- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- Administration
- Agriculture
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry
- Appropriations
- Armed Services
- Banking, Housing, And Urban Affairs
- Budget
- Commerce, Science, And Transportation
- Education and Workforce
- Energy And Commerce
- Energy And Natural Resources
- Environment And Public Works
- Ethics
- Finance
- Financial Services
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Relations
- Health, Education, Labor, And Pensions
- Homeland Security
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…
- Indian Affairs
- Indian and Insular Affairs
- Intelligence
- Judiciary
- Natural Resources
- Oversight And Government Reform
- Permanent Select Intelligence
- Rules
- Rules And Administration
- Science, Space, And Technology
- Select Intelligence
- Small Business
- Small Business And Entrepreneurship
- Subcommittee on Aviation
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…
- Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…
- Subcommittee on Federal Lands
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…
- Subcommittee on Health
- Subcommittee on Highways and Transit
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…
- Transportation And Infrastructure
- Veterans' Affairs
- Ways And Means

H.R. 8287
U.S. House•In House Committee
Summary
H.R. 8287, the Semiconductor Controls Effectiveness Act of 2026, was introduced in the House on Apr 15, 2026 by Rep. Greg Stanton (D) with 6 co-sponsors. It last saw action on Apr 22, 2026: Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 43 - 0.
Record
Text
H.R. 8287 has 6 co-sponsors.
hb8287/introduced-in-house.txt119 HR 8287 IH: Semiconductor Controls Effectiveness Act of 2026U.S. House of Representatives2026-04-15text/xmlENPursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.I 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 8287 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 15, 2026 Mr. Stanton (for himself and Mr. Issa ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs A BILLTo require the Assistant Secretary of State for Intelligence and Research to submit a comprehensive report on the impact and effectiveness of United States semiconductor export controls on the People’s Republic of China, and for other purposes.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Semiconductor Controls Effectiveness Act of 2026 .2.Sense of CongressIt is the sense of Congress that—(1)United States export controls on semiconductor manufacturing equipment and advanced integrated circuits are critical for United States national security and the Artificial Intelligence race with the People’s Republic of China (PRC);(2)the efficacy of export controls requires rigorous, data-driven evaluation and assessment;(3)export controls on semiconductor manufacturing equipment and advanced integrated circuits to the PRC have impacted the PRC’s military modernization efforts, indigenous semiconductor industry, and advanced artificial intelligence development; and(4)given the stakes of the strategic and technology competition with the PRC, the American public benefits from public disclosure of the real-world data and impact analysis to understand the national security, foreign policy, and economic impact of specific export control policies.3.Report on impact and effectiveness of semiconductor and advanced computing export controls(a)In generalNot later than 360 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Assistant Secretary of State for Intelligence and Research (in this section referred to as the Assistant Secretary ), in coordination with the Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security and the Director of National Intelligence, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the impact and effectiveness of United States semiconductor export controls on the People’s Republic of China (PRC).(b)ElementsThe report required by subsection (a) shall include a comprehensive inventory of all United States export controls concerning semiconductors and semiconductor manufacturing equipment (SME) destined for the PRC. For each such control, the report should detail the following:(1)A short description of the control and when it was imposed.(2)Whether the control constitutes a technology control, an end-use control, or an end-user control.(3)Whether such control is unilateral in nature or has been implemented by any international partners and allies.(4)An analysis, including quantitative data and evidence to the maximum extent practicable, on—(A)the intended goal or stated purpose of the control when it was originally imposed;(B)the impact of the control on the PRC’s military, intelligence, and surveillance capabilities;(C)the impact of the control on the PRC’s ability to develop, manufacture, and acquire advanced integrated circuits;(D)the impact of the control on the broader PRC indigenous semiconductor industry, its revenue, and global market share;(E)the impact of the control on PRC artificial intelligence capabilities, including, but not limited to, computing capacity, model usage, and data-processing capacity;(F)the impact of the control on the revenue and global market share of United States companies, and, if negatively impacted, whether that revenue went to companies headquartered in allied countries or to PRC companies;(G)the impact of the control on United States long-term technology leadership and global competitiveness; and(H)a determination as to whether the control has been and remains effective in achieving its stated national security objective.(5)An analysis of whether the availability of comparable items, software, or technology from sources outside the United States has undermined the effectiveness of the control. In detailing such foreign availability, the Assistant Secretary shall include whether the foreign availability originates from within the PRC or from allies and partners of the United States.(c)Additional elementsThe report required by subsection (a) shall also identify—(1)controls that have been the most successful in constraining the PRC’s strategic capabilities;(2)a list of controls, if any, that have failed to constrain the PRC and disproportionately harm United States industry without a corresponding advancement in United States national security and foreign policy, and the reason for why the control has failed to constrain the PRC;(3)recommendations on how to bolster cooperation with United States industry to enhance compliance with the controls and the overall effectiveness of controls; and(4)a set of recommendations to improve the efficacy of the export control regime, including—(A)specific refinements to existing controls;(B)methods for bolstering enforcement efforts; and(C)recommendations for closing diversion loopholes.(d)Stakeholder engagementIn carrying out the requirements under subsection (a), the Assistant Secretary shall engage relevant stakeholders to inform the assessment of United States export controls, including—(1)relevant Federal departments and agencies;(2)private sector entities from the United States semiconductor, semiconductor manufacturing equipment, and advanced computing sectors; and(3)individuals from academic institutions, think tanks, and other research organizations with relevant expertise;(e)FormThe report required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form and posted on the Department’s website. The Assistant Secretary of State for Intelligence and Research may include a classified annex as appropriate.4.Appropriate congressional committees definedIn this Act, the term appropriate congressional committees means—(1)the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives; and(2)the Committee on Foreign Relations and the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate.
Tracker
The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.
- Introduced2026-04-15
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- Conference
- To President
- Became Law
To require the Assistant Secretary of State for Intelligence and Research to submit a comprehensive report on the impact and effectiveness of United States semiconductor export controls on the People's Republic of China, and for other purposes.
Sponsors
Rep. Greg Stanton (D) sponsors H.R. 8287, and 6 members have co-sponsored it, 1 of them from the day it was introduced.

Rep. · D–AZ-4 · Sponsor
Introduced Apr 15, 2026

Rep. · R–CA-48 · Co-sponsor
Joined Apr 15, 2026 · Original

Rep. · D–NY-5 · Co-sponsor
Joined Apr 20, 2026

Rep. · D–CA-6 · Co-sponsor
Joined Apr 21, 2026

Rep. · D–CA-37 · Co-sponsor
Joined Apr 21, 2026

Rep. · R–NY-17 · Co-sponsor
Joined Apr 21, 2026

Rep. · D–CA-32 · Co-sponsor
Joined Apr 27, 2026
Committees
H.R. 8287 went before 1 committee: Foreign Affairs.
Actions
H.R. 8287 has taken 4 actions since Apr 15, 2026, the latest on Apr 22, 2026.
| Chamber | Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 22, 2026 | House | Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session HeldForeign Affairs Committee | ||
Apr 22, 2026 | House | Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 43 - 0.Foreign Affairs Committee | ||
Apr 15, 2026 | House | Introduced in House | ||
Apr 15, 2026 | House | Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.Foreign Affairs Committee |
Votes
H.R. 8287 has not gone to a roll call.
Titles
H.R. 8287 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.
- Semiconductor Controls Effectiveness Act of 2026 — Display Title
- To require the Assistant Secretary of State for Intelligence and Research to submit a comprehensive report on the impact and effectiveness of United States semiconductor export controls on the People's Republic of China, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced
- Semiconductor Controls Effectiveness Act of 2026 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
Cost estimate
The Congressional Budget Office has filed 1 estimate for H.R. 8287, the latest on May 13, 2026.
- H.R. 8287, Semiconductor Controls Effectiveness Act of 2026 — 2026-05-13As ordered reported by the House Committee on Foreign Affairs on April 22, 2026
Lobbying
5 clients hired 5 firms and 48 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 8287 in 9 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.
Filed under Budget/Appropriations, Copyright/Patent/Trademark, Taxation/Internal Revenue Code, Consumer Issues/Safety/Products, Accounting, Agriculture, Banking, Bankruptcy.
Clients
Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.
| Client | Business | State | Firms | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 5 | — |
| DEMAND PROGRESS ACTION, INC | — | Maryland | 1 | 1 | — |
| SEMI | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 1 | — |
| SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 1 | — |
| SOFTWARE & INFORMATION INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 1 | — |
Firms
Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.
| Registrant | Clients | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION | 1 | 5 | — |
| DEMAND PROGRESS ACTION, INC | 1 | 1 | — |
| SEMI | 1 | 1 | — |
| SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION | 1 | 1 | — |
| SIIA | 1 | 1 | — |
Lobbyists
Named on the filings that cite the bill. The 20 named most often, of 48.
| Lobbyist | Firms | Clients | Filings |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALEX CATANESE | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| ALISON TOUHEY | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| ANTHONY PARDAL | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| BLAKE EARLEY | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| CHRIS FISHER | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| EDWARD CONNOR | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| EDWIN ELFMANN | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| FRANK PIGULSKI | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| HUGH CARNEY | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| JENNIFER HATTEN | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| JESS SHARP | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| JOHN KEVIN MCKECHNIE | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| JOSEPH PIGG | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| JOSHUA STEIN | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| JUSTIN MELVIN | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| KIRSTEN SUTTON | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| MICHAEL GULLETTE | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| NAOMI CAMPER | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| ROBERT FLOCK | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| ROBERT NICHOLS | 1 | 1 | 5 |
Filings
The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.
| Client | Registrant | Period | Reported | Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION | AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION | 2026 second_quarter | $3.5M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION | AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION | 2026 first_quarter | $3.1M | 1st Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION | AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION | 2025 third_quarter | $2.2M | 3rd Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION | AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION | 2025 second_quarter | $2M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION | AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION | 2025 fourth_quarter | $1.7M | 4th Quarter - Report |
| SOFTWARE & INFORMATION INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION | SIIA | 2026 second_quarter | $1.4M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| SEMI | SEMI | 2026 second_quarter | $470K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION | SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION | 2026 second_quarter | $460K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| DEMAND PROGRESS ACTION, INC | DEMAND PROGRESS ACTION, INC | 2026 second_quarter | $70K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
Classification
The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 8287 under International Affairs, one of its 31 policy areas.
CRS Subjects
CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 8287’s is International Affairs.
hr8287/policy-areas.txtConstitutional authority
The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 8287, as entered in the Congressional Record.
[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 66 (Wednesday, April 15, 2026)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Mr. STANTON:H.R. 8287.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution.[Page H2925]
Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com