- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- Administration
- Agriculture
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry
- Appropriations
- Armed Services
- Banking, Housing, And Urban Affairs
- Budget
- Commerce, Science, And Transportation
- Education and Workforce
- Energy And Commerce
- Energy And Natural Resources
- Environment And Public Works
- Ethics
- Finance
- Financial Services
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Relations
- Health, Education, Labor, And Pensions
- Homeland Security
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…
- Indian Affairs
- Indian and Insular Affairs
- Intelligence
- Judiciary
- Natural Resources
- Oversight And Government Reform
- Permanent Select Intelligence
- Rules
- Rules And Administration
- Science, Space, And Technology
- Select Intelligence
- Small Business
- Small Business And Entrepreneurship
- Subcommittee on Aviation
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…
- Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…
- Subcommittee on Federal Lands
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…
- Subcommittee on Health
- Subcommittee on Highways and Transit
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…
- Transportation And Infrastructure
- Veterans' Affairs
- Ways And Means

H.R. 8283
U.S. House•In House Committee
Summary
H.R. 8283, the Deterring American AI Model Theft Act of 2026, was introduced in the House on Apr 15, 2026 by Rep. Bill Huizenga (R) with 21 co-sponsors. It last saw action on Apr 22, 2026: Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 43 - 0.
Record
Text
H.R. 8283 has 21 co-sponsors.
hb8283/introduced-in-house.txt119 HR 8283 IH: Deterring American AI Model Theft Act of 2026U.S. House of Representatives2026-04-15text/xmlENPursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.I 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 8283 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 15, 2026 Mr. Huizenga (for himself and Mr. Moolenaar ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs A BILLTo prevent foreign adversaries from threatening the national security of the United States by extracting key technical features of closed-source, American-owned artificial intelligence models, and for other purposes.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as Deterring American AI Model Theft Act of 2026 .2.Sense of CongressIt is the sense of Congress that—(1)artificial intelligence (AI) models owned by United States private sector companies are essential for advancing United States economic and national security interests;(2)many of the most advanced AI models owned by United States companies are closed-source models whose unique technical characteristics are not openly shared or published;(3)the unauthorized acquisition of model capabilities, such as model weights, model architectures, and other technical characteristics of closed-source AI models by entities of concern through model extraction attacks represents a threat to the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States, as well as the intellectual property rights and economic competitiveness of United States companies;(4)the United States Government, in cooperation with private owners of closed-source AI models, should take steps to identify, punish, and deter model extraction attacks on the protected capabilities of closed-source models by entities of concern;(5)model extraction attacks against American closed-source AI models allow foreign adversaries a short cut to acquiring advanced AI capabilities; and(6)authorized model training practices that adhere to the terms of service or are otherwise consistent with contractual terms set by the owners of closed-source AI models are a legitimate research method that play an important role in AI research and are fundamentally distinct from model extraction attacks defined in this Act.3.DefinitionsIn this Act:(1)Appropriate congressional committeesThe term appropriate congressional committees means—(A)the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives; and(B)the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs in the Senate.(2)Closed-source AI modelThe term closed-source AI model means any artificial intelligence model with the following characteristics:(A)Proprietary key technical information such as underlying model weights that are necessary to reproduce and independently recreate the model that are not willingly shared with third parties or otherwise made publicly available by the owner of the model.(B)Access and use governed by terms of service or contractual agreements that are established by the owner of the model.(C)Access that is provided via an Application Program Interface (API) or other consumer-facing, owner-controlled interfaces without enabling third parties to obtain, modify, or host the closed-source AI model on their own data servers or other technology unless specifically authorized by the owner of the closed-source AI model.(3)Country of concernThe term country of concern means—(A)the People’s Republic of China, including the Hong Kong and Macau Special Administrative Regions;(B)the Russian Federation; and(C)any other foreign country—(i)listed in Country Group D:5 under Supplement No. 1 to part 740 of the Export Administration Regulations, as published on January 1, 2026, that is designated by the Secretary of State as a country of concern for purposes of this section and for which notice of such designation has been published in the Federal Register; and(ii)designated by the Secretary of State pursuant to the assessment described in subsection (b) or (e) of section 4 of this Act.(4)Entity of concernThe term entity of concern means any foreign person or entity that—(A)is located or headquartered in, or the ultimate parent company of which is headquartered in, a country of concern;(B)is operating under the direction or control of any entity located or headquartered in, or the ultimate parent company of which is headquartered in, a country of concern; or(C)is conducting or attempting to conduct a model extraction attack against closed-source AI models owned by United States persons and outside of authorized model training practices.(5)ExportThe term export has the meaning given that term in section 1742(3) of the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 ( 50 U.S.C. 4801(3) ).(6)Foreign personThe term foreign person means a person that is not a United States person.(7)Fraudulent account network provider(A)In generalThe term fraudulent account network provider means any foreign entity that knowingly and intentionally creates, obtains, maintains, sells, brokers, or otherwise provides access to accounts that allow entities of concern to access closed-source AI models that they would otherwise be prohibited from accessing due to location restrictions in the terms of service or contractual agreements created by the owner of the closed-source AI model.(B)ExceptionAn entity that creates or transmits location information to enable persons within countries of concern to access the internet for purposes of freedom of expression is not considered, on the basis of this activity alone, a fraudulent account network provider.(8)GoodThe term good has the meaning given that term in section 16 of the Export Administration Act of 1979 ( 50 U.S.C. App. 2415 )(as continued in effect pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act ( 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq. )).(9)In-country transferThe term in-country transfer has the meaning given that term in section 1742(6) of the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 ( 50 U.S.C. 4801(6) ).(10)ItemThe term item has the meaning given that term in section 1742(7) of the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 ( 50 U.S.C. 4801(7) ).(11)Model extraction attack(A)In generalThe term model extraction attack means the unauthorized extracting of a closed-source AI model’s capabilities to replicate, develop, train, or improve another AI model, where such querying—(i)circumvents technical, contractual, or other access controls, identity verification requirements, or geographic access restrictions implemented by the model’s owner;(ii)is conducted through fraudulent, misrepresented, or unauthorized credentials; or(iii)violates the terms, conditions, or restrictions governing access to or use of the model, as established by the owner or authorized provider, that specifically prohibit the use of model outputs or interactions to replicate, develop, train, or improve another AI model.(B)Inference of purposeFor purposes of subparagraph (A), the purpose of querying may be inferred from the totality of circumstances, including—(i)the volume, structure, pattern, coordination, or timing of the querying activity;(ii)the concentration of queries on specific model capabilities;(iii)the use of multiple accounts in a coordinated matter; or(iv)the correlation of querying activity within the development timeline of another AI model.(C)ExclusionModel training activities conducted in compliance with the terms, conditions, and restrictions governing access to and use of the closed-source AI model, or otherwise conducted within a permitted exception or the express authorization of the owner of the closed-source AI model, are not model extraction attacks.(12)Operating Committee for Export PolicyThe term Operating Committee for Export Policy means the Operating Committee for Export Policy referred to in section 1763(c) of the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 ( 50 U.S.C. 4822(c) ).(13)OwnerThe term owner means, with respect to a closed-source AI model, the person or entity that—(A)holds intellectual property rights (including trade secret, copyright, patent, or other proprietary rights), contractual rights, or a combination thereof, sufficient to authorize or restrict third-party access to, use of, extraction from, or reproduction of such closed-source AI model, or any version, instance, or deployment thereof, whether such rights were obtained through development, acquisition, assignment, license, or otherwise; and(B)is a United States person.(14)ReexportThe term reexport has the meaning given that term in section 1742(9) of the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 ( 50 U.S.C. 4801(9) ).4.Assessment of model extraction attacks and fraudulent account network providers(a)In generalNot later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State, in coordination with each agency that is a member of the Operating Committee for Export Policy, shall complete an assessment to determine—(1)which, if any, entities of concern have conducted or are currently conducting model extraction attacks against closed-source AI models owned by United States entities; and(2)which, if any, entities of concern are fraudulent account network providers.(b)Matters To be includedThe assessment required by subsection (a) shall include the following:(1)A determination of which entities of concern—(A)have either previously or are currently engaging in model extraction attacks; or(B)are fraudulent account network providers.(2)A determination of which, if any, countries model extraction attacks have originated from and where fraudulent account network providers exist.(3)An identification of which, if any, agencies or instrumentalities of governments of countries of concern have provided or are providing material assistance to entities identified pursuant to paragraph (1).(4)An analysis of the methods employed by entities of concern identified pursuant to paragraph (1), including—(A)the role of fraudulent account network providers in model extraction attacks, including, to the extent possible, the physical location of fraudulent account network provider offices and data centers; and(B)a determination, to the extent possible, of the number of attempted model extraction attacks that occurred in the previous two calendar years from the date on which the Secretary of State begins the assessment pursuant to subsection (a)(1).(5)An examination of the strengths and weaknesses of various detection approaches that can be used to determine whether a model extraction attack has occurred or is occurring.(6)An assessment of the economic and national security consequences of successful model extraction attacks by entities of concern that occurred in the previous two calendar years from the date on which the Secretary of State begins the assessment pursuant to subsection (a)(1).(7)Steps detailing how the United States Government is assisting owners of closed-source AI models that have been the target or victim of model extraction attacks in detecting model extraction attacks, deterring future model extraction attacks, and punishing entities of concern that engage in model extraction attacks or are fraudulent account network providers.(8)A diplomatic strategy to leverage United States allies and partners in detecting and preventing model extraction attacks by entities of concern.(c)Public consultationIn conducting the assessment required by subsection (a), the Secretary of Commerce, in coordination with each agency that is a member of the Operating Committee for Export Policy, shall consult with owners of closed-source AI models that have been the targets or victims of model extraction attacks, whose participation in this consultation shall be voluntary, other companies, academic experts, industry fora, and other appropriate entities to—(1)identify patterns of attacker behavior and methods to better inform United States Government and private sector efforts to detect model extraction attacks;(2)develop best practices for defending against model extraction attacks; and(3)develop best practices for identifying fraudulent account network provider activities that facilitate model extraction attacks.(d)Report(1)In generalNot later than 210 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Commerce, in coordination with each agency that is a member of the Operating Committee for Export Policy, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that contains the findings of the assessment. The Secretary of Commerce shall, annually for 3 years, submit to the appropriate congressional committees an updated report with any additional entities of concern identified pursuant to subsection (b)(1).(2)FormThe report required by this subsection shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified annex.(e)Routine assessmentThe Secretary of Commerce, in coordination with each agency that is a member of the Operating Committee for Export Policy, shall routinely assess for—(1)model extraction attacks directed against owners of closed-source AI models that occur after the date of completion of the assessment required by this section;(2)fraudulent account network providers that facilitate model extraction attacks after the date of completion of the assessment required by this section; and(3)any material changes related to other matters specified in subsection (b).(f)Industry coordinationThe Secretary of Commerce, in coordination with each agency that is a member of the Operating Committee for Export Policy, shall establish an information sharing mechanism that allows owners of closed-source AI models to voluntarily, quickly, and confidentially share information about model extraction attacks and fraudulent account network providers with the Department of Commerce.(g)AI model extraction attackers list(1)In generalThe Secretary of State, in coordination with each agency that is a member of the Operating Committee for Export Policy, shall—(A)maintain a list, to be known as the AI Model Extraction Attackers List , that displays information about specific individuals and entities of concern, that the assessment required by subsection (a) and routine assessment described in subsection (e) identify as having conducted or directed model extraction attacks in the past year; and(B)publish such list on a publicly available website of the Department of State for up to 5 years.(2)Protection of confidential informationThe Secretary of State may not, in publishing the list required by paragraph (1) on a publicly available website of the Department of State, disclose confidential information provided by owners of closed-source AI models without the express permission of said owner.(h)Public guidanceNot later than 210 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Commerce, in coordination with each agency that is a member of the Operating Committee for Export Policy, shall publish a report comprising of best practices to detect, prevent, and respond to model extraction attacks.(1)Public accessThe report required by this subsection shall be publicly available.(2)Protection of confidential informationIn making the report required by this subsection publicly available, the Secretary of Commerce, in coordination with each agency that is a member of the Operating Committee for Export Policy, shall not disclose confidential information provided by owners of closed-source AI models without the express permission of said owner.5.Deterring model extraction attacks and fraudulent account network providers(a)Addition consideration for Entity ListNot later than 210 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security, in coordination with each agency that is a member of the End-User Review Committee, shall make a determination by majority vote of the Committee on whether entities identified as having conducted model extraction attacks or having facilitated them via fraudulent account networks after the date of the completion of the assessment required under section 4 of this Act (identified pursuant to subsection (e) of such section), or any affiliate of such entity (to be determined by ownership of 50 percent or more in the aggregate, directly or indirectly), should be added to the Entity List maintained by the Bureau of Industry and Security of the Department of Commerce under Supplement No. 4 to part 744 of title 15, Code of Federal Regulations, or any successor regulations.(b)Sanctions described(1)In generalThe President, acting through the Secretary of State, may, pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act ( 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq. ), block and prohibit all transactions in all property and interests in property of entities of concern identified pursuant to subsections (b)(1) and (e) of section 4 if such property and interests in property are in the United States, come within the United States, or are or come within the possession or control of a United States person.(2)Exceptions(A)Exception to comply with international obligationsSanctions under this subsection shall not apply with respect to the admission of an alien if admitting or paroling the alien into the United States is necessary to permit the United States to comply with the Agreement regarding the Headquarters of the United Nations, signed at Lake Success June 26, 1947, and entered into force November 21, 1947, between the United Nations and the United States, or other applicable international obligations.(B)Exception relating to the provision of humanitarianassistanceSanctions under this subsection may not be imposed with respect to transactions or the facilitation of transactions for—(i)the sale of agricultural commodities, food, medicine, or medical devices;(ii)the provision of humanitarian assistance;(iii)financial transactions relating to humanitarian assistance; or(iv)transporting goods or services that are necessary to carry out operations relating to humanitarian assistance.(C)Exception for intelligence, law enforcement, and national securityactivitiesSanctions under this subsection shall not apply to any authorized intelligence, law enforcement, or national security activities of the United States.(3)PenaltiesA person that violates, attempts to violate, conspires to violate, or causes a violation of this subsection or any regulation, license, or order issued to carry out that subsection shall be subject to the penalties set forth in subsections (b) and (c) of section 206 of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act ( 50 U.S.C. 1705 ) to the same extent as a person that commits an unlawful act described in subsection (a) of that section.
Tracker
The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.
- Introduced2026-04-15
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- Conference
- To President
- Became Law
To prevent foreign adversaries from threatening the national security of the United States by extracting key technical features of closed-source, American-owned artificial intelligence models, and for other purposes.
Sponsors
Rep. Bill Huizenga (R) sponsors H.R. 8283, and 21 members have co-sponsored it, 1 of them from the day it was introduced.

Rep. · R–MI-4 · Sponsor
Introduced Apr 15, 2026

Rep. · R–MI-2 · Co-sponsor
Joined Apr 15, 2026 · Original

Rep. · R–NY-17 · Co-sponsor
Joined Apr 20, 2026

Rep. · R–AR-1 · Co-sponsor
Joined Apr 21, 2026

Rep. · R–VA-6 · Co-sponsor
Joined Apr 29, 2026

Rep. · R–NC-10 · Co-sponsor
Joined Apr 29, 2026

Rep. · D–CA-37 · Co-sponsor
Joined Apr 29, 2026

Rep. · R–IL-16 · Co-sponsor
Joined Apr 29, 2026

Rep. · R–TX-10 · Co-sponsor
Joined May 11, 2026

Rep. · R–AL-1 · Co-sponsor
Joined May 11, 2026
Committees
H.R. 8283 went before 1 committee: Foreign Affairs.
Actions
H.R. 8283 has taken 4 actions since Apr 15, 2026, the latest on Apr 22, 2026.
| Chamber | Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 22, 2026 | House | Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session HeldForeign Affairs Committee | ||
Apr 22, 2026 | House | Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 43 - 0.Foreign Affairs Committee | ||
Apr 15, 2026 | House | Introduced in House | ||
Apr 15, 2026 | House | Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.Foreign Affairs Committee |
Votes
H.R. 8283 has not gone to a roll call.
Titles
H.R. 8283 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.
- Deterring American AI Model Theft Act of 2026 — Display Title
- To prevent foreign adversaries from threatening the national security of the United States by extracting key technical features of closed-source, American-owned artificial intelligence models, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced
- Deterring American AI Model Theft Act of 2026 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
Cost estimate
The Congressional Budget Office has filed 1 estimate for H.R. 8283, the latest on May 28, 2026.
- H.R. 8283, Deterring American AI Model Theft Act of 2026 — 2026-05-28As ordered reported by the House Committee on Foreign Affairs on April 22, 2026
Lobbying
5 clients hired 6 firms and 42 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 8283 in 7 quarterly filings, 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.
Filed under Science/Technology, Trade (domestic/foreign), Defense, Education, Homeland Security, Computer Industry, Foreign Relations, Banking.
Clients
Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.
| Client | Business | State | Firms | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY COUNCIL | Advocacy and policy on behalf of innovation and technology companies | District of Columbia | 2 | 2 | $50K |
| FDD ACTION | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 2 | — |
| DEMAND PROGRESS ACTION, INC | — | Maryland | 1 | 1 | — |
| META PLATFORMS, INC. AND VARIOUS SUBSIDIARIES | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 1 | — |
| SOFTWARE & INFORMATION INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 1 | — |
Firms
Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.
| Registrant | Clients | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDD ACTION | 1 | 2 | — |
| DEMAND PROGRESS ACTION, INC | 1 | 1 | — |
| INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY COUNCIL | 1 | 1 | — |
| META PLATFORMS, INC. AND VARIOUS SUBSIDIARIES | 1 | 1 | — |
| SIGHTLINE ADVOCACY, LLC | 1 | 1 | $50K |
| SIIA | 1 | 1 | — |
Lobbyists
Named on the filings that cite the bill. The 20 named most often, of 42.
| Lobbyist | Firms | Clients | Filings |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALEXANDRIA PAOLOZZI MOORE | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| CONNOR PFEIFFER | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| DANIEL VAYNSHTEYN | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| MATTHEW REID ZWEIG | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| NICHOLAS STEWART | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| TYLER STAPLETON | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| ZACHARY JUTCOVICH | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| ANTON VAN SEVENTER | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| BETHANY ABBATE | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| BRIAN RICE | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| CHRISTOPHER HERNDON | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| CHRISTOPHER RANDLE | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| COLIN MCGLYNN | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| DANNY BOUNDS | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| DUSTIN CARMACK | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| ELIZABETH CARROLL | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| FINNEGAN BREWER | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| HAJAR HAMMADO | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| HANNAH SPECOGNA | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| JOHN BRANSCOME | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Filings
The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.
| Client | Registrant | Period | Reported | Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| META PLATFORMS, INC. AND VARIOUS SUBSIDIARIES | META PLATFORMS, INC. AND VARIOUS SUBSIDIARIES | 2026 second_quarter | $6M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| SOFTWARE & INFORMATION INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION | SIIA | 2026 second_quarter | $1.4M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY COUNCIL | INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY COUNCIL | 2026 second_quarter | $720K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| FDD ACTION | FDD ACTION | 2026 first_quarter | $270K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| FDD ACTION | FDD ACTION | 2026 second_quarter | $240K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| DEMAND PROGRESS ACTION, INC | DEMAND PROGRESS ACTION, INC | 2026 second_quarter | $70K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY COUNCIL | SIGHTLINE ADVOCACY, LLC | 2026 second_quarter | $50K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
Classification
The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 8283 under International Affairs, one of its 31 policy areas.
CRS Subjects
CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 8283’s is International Affairs.
hr8283/policy-areas.txtConstitutional authority
The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 8283, as entered in the Congressional Record.
[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 66 (Wednesday, April 15, 2026)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Mr. HUIZENGA:H.R. 8283.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution[Page H2925]
Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com