- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- Administration
- Agriculture
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry
- Appropriations
- Armed Services
- Banking, Housing, And Urban Affairs
- Budget
- Commerce, Science, And Transportation
- Education and Workforce
- Energy And Commerce
- Energy And Natural Resources
- Environment And Public Works
- Ethics
- Finance
- Financial Services
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Relations
- Health, Education, Labor, And Pensions
- Homeland Security
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…
- Indian Affairs
- Indian and Insular Affairs
- Intelligence
- Judiciary
- Natural Resources
- Oversight And Government Reform
- Permanent Select Intelligence
- Rules
- Rules And Administration
- Science, Space, And Technology
- Select Intelligence
- Small Business
- Small Business And Entrepreneurship
- Subcommittee on Aviation
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…
- Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…
- Subcommittee on Federal Lands
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…
- Subcommittee on Health
- Subcommittee on Highways and Transit
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…
- Transportation And Infrastructure
- Veterans' Affairs
- Ways And Means

H.R. 8037
U.S. House•In House Committee
Summary
H.R. 8037, the Protect American AI Act of 2026, was introduced in the House on Mar 24, 2026 by Rep. Michael Baumgartner (R). It was referred to Judiciary, and last saw action on Mar 24, 2026: Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Record
Text
H.R. 8037 has no co-sponsors and has not gone to a roll call.
hb8037/introduced-in-house.txt119 HR 8037 IH: Protect American AI Act of 2026U.S. House of Representatives2026-03-24text/xmlENPursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.I 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 8037 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES March 24, 2026 Mr. Baumgartner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary , and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce , for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned A BILLTo limit the effect of litigation on the environmental application process for data centers and associated infrastructure.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Protect American AI Act of 2026 .2.DefinitionsIn this Act:(1)Covered applicationThe term covered application means an application for an authorization to site, construct, expand, or operate a—(A)data center; or(B)covered infrastructure.(2)Data centerThe term data center means any facility that primarily contains electronic equipment used to process, store, or transmit digital information.(3)Covered infrastructureThe term covered infrastructure means any infrastructure, facility, or other project that is primarily constructed, expanded, or operated to support a data center.3.Effect of litigation on data center and covered infrastructure applications(a)Effect of litigationA civil action relating to an environmental review under the Natural Gas Act ( 15 U.S.C. 717 et seq. ), the Federal Water Pollution Control Act ( 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq. ), the Endangered Species Act of 1973 ( 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq. ), sections 10 and 14 of the Act of March 3, 1899 ( 33 U.S.C. 403 ; 408), the Clean Air Act ( 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. ), or the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 ( 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq. ) with respect to a data center or covered infrastructure shall not affect the validity of a permit, license, or approval issued for the data center or covered infrastructure that is the subject of the civil action.(b)Remand; processing of covered applicationsIf, in a civil action described in subsection (a), the environmental review for a permit, license, or approval issued to the data center or covered infrastructure that is the subject of the civil action is found by the applicable court to violate the Natural Gas Act ( 15 U.S.C. 717 et seq. ), the Federal Water Pollution Control Act ( 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq. ), the Endangered Species Act of 1973 ( 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq. ), sections 10 and 14 of the Act of March 3, 1899 ( 33 U.S.C. 403 ; 408), the Clean Air Act ( 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. ), or the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 ( 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq. )—(1)notwithstanding chapter 5 or 7 of title 5, United States Code (commonly referred to as the Administrative Procedure Act ), the applicable court shall not set aside or vacate the permit, license, or approval issued for the data center or covered infrastructure but instead remand the matter to the relevant Federal agency to resolve the violation; and(2)the relevant Federal agency shall continue to process all covered applications.4.Action on covered applications(a)Judicial reviewExcept for review in the Supreme Court of the United States, the court of appeals of the United States for the circuit in which a data center or covered infrastructure is, or will be, located pursuant to a covered application shall have original and exclusive jurisdiction over any civil action for the review of an order issued by a Federal agency with respect to the covered application.(b)Expedited reviewThe applicable United States Court of Appeals under subsection (a) shall—(1)set any civil action brought under this subsection for expedited review; and(2)set the action on the docket as soon as practicable after the filing date of the initial pleading.(c)Transfer of existing actionsIn the case of a covered application for which a petition for review has been filed as of the date of enactment of this Act, the petition shall be—(1)on a motion by the applicant, transferred to the court of appeals of the United States in which the data center or covered infrastructure that is the subject of the covered application is, or will be, located; and(2)adjudicated in accordance with this section.(d)Limitation on claimsNotwithstanding any other provision of law, a claim arising under Federal law seeking judicial review of a permit, license, or approval issued by a Federal agency for a data center or covered infrastructure pursuant to a covered application shall be barred unless the claim is filed not later than 90 days after publication of a notice in the Federal Register announcing that the permit, license, or approval is final pursuant to the law under which the agency action is taken, unless a shorter time is specified in the Federal law pursuant to which judicial review is allowed.(e)Savings clauseNothing in this section establishes a right to judicial review or places any limit on filing a claim that a person has violated the terms of a permit, license, or approval.
Tracker
The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.
- Introduced2026-03-24
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- Conference
- To President
- Became Law
To limit the effect of litigation on the environmental application process for data centers and associated infrastructure.
Sponsors
Rep. Michael Baumgartner (R) sponsors H.R. 8037 alone.
Committees
H.R. 8037 went before 2 committees: Energy and Commerce and Judiciary.
Actions
H.R. 8037 has taken 2 actions since Mar 24, 2026.
| Chamber | Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 24, 2026 | House | Introduced in House | ||
Mar 24, 2026 | House | Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.Judiciary Committee |
Votes
H.R. 8037 has not gone to a roll call.
Titles
H.R. 8037 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.
- Protect American AI Act of 2026 — Display Title
- Protect American AI Act of 2026 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
- To limit the effect of litigation on the environmental application process for data centers and associated infrastructure. — Official Title as Introduced
Lobbying
6 clients hired 6 firms and 38 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 8037 in 12 quarterly filings, 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.
Filed under Energy/Nuclear, Natural Resources, Budget/Appropriations, Government Issues, Agriculture, Animals, Clean Air and Water (quality), Chemicals/Chemical Industry.
Clients
Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.
| Client | Business | State | Firms | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EARTHJUSTICE ACTION | nonprofit advocacy organization | District of Columbia | 1 | 3 | — |
| DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 2 | — |
| LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. | Consumer electronics manufacturer | North Carolina | 1 | 2 | — |
| NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIES | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 2 | — |
| SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER | — | Virginia | 1 | 2 | — |
| EARTHJUSTICE | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 1 | — |
Firms
Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.
| Registrant | Clients | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| EARTHJUSTICE ACTION | 1 | 3 | — |
| DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE | 1 | 2 | — |
| LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. | 1 | 2 | — |
| NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIES | 1 | 2 | — |
| SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER | 1 | 2 | — |
| EARTHJUSTICE | 1 | 1 | — |
Lobbyists
Named on the filings that cite the bill. The 20 named most often, of 38.
| Lobbyist | Firms | Clients | Filings |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADDIE HAUGHEY | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| AUBURN BELL | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| BLAINE MILLER MCFEELEY | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| CAMERON WALKUP | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| DANIEL SAVERY | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| ELIZABETH RUBEN | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| JASMINE JENNINGS ELLER | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| KRISTIN BUTLER | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| NIRANJANI PRABHAKAR | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| RAUL GARCIA LOPEZ | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| STEPHEN SCHIMA | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| ANDREW GINSBURG | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| ANNE CLEMENT | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| ANTHONY COTTO | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| CASSIE FERRI | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| CHRISTOPHER WESTFALL | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| DANIEL MOSS | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| HEATHER SMITH | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| JAMES GRANDE | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| JON BEAMER | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Filings
The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.
| Client | Registrant | Period | Reported | Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. | LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. | 2026 second_quarter | $570K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. | LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. | 2026 first_quarter | $570K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIES | NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIES | 2026 second_quarter | $540K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIES | NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIES | 2026 first_quarter | $506.4K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER | SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER | 2026 first_quarter | $280K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE | DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE | 2026 second_quarter | $270K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| EARTHJUSTICE ACTION | EARTHJUSTICE ACTION | 2026 second_quarter | $188.3K | 2nd Quarter - Amendme… |
| EARTHJUSTICE ACTION | EARTHJUSTICE ACTION | 2026 second_quarter | $188.3K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| EARTHJUSTICE ACTION | EARTHJUSTICE ACTION | 2026 first_quarter | $111.7K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE | DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE | 2026 first_quarter | $100K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER | SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER | 2026 second_quarter | $90K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| EARTHJUSTICE | EARTHJUSTICE | 2026 first_quarter | $55.5K | 1st Quarter - Report |
Classification
The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 8037 under Law, one of its 31 policy areas.
CRS Subjects
CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 8037’s is Law.
hr8037/policy-areas.txtConstitutional authority
The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 8037, as entered in the Congressional Record.
[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 55 (Tuesday, March 24, 2026)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Mr. BAUMGARTNER:H.R. 8037.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:Art I, Sec 8[Page H2676]
Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com