Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

H.R. 7437

U.S. HouseIn House Committee

Summary

H.R. 7437, the BASICS Act, was introduced in the House on Feb 9, 2026 by Rep. Kristen McDonald Rivet (D) with 13 co-sponsors. It was referred to Transportation And Infrastructure, and last saw action on Feb 9, 2026: Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.


Record

Text

H.R. 7437 has 13 co-sponsors.

hb7437/introduced-in-house.txt
119 HR 7437 IH: Bridges And Safety Infrastructure for Community Success Act
U.S. House of Representatives
2026-02-09
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
I 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 7437 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES February 9, 2026 Ms. McDonald Rivet (for herself and Mr. Bresnahan ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure A BILL
To improve Federal transportation programs, and for other purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Bridges And Safety Infrastructure for Community Success Act or the BASICS Act .
2.
Definitions
In this Act:
(1)
Secretary
The term Secretary means the Secretary of Transportation.
(2)
Metropolitan planning organization
The term Metropolitan planning organization has the meaning given such term in section 134 of title 23, United States Code.
(3)
Urbanized area
The term urbanized area has the meaning given such term in section 134 of title 23, United States Code.
(4)
Off-system bridge
The term off-system bridge means a highway bridge or low water crossing (as defined by the Secretary) located on a public road, other than a bridge or low water crossing (as defined by the Secretary) on a Federal-aid highway.
(5)
Regional transportation planning organization
The term regional transportation planning organization means the policy board of an organization established as the result of a designation under section 135(m) of title 23, United States Code.
3.
Apportionment
Section 104 of title 23, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in subsection (b)(1) by—
(A)
striking paragraphs (4), (5), and (6) and inserting (paragraphs (4), (5), (9), and (10)) ; and
(B)
striking 59.0771195921461 and inserting 53.71 ;
(2)
in subsection (b)(2) by—
(A)
striking paragraphs (4), (5), and (6) and inserting (paragraphs (4), (5), (9), and (10)) ; and
(B)
striking 28.7402203421251 and inserting 31.07 ;
(3)
in subsection (b)(3) by—
(A)
striking paragraphs (4), (5), and (6) and inserting (paragraphs (4), (5), (9), and (10)) ; and
(B)
striking 6.70605141316253 and inserting 7.61 ;
(4)
in subsection (b)(7) by—
(A)
striking paragraphs (4), (5), and (6) and inserting (paragraphs (4), (5), (9), and (10)) ; and
(B)
striking 2.56266964565637 and inserting 2.39 ;
(5)
in subsection (b)(8) by—
(A)
striking paragraphs (4), (5), and (6) and inserting (paragraphs (4), (5), (9), and (10)) ; and
(B)
striking 2.91393900690991 and inserting 2.72 ;
(6)
striking subsection (b)(6)(B) and inserting the following:
(B)
The total amount for metropolitan planning for all States each fiscal year shall be 2.5 percent of the amount remaining after distributing amounts under paragraphs (4), (5), (9) and (10).
; and
(7)
by adding the following at the end:
(9)
Strengthening bridges formula program
(A)
In general
For the strengthening bridges formula program under section 180, the Secretary shall set aside from the base apportionment determined for a State under subsection (c) an amount determined for the State under subparagraphs (B) and (C).
(B)
Total amount
The total amount set aside for the strengthening bridges formula program for all States shall be $5,500,000,000 for each fiscal year between 2027 and 2031.
(C)
State share
Notwithstanding subparagraph (D), for each fiscal year, after the setting aside funds as required by section 180(e), the Secretary shall distribute among the States the remaining amount for the strengthening bridges formula program under subparagraph (B) so that each State receives the amount equal to the proportion that—
(i)
the total cost of replacing or rehabilitating all bridges classified in poor condition in such State; bears to
(ii)
the total cost of replacing or rehabilitating all bridges classified in poor condition in all States.
(D)
Determination of costs
For purposes of subparagraph (C), the Secretary shall determine replacement and rehabilitation costs based on the average unit costs of bridges from 2021 through 2024, as submitted by States to the Federal Highway Administration as required by section 144(b)(5).
(E)
Minimum amount
The minimum amount that the Secretary apportions to a State in a fiscal year under this program shall be $45,000,000.
(10)
Regional transportation planning
(A)
In general
To carry out section 135(n) of this title, an amount determined for the State under subparagraphs (C) of this subsection.
(B)
Total amount
The total amount to carry out section 135(n) of this title for all States shall be $150,000,000 for each fiscal year between 2027 and 2031.
(C)
Distribution among the States
For each fiscal year, the Secretary shall distribute the amounts authorized to carry out section 135(n) of this title among the States in the same proportion as the amount distributed to the State share under subsection (b) of this section.
(D)
Administration
Up to 5 percent of the amounts provided to each State may be used by the State to administer this program.
.
4.
Surface transportation block grant program
Section 133(d)(3) of title 23, United States Code, is amended by inserting after paragraph (B) the following:
(C)
Consultation with local governments
For purposes of clauses (iii) and (iv) of paragraph (1)(A), before obligating funding attributed to an area with a population of less than 50,000 that is not represented by a regional transportation planning organization, a State shall consult with local governments in that area and may partner with nonpartisan, statewide organizations representing local governments and their elected leaders in order to facilitate such consultation.
.
5.
Bridge formula program
(a)
In general
Chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
180.
Strengthening bridges formula program
(a)
Establishment
The Secretary shall establish a program in accordance with this section to provide funding for bridge projects.
(b)
Eligible uses
Funds apportioned to a State under this section may be obligated for the construction, replacement, rehabilitation, preservation, and protection of highway bridges on public roads.
(c)
Suballocation of apportioned funds
(1)
Calculation
Of the funds apportioned to a State under section 104(b)(9) (after the set aside of funds under subsection (e)), the State shall obligate—
(A)
25 percent in the following areas in proportion to their relative shares of the population of the State—
(i)
in urbanized areas of the State with an urbanized population of over 200,000;
(ii)
in urbanized areas of the State with an urbanized population of not less than 50,000 and not more than 200,000;
(iii)
in urban areas of the State with a population of not less than 5,000 and not more than 49,999; and
(iv)
in other areas of the State with a population less than 5,000; and
(B)
the remainder may be obligated in any area of the State.
(2)
Treatment of funds
Funds made available to carry out this section shall be administered as if apportioned under Section 104(e) and Section 104(i) of Title 23, United States Code (as amended).
(3)
Project selection
A State shall only obligate funding under this section for—
(A)
in areas of more than 50,000, projects that have been included on the Transportation Improvement Program for the metropolitan planning organization representing that area;
(B)
in areas under 50,000 that are covered by a regional transportation planning organization, projects that are identified in cooperation with said regional transportation planning organization; and
(C)
in areas under 50,000 that are not covered by a regional transportation planning organization, projects that are selected in consultation with local governments in that area.
(4)
In order to facilitate better consultation with local governments to identify eligible projects, the State may work with nonpartisan, statewide organizations representing units of local government and their elected officials.
(d)
Applicability of planning requirements
Programming and expenditure of funds for projects under this section shall be consistent with sections 134 and 135 of title 23, United States Code.
(e)
Set asides
The Secretary shall set aside—
(1)
3 percent of the funds available for this program in each fiscal year to carry out section 202(d) of title 23, United States Code; and
(2)
up to one-half of 1 percent of the amounts made available for this program for the administration and operations of the Federal Highway Administration.
(f)
Cost share
(1)
In general
For funds made available from this program, the Federal share shall be determined in accordance with section 120 of title 23, United States Code.
(2)
Local, off-system bridge
For funding for a project used on an off-system bridge that is owned by a local government or Tribe, the Federal share shall be 100 percent.
.
(b)
Clerical amendment
The analysis for chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
180. Strengthening bridges formula program.
.
6.
Highway safety improvement program
(a)
Local safety set-Aside
Section 148 of title 23, United States Code, is amended by—
(1)
redesignating subsections (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (i), (j), (k), and (l) as subsections (e), (f), (g), (h), (i), (j), (k), (l), and (m), respectively;
(2)
inserting after subsection (c) the following:
(d)
Allocations of apportioned funds based on population
(1)
Calculation
Of the funds apportioned to a State under section 104(b)(3)—
(A)
25 percent for each of fiscal years 2027 through 2031 shall be obligated under this section, in proportion to their relative shares of the population of the State—
(i)
in urbanized areas of the State with an urbanized area population of over 200,000;
(ii)
in urbanized areas of the State with an urbanized area population of not less than 50,000 and not more than 200,000;
(iii)
in urban areas of the State with a population not less than 5,000 and not more than 49,999; and
(iv)
in other areas of the State with a population less than 5,000; and
(B)
the remainder may be obligated in any area of the State.
(2)
Project selection
A State shall only obligate funding under this section for—
(A)
in areas of more than 50,000, projects that have been included on the Transportation Improvement Program for the metropolitan planning organization representing that area;
(B)
in areas under 50,000 that are covered by a regional transportation planning organization, projects that are identified in cooperation with said regional transportation planning organization; and
(C)
in areas under 50,000 that are not covered by a regional transportation planning organization, projects that are selected in consultation with local governments in that area.
(3)
Consultation
In order to facilitate better consultation with local governments to identify eligible projects, the State may work with nonpartisan, statewide organizations representing units of local government and their elected officials.
(4)
Applicability of planning requirements
Programming and expenditure of funds for projects under this section shall be consistent with sections 134 and 135 of title 23, United States Code.
;
(3)
in subsection (f)(1)(B), as so redesignated, by striking subsection (g) and inserting subsection (h) ; and
(4)
in subsection (h)(1), as so redesignated, by striking subsection (f) and inserting subsection (g) .
(b)
Included project
Section 148(a)(4) of title 23, United States Code, is amended by inserting after subparagraph (xxix) the following:
(xxx)
Any project that was eligible for funding under section 24112 of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act ( 23 U.S.C. 402 note).
.
7.
Transferability
Section 126 of title 23, United States Code, is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (a) by replacing subject to subsection (b) with subject to subsections (b) and (c) ;
(2)
in paragraph (b)(1) by replacing 104(d) and 133(d)(1)(A) with 104(d), 133(d)(1)(A), 135(n), 148(d)(1)(A), 175(e)(1)(A), and 180(c)(1)(A) ; and
(3)
by inserting after paragraph (b) the following—
(c)
Safety funding
Before transferring any funding apportioned under section 104(b)(3), a State shall make those funds available to local governments and regional planning organizations through a competitive process.
(1)
In general
Projects funded through this process must meet the requirements for funding under Section 104(b)(3) as outlined in section 148 of title 23, United States Code.
(2)
Open and fair competition
Only after the Secretary has certified that the State has held an open and fair competition for the funds under 104(b)(3) shall a State be able to transfer them under subsection (a) of this section.
.
8.
Project selection
It is the sense of Congress that—
(1)
States should obligate all funds appropriated under section 133(d)(1)(A), section 148(d)(1)(A), section 175(e), and section 180(c)(1)(A) of title 23, United States Code, of this Act to locally selected projects; and
(2)
the Secretary, in partnership with the Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration, should work with States to ensure that the local consultation and coordination processes established under title 23, United States Code, are followed.
9.
Metropolitan planning
(a)
Eliminating local match
Section 120(c) of title 23, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
(5)
Metropolitan planning funds
The Federal share payable for activities authorized by section 134 of title 23 and apportioned under section 104(b)(6) of title 23 shall be 100 percent.
.
(b)
Enhanced planning for faster project delivery
Section 134 of title 23, United States Code, is amended by—
(1)
inserting at the end:
(s)
Additional uses of metropolitan planning funding
In addition to carrying out the purposes of this section, funds provided to States and metropolitan planning organizations as apportioned under section 104 may be used for—
(1)
fiscal administration of local projects;
(2)
preliminary design;
(3)
administrative and overhead costs, general operating expenses, and facilities and infrastructure costs;
(4)
local technical assistance;
(5)
housing studies directly linked to transportation;
(6)
economic development studies directly linked to transportation; and
(7)
critical data procurement.
;
(2)
striking subsection (p) and inserting the following:
(p)
Funding
(1)
In general
Funds apportioned under section 104(b)(6) or section 5305(g) of title 49 shall be available to carry out this section.
(2)
Direct recipient status
Not less than 180 days after the passage of this Act, the Secretary shall establish a process whereby a metropolitan planning agency may qualify to become direct recipient of Federal funding, such process shall—
(A)
be restricted to determining the technical and financial capabilities for an metropolitan planning organization to receive and be able to appropriately manage Federal funding and funding requirements; and
(B)
occur concurrently to the recertification process through which metropolitan planning organizations have their abilities reconfirmed under this section.
(3)
Suballocation of Federal planning funds
When the Secretary annually apportions funds to States under section 104(b)(6), the Secretary shall directly sub-allocate obligation authority and all associated responsibilities to metropolitan planning organizations that have become direct recipients for funding allocated under 104(b)(6) of this title or section 5305(g) of title 49, United States Code.
.
(c)
Federal transparency
The Secretary shall give the same access to Federal-aid financial management systems to metropolitan planning organizations that it provides to State Departments of Transportation.
10.
Rural transportation planning
Section 135 of title 23, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
(n)
Regional transportation planning funding
(1)
In general
Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall establish a program to provide assistance to States to support regional transportation planning organizations and regional entities responsible for transportation planning or economic development planning in nonmetropolitan areas of the State in carrying out the duties contained in subsection (m) of this section.
(2)
Use of funds
Funds made available to States under section 104(b)(9) of this title shall be utilized to—
(A)
provide direct funding to federally designated regional transportation planning organizations to enable them to carry out the duties contained in paragraph (m)(4) of this section; and
(B)
undertake activities, including the establishment of State-based pilot programs, to provide assistance to regional entities responsible for transportation planning or economic development planning in nonmetropolitan areas of the State to—
(i)
increase the organizations understanding of statewide transportation planning requirements;
(ii)
provide technical assistance in building organizational capacity and developing transportation planning expertise necessary to develop multimodal long-range transportation plans;
(iii)
strengthening rural partnerships and collaboration;
(iv)
enhance project prioritization and delivery;
(v)
improve the overall statewide transportation planning process and respond to nonmetropolitan needs; and
(vi)
secure Federal designation of regional transportation planning organizations.
(3)
Eligible recipients
Funding made available to States under section 104(b)(9) of this title shall be made available to—
(A)
regional transportation planning organization organizations as defined under section 134 (b)(5); and
(B)
regional entities responsible for transportation planning or economic development planning in nonmetropolitan areas of the State.
(4)
Distribution of funds within States
(A)
In general
The amounts made available to States to carry out this program under section 104(b)(9) of this title shall be distributed within the State—
(i)
among all federally designated regional transportation planning organization through a formula developed by the State; and
(ii)
to non-federally designated regional entities responsible for transportation planning or economic development planning in nonmetropolitan areas of the State through a grant process allowing regional entities to submit proposals for funding that achieve the objectives of this subsection.
(B)
Secretarial approval
Both the formula distribution developed by a State under clause (i) of this paragraph and the grant process undertaken by a State under clause (ii) of this paragraph shall be approved by the Secretary.
(C)
Minimum allocation
States receiving funding under this paragraph shall provide each federally designated regional transportation planning organization not less than $300,000 in fiscal years 2027 through 2031 to carry out this subsection.
(5)
Federal share
The Federal share payable on activities carried out with funds provided under this program shall be 100 percent.
.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2026-02-09
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

To improve Federal transportation programs, and for other purposes.

Sponsors

Rep. Kristen McDonald Rivet (D) sponsors H.R. 7437, and 13 members have co-sponsored it, 1 of them from the day it was introduced.

Committees

H.R. 7437 went before 1 committee: Transportation and Infrastructure.

Transportation and Infrastructure
Transportation and Infrastructure
Referred To · Feb 9, 2026 · 156 Bills

Actions

H.R. 7437 has taken 2 actions since Feb 9, 2026.

ChamberAction
Feb 9, 2026
House
Introduced in House
Feb 9, 2026
House
Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.Transportation and Infrastructure Committee

Votes

H.R. 7437 has not gone to a roll call.

Titles

H.R. 7437 goes by 4 titles, 2 of them short titles.

  • BASICS Act — Display Title
  • BASICS Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • Bridges And Safety Infrastructure for Community Success Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • To improve Federal transportation programs, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced

Lobbying

28 clients hired 12 firms and 41 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 7437 in 39 quarterly filings, 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Transportation, Budget/Appropriations, Environment/Superfund, Taxation/Internal Revenue Code, Housing, Clean Air and Water (quality), Government Issues, Natural Resources.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill. The 20 that filed most often, of 28.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
COUNTY OF VENTURAAirline CompanyCalifornia12$120K
STATE OF NEVADAState governmentNevada12$120K
COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA12$48K
CITY OF CORAL SPRINGS, FLCity Government.Florida12$40K
CITY OF HALLANDALE BEACHCity GovernmentFlorida12$40K
COUNTY OF KERNcounty governmentCalifornia12$40K
SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (SEMCOG)Water management servicesUtah12$20K
AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATIONDistrict of Columbia12
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERSDistrict of Columbia12
ASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS OF AMERICAVirginia12
NATIONAL ASPHALT PAVEMENT ASSOCIATIONMaryland12
CITY OF DALLASGeneral purpose local governmentTexas11$40K
CITRUS COUNTYCounty GovernmentFlorida11$20K
CITY OF ALPHARETTA, GEORGIALocal City Government OrganizationGeorgia11$20K
CITY OF ARLINGTONGeneral purpose local governmentTexas11$20K
CITY OF AUSTINGeneral purpose local governmentTexas11$20K
CITY OF DEERFIELD BEACHReclamation SystemsWisconsin11$20K
CITY OF ELIZABETHGeneral purpose local governmentNew Jersey11$20K
CITY OF OVIEDO, FLCity GovernmentFlorida11$20K
CITY OF THOUSAND OAKS, CAMunicipalityCalifornia11$20K

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill. The 20 named most often, of 41.

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERSAMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS2026 second_quarter$303.4K2nd Quarter - Report
ASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS OF AMERICAASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS OF AMERICA2026 second_quarter$216.4K2nd Quarter - Report
ASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS OF AMERICAASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS OF AMERICA2026 first_quarter$195.9K1st Quarter - Report
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERSAMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS2026 first_quarter$170.1K1st Quarter - Report
NATIONAL ASPHALT PAVEMENT ASSOCIATIONNATIONAL ASPHALT PAVEMENT ASSOCIATION2026 second_quarter$150K2nd Quarter - Report
NATIONAL ASPHALT PAVEMENT ASSOCIATIONNATIONAL ASPHALT PAVEMENT ASSOCIATION2026 first_quarter$110K1st Quarter - Report
STATE OF NEVADACASSIDY & ASSOCIATES, INC.2026 first_quarter$60K1st Quarter - Amendme…
COUNTY OF VENTURATHOMAS WALTERS & ASSOCIATES, INC.2026 second_quarter$60K2nd Quarter - Report
COUNTY OF VENTURATHOMAS WALTERS & ASSOCIATES, INC.2026 first_quarter$60K1st Quarter - Report
STATE OF NEVADACASSIDY & ASSOCIATES, INC.2026 first_quarter$60K1st Quarter - Report
CITY OF DALLASCAPITALEDGE STRATEGIES, LLC2026 first_quarter$40K1st Quarter - Report
COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARATHOMAS WALTERS & ASSOCIATES, INC.2026 second_quarter$24K2nd Quarter - Report
COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARATHOMAS WALTERS & ASSOCIATES, INC.2026 first_quarter$24K1st Quarter - Report
CITY OF THOUSAND OAKS, CAVAN SCOYOC ASSOCIATES2026 second_quarter$20K2nd Quarter - Report
COUNTY OF KERNTOWNSEND PUBLIC AFFAIRS2026 second_quarter$20K2nd Quarter - Report
CITRUS COUNTYALCALDE & FAY2026 second_quarter$20K2nd Quarter - Report
CITY OF OVIEDO, FLALCALDE & FAY2026 second_quarter$20K2nd Quarter - Report
LAKE COUNTYALCALDE & FAY2026 second_quarter$20K2nd Quarter - Report
CITY OF HALLANDALE BEACHALCALDE & FAY2026 second_quarter$20K2nd Quarter - Report
CITY OF DEERFIELD BEACHALCALDE & FAY2026 second_quarter$20K2nd Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 7437 under Transportation and Public Works, one of its 31 policy areas.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 7437’s is Transportation and Public Works.

hr7437/policy-areas.txt
Transportation and Public WorksAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationWater Resources Development

Constitutional authority

The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 7437, as entered in the Congressional Record.

[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 27 (Monday, February 9, 2026)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Ms. McDONALD RIVET:H.R. 7437.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:U.S. Constitution, Article 1, Sec. 8[Page H2096]

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com