelated to pharmaceutical or therapeutic production, or basic academic research with no direct pharmaceutical or therapeutic application.
5.
Report required
(a)
In general
Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit a report to the appropriate congressional committees assessing whether flows of United States capital into China’s biotechnology sector, including through licensing transactions with Chinese biotechnology firms, negatively affect United States national security and military readiness.
(b)
Form
The report described in subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form but may include a classified annex.
(c)
Appropriate congressional committees defined
The term appropriate congressional committees means—
(1)
the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives;
(2)
the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives;
(3)
the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives;
(4)
the Select Committee on the Strategic Competition between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party of the House of Representatives;
(5)
the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate;
(6)
the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate; and
(7)
the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2026-06-02
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

To amend title VIII of the Defense Production Act of 1950 to alter the definitions of "prohibited technology" and "notifiable technology", and for other purposes.

Sponsors

Rep. John Moolenaar (R) sponsors H.R. 9102, and 1 member has co-sponsored it from the day it was introduced.

Committees

H.R. 9102 went before 1 committee: Financial Services.

Financial Services
Financial Services
Referred To · Jun 2, 2026 · 559 Bills

Actions

H.R. 9102 has taken 2 actions since Jun 2, 2026.

ChamberAction
Jun 2, 2026
House
Introduced in House
Jun 2, 2026
House
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.Financial Services Committee

Votes

H.R. 9102 has not gone to a roll call.

Titles

H.R. 9102 goes by 4 titles, 2 of them short titles.

  • BINSA Act — Display Title
  • BINSA Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • Biotech Investment National Security Act of 2026 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • To amend title VIII of the Defense Production Act of 1950 to alter the definitions of "prohibited technology" and "notifiable technology", and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced

Lobbying

13 clients hired 13 firms and 96 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 9102 in 13 quarterly filings, 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Health Issues, Medicare/Medicaid, Copyright/Patent/Trademark, Taxation/Internal Revenue Code, Trade (domestic/foreign), Budget/Appropriations, Defense, Banking.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
CURIE BIO OPERATIONS, LLCVenture Capital Firm and Biotech AcceleratorMassachusetts11$130K
ASTRAZENECA11$80K
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYHealthcare and medical researchMaryland11$60K
ACADIA PHARMACEUTICALSCalifornia11
AMGEN INCDistrict of Columbia11
BIOTECHNOLOGY INNOVATION ORGANIZATIONDistrict of Columbia11
FDD ACTIONDistrict of Columbia11
GSK (FKA GLAXOSMITHKLINE INC.)District of Columbia11
NOVARTISDistrict of Columbia11
PFIZER INC.District of Columbia11
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICADistrict of Columbia11
SANOFI US SERVICES INCDistrict of Columbia11
TRAVERE THERAPEUTICSBiopharmaceuticalsCalifornia11

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill. The 20 named most often, of 96.

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICAPHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA2026 second_quarter$7.4M2nd Quarter - Report
AMGEN INCAMGEN, INC.2026 second_quarter$2.4M2nd Quarter - Report
BIOTECHNOLOGY INNOVATION ORGANIZATIONBIOTECHNOLOGY INNOVATION ORGANIZATION2026 second_quarter$2.4M2nd Quarter - Report
PFIZER INC.PFIZER INC.2026 second_quarter$1.9M2nd Quarter - Report
NOVARTISNOVARTIS2026 second_quarter$1.4M2nd Quarter - Report
SANOFI US SERVICES INCSANOFI US SERVICES INC.2026 second_quarter$920K2nd Quarter - Report
GSK (FKA GLAXOSMITHKLINE INC.)GSK (FKA GLAXOSMITHKLINE INC.)2026 second_quarter$890K2nd Quarter - Report
ACADIA PHARMACEUTICALSACADIA PHARMACEUTICALS2026 second_quarter$700K2nd Quarter - Report
FDD ACTIONFDD ACTION2026 second_quarter$240K2nd Quarter - Report
TRAVERE THERAPEUTICSTRAVERE THERAPEUTICS2026 second_quarter$140K2nd Quarter - Report
CURIE BIO OPERATIONS, LLCALSTON & BIRD LLP2026 second_quarter$130K2nd Quarter - Report
ASTRAZENECATIBER CREEK GROUP2026 second_quarter$80K2nd Quarter - Report
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYCORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC.2026 second_quarter$60K2nd Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 9102 under Science, Technology, Communications, one of its 31 policy areas.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 9102’s is Science, Technology, Communications.

hr9102/policy-areas.txt
Science, Technology, CommunicationsAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Constitutional authority

The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 9102, as entered in the Congressional Record.

[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 93 (Tuesday, June 2, 2026)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Mr. MOOLENAAR:H.R. 9102.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:Article I, Section 8, Clauses 1, 3, and 18--the powers tolay and collect taxes, regulate commerce with foreignnations, and make all laws necessary and proper for executingthe foregoing powers, as well as the powers vested in theGovernment of the United States.[Page H3775]

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com