Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

S. 4091

U.S. SenateIn Senate Committee

Summary

S. 4091, the Habitat Connectivity on Working Lands Act of 2026, was introduced in the Senate on Mar 12, 2026 by Sen. Martin Heinrich (D) with 1 co-sponsor. It was referred to Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry, and last saw action on Mar 12, 2026: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.


Record

Text

S. 4091 has 1 co-sponsor.

sb4091/introduced-in-senate.txt
119 S4091 IS: Habitat Connectivity on Working Lands Act of 2026
U.S. Senate
2026-03-12
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
II 119th CONGRESS 2d Session S. 4091 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES March 12, 2026 Mr. Heinrich (for himself and Mr. Sheehy ) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry A BILL
To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to improve wildlife habitat connectivity and wildlife migration corridors, and for other purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Habitat Connectivity on Working Lands Act of 2026 .
2.
Conservation programs
(a)
Definition of native big game species
Section 1201(a) of the Food Security Act of 1985 ( 16 U.S.C. 3801(a) ) is amended—
(1)
by redesignating paragraphs (18) through (27) as paragraphs (19) through (28), respectively; and
(2)
by inserting after paragraph (17) the following:
(18)
Native big game species
The term native big game species means a native species of a large mammal, including a wild deer, an elk, a pronghorn, a wild sheep, and a moose.
.
(b)
Regional Conservation Partnership Program critical conservation areas
Section 1271F(a)(2)(C) of the Food Security Act of 1985 ( 16 U.S.C. 3871f(a)(2)(C) ) is amended by inserting , including restoration and enhancement of wildlife habitat connectivity and wildlife migration corridors, with a focus on native big game species before ; and .
(c)
Enrollment in the environmental quality incentives program and the conservation stewardship program of grassland enrolled in the conservation reserve program
(1)
Environmental quality incentives program
Section 1240B(d) of the Food Security Act of 1985 ( 16 U.S.C. 3839aa–2(d) ) is amended—
(A)
in paragraph (6), by striking A producer and inserting Except as provided in paragraph (8), a producer ; and
(B)
by adding at the end the following:
(8)
Cost-share payments for grassland enrolled in the conservation reserve program
(A)
In general
The Secretary may provide payments under the program for costs associated with planning, design, materials, equipment, installation, labor, management, maintenance, or training with respect to eligible land that is—
(i)
enrolled in the conservation reserve program under section 1231(d)(2)(A); and
(ii)
of ecological significance, as described in section 1231(d)(2)(B)(iii).
(B)
Limitations
(i)
Other Federal programs
A producer shall not be eligible for payments under subparagraph (A) for practices if the producer receives payments or other benefits for the same practice on the same land under another Federal program (other than the conservation reserve program under subchapter B of chapter 1).
(ii)
Protection of emergency grazing and haying
An activity to restore or enhance wildlife habitat connectivity or wildlife migration corridors carried out using a payment under subparagraph (A) shall not prevent or alter emergency haying or emergency grazing carried out in accordance with the requirements of the conservation reserve program under subchapter B of chapter 1.
.
(2)
Conservation stewardship program
Section 1240J(b) of the Food Security Act of 1985 ( 16 U.S.C. 3839aa–22(b) ) is amended—
(A)
in paragraph (1), in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by inserting and except as provided in paragraph (3), after paragraph (2), ; and
(B)
by adding at the end the following:
(3)
Cost-share payments for grassland enrolled in the conservation reserve program
(A)
In general
The Secretary may provide payments under the program for costs associated with planning, design, materials, equipment, installation, labor, management, maintenance, or training with respect to eligible land that is—
(i)
enrolled in the conservation reserve program under section 1231(d)(2)(A); and
(ii)
of ecological significance, as described in section 1231(d)(2)(B)(iii).
(B)
Limitations
(i)
Other Federal programs
A producer shall not be eligible for payments under subparagraph (A) for conservation activities if the producer receives payments or other benefits for the same conservation activities on the same land under another Federal program (other than the conservation reserve program under subchapter B of chapter 1).
(ii)
Protection of emergency grazing and haying
An activity to restore or enhance wildlife habitat connectivity or wildlife migration corridors carried out using a payment under subparagraph (A) shall not prevent or alter emergency haying or emergency grazing carried out in accordance with the requirements of the conservation reserve program under subchapter B of chapter 1.
.
(3)
Payment limitation for rental payments under the conservation reserve program
Section 1234(g)(1) of the Food Security Act of 1985 ( 16 U.S.C. 3834(g)(1) ) is amended by striking $50,000 and inserting $125,000 .
(d)
Increased payments under the environmental quality incentives program
Section 1240B(d) of the Food Security Act of 1985 ( 16 U.S.C. 3839aa–2(d) ) is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (3)(F), by inserting and wildlife habitat connectivity before ; or ; and
(2)
in paragraph (7)(A)—
(A)
in clause (iii), by striking or at the end;
(B)
in clause (iv), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; or ; and
(C)
by adding at the end the following:
(v)
addresses the conservation and restoration of wildlife habitat, including wildlife habitat connectivity and wildlife migration corridors.
.
(e)
Conservation practice standards
Section 1242 of the Food Security Act of 1985 ( 16 U.S.C. 3842 ) is amended by adding at the end the following:
(j)
Addressing barriers to habitat connectivity
(1)
In general
The Secretary shall—
(A)
to the maximum extent practicable, fully incorporate nonstructural methods to manage livestock distribution, such as virtual fencing, into the conservation practice standards; and
(B)
provide for the appropriate range of conservation practices and resource mitigation measures available to landowners using nonstructural methods described in subparagraph (A).
(2)
Availability of adequate technical assistance
The Secretary shall ensure that adequate technical assistance is available for the implementation of—
(A)
nonstructural methods described in paragraph (1)(A); and
(B)
other practices that support habitat connectivity through Federal conservation programs.
.
(f)
Administrative requirements for conservation programs
Section 1244 of the Food Security Act of 1985 ( 16 U.S.C. 3844 ) is amended by adding at the end the following:
(q)
Encouragement of habitat connectivity and native big game migration corridors
In carrying out any conservation program administered by the Secretary, the Secretary may, as appropriate, encourage—
(1)
the conservation of landscape corridors and hydrologic connectivity, where native big game species and ecological processes can transition from one habitat to another, in order to conserve native biodiversity and ensure resiliency against impacts from a range of stressors; and
(2)
the use of conservation practices that support the development, restoration, and maintenance of landscape corridors and hydrologic connectivity.
.
3.
High-priority research and extension areas
Section 1672(d) of the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 ( 7 U.S.C. 5925(d) ) is amended by adding at the end the following:
(21)
Virtual fencing
Research and extension grants may be made under this section for the purposes of—
(A)
understanding and addressing the barriers to the adoption of virtual fencing technology; or
(B)
studying the effects of virtual fencing technology on—
(i)
natural and cultural resources, such as—
(I)
sensitive riparian areas; and
(II)
crucial winter range and stopover habitats for native big game species (as defined in section 1201(a) of the Food Security Act of 1985 ( 16 U.S.C. 3801(a) )); or
(ii)
overall range health.
.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2026-03-12
  2. Passed Senate
  3. Passed House
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

A bill to amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to improve wildlife habitat connectivity and wildlife migration corridors, and for other purposes.

Sponsors

Sen. Martin Heinrich (D) sponsors S. 4091, and 1 member has co-sponsored it from the day it was introduced.

Committees

S. 4091 went before 1 committee: Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.

Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry
Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry
Referred To · Mar 12, 2026 · 334 Bills

Actions

S. 4091 has taken 2 actions since Mar 12, 2026.

ChamberAction
Mar 12, 2026
Senate
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry Committee
Mar 12, 2026
Introduced in Senate

Votes

S. 4091 has not gone to a roll call.

Titles

S. 4091 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.

  • Habitat Connectivity on Working Lands Act of 2026 — Display Title
  • Habitat Connectivity on Working Lands Act of 2026 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • A bill to amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to improve wildlife habitat connectivity and wildlife migration corridors, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced

Lobbying

1 client hired 1 firm and 1 registered lobbyist who named S. 4091 in 2 quarterly filings, 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Agriculture, Animals, Budget/Appropriations, Environment/Superfund, Marine/Maritime/Boating/Fisheries, Natural Resources.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND, INC.District of Columbia12

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

RegistrantClientsFilingsReported
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND, INC.12

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill.

LobbyistFirmsClientsFilings
JONATHON GARTSHORE112

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND, INC.WORLD WILDLIFE FUND, INC.2026 second_quarter$220K2nd Quarter - Report
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND, INC.WORLD WILDLIFE FUND, INC.2026 first_quarter$130K1st Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files S. 4091 under Agriculture and Food, one of its 31 policy areas.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; S. 4091’s is Agriculture and Food.

s4091/policy-areas.txt
Agriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com