- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- Administration
- Agriculture
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry
- Appropriations
- Armed Services
- Banking, Housing, And Urban Affairs
- Budget
- Commerce, Science, And Transportation
- Education and Workforce
- Energy And Commerce
- Energy And Natural Resources
- Environment And Public Works
- Ethics
- Finance
- Financial Services
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Relations
- Health, Education, Labor, And Pensions
- Homeland Security
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…
- Indian Affairs
- Indian and Insular Affairs
- Intelligence
- Judiciary
- Natural Resources
- Oversight And Government Reform
- Permanent Select Intelligence
- Rules
- Rules And Administration
- Science, Space, And Technology
- Select Intelligence
- Small Business
- Small Business And Entrepreneurship
- Subcommittee on Aviation
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…
- Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…
- Subcommittee on Federal Lands
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…
- Subcommittee on Health
- Subcommittee on Highways and Transit
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…
- Transportation And Infrastructure
- Veterans' Affairs
- Ways And Means

S. 4609
U.S. Senate•In Senate Committee
Summary
S. 4609, the Strategy for Crisis Management Act of 2026, was introduced in the Senate on May 20, 2026 by Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D) with 1 co-sponsor. It was referred to Foreign Relations, and last saw action on May 20, 2026: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Record
Text
S. 4609 has 1 co-sponsor.
sb4609/introduced-in-senate.txt119 S4609 IS: Strategy for Crisis Management Act of 2026U.S. Senate2026-05-20text/xmlENPursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.II 119th CONGRESS 2d Session S. 4609 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES May 20, 2026 Ms. Duckworth (for herself and Mr. Curtis ) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations A BILLTo require the Secretary of Defense to develop a strategy for crisis management in the South China Sea, and for other purposes.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Strategy for Crisis Management Act of 2026 .2.Strategy for crisis management in South China Sea(a)Crisis definedIn this section, the term crisis means an incident or situation that creates a condition of such national security importance that the President or the Secretary of Defense may consider a commitment of the United States Armed Forces or Department resources, or the initiation of activities by the Department of Defense, to achieve or defend national objectives.(b)StrategyThe Secretary of Defense shall develop a strategy for crisis management in the South China Sea that—(1)identifies the exact locations of the most likely flashpoints in the South China Sea that could lead to scenarios of crises short of war that would require heightened interagency and international coordination; and(2)includes, for each major likely flashpoint, a crisis playbook with sequenced response options and a plan for coordination with foreign partners.(c)ObjectivesThe strategy required by subsection (b) shall be designed—(1)to deny the aim of the People’s Republic of China and deter further People’s Republic of China provocation or actions that expand the crisis;(2)to ensure the safety of United States citizens and residents in the region and in the United States;(3)to ensure the safety of members of the United States Armed Forces in the region, including safety from accidents;(4)to preserve United States economic interests in the region, including protecting key trade and commerce routes;(5)to protect United States national security interests, including by upholding treaty obligations and protecting allies and partners; and(6)to manage possible escalation into combat operations by taking opportunities for de-escalation and maintaining strategic stability.(d)Crisis playbooks(1)In generalEach crisis playbook required by subsection (b)(2)—(A)shall be developed by the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, the applicable Chief of Mission, the Secretary of Commerce, the Secretary of the Treasury, and the head of any other relevant agency; and(B)shall be informed by the intelligence community and relevant experts.(2)ElementsEach crisis playbook shall include the following:(A)A list of specific indicators that would elevate a scenario from a baseline of gray-zone conditions to the level of a crisis.(B)Not less than one planning scenario that could lead to crisis, with clearly identified assumptions, phases, and likely branches.(C)Anticipated decision points and recommended options, sequenced across all identified phases. The Secretary of Defense shall consider at least the following types of recommended options:(i)Response options for Department action, across the range of possible decisions across the Department, including force employment, military posture, Department official statements or travel, engagements or public announcements, capability demonstrations or tests.(ii)Recommendations for types of ongoing Department activities to consider ceasing, reducing, or changing in scale or type.(iii)Diplomatic and economic options, developed in coordination with the Secretary of State, the applicable Chief of Mission, the Secretary of Commerce, the Secretary of the Treasury, and the head of any other relevant agency, to accompany the options for the Department.(D)Each option recommended under subparagraph (C) shall include a cost-benefit-risk analysis, specifically—(i)the projected benefit of the option;(ii)the assessed risk to members of the United States Armed Forces;(iii)the estimated financial cost;(iv)the projected humanitarian impact, including the impact on local civilians;(v)the projected impact to escalation risk; and(vi)any accompanying risk mitigation strategies.(E)A list of possible off-ramps, including a description of indicators of such off-ramps and recommendations of options for the Secretary of Defense to take advantage of such off-ramps.(F)An engagement plan—(i)for streamlined communication and coordination with relevant foreign partners during each phase of the crisis to design collective diplomatic, economic and military responses to People’s Republic of China coercion and avoid potential actions that could unnecessarily provoke or exacerbate a tense situation; and(ii)that identifies recommendations for specific immediate actions the Secretary of Defense should take now to pre-coordinate with foreign partners.(e)Semiannual reviewNot less frequently than semiannually, the Secretary of Defense shall review, update as necessary, and validate each crisis playbook developed under subsection (b)(2).(f)Interim report(1)In generalNot later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives a progress report that—(A)details the list of locations and scenarios identified under subsection (b)(1);(B)provides a status update on the development of the crisis playbook required by subsection (b)(2);(C)sets forth a plan for the completion of such playbooks not later than March 2027; and(D)details the process by which such playbooks will be reviewed, updated as necessary, and validated under subsection (e).(2)FormThe interim report required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form but may include a classified annex.(g)Report(1)In generalNot later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate the House of Representatives a report that summarizes the strategy developed under subsection (b).(2)FormThe report required by paragraph (1) shall be submitted in unclassified form but may include a classified annex.(h)Rule of constructionNothing in this section may be construed to require the options set forth in a playbook developed under subsection (b)(2) to be the only options considered or followed in a crisis scenario.
Tracker
The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.
- Introduced2026-05-20
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- Conference
- To President
- Became Law
A bill to require the Secretary of Defense to develop a strategy for crisis management in the South China Sea, and for other purposes.
Sponsors
Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D) sponsors S. 4609, and 1 member has co-sponsored it from the day it was introduced.
Committees
S. 4609 went before 1 committee: Foreign Relations.
Actions
S. 4609 has taken 2 actions since May 20, 2026.
| Chamber | Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
May 20, 2026 | Senate | Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.Foreign Relations Committee | ||
May 20, 2026 | — | Introduced in Senate |
Votes
S. 4609 has not gone to a roll call.
Titles
S. 4609 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.
- Strategy for Crisis Management Act of 2026 — Display Title
- Strategy for Crisis Management Act of 2026 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
- A bill to require the Secretary of Defense to develop a strategy for crisis management in the South China Sea, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced
Lobbying
1 client hired 1 firm and 6 registered lobbyists who named S. 4609 in 1 quarterly filing, 2025. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.
Filed under Budget/Appropriations, Clean Air and Water (quality), Chemicals/Chemical Industry, Defense, Energy/Nuclear, Labor Issues/Antitrust/Workplace, Natural Resources, Taxation/Internal Revenue Code.
Clients
Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.
| Client | Business | State | Firms | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NATIONAL MINING ASSOCIATION | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 1 | — |
Firms
Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.
| Registrant | Clients | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| NATIONAL MINING ASSOCIATION | 1 | 1 | — |
Lobbyists
Named on the filings that cite the bill.
| Lobbyist | Firms | Clients | Filings |
|---|---|---|---|
| GERALD MULLINS | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| JAMES YOUNG | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| JUSTIN PROSSER | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| KATIE KINGSLEY | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| MARTHA NEWELL | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| RICHARD RUSSELL | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Filings
The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.
| Client | Registrant | Period | Reported | Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NATIONAL MINING ASSOCIATION | NATIONAL MINING ASSOCIATION | 2025 third_quarter | $649K | 3rd Quarter - Report |
Classification
The Congressional Research Service files S. 4609 under International Affairs, one of its 31 policy areas.
CRS Subjects
CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; S. 4609’s is International Affairs.
s4609/policy-areas.txtSource: congress.gov · legiscan.com