Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

H.R. 8287

U.S. HouseIn House Committee

Summary

H.R. 8287, the Semiconductor Controls Effectiveness Act of 2026, was introduced in the House on Apr 15, 2026 by Rep. Greg Stanton (D) with 6 co-sponsors. It last saw action on Apr 22, 2026: Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 43 - 0.


Record

Text

H.R. 8287 has 6 co-sponsors.

hb8287/introduced-in-house.txt
119 HR 8287 IH: Semiconductor Controls Effectiveness Act of 2026
U.S. House of Representatives
2026-04-15
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
I 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 8287 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 15, 2026 Mr. Stanton (for himself and Mr. Issa ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs A BILL
To require the Assistant Secretary of State for Intelligence and Research to submit a comprehensive report on the impact and effectiveness of United States semiconductor export controls on the People’s Republic of China, and for other purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Semiconductor Controls Effectiveness Act of 2026 .
2.
Sense of Congress
It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
United States export controls on semiconductor manufacturing equipment and advanced integrated circuits are critical for United States national security and the Artificial Intelligence race with the People’s Republic of China (PRC);
(2)
the efficacy of export controls requires rigorous, data-driven evaluation and assessment;
(3)
export controls on semiconductor manufacturing equipment and advanced integrated circuits to the PRC have impacted the PRC’s military modernization efforts, indigenous semiconductor industry, and advanced artificial intelligence development; and
(4)
given the stakes of the strategic and technology competition with the PRC, the American public benefits from public disclosure of the real-world data and impact analysis to understand the national security, foreign policy, and economic impact of specific export control policies.
3.
Report on impact and effectiveness of semiconductor and advanced computing export controls
(a)
In general
Not later than 360 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Assistant Secretary of State for Intelligence and Research (in this section referred to as the Assistant Secretary ), in coordination with the Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security and the Director of National Intelligence, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the impact and effectiveness of United States semiconductor export controls on the People’s Republic of China (PRC).
(b)
Elements
The report required by subsection (a) shall include a comprehensive inventory of all United States export controls concerning semiconductors and semiconductor manufacturing equipment (SME) destined for the PRC. For each such control, the report should detail the following:
(1)
A short description of the control and when it was imposed.
(2)
Whether the control constitutes a technology control, an end-use control, or an end-user control.
(3)
Whether such control is unilateral in nature or has been implemented by any international partners and allies.
(4)
An analysis, including quantitative data and evidence to the maximum extent practicable, on—
(A)
the intended goal or stated purpose of the control when it was originally imposed;
(B)
the impact of the control on the PRC’s military, intelligence, and surveillance capabilities;
(C)
the impact of the control on the PRC’s ability to develop, manufacture, and acquire advanced integrated circuits;
(D)
the impact of the control on the broader PRC indigenous semiconductor industry, its revenue, and global market share;
(E)
the impact of the control on PRC artificial intelligence capabilities, including, but not limited to, computing capacity, model usage, and data-processing capacity;
(F)
the impact of the control on the revenue and global market share of United States companies, and, if negatively impacted, whether that revenue went to companies headquartered in allied countries or to PRC companies;
(G)
the impact of the control on United States long-term technology leadership and global competitiveness; and
(H)
a determination as to whether the control has been and remains effective in achieving its stated national security objective.
(5)
An analysis of whether the availability of comparable items, software, or technology from sources outside the United States has undermined the effectiveness of the control. In detailing such foreign availability, the Assistant Secretary shall include whether the foreign availability originates from within the PRC or from allies and partners of the United States.
(c)
Additional elements
The report required by subsection (a) shall also identify—
(1)
controls that have been the most successful in constraining the PRC’s strategic capabilities;
(2)
a list of controls, if any, that have failed to constrain the PRC and disproportionately harm United States industry without a corresponding advancement in United States national security and foreign policy, and the reason for why the control has failed to constrain the PRC;
(3)
recommendations on how to bolster cooperation with United States industry to enhance compliance with the controls and the overall effectiveness of controls; and
(4)
a set of recommendations to improve the efficacy of the export control regime, including—
(A)
specific refinements to existing controls;
(B)
methods for bolstering enforcement efforts; and
(C)
recommendations for closing diversion loopholes.
(d)
Stakeholder engagement
In carrying out the requirements under subsection (a), the Assistant Secretary shall engage relevant stakeholders to inform the assessment of United States export controls, including—
(1)
relevant Federal departments and agencies;
(2)
private sector entities from the United States semiconductor, semiconductor manufacturing equipment, and advanced computing sectors; and
(3)
individuals from academic institutions, think tanks, and other research organizations with relevant expertise;
(e)
Form
The report required by subsection (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form and posted on the Department’s website. The Assistant Secretary of State for Intelligence and Research may include a classified annex as appropriate.
4.
Appropriate congressional committees defined
In this Act, the term appropriate congressional committees means—
(1)
the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives; and
(2)
the Committee on Foreign Relations and the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2026-04-15
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

To require the Assistant Secretary of State for Intelligence and Research to submit a comprehensive report on the impact and effectiveness of United States semiconductor export controls on the People's Republic of China, and for other purposes.

Sponsors

Rep. Greg Stanton (D) sponsors H.R. 8287, and 6 members have co-sponsored it, 1 of them from the day it was introduced.

Committees

H.R. 8287 went before 1 committee: Foreign Affairs.

Foreign Affairs
Foreign Affairs
Markup By · Apr 22, 2026 · 658 Bills

Actions

H.R. 8287 has taken 4 actions since Apr 15, 2026, the latest on Apr 22, 2026.

ChamberAction
Apr 22, 2026
House
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session HeldForeign Affairs Committee
Apr 22, 2026
House
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 43 - 0.Foreign Affairs Committee
Apr 15, 2026
House
Introduced in House
Apr 15, 2026
House
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.Foreign Affairs Committee

Votes

H.R. 8287 has not gone to a roll call.

Titles

H.R. 8287 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.

  • Semiconductor Controls Effectiveness Act of 2026 — Display Title
  • To require the Assistant Secretary of State for Intelligence and Research to submit a comprehensive report on the impact and effectiveness of United States semiconductor export controls on the People's Republic of China, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced
  • Semiconductor Controls Effectiveness Act of 2026 — Short Title(s) as Introduced

Cost estimate

The Congressional Budget Office has filed 1 estimate for H.R. 8287, the latest on May 13, 2026.


Lobbying

5 clients hired 5 firms and 48 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 8287 in 9 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Budget/Appropriations, Copyright/Patent/Trademark, Taxation/Internal Revenue Code, Consumer Issues/Safety/Products, Accounting, Agriculture, Banking, Bankruptcy.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATIONDistrict of Columbia15
DEMAND PROGRESS ACTION, INCMaryland11
SEMIDistrict of Columbia11
SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY ASSOCIATIONDistrict of Columbia11
SOFTWARE & INFORMATION INDUSTRY ASSOCIATIONDistrict of Columbia11

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill. The 20 named most often, of 48.

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATIONAMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION2026 second_quarter$3.5M2nd Quarter - Report
AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATIONAMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION2026 first_quarter$3.1M1st Quarter - Report
AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATIONAMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION2025 third_quarter$2.2M3rd Quarter - Report
AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATIONAMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION2025 second_quarter$2M2nd Quarter - Report
AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATIONAMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION2025 fourth_quarter$1.7M4th Quarter - Report
SOFTWARE & INFORMATION INDUSTRY ASSOCIATIONSIIA2026 second_quarter$1.4M2nd Quarter - Report
SEMISEMI2026 second_quarter$470K2nd Quarter - Report
SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY ASSOCIATIONSEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION2026 second_quarter$460K2nd Quarter - Report
DEMAND PROGRESS ACTION, INCDEMAND PROGRESS ACTION, INC2026 second_quarter$70K2nd Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 8287 under International Affairs, one of its 31 policy areas.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 8287’s is International Affairs.

hr8287/policy-areas.txt
International AffairsAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Constitutional authority

The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 8287, as entered in the Congressional Record.

[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 66 (Wednesday, April 15, 2026)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Mr. STANTON:H.R. 8287.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution.[Page H2925]

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com