Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

H.R. 9098

U.S. HouseIn House Committee

Summary

H.R. 9098, the Congressional Records Protection Act, was introduced in the House on Jun 2, 2026 by Rep. Mike Kelly (R) with 6 co-sponsors. It last saw action on Jul 15, 2026: Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 22 - 1.


Record

Text

H.R. 9098 has 6 co-sponsors.

hb9098/introduced-in-house.txt
119 HR 9098 IH: Congressional Records Protection Act
U.S. House of Representatives
2026-06-02
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
I 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 9098 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES June 2, 2026 Mr. Kelly of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. Gooden , Mr. Hunt , Ms. Hageman , Mr. Fry , Mr. Onder , and Mr. Jordan ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary A BILL
To protect the separation of powers enshrined in the United States Constitution and end the weaponized surveillance of Members of Congress.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Congressional Records Protection Act .
2.
Prohibition on obtaining records for Members of Congress
(a)
In general
Title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
239
Congressional Records
3773.
Prohibition on obtaining records for Members of Congress or congressional employees
(a)
Prohibition on obtaining records
(1)
In general
Notwithstanding any other provision of Federal or State law, a governmental entity may not—
(A)
seek or obtain a search warrant, grand jury subpoena, court order, statutory authorization, certification, or subpoena that could reasonably be expected to return any covered material; or
(B)
issue an administrative order that could reasonably be expected to return any covered material.
(2)
Exception
This subsection shall not apply if the subject of the search warrant, grand jury subpoena, court order, statutory authorization, certification, subpoena, or administrative order is—
(A)
the target of a criminal investigation; or
(B)
a third party and the search warrant, grand jury subpoena, court order, statutory authorization, certification, subpoena, or administrative order demands records, information, or the content of communications pertaining to a Member of Congress or congressional employee who is the target of a criminal investigation.
(b)
Notification requirement
(1)
Notice
(A)
In general
A governmental entity shall notify the Member of Congress or congressional employee—
(i)
prior to or concurrently with the execution of a search warrant, grand jury subpoena, court order, statutory authorization, certification, administrative order, or subpoena that could reasonably be expected to return any covered material; or
(ii)
as soon as practicable following the execution of a search warrant, grand jury subpoena, court order, statutory authorization, certification, administrative order, or subpoena that unexpectedly returns covered material.
(B)
Exception
If a subject of the search warrant, grand jury subpoena, court order, statutory authorization, certification, subpoena, or administrative order is the target of a criminal investigation or if the subject is a third party and the search warrant, grand jury subpoena, court order, statutory authorization, certification, subpoena, or administrative order demands records, information, or the content of communications pertaining to a Member of Congress or congressional employee who is the target of a criminal investigation, a court may, upon application by the governmental entity, issue an order delaying the notice required under subparagraph (A)(i) with respect to an acquisition, subpoena, search, accessing, or disclosure that could reasonably be expected to return covered material in connection with such investigation for a period of not more than 10 days if the court determines that there is reason to believe that providing notice would—
(i)
endanger the life or physical safety of any person;
(ii)
result in flight from prosecution;
(iii)
result in destruction of or tampering with evidence;
(iv)
result in intimidation of potential witnesses; or
(v)
otherwise seriously jeopardize an investigation or unduly delay a trial.
(2)
Delayed review
(A)
In general
The governmental entity may not review materials that are reasonably expected to contain covered material until the date that is 30 days after the date notice is made pursuant to paragraph (1)(A)(i).
(B)
Unexpected Return of Covered Materials
In instances where a search warrant, grand jury subpoena, court order, statutory authorization, certification, administrative order, or subpoena unexpectedly returns covered material, the governmental entity shall halt review of the returned material upon the discovery of the covered material until the date that is 30 days after the date notice is made pursuant to paragraph (1)(A)(ii).
(C)
Exception
Subparagraphs (b)(2)(A) and (b)(2)(B) shall not apply when a 30-day delay in reviewing materials could cause an imminent risk to life or serious bodily injury.
(c)
Rule of construction
This section may not be construed to limit the scope of any protection applicable under article I, section 6, clause 1 of the Constitution of the United States.
(d)
Definitions
In this section:
(1)
Congressional employee
The term congressional employee has the meaning given that term in subparagraphs (1), (2), (3), and (5) of section 2107 of title 5 and includes current and former congressional employees.
(2)
Covered material
The term covered material means—
(A)
records, including all written materials, wire communications, and electronic communications, that were prepared by, shared with, or otherwise obtained by a Member of Congress or congressional employee in the course of their official duties, including electronic devices containing such records; and
(B)
records from an electronic or wire communication service related to any accounts of Members and from the time period of their service in Congress or official congressional accounts of congressional employees, or related to any communications between a Member of Congress or congressional employee and other Members of Congress, other congressional employees, or executive branch employees while at least one party to the communication was serving or working in Congress and another party to the communication was serving or working in Congress or the executive branch.
(3)
Wire communication; Electronic communication
The terms wire communication, electronic communication, and electronic communication service have the meanings given those terms in section 2510.
(4)
Governmental entity
The term governmental entity means a department or agency of the United States or any State or political subdivision thereof.
(5)
Member of Congress
The term Member of Congress means a current or former Senator or Representative in, or Delegate or Resident Commissioner to, the United States Congress.
(6)
Executive branch employee
The term executive branch employee has the meaning given that term in subparagraph (2)(A) of section 78u1(h) of title 15 and includes current and former executive branch employees.
(7)
Subject of the search warrant, grand jury subpoena, court order, statutory
authorization, certification, subpoena, or administrative order
The term subject of the search warrant, grand jury subpoena, court order, statutory authorization, certification, subpoena, or administrative order means the person whose records are sought by the governmental entity, or, if records are sought from an electronic or wire communication service, the person to whom the sought records pertain.
(8)
Target of a criminal investigation
The term target of a criminal investigation means a person whom a governmental entity has probable cause to believe has committed a crime. If the person is a Member of Congress or a congressional employee, then the governmental entity shall submit an application certifying to a magistrate judge with authority in the district—or if there is none reasonably available, a judge of a court of record in the district—that there is probable cause to believe the person has committed a crime. The judge must certify that the application establishes that probable cause exists prior to or concurrently with the governmental entity seeking, obtaining, or issuing a search warrant, grand jury subpoena, court order, statutory authorization, certification, subpoena, or administrative order for covered material.
(9)
Third party
The term third party means any person who is not a Member of Congress or congressional employee.
.
(b)
Clerical amendment
The table of chapters at the beginning of part I of title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to chapter 238 the following new item:
239. Congressional Records 3773
.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2026-06-02
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

To protect the separation of powers enshrined in the United States Constitution and end the weaponized surveillance of Members of Congress.

Sponsors

Rep. Mike Kelly (R) sponsors H.R. 9098, and 6 members have co-sponsored it, all of them from the day it was introduced.

Committees

H.R. 9098 went before 1 committee: Judiciary.

Judiciary
Judiciary
Markup By · Jul 15, 2026 · 2,181 Bills

Actions

H.R. 9098 has taken 4 actions since Jun 2, 2026, the latest on Jul 15, 2026.

ChamberAction
Jul 15, 2026
House
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session HeldJudiciary Committee
Jul 15, 2026
House
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 22 - 1.Judiciary Committee
Jun 2, 2026
House
Introduced in House
Jun 2, 2026
House
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.Judiciary Committee

Votes

H.R. 9098 has not gone to a roll call.

Titles

H.R. 9098 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.

  • Congressional Records Protection Act — Display Title
  • Congressional Records Protection Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • To protect the separation of powers enshrined in the United States Constitution and end the weaponized surveillance of Members of Congress. — Official Title as Introduced

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 9098 under Crime and Law Enforcement, one of its 31 policy areas, and gives it 5 legislative subjects.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 9098’s is Crime and Law Enforcement.

hr9098/policy-areas.txt
Crime and Law EnforcementAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Legislative Subjects

H.R. 9098 carries 5 of CRS’s legislative subjects, from Congressional officers and employees to Members of Congress.

hr9098/subjects.txt
Congressional officers and employeesCriminal investigation, prosecution, interrogationGovernment information and archivesIntelligence activities, surveillance, classified informationMembers of Congress

Constitutional authority

The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 9098, as entered in the Congressional Record.

[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 93 (Tuesday, June 2, 2026)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania:H.R. 9098.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:Clause 3 of section 8 of article 1 of the Consitution[Page H3775]

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com