Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

S. 4609

U.S. SenateIn Senate Committee

Summary

S. 4609, the Strategy for Crisis Management Act of 2026, was introduced in the Senate on May 20, 2026 by Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D) with 1 co-sponsor. It was referred to Foreign Relations, and last saw action on May 20, 2026: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.


Record

Text

S. 4609 has 1 co-sponsor.

sb4609/introduced-in-senate.txt
119 S4609 IS: Strategy for Crisis Management Act of 2026
U.S. Senate
2026-05-20
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
II 119th CONGRESS 2d Session S. 4609 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES May 20, 2026 Ms. Duckworth (for herself and Mr. Curtis ) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations A BILL
To require the Secretary of Defense to develop a strategy for crisis management in the South China Sea, and for other purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Strategy for Crisis Management Act of 2026 .
2.
Strategy for crisis management in South China Sea
(a)
Crisis defined
In this section, the term crisis means an incident or situation that creates a condition of such national security importance that the President or the Secretary of Defense may consider a commitment of the United States Armed Forces or Department resources, or the initiation of activities by the Department of Defense, to achieve or defend national objectives.
(b)
Strategy
The Secretary of Defense shall develop a strategy for crisis management in the South China Sea that—
(1)
identifies the exact locations of the most likely flashpoints in the South China Sea that could lead to scenarios of crises short of war that would require heightened interagency and international coordination; and
(2)
includes, for each major likely flashpoint, a crisis playbook with sequenced response options and a plan for coordination with foreign partners.
(c)
Objectives
The strategy required by subsection (b) shall be designed—
(1)
to deny the aim of the People’s Republic of China and deter further People’s Republic of China provocation or actions that expand the crisis;
(2)
to ensure the safety of United States citizens and residents in the region and in the United States;
(3)
to ensure the safety of members of the United States Armed Forces in the region, including safety from accidents;
(4)
to preserve United States economic interests in the region, including protecting key trade and commerce routes;
(5)
to protect United States national security interests, including by upholding treaty obligations and protecting allies and partners; and
(6)
to manage possible escalation into combat operations by taking opportunities for de-escalation and maintaining strategic stability.
(d)
Crisis playbooks
(1)
In general
Each crisis playbook required by subsection (b)(2)—
(A)
shall be developed by the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, the applicable Chief of Mission, the Secretary of Commerce, the Secretary of the Treasury, and the head of any other relevant agency; and
(B)
shall be informed by the intelligence community and relevant experts.
(2)
Elements
Each crisis playbook shall include the following:
(A)
A list of specific indicators that would elevate a scenario from a baseline of gray-zone conditions to the level of a crisis.
(B)
Not less than one planning scenario that could lead to crisis, with clearly identified assumptions, phases, and likely branches.
(C)
Anticipated decision points and recommended options, sequenced across all identified phases. The Secretary of Defense shall consider at least the following types of recommended options:
(i)
Response options for Department action, across the range of possible decisions across the Department, including force employment, military posture, Department official statements or travel, engagements or public announcements, capability demonstrations or tests.
(ii)
Recommendations for types of ongoing Department activities to consider ceasing, reducing, or changing in scale or type.
(iii)
Diplomatic and economic options, developed in coordination with the Secretary of State, the applicable Chief of Mission, the Secretary of Commerce, the Secretary of the Treasury, and the head of any other relevant agency, to accompany the options for the Department.
(D)
Each option recommended under subparagraph (C) shall include a cost-benefit-risk analysis, specifically—
(i)
the projected benefit of the option;
(ii)
the assessed risk to members of the United States Armed Forces;
(iii)
the estimated financial cost;
(iv)
the projected humanitarian impact, including the impact on local civilians;
(v)
the projected impact to escalation risk; and
(vi)
any accompanying risk mitigation strategies.
(E)
A list of possible off-ramps, including a description of indicators of such off-ramps and recommendations of options for the Secretary of Defense to take advantage of such off-ramps.
(F)
An engagement plan—
(i)
for streamlined communication and coordination with relevant foreign partners during each phase of the crisis to design collective diplomatic, economic and military responses to People’s Republic of China coercion and avoid potential actions that could unnecessarily provoke or exacerbate a tense situation; and
(ii)
that identifies recommendations for specific immediate actions the Secretary of Defense should take now to pre-coordinate with foreign partners.
(e)
Semiannual review
Not less frequently than semiannually, the Secretary of Defense shall review, update as necessary, and validate each crisis playbook developed under subsection (b)(2).
(f)
Interim report
(1)
In general
Not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a progress report that—
(A)
details the list of locations and scenarios identified under subsection (b)(1);
(B)
provides a status update on the development of the crisis playbook required by subsection (b)(2);
(C)
sets forth a plan for the completion of such playbooks not later than March 2027; and
(D)
details the process by which such playbooks will be reviewed, updated as necessary, and validated under subsection (e).
(2)
Form
The interim report required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form but may include a classified annex.
(g)
Report
(1)
In general
Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate the House of Representatives a report that summarizes the strategy developed under subsection (b).
(2)
Form
The report required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form but may include a classified annex.
(h)
Rule of construction
Nothing in this section may be construed to require the options set forth in a playbook developed under subsection (b)(2) to be the only options considered or followed in a crisis scenario.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2026-05-20
  2. Passed Senate
  3. Passed House
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

A bill to require the Secretary of Defense to develop a strategy for crisis management in the South China Sea, and for other purposes.

Sponsors

Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D) sponsors S. 4609, and 1 member has co-sponsored it from the day it was introduced.

Committees

S. 4609 went before 1 committee: Foreign Relations.

Foreign Relations
Foreign Relations
Referred To · May 20, 2026 · 385 Bills

Actions

S. 4609 has taken 2 actions since May 20, 2026.

ChamberAction
May 20, 2026
Senate
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.Foreign Relations Committee
May 20, 2026
Introduced in Senate

Votes

S. 4609 has not gone to a roll call.

Titles

S. 4609 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.

  • Strategy for Crisis Management Act of 2026 — Display Title
  • Strategy for Crisis Management Act of 2026 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • A bill to require the Secretary of Defense to develop a strategy for crisis management in the South China Sea, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced

Lobbying

1 client hired 1 firm and 6 registered lobbyists who named S. 4609 in 1 quarterly filing, 2025. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Budget/Appropriations, Clean Air and Water (quality), Chemicals/Chemical Industry, Defense, Energy/Nuclear, Labor Issues/Antitrust/Workplace, Natural Resources, Taxation/Internal Revenue Code.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
NATIONAL MINING ASSOCIATIONDistrict of Columbia11

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

RegistrantClientsFilingsReported
NATIONAL MINING ASSOCIATION11

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill.

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
NATIONAL MINING ASSOCIATIONNATIONAL MINING ASSOCIATION2025 third_quarter$649K3rd Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files S. 4609 under International Affairs, one of its 31 policy areas.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; S. 4609’s is International Affairs.

s4609/policy-areas.txt
International AffairsAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com