Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

H.R. 7491

U.S. HouseIn House Committee

Summary

H.R. 7491, the Effective Assistance of Counsel in the Digital Era Act, was introduced in the House on Feb 11, 2026 by Rep. Madeleine Dean (D) with 3 co-sponsors. It was referred to Judiciary, and last saw action on Feb 11, 2026: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.


Record

Text

H.R. 7491 has 3 co-sponsors.

hb7491/introduced-in-house.txt
119 HR 7491 IH: Effective Assistance of Counsel in the Digital Era Act
U.S. House of Representatives
2026-02-11
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
I 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 7491 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES February 11, 2026 Ms. Dean of Pennsylvania (for herself, Mr. Jeffries , Ms. Lee of Florida , and Mr. Bacon ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary A BILL
To regulate monitoring of electronic communications between an incarcerated person in a Bureau of Prisons facility and that person’s attorney or other legal representative, and for other purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Effective Assistance of Counsel in the Digital Era Act .
2.
Electronic communications between an incarcerated person and the person’s attorney
(a)
Prohibition on monitoring
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Attorney General shall create a program or system, or modify any program or system that exists on the date of enactment of this Act, through which an incarcerated person sends or receives an electronic communication, to exclude from monitoring the contents of any privileged electronic communication. In the case that the Attorney General creates a program or system in accordance with this subsection, the Attorney General shall, upon implementing such system, discontinue using any program or system that exists on the date of enactment of this Act through which an incarcerated person sends or receives a privileged electronic communication, except that any program or system that exists on such date may continue to be used for any other electronic communication.
(b)
Retention of contents
A program or system or a modification to a program or system under subsection (a) may allow for retention by the Bureau of Prisons of, and access by an incarcerated person to, the contents of electronic communications, including the contents of privileged electronic communications, of the person until the date on which the person is released from prison.
(c)
Attorney-Client privilege
Attorney-client privilege, and the protections and limitations associated with such privilege (including the crime fraud exception), applies to electronic communications sent or received through the program or system established or modified under subsection (a).
(d)
Accessing retained contents
Contents retained under subsection (b) may only be accessed by a person other than the incarcerated person for whom such contents are retained under the following circumstances:
(1)
Attorney General
The Attorney General may only access retained contents if necessary for the purpose of creating and maintaining the program or system, or any modification to the program or system, through which an incarcerated person sends or receives electronic communications. The Attorney General may not review retained contents that are accessed pursuant to this paragraph.
(2)
Investigative and law enforcement officers
(A)
Warrant
(i)
In general
Retained contents may only be accessed by an investigative or law enforcement officer pursuant to a warrant issued by a court pursuant to the procedures described in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
(ii)
Approval
No application for a warrant may be made to a court without the express approval of a United States Attorney or an Assistant Attorney General.
(B)
Privileged information
(i)
Review
Before retained contents may be accessed pursuant to a warrant obtained under subparagraph (A), such contents shall be reviewed by a United States Attorney to ensure that privileged electronic communications are not accessible.
(ii)
Barring participation
A United States Attorney who reviews retained contents pursuant to clause (i) shall be barred from—
(I)
participating in a legal proceeding in which an individual who sent or received an electronic communication from which such contents are retained under subsection (b) is a defendant; or
(II)
sharing the retained contents with an attorney who is participating in such a legal proceeding.
(3)
Motion to suppress
In a case in which retained contents have been accessed in violation of this subsection, a court may suppress evidence obtained or derived from access to such contents upon motion of the defendant.
(e)
Definitions
In this Act—
(1)
the term agent of an attorney or legal representative means any person employed by or contracting with an attorney or legal representative, including law clerks, interns, investigators, paraprofessionals, and administrative staff;
(2)
the term contents has the meaning given such term in 2510 of title 18, United States Code;
(3)
the term electronic communication has the meaning given such term in section 2510 of title 18, United States Code, and includes the Trust Fund Limited Inmate Computer System;
(4)
the term monitoring means accessing the contents of an electronic communication at any time after such communication is sent;
(5)
the term incarcerated person means any individual in the custody of the Bureau of Prisons or the United States Marshals Service who has been charged with or convicted of an offense against the United States, including such an individual who is imprisoned in a State institution; and
(6)
the term privileged electronic communication means—
(A)
any electronic communication between an incarcerated person and a potential, current, or former attorney or legal representative of such a person; and
(B)
any electronic communication between an incarcerated person and the agent of an attorney or legal representative described in subparagraph (A).

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2026-02-11
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

CRS Summary

The summaries are the Congressional Research Service’s, one per stage. Read them in full.

Introduced in House Feb 11, 2026

hb7491/introduced-in-house.md

Shown Here:
Introduced in House (02/11/2026)

Effective Assistance of Counsel in the Digital Era Act

This bill prohibits the Department of Justice from monitoring the contents of a privileged electronic communication between an incarcerated person and his or her legal representative.

Sponsors

Rep. Madeleine Dean (D) sponsors H.R. 7491, and 3 members have co-sponsored it, all of them from the day it was introduced.

Committees

H.R. 7491 went before 1 committee: Judiciary.

Judiciary
Judiciary
Referred To · Feb 11, 2026 · 2,181 Bills

Actions

H.R. 7491 has taken 2 actions since Feb 11, 2026.

ChamberAction
Feb 11, 2026
House
Introduced in House
Feb 11, 2026
House
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.Judiciary Committee

Votes

H.R. 7491 has not gone to a roll call.

Titles

H.R. 7491 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.

  • Effective Assistance of Counsel in the Digital Era Act — Display Title
  • Effective Assistance of Counsel in the Digital Era Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • To regulate monitoring of electronic communications between an incarcerated person in a Bureau of Prisons facility and that person's attorney or other legal representative, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced

Lobbying

1 client hired 1 firm and 8 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 7491 in 2 quarterly filings, 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Budget/Appropriations, Education, Financial Institutions/Investments/Securities, Foreign Relations, Government Issues, Immigration, Law Enforcement/Crime/Criminal Justice, Labor Issues/Antitrust/Workplace.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATIONDistrict of Columbia12

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

RegistrantClientsFilingsReported
AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION12

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill.

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATIONAMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION2026 first_quarter$250K1st Quarter - Report
AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATIONAMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION2026 second_quarter$210K2nd Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 7491 under Crime and Law Enforcement, one of its 31 policy areas.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 7491’s is Crime and Law Enforcement.

hr7491/policy-areas.txt
Crime and Law EnforcementAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Constitutional authority

The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 7491, as entered in the Congressional Record.

[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 29 (Wednesday, February 11, 2026)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Ms. DEAN of Pennsylvania:H.R. 7491.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:Article 1, Section 8[Page H2187]

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com