- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- Administration
- Agriculture
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry
- Appropriations
- Armed Services
- Banking, Housing, And Urban Affairs
- Budget
- Commerce, Science, And Transportation
- Education and Workforce
- Energy And Commerce
- Energy And Natural Resources
- Environment And Public Works
- Ethics
- Finance
- Financial Services
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Relations
- Health, Education, Labor, And Pensions
- Homeland Security
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…
- Indian Affairs
- Indian and Insular Affairs
- Intelligence
- Judiciary
- Natural Resources
- Oversight And Government Reform
- Permanent Select Intelligence
- Rules
- Rules And Administration
- Science, Space, And Technology
- Select Intelligence
- Small Business
- Small Business And Entrepreneurship
- Subcommittee on Aviation
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…
- Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…
- Subcommittee on Federal Lands
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…
- Subcommittee on Health
- Subcommittee on Highways and Transit
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…
- Transportation And Infrastructure
- Veterans' Affairs
- Ways And Means

H.R. 8470
U.S. House•In House Committee
Summary
H.R. 8470, the Surveillance Accountability Act, was introduced in the House on Apr 23, 2026 by Rep. Thomas Massie (R) with 1 co-sponsor. It was referred to Judiciary, and last saw action on Apr 23, 2026: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Record
Text
H.R. 8470 has 1 co-sponsor.
hb8470/introduced-in-house.txt119 HR 8470 IH: Surveillance Accountability ActU.S. House of Representatives2026-04-23text/xmlENPursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.I 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 8470 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 23, 2026 Mr. Massie (for himself and Ms. Boebert ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary A BILLTo amend title 18, United States Code, to ensure that all searches that significantly impinge on the privacy or security of a person require a warrant based on probable cause, to provide a right of action for violations of Fourth Amendment rights, and for other purposes.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Surveillance Accountability Act .2.Warrant requirement for searches(a)In generalChapter 205 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:3119.Searches to accord with the Fourth Amendment(a)Warrant requirement(1)In generalExcept as provided in subsection (b), no search may be conducted without a warrant issued by a neutral and detached magistrate upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized.(2)Third-Party Data(A)Presumption of privacyThe government shall not access any data, metadata, or personal information held by a third party, including financial services providers, telecommunication service providers, internet service providers, cloud storage companies, or data brokers, without a valid warrant, regardless of whether the third party consents or cooperates.(B)Exception invalidatedNo contractual agreement between a user and a third party may be interpreted as waiving the government’s warrant requirement for access to the data of that user, unless such waiver is knowing, voluntary, and explicit.(b)ExceptionsThe following may be conducted without a warrant:(1)Plain-view searches.(2)The verification of government-issued primary photo identification documents during a stop of a motor vehicle, travel, or other interactions with law enforcement, including the verification of—(A)a State identification card;(B)a driver’s license;(C)a passport;(D)a passport card;(E)a military identification; or(F)a permanent resident card.(3)The collection or analysis of information that is lawfully published or voluntarily made available by a person or entity to a public audience, and which requires no circumvention of privacy settings, encryption, or other access controls.(4)The use of lawful investigative techniques to collect data from publicly available sources such as new outlets, official government publications, public records, or user-posted content that is clearly accessible to the general public without special access or tools.(5)Searches conducted with consent.(6)Searched conducted under exigent circumstances.(c)LimitationsThe exceptions described in subsection (b) shall not be construed to permit the warrantless collection, retention, querying, or analysis of data exposed to public view or accessible to a third party if the person associated with the collected identifiers did not express informed and voluntary consent to such collection with respect to data gathered by entering a public place, operating a motor vehicle on a public roadway, or patronizing a private establishment open to the public, including—(1)biometric data, including facial images, faceprints, gait, voice recognition, or other unique physical identifiers, obtained through facial recognition systems or comparable surveillance technologies; or(2)license plate images, vehicle metadata, or vehicle movement patterns obtained through automated license plate readers or similar systems.(d)DefinitonsIn this section:(1)SearchThe term search means any government-initiated act that intrudes upon an individual’s reasonable expectation of privacy, including the following:(A)Investigatory actsAny investigatory act purposefully directed at a specific person or entity, or the property of a specific person or entity, with the intent of obtaining information not otherwise available to the public.(B)Government surveillance and monitoringAny non-consensual surveillance, monitoring, or inquiry conducted by a government entity or its agents, whether through human, digital, or automated means, that collects information on a specific individual or entity, including information on that individual or entity’s—(i)communications;(ii)associations;(iii)employment;(iv)social media usage;(v)internet usage;(vi)financial transactions; or(vii)travel.(C)Collection of personal dataThe acquisition and analysis of any data, metadata, or information pertaining to a person’s digital or physical life, including—(i)geolocation;(ii)communication records;(iii)personal device activity;(iv)assets;(v)liabilities;(vi)biometric identifiers;(vii)behavioral signals data; or(viii)financial transactions.(2)Plain-view searches definedIn this section, the term plain-view searches means the observation or seizure of evidence by a law enforcement officer who is lawfully present at a location, where the incriminating nature of the evidence is immediately apparent, and where such observation is incidental to the officer’s lawful presence and does not involve the use of enhanced surveillance technology or systematic monitoring.(e)Rule of constructionNothing in this section shall be construed to—(1)modify, supersede, or limit any existing constitutional protection, or to authorize surveillance that would otherwise be unlawful;(2)eliminate or restrict constitutionally recognized exceptions permitting brief investigatory detentions or protective frisks based on reasonable suspicion; or(3)eliminate or restrict the authority of law enforcement officers to conduct brief investigatory detentions, protective frisks, arrests, or searches incident to ordinary criminal law enforcement encounters..(b)Clerical amendmentThe table of sections for chapter 205 of title 18, United States Code, amended by adding at the end the following:3119. Searches to accord with the Fourth Amendment..3.Right of action for violations of Fourth Amendment rights(a)In generalThe Revised Statutes are amended by inserting after section 1979 the following:1979A.Deprivation of Fourth Amendment rights(a)In generalEvery person, including a Federal employee, who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of the United States, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or any person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Fourth Amendment, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress.(b)Attorney’s feesIn any action, suit, or proceeding to enforce this Act, the court, in its discretion, may allow the prevailing party, other than the United States, a reasonable attorney’s fee as part of the costs.(c)Federal employee definedIn this section, the term Federal employee means an individual other than the President or the Vice President, who occupies a position in any agency or instrumentality of the executive branch (including any independent agency).(d)Rule of constructionNothing in this section shall be construed to authorize a Federal employee to bring a suit against their Federal employer or the Federal Government for conduct that is within the scope of the employment relationship..(b)SeverabilityIf any provision of this Act or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder of this Act, and the application of this Act, to any other person or circumstance, shall not be affected thereby.
Tracker
The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.
- Introduced2026-04-23
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- Conference
- To President
- Became Law
To amend title 18, United States Code, to ensure that all searches that significantly impinge on the privacy or security of a person require a warrant based on probable cause, to provide a right of action for violations of Fourth Amendment rights, and for other purposes.
Sponsors
Rep. Thomas Massie (R) sponsors H.R. 8470, and 1 member has co-sponsored it from the day it was introduced.
Committees
H.R. 8470 went before 1 committee: Judiciary.
Actions
H.R. 8470 has taken 2 actions since Apr 23, 2026.
| Chamber | Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 23, 2026 | House | Introduced in House | ||
Apr 23, 2026 | House | Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.Judiciary Committee |
Votes
H.R. 8470 has not gone to a roll call.
Titles
H.R. 8470 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.
- Surveillance Accountability Act — Display Title
- To amend title 18, United States Code, to ensure that all searches that significantly impinge on the privacy or security of a person require a warrant based on probable cause, to provide a right of action for violations of Fourth Amendment rights, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced
- Surveillance Accountability Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
Lobbying
1 client hired 1 firm and 2 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 8470 in 2 quarterly filings, 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.
Filed under Civil Rights/Civil Liberties, Constitution, Intelligence, Law Enforcement/Crime/Criminal Justice.
Clients
Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.
| Client | Business | State | Firms | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DUE PROCESS INSTITUTE | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 2 | — |
Firms
Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.
| Registrant | Clients | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| DUE PROCESS INSTITUTE | 1 | 2 | — |
Lobbyists
Named on the filings that cite the bill.
| Lobbyist | Firms | Clients | Filings |
|---|---|---|---|
| JASON PYE | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| SHANA-TARA O'TOOLE | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Filings
The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.
| Client | Registrant | Period | Reported | Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DUE PROCESS INSTITUTE | DUE PROCESS INSTITUTE | 2026 second_quarter | $15K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| DUE PROCESS INSTITUTE | DUE PROCESS INSTITUTE | 2026 first_quarter | $15K | 1st Quarter - Report |
Classification
The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 8470 under Crime and Law Enforcement, one of its 31 policy areas.
CRS Subjects
CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 8470’s is Crime and Law Enforcement.
hr8470/policy-areas.txtConstitutional authority
The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 8470, as entered in the Congressional Record.
[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 72 (Thursday, April 23, 2026)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Mr. MASSIE:H.R. 8470.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:Article I, Section 8, Clause 18[Page H3092]
Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com