Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

S. 4545

U.S. SenateIn Senate Committee

Summary

S. 4545, the Scientific Integrity Act, was introduced in the Senate on May 14, 2026 by Sen. Brian Schatz (D) with 21 co-sponsors. It was referred to Commerce, Science, And Transportation, and last saw action on May 14, 2026: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.


Record

Text

S. 4545 has 21 co-sponsors.

sb4545/introduced-in-senate.txt
119 S4545 IS: Scientific Integrity Act
U.S. Senate
2026-05-14
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
II 119th CONGRESS 2d Session S. 4545 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES May 14, 2026 Mr. Schatz (for himself, Mr. Bennet , Mr. Blumenthal , Mr. Hickenlooper , Ms. Klobuchar , Mr. Luján , Mr. Markey , Mr. Merkley , Mr. Padilla , Ms. Rosen , Mr. Schiff , Mr. Van Hollen , Mr. Warner , Mr. Welch , Mr. Whitehouse , Mr. Wyden , Mrs. Shaheen , Mr. Schumer , Mr. Booker , Ms. Warren , and Ms. Baldwin ) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation A BILL
To amend the America COMPETES Act to establish certain scientific integrity policies for Federal agencies that fund, conduct, or oversee scientific research, and for other purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Scientific Integrity Act .
2.
Sense of Congress
It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
science and the scientific process should help inform and guide public policy decisions on a wide range of issues, including improvement of public health, protection of the environment, and protection of national security;
(2)
the public must be able to trust the science and scientific process informing public policy decisions;
(3)
science, the scientific process, and the communication of science should be free from politics, ideology, and financial conflicts of interest;
(4)
policies and procedures that ensure the integrity of the conduct and communication of publicly funded science are critical to ensuring public trust;
(5)
a Federal agency that funds, conducts, or oversees research should not suppress, alter, interfere with, or otherwise impede the timely communication and open exchange of data and findings to other agencies, policymakers, and the public of research conducted by a scientist or engineer employed or contracted by a Federal agency that funds, conducts, or oversees scientific research;
(6)
Federal agencies that fund, conduct, or oversee research should work to prevent the suppression or distortion of the data and findings;
(7)
under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, citizens of the United States have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances ; and
(8)
Congress has further protected those rights under section 7211 of title 5, United States Code, which states, [t]he right of employees, individually or collectively, to petition Congress or a member of Congress . . . may not be interfered with or denied .
3.
Amendment to America COMPETES Act
Section 1009 of the America COMPETES Act ( 42 U.S.C. 6620 ) is amended by striking subsections (a) and (b) and inserting the following:
(a)
Scientific integrity policies
(1)
In general
Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of the Scientific Integrity Act , the head of each covered agency shall—
(A)
adopt and enforce a scientific integrity policy in accordance with subsections (b) and (c); and
(B)
submit such policy to the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy for approval.
(2)
Publication
Not later than 30 days after the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy approves the scientific integrity policy under paragraph (1) with respect to a covered agency, the head of that agency shall—
(A)
make such policy available to the public on the website of the agency; and
(B)
submit such policy to the relevant Committees of Congress.
(b)
Requirements
A scientific integrity policy under subsection (a) for a covered agency—
(1)
shall prohibit any covered individual from—
(A)
engaging in dishonesty, fraud, deceit, misrepresentation, coercive manipulation, or other scientific or research misconduct;
(B)
suppressing, altering, interfering with, delaying without scientific merit, or otherwise impeding the release and communication of, scientific or technical findings;
(C)
intimidating or coercing an individual to alter or censor, attempting to intimidate or coerce an individual to alter or censor, or retaliating against an individual for failure to alter or censor, scientific or technical findings; or
(D)
implementing an institutional barrier to cooperation with scientists outside the covered agency and the timely communication of scientific or technical findings;
(2)
shall allow a covered individual to—
(A)
disseminate scientific or technical findings, subject to existing law, by—
(i)
participating in scientific conferences; and
(ii)
seeking publication in online and print publications through peer-reviewed, professional, or scholarly journals;
(B)
sit on scientific advisory or governing boards;
(C)
join or hold leadership positions on scientific councils, societies, unions, and other professional organizations;
(D)
contribute to the academic peer-review process as reviewers or editors; and
(E)
participate and engage with the scientific community;
(3)
may require a covered individual, before disseminating scientific or technical findings as described in paragraph (2)(A), to submit such findings to the agency for the purpose of review by the agency of the data and findings for technical accuracy if the scientific integrity policy outlines a clear and consistent process for such review; and
(4)
shall require that—
(A)
scientific conclusions are not made based on political considerations;
(B)
the selection and retention of candidates for science and technology positions in the covered agency are based primarily on the candidate’s expertise, scientific credentials, experience, and integrity;
(C)
personnel actions regarding covered individuals, except for political appointees, are not taken on the basis of political consideration or ideology;
(D)
covered individuals adhere to the highest ethical and professional standards in conducting their research and disseminating their findings;
(E)
appropriate rules, procedures, and safeguards are in place to ensure the integrity of the scientific process within the covered agency;
(F)
scientific or technological information considered in policy decisions is subject to well-established scientific processes, including peer review as appropriate;
(G)
procedures, including procedures with respect to applicable whistleblower protections, are in place as necessary to ensure the integrity of scientific and technological information and processes on which the covered agency relies in its decisionmaking or that the covered agency otherwise uses; and
(H)
enforcement of such policy is consistent with the processes for an administrative hearing and an administrative appeal.
(c)
Implementation
In carrying out subsection (a), the head of each covered agency shall—
(1)
design the scientific integrity policy under such subsection to apply with respect to the covered agency;
(2)
ensure that such policy is clear with respect to what activities are permitted and what activities are not permitted;
(3)
ensure that there is a process for individuals not employed or contracted by the agency, including grantees, collaborators, partners, and volunteers, to report violations of the scientific integrity policy;
(4)
enforce such policy uniformly throughout the covered agency; and
(5)
make such policy available to the public, employees, private contractors, and grantees of the covered agency.
(d)
Scientific Integrity Officer
Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of the Scientific Integrity Act , each covered agency shall appoint a Scientific Integrity Officer, who shall—
(1)
be a career employee at the covered agency in a professional position;
(2)
have technical knowledge and expertise in conducting and overseeing scientific research;
(3)
direct the activities and duties described in subsections (e), (f), and (g); and
(4)
work closely with the inspector general of the covered agency, as appropriate.
(e)
Administrative process and training
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of the Scientific Integrity Act , the head of each covered agency shall establish—
(1)
an administrative process and administrative appeal process for dispute resolution consistent with the scientific integrity policy of the covered agency adopted under subsection (a); and
(2)
a training program to provide—
(A)
regular scientific integrity and ethics training to employees and contractors of the covered agency;
(B)
training to new employees of the covered agency who are covered individuals within 1 month of commencing employment;
(C)
information to ensure that covered individuals are fully aware of their rights and responsibilities regarding the conduct of scientific research, publication of scientific research, and communication with the media and the public regarding scientific research; and
(D)
information to ensure that covered individuals are fully aware of their rights and responsibilities for administrative hearings and appeals established in the scientific integrity policy of the covered agency.
(f)
Reporting
(1)
Annual report
Each year, each Scientific Integrity Officer appointed by a covered agency under subsection (d) shall post an annual report on the public website of the covered agency that includes, for the year covered by the report—
(A)
the number of complaints of misconduct with respect to the scientific integrity policy adopted under subsection (a)—
(i)
filed for administrative redress;
(ii)
petitioned for administrative appeal; and
(iii)
still pending from years prior to the year covered by the report, if any;
(B)
an anonymized summary of each such complaint and the results of each such complaint; and
(C)
any changes made to the scientific integrity policy.
(2)
Incident report
(A)
In general
Not later than 30 days after the date on which an incident described in subparagraph (B) occurs, the head of a covered agency shall submit a report describing the incident to the Office of Science and Technology Policy and the relevant Committees of Congress.
(B)
Incident
An incident described in this subparagraph is an incident in which an individual, acting outside the channels established under subsection (e), overrules the decision of the Scientific Integrity Officer appointed under subsection (d) with respect to a dispute regarding a violation of the scientific integrity policy adopted under subsection (a).
(g)
Office of Science and Technology Policy
The Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall—
(1)
collate, organize, and publicly share all information received by the Director under subsection (f) in 1 place on the website of the Office of Science and Technology Policy; and
(2)
on an annual basis, convene the Scientific Integrity Officer of each covered agency appointed under subsection (d) to discuss best practices for implementing the requirements of this section.
(h)
Periodic review and approval
(1)
Internal review
The head of each covered agency shall periodically conduct a review of the scientific integrity policy adopted under subsection (a) and change such policy as appropriate.
(2)
Review by the Office of Science and Technology Policy
(A)
Review of substantial updates
The head of each covered agency shall submit to the Office of Science and Technology Policy for approval any substantial changes to the scientific integrity policy adopted under subsection (a).
(B)
Quinquennial review
Not later than 5 years after the date of the enactment of the Scientific Integrity Act , and every 5 years thereafter, the head of each covered agency shall submit the scientific integrity policy for such agency to the Office of Science and Technology Policy for review and approval.
(i)
Comptroller General review
Not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of the Scientific Integrity Act , the Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct a review of the implementation of the scientific integrity policy by each covered agency.
(j)
Definitions
In this section:
(1)
Agency
The term agency has the meaning given the term in section 551 of title 5, United States Code.
(2)
Covered agency
The term covered agency means an agency that funds, conducts, or oversees scientific research.
(3)
Covered individual
The term covered individual means a Federal employee or contractor who—
(A)
is engaged in, supervises, or manages scientific activities;
(B)
analyzes or publicly communicates information resulting from scientific activities; or
(C)
uses scientific information or analyses in making bureau, office, or agency policy, management, or regulatory decisions.
(4)
Relevant committees of Congress
The term relevant Committees of Congress means—
(A)
the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate; and
(B)
the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives.
.
4.
Existing policies; clarification
(a)
Existing scientific integrity policies
Notwithstanding the amendments made by this Act, the scientific integrity policy of a covered agency that was in effect on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act may satisfy the requirements under the amendments made by this Act if the head of the covered agency—
(1)
makes a written determination that the policy satisfies such requirements; and
(2)
submits the written determination and the policy to the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy for review and approval.
(b)
Clarification
Nothing in this Act or the amendments made by this Act shall affect the application of United States copyright law.
(c)
Covered agency defined
The term covered agency has the meaning given the term in section 1009 of the America COMPETES Act ( 42 U.S.C. 6620 ), as amended by section 3.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2026-05-14
  2. Passed Senate
  3. Passed House
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

A bill to amend the America COMPETES Act to establish certain scientific integrity policies for Federal agencies that fund, conduct, or oversee scientific research, and for other purposes.

Sponsors

Sen. Brian Schatz (D) sponsors S. 4545, and 21 members have co-sponsored it, 20 of them from the day it was introduced.

Committees

S. 4545 went before 1 committee: Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

Commerce, Science, and Transportation
Commerce, Science, and Transportation
Referred To · May 14, 2026 · 458 Bills

Actions

S. 4545 has taken 2 actions since May 14, 2026.

ChamberAction
May 14, 2026
Senate
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee
May 14, 2026
Introduced in Senate

Votes

S. 4545 has not gone to a roll call.

1 bill is related to S. 4545.

Titles

S. 4545 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.

  • Scientific Integrity Act — Display Title
  • Scientific Integrity Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • A bill to amend the America COMPETES Act to establish certain scientific integrity policies for Federal agencies that fund, conduct, or oversee scientific research, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced

Lobbying

5 clients hired 5 firms and 23 registered lobbyists who named S. 4545 in 5 quarterly filings, 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Government Issues, Science/Technology, Budget/Appropriations, Health Issues, Taxation/Internal Revenue Code, Arts/Entertainment, Banking, Civil Rights/Civil Liberties.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNIONDistrict of Columbia11
DEPARTMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES AFL-CIODistrict of Columbia11
NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNIONDistrict of Columbia11
PUBLIC CITIZENDistrict of Columbia11
ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYA private research university in the Rochester, New York, metropolitan area.New York11

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill. The 20 named most often, of 23.

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNIONNATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION2026 second_quarter$340K2nd Quarter - Report
PUBLIC CITIZENPUBLIC CITIZEN2026 second_quarter$99.6K2nd Quarter - Report
AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNIONAMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION2026 second_quarter$20K2nd Quarter - Report
ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY2026 second_quarter$10K2nd Quarter - Report
DEPARTMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES AFL-CIODEPARTMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO2026 second_quarter2nd Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files S. 4545 under Science, Technology, Communications, one of its 31 policy areas.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; S. 4545’s is Science, Technology, Communications.

s4545/policy-areas.txt
Science, Technology, CommunicationsAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com