Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

SB 3564

Illinois SenateIn Senate Committee

Summary

SB 3564, “POLICE-FACIAL RECOGNITION ACT”, was introduced in the Senate on Feb 5, 2026 by Sen. Adriane Johnson (D). It was referred to Assignments, and last saw action on Feb 5, 2026: Referred to Assignments.


Record

Text

SB 3564 has no co-sponsors and has not gone to a roll call.

sb3564/introduced.txt
Select Language
×
The Illinois General Assembly offers the Google Translate™ service for visitor convenience. In no way should it be considered accurate as to the translation of any content herein.
Visitors of the Illinois General Assembly website are encouraged to use other translation services available on the internet.
The English language version is always the official and authoritative version of this website.
NOTE: To return to the original English language version, select the "Show Original" button on the Google Translate™ menu bar at the top of the window.
Choose Language
English
Afrikaans
Albanian
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Bengali
Bosnian
Catalan
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
Esperanto
Estonian
Filipino
Finnish
French
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Icelandic
Indonesian
Interlingua
Interlingue
Inuktitut
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Khmer
Korean
Latin
Latvian
Lithuanian
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Myanmar
Nepali
Norwegian
Odia
Pashto
Punjabi
Romanian
Russian
Samoan
Sango
Sanskrit
Sardinian
Sindhi
Sinhala
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Southern Sotho
Spanish
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tamil
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Turkish
Ukrainian
Urdu
Vietnamese
Welsh
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
Powered by Translate
Close
Illinois General Assembly
Top Navigation Bar
Translate
Learn
Select General Assembly
Search the 104th General Assembly
Enter search terms for legislation, members, committees, or schedules.
ILGA.GOV
Mobile Top Bar
Search the 104th General Assembly
Enter keywords to search the Illinois General Assembly website.
Full Text of SB3564
Home
Legislation
Full Text
SB3564 - 104th General Assembly
Bill Status
Full Text
Votes
Witness Slips
Select Menu
Bill Status
Full Text
Votes
Witness Slips
Printer Friendly Version
Introduced
Printer Friendly Version
Introduced
Open PDF
104TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY
State of Illinois
2025 and 2026
SB3564
Introduced 2/5/2026, by Sen. Adriane Johnson
SYNOPSIS AS INTRODUCED:
See Index
Creates the Facial Recognition Technology in Law Enforcement Act. Provides that a law enforcement agency that uses facial recognition technology shall conduct a compliance audit regarding implementation of the policies established under the Act. Requires the Illinois State Police to publish a report that may contain recommendations for updates in local policies regarding the use of facial recognition technology, overall rates of implementation of policies outlined in the Act, and an assessment of the accuracy and reliability of facial recognition technology used by law enforcement agencies in this State. Provides that facial recognition technology shall not be used by law enforcement agencies or law enforcement officers to analyze an image or recording of individuals (1) engaged in activity that is protected under the United States Constitution or the Illinois Constitution unless there is reasonable suspicion that the individual is actively committing a crime, is about to commit a crime, or has already committed a crime; (2) for the purpose of real or live-time identification of an image or recording; or (3) solely based on an individual's political or social beliefs, the individual's engagement in lawful activities, or the individual's race, color, religious beliefs, sexual orientation, gender, disability, national origin, or housing status. Amends the Illinois Police Training Act. Requires the Law Enforcement Training Standards Board to publish a model statewide policy and curriculum regarding the use of facial recognition technology and other emerging technologies. In provisions concerning the decertification of law enforcement officers, requires administrative law judges presiding over decertification hearings to be trained in, among other things, technological tools that law enforcement officers use in criminal procedures. Amends the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963. Provides that results generated by facial recognition technology shall not serve as the sole basis to establish probable cause for a warrant for arrest or a search warrant. Effective immediately.
LRB104 19623 RTM 33072 b
A BILL FOR
SB3564 LRB104 19623 RTM 33072 b
AN ACT concerning government.
Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,
represented in the General Assembly:
Section 1. Short title. This Act may be cited as the Facial
Recognition Technology in Law Enforcement Act.
Section 5. Findings; purpose.
(a) The General Assembly finds that:
(1) national studies indicate that African American
and Asian faces were up to 100 times more likely to be
misidentified than white faces, and the highest
false-positive rate was among Native Americans;
(2) incorrect results from facial recognition
technology have led to false arrests across the nation;
(3) law enforcement agencies in Illinois currently
lack consistent statewide policies governing how facial
recognition technology may be used, audited, or challenged
by individuals who are misidentified;
(4) the use of facial recognition technology may
disproportionately impact communities that are already
subject to higher levels of police surveillance,
compounding existing racial and socioeconomic disparities;
(5) various states across the United States, such as
Maryland and Alabama, have placed limitations on facial
SB3564 - 2 - LRB104 19623 RTM 33072 b
recognition technology when used in criminal proceedings
by law enforcement agents or representing individuals; and
(6) law enforcement agencies may rely on private
vendors for facial recognition technology, whose
proprietary systems are not subject to public audit or
independent verification.
(b) The purpose of this Act is to:
(1) reduce the use of technology that may
disproportionately target minority populations;
(2) mandate a statewide policy to train officers in
the proper uses of facial recognition technology;
(3) protect constituents' rights to express their
constitutional rights freely and safely; and
(4) prevent false arrests of vulnerable populations.
Section 10. Definitions. As used in this Act:
"Facial recognition technology" means a system that
compares a probe image of an unidentified human face against a
reference photograph database and, based on biometric data,
generates possible matches to aid in identifying the person in
the probe image.
"Law enforcement agency" has the meaning given to that
term in the Illinois Police Training Act.
"Law enforcement officer" has the meaning given to that
term in the Illinois Police Training Act.
SB3564 - 3 - LRB104 19623 RTM 33072 b
Section 15. Audit reporting.
(a) On or before January 1, 2027, and every 3 years
thereafter, a law enforcement agency that uses facial
recognition technology shall conduct a compliance audit
regarding the implementation of policies under this Act. The
results of the audit, including any documents, materials, or
data, shall be reported to the Illinois State Police and shall
be accessible if requested by:
(1) the Attorney General or the Attorney General's
designee;
(2) the Director of the Illinois State Police or the
Director's designee;
(3) a United States Attorney or the United States
Attorney's designee; or
(4) a State's Attorney of any county or the State's
Attorney's designee.
(b) On or before January 1, 2030, and every 5 years
thereafter, the Illinois State Police shall publish a report
that may contain recommendations for updates in local policies
regarding the use of facial recognition technology, overall
rates of implementation of policies outlined in this Act
throughout the State, and an assessment of the accuracy and
reliability of facial recognition technology as used by law
enforcement agencies in this State. The Illinois State Police
shall publish the report on its public website.
(c) The Illinois State Police may adopt rules to implement
SB3564 - 4 - LRB104 19623 RTM 33072 b
this Section.
Section 20. Restrictions. Facial recognition technology
shall not be used by law enforcement agencies or law
enforcement officers to analyze an image or recording of an
individual:
(1) engaged in activity that is protected under the
United States Constitution or the Illinois Constitution
unless there is reasonable suspicion that the individual
is actively committing a crime, is about to commit a
crime, or has already committed a crime;
(2) for the purpose of real or live-time
identification of an image or recording; or
(3) solely based on an individual's political or
social beliefs, the individual's engagement in lawful
activities, or the individual's race, color, religious
beliefs, sexual orientation, gender, disability, national
origin, or housing status.
Section 25. Data management.
(a) A law enforcement agency that uses facial recognition
technology shall adopt and maintain a use and data management
policy.
(1) A law enforcement agency that develops a policy
under this subsection shall post a copy of the policy on
the law enforcement agency's public website.
SB3564 - 5 - LRB104 19623 RTM 33072 b
(2) A law enforcement agency that contracts for use of
a nongovernmental facial recognition system shall disclose
on its public website the name of the system and the names
and description of the databases searched.
(b) Enforcement of the policy under subsection (a) shall
be implemented by the Illinois State Police.
Section 900. The Illinois Police Training Act is amended
by changing Sections 6 and 6.3 as follows:
(50 ILCS 705/6) (from Ch. 85, par. 506)
Sec. 6. Powers and duties of the Board; selection and
certification of schools. The Board shall select and certify
schools within the State of Illinois for the purpose of
providing basic training for probationary law enforcement
officers, probationary county corrections officers, and court
security officers and of providing advanced or in-service
training for permanent law enforcement officers or permanent
county corrections officers, which schools may be either
publicly or privately owned and operated. In addition, the
Board has the following power and duties:
a. To require law enforcement agencies to furnish such
reports and information as the Board deems necessary to
fully implement this Act.
b. To establish appropriate mandatory minimum
standards relating to the training of probationary local
SB3564 - 6 - LRB104 19623 RTM 33072 b
law enforcement officers or probationary county
corrections officers, and in-service training of permanent
law enforcement officers.
c. To provide appropriate certification to those
probationary officers who successfully complete the
prescribed minimum standard basic training course.
d. To review and approve annual training curriculum
for county sheriffs.
e. To review and approve applicants to ensure that no
applicant is admitted to a certified academy unless the
applicant is a person of good character and has not been
convicted of, found guilty of, entered a plea of guilty
to, or entered a plea of nolo contendere to a felony
offense, any of the misdemeanors in Sections 11-1.50,
11-6, 11-6.5, 11-6.6, 11-9.1, 11-9.1B, 11-14, 11-14.1,
11-30, 12-2, 12-3.2, 12-3.4, 12-3.5, 16-1, 17-1, 17-2,
26.5-1, 26.5-2, 26.5-3, 28-3, 29-1, any misdemeanor in
violation of any Section of Part E of Title III of the
Criminal Code of 1961 or the Criminal Code of 2012, or
subsection (a) of Section 17-32 of the Criminal Code of
1961 or the Criminal Code of 2012, or Section 5 or 5.2 of
the Cannabis Control Act, or a crime involving moral
turpitude under the laws of this State or any other state
which if committed in this State would be punishable as a
felony or a crime of moral turpitude, or any felony or
misdemeanor in violation of federal law or the law of any
SB3564 - 7 - LRB104 19623 RTM 33072 b
state that is the equivalent of any of the offenses
specified therein. The Board may appoint investigators who
shall enforce the duties conferred upon the Board by this
Act.
For purposes of this paragraph e, a person is
considered to have been convicted of, found guilty of, or
entered a plea of guilty to, plea of nolo contendere to
regardless of whether the adjudication of guilt or
sentence is withheld or not entered thereon. This includes
sentences of supervision, conditional discharge, or first
offender probation, or any similar disposition provided
for by law.
f. To establish statewide standards for minimum
standards regarding regular mental health screenings for
probationary and permanent police officers, ensuring that
counseling sessions and screenings remain confidential.
g. To review and ensure all law enforcement officers
remain in compliance with this Act, and any administrative
rules adopted under this Act.
h. To suspend any certificate for a definite period,
limit or restrict any certificate, or revoke any
certificate.
i. The Board and the Panel shall have power to secure
by its subpoena and bring before it any person or entity in
this State and to take testimony either orally or by
deposition or both with the same fees and mileage and in
SB3564 - 8 - LRB104 19623 RTM 33072 b
the same manner as prescribed by law in judicial
proceedings in civil cases in circuit courts of this
State. The Board and the Panel shall also have the power to
subpoena the production of documents, papers, files,
books, documents, and records, whether in physical or
electronic form, in support of the charges and for
defense, and in connection with a hearing or
investigation.
j. The Executive Director, the administrative law
judge designated by the Executive Director, and each
member of the Board and the Panel shall have the power to
administer oaths to witnesses at any hearing that the
Board is authorized to conduct under this Act and any
other oaths required or authorized to be administered by
the Board under this Act.
k. In case of the neglect or refusal of any person to
obey a subpoena issued by the Board and the Panel, any
circuit court, upon application of the Board and the
Panel, through the Illinois Attorney General, may order
such person to appear before the Board and the Panel give
testimony or produce evidence, and any failure to obey
such order is punishable by the court as a contempt
thereof. This order may be served by personal delivery, by
email, or by mail to the address of record or email address
of record.
l. The Board shall have the power to administer state
SB3564 - 9 - LRB104 19623 RTM 33072 b
certification examinations. Any and all records related to
these examinations, including, but not limited to, test
questions, test formats, digital files, answer responses,
answer keys, and scoring information shall be exempt from
disclosure.
m. To make grants, subject to appropriation, to units
of local government and public institutions of higher
education for the purposes of hiring and retaining law
enforcement officers.
n. To make grants, subject to appropriation, to local
law enforcement agencies for costs associated with the
expansion and support of National Integrated Ballistic
Information Network (NIBIN) and other ballistic technology
equipment for ballistic testing.
o. To publish a model statewide policy and curriculum
regarding the use of facial recognition technology and
other emerging technologies for use in officer training
schools.
(Source: P.A. 102-687, eff. 12-17-21; 102-694, eff. 1-7-22;
102-1115, eff. 1-9-23; 103-8, eff. 6-7-23.)
(50 ILCS 705/6.3)
Sec. 6.3. Discretionary decertification of full-time and
part-time law enforcement officers.
(a) Definitions. For purposes of this Section 6.3:
"Duty to intervene" means an obligation to intervene to
SB3564 - 10 - LRB104 19623 RTM 33072 b
prevent harm from occurring that arises when: an officer is
present, and has reason to know (1) that excessive force is
being used or that any constitutional violation has been
committed by a law enforcement official; and (2) the officer
has a realistic opportunity to intervene. This duty applies
equally to supervisory and nonsupervisory officers. If aid is
required, the officer shall not, when reasonable to administer
aid, knowingly and willingly refuse to render aid as defined
by State or federal law. An officer does not violate this duty
if the failure to render aid is due to circumstances such as
lack of appropriate specialized training, lack of resources or
equipment, or if it is unsafe or impracticable to render aid.
"Excessive use of force" means using force in violation of
State or federal law.
"False statement" means (1) any knowingly false statement
provided on a form or report, (2) that the writer does not
believe to be true, and (3) that the writer includes to mislead
a public servant in performing the public servant's official
functions.
"Perjury" means that as defined under Sections 32-2 and
32-3 of the Criminal Code of 2012.
"Tampers with or fabricates evidence" means if a law
enforcement officer (1) has reason to believe that an official
proceeding is pending or may be instituted, and (2) alters,
destroys, conceals, or removes any record, document, data,
video or thing to impair its validity or availability in the
SB3564 - 11 - LRB104 19623 RTM 33072 b
proceeding.
(b) Decertification conduct. The Board has the authority
to decertify a full-time or a part-time law enforcement
officer upon a determination by the Board that the law
enforcement officer has:
(1) committed an act that would constitute a felony or
misdemeanor which could serve as basis for automatic
decertification, whether or not the law enforcement
officer was criminally prosecuted, and whether or not the
law enforcement officer's employment was terminated;
(2) exercised excessive use of force;
(3) failed to comply with the officer's duty to
intervene, including through acts or omissions;
(4) tampered with a dash camera or body-worn camera or
data recorded by a dash camera or body-worn camera or
directed another to tamper with or turn off a dash camera
or body-worn camera or data recorded by a dash camera or
body-worn camera for the purpose of concealing, destroying
or altering potential evidence;
(5) engaged in the following conduct relating to the
reporting, investigation, or prosecution of a crime:
committed perjury, made a false statement, or knowingly
tampered with or fabricated evidence; and
(6) engaged in any unprofessional, unethical,
deceptive, or deleterious conduct or practice harmful to
the public; such conduct or practice need not have
SB3564 - 12 - LRB104 19623 RTM 33072 b
resulted in actual injury to any person. As used in this
paragraph, the term "unprofessional conduct" shall include
any departure from, or failure to conform to, the minimal
standards of acceptable and prevailing practice of an
officer.
(b-5) The Board has the authority to decertify a full-time
or part-time law enforcement officer notwithstanding whether a
law enforcement agency takes disciplinary action against a law
enforcement officer for the same underlying conduct as
outlined in subsection (b).
(c) Notice of Alleged Violation.
(1) The following individuals and agencies shall
notify the Board within 7 days of becoming aware of any
violation described in subsection (b):
(A) A law enforcement agency as defined in Section
2 or any law enforcement officer of this State. For
this subsection (c), law enforcement agency includes,
but is not limited to, a civilian review board, an
inspector general, and legal counsel for a law
enforcement agency.
(B) The Executive Director of the Board;
(C) A State's Attorney's Office of this State.
"Becoming aware" does not include confidential
communications between agency lawyers and agencies
regarding legal advice. For purposes of this subsection,
"law enforcement agency" does not include the Illinois
SB3564 - 13 - LRB104 19623 RTM 33072 b
Attorney General when providing legal representation to a
law enforcement officer under the State Employee
Indemnification Act.
(2) Any person may also notify the Board of any
conduct the person believes a law enforcement officer has
committed as described in subsection (b). Such
notifications may be made confidentially. Notwithstanding
any other provision in state law or any collective
bargaining agreement, the Board shall accept notice and
investigate any allegations from individuals who remain
confidential.
(3) Upon written request, the Board shall disclose to
the individual or entity who filed a notice of violation
the status of the Board's review.
(d) Form. The notice of violation reported under
subsection (c) shall be on a form prescribed by the Board in
its rules. The form shall be publicly available by paper and
electronic means. The form shall include fields for the
following information, at a minimum:
(1) the full name, address, and telephone number of
the person submitting the notice;
(2) if submitted under subsection (c)(1), the agency
name and title of the person submitting the notice;
(3) the full name, badge number, employing agency, and
physical description of the officer, if known;
(4) the full name or names, address or addresses,
SB3564 - 14 - LRB104 19623 RTM 33072 b
telephone number or numbers, and physical description or
descriptions of any witnesses, if known;
(5) a concise statement of facts that describe the
alleged violation and any copies of supporting evidence
including but not limited to any photographic, video, or
audio recordings of the incident;
(6) whether the person submitting the notice has
notified any other agency; and
(7) an option for an individual, who submits directly
to the Board, to consent to have the individual's identity
disclosed. The identity of any individual providing
information or reporting any possible or alleged violation
to the Board shall be kept confidential and may not be
disclosed without the consent of that individual, unless
the individual consents to disclosure of the individual's
name or disclosure of the individual's identity is
otherwise required by law. The confidentiality granted by
this subsection does not preclude the disclosure of the
identity of a person in any capacity other than as the
source of an allegation.
Nothing in this subsection (d) shall preclude the Board
from receiving, investigating, or acting upon allegations made
confidentially or in a format different from the form provided
for in this subsection.
(e) Preliminary review.
(1) The Board shall complete a preliminary review of
SB3564 - 15 - LRB104 19623 RTM 33072 b
the allegations to determine whether there is sufficient
information to warrant a further investigation of any
violations of the Act. Upon initiating a preliminary
review of the allegations, the Board shall notify the head
of the law enforcement agency that employs the law
enforcement officer who is the subject of the allegations.
At the request of the Board, the law enforcement agency
must submit any copies of investigative findings,
evidence, or documentation to the Board in accordance with
rules adopted by the Board to facilitate the Board's
preliminary review. The Board may correspond with the law
enforcement agency, official records clerks or any
investigative agencies in conducting its preliminary
review.
(2) During the preliminary review, the Board will take
all reasonable steps to discover any and all objective
verifiable evidence relevant to the alleged violation
through the identification, retention, review, and
analysis of all currently available evidence, including,
but not limited to: all time-sensitive evidence, audio and
video evidence, physical evidence, arrest reports,
photographic evidence, GPS records, computer data, lab
reports, medical documents, and witness interviews. All
reasonable steps will be taken to preserve relevant
evidence identified during the preliminary investigation.
(3) If after a preliminary review of the alleged
SB3564 - 16 - LRB104 19623 RTM 33072 b
violation or violations, the Board believes there is
sufficient information to warrant further investigation of
any violations of this Act, the alleged violation or
violations shall be assigned for investigation in
accordance with subsection (f).
(4) If after a review of the allegations, the Board
believes there is insufficient information supporting the
allegations to warrant further investigation, it may close
a notice. Notification of the Board's decision to close a
notice shall be sent to all relevant individuals,
agencies, and any entities that received notice of the
violation under subsection (c) within 30 days of the
notice being closed, except in cases where the notice is
submitted anonymously if the complainant is unknown.
(5) Except when the Board has received notice under
subparagraph (A) of paragraph (1) of subsection (c), no
later than 30 days after receiving notice, the Board shall
report any notice of violation it receives to the relevant
law enforcement agency, unless reporting the notice would
jeopardize any subsequent investigation. The Board shall
also record any notice of violation it receives to the
Officer Professional Conduct Database in accordance with
Section 9.2. The Board shall report to the appropriate
State's Attorney any alleged violations that contain
allegations, claims, or factual assertions that, if true,
would constitute a violation of Illinois law. The Board
SB3564 - 17 - LRB104 19623 RTM 33072 b
shall inform the law enforcement officer via certified
mail that it has received a notice of violation against
the law enforcement officer.
If the Board determines that due to the circumstances
and the nature of the allegation that it would not be
prudent to notify the law enforcement officer and the
officer's law enforcement agency unless and until the
filing of a Formal Complaint, the Board shall document in
the file the reason or reasons a notification was not
made.
(6) If the law enforcement officer is involved in a
criminal proceeding on the same subject as the notice of
violation, the Board is responsible for maintaining a
current status report including court dates, hearings,
pleas, adjudication status and sentencing. A State's
Attorney's Office must notify the Board of any criminal
charges filed against a law enforcement officer, and must
provide updates of significant developments to the Board
in a timely manner but no later than 30 days after such
developments.
(f) Investigations; requirements. Investigations are to be
assigned after a preliminary review, unless the investigations
were closed under paragraph (4) of subsection (e), as follows
in paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of this subsection (f).
(1) A law enforcement agency that submits a notice of
violation to the Board under subparagraph (A) of paragraph
SB3564 - 18 - LRB104 19623 RTM 33072 b
(1) of subsection (c) shall be responsible for conducting
an investigation of the underlying allegations except
when: (i) the law enforcement agency refers the notice to
another law enforcement agency or the Board for
investigation and such other agency or the Board agrees to
conduct the investigation; (ii) an external, independent,
or civilian oversight agency conducts the investigation in
accordance with local ordinance or other applicable law;
or (iii) the Board has determined that it will conduct the
investigation based upon the facts and circumstances of
the alleged violation, including but not limited to,
investigations regarding the Chief or Sheriff of a law
enforcement agency, familial conflict of interests,
complaints involving a substantial portion of a law
enforcement agency, or complaints involving a policy of a
law enforcement agency. Any agency or entity conducting an
investigation under this paragraph (1) shall submit
quarterly reports to the Board regarding the progress of
the investigation. The quarterly report shall be reviewed
by the individual or individuals at the Board who
conducted the preliminary review, if available.
Any agency or entity conducting an investigation under
this paragraph (1) shall, within 7 days of completing an
investigation, deliver an Investigative Summary Report and
copies of any administrative evidence to the Board. If the
Board finds an investigation conducted under this
SB3564 - 19 - LRB104 19623 RTM 33072 b
paragraph (1) is incomplete, unsatisfactory, or deficient
in any way, the Board may direct the investigating entity
or agency to take any additional investigative steps
deemed necessary to thoroughly and satisfactorily complete
the investigation, or the Board may take any steps
necessary to complete the investigation. The investigating
entity or agency or, when necessary, the Board will then
amend and re-submit the Investigative Summary Report to
the Board for approval.
The Board shall submit a report to the investigating
entity disclosing the name, address, and telephone numbers
of persons who have knowledge of facts which are the
subject of the investigation and identifying the subject
matter of their knowledge.
(2) The Board shall investigate and complete an
Investigative Summary Report when a State's Attorney's
Office submits a notice of violation to the Board under
(c)(1)(C).
(3) When a person submits a notice to the Board under
paragraph (2) of subsection (c), The Board shall assign
the investigation to the law enforcement agency that
employs the law enforcement officer, except when: (i) the
law enforcement agency requests to refer the notice to
another law enforcement agency or the Board for
investigation and such other agency or the Board agrees to
conduct the investigation; (ii) an external, independent,
SB3564 - 20 - LRB104 19623 RTM 33072 b
or civilian oversight agency conducts the investigation in
accordance with local ordinance or other applicable law;
or (iii) the Board has determined that it will conduct the
investigation based upon the facts and circumstances of
the alleged violation, including but not limited to,
investigations regarding the Chief or Sheriff of a law
enforcement agency, familial conflict of interests,
complaints involving a substantial portion of a law
enforcement agency, or complaints involving a policy of a
law enforcement agency.
The investigating entity or agency shall submit
quarterly reports to the Board regarding the progress of
the investigation in a form to be determined by the Board.
The quarterly report shall be reviewed by the individual
at the Board who conducted the preliminary review, if
available.
The investigating entity or agency shall, within 7 days of
completing an investigation, deliver an Investigative
Summary Report and copies of any evidence to the Board. If
the Board finds an investigation conducted under this
subsection (f)(3) is incomplete, unsatisfactory, or
deficient in any way, the Board may direct the
investigating entity to take any additional investigative
steps deemed necessary to thoroughly and satisfactorily
complete the investigation, or the Board may take any
steps necessary to complete the investigation. The
SB3564 - 21 - LRB104 19623 RTM 33072 b
investigating entity or agency or, when necessary, the
Board will then amend and re-submit the Investigative
Summary Report to the Board for approval. The
investigating entity shall cooperate with and assist the
Board, as necessary, in any subsequent investigation.
(4) Concurrent Investigations. The Board may, at any
point, initiate a concurrent investigation under this
section. The original investigating entity shall timely
communicate, coordinate, and cooperate with the Board to
the fullest extent. The Board shall promulgate rules that
shall address, at a minimum, the sharing of information
and investigative means such as subpoenas and interviewing
witnesses.
(5) Investigative Summary Report. An Investigative
Summary Report shall contain, at a minimum, the
allegations and elements within each allegation followed
by the testimonial, documentary, or physical evidence that
is relevant to each such allegation or element listed and
discussed in association with it. All persons who have
been interviewed and listed in the Investigative Summary
Report will be identified as a complainant, witness,
person with specialized knowledge, or law enforcement
employee.
(6) Each law enforcement agency shall adopt a written
policy regarding the investigation of conduct under
subsection (a) that involves a law enforcement officer
SB3564 - 22 - LRB104 19623 RTM 33072 b
employed by that law enforcement agency. The written
policy adopted must include the following, at a minimum:
(a) Each law enforcement officer shall immediately
report any conduct under subsection (b) to the
appropriate supervising officer.
(b) The written policy under this Section shall be
available for inspection and copying under the Freedom
of Information Act, and not subject to any exemption
of that Act.
(7) Nothing in this Act shall prohibit a law
enforcement agency from conducting an investigation for
the purpose of internal discipline. However, any such
investigation shall be conducted in a manner that avoids
interference with, and preserves the integrity of, any
separate investigation by the Board being conducted.
(g) Formal complaints. Upon receipt of an Investigative
Summary Report, the Board shall review the Report and any
relevant evidence obtained and determine whether there is
reasonable basis to believe that the law enforcement officer
committed any conduct that would be deemed a violation of this
Act. If after reviewing the Report and any other relevant
evidence obtained, the Board determines that a reasonable
basis does exist, the Board shall file a formal complaint with
the Certification Review Panel.
(h) Formal Complaint Hearing.
(1) Upon issuance of a formal complaint, the Panel
SB3564 - 23 - LRB104 19623 RTM 33072 b
shall set the matter for an initial hearing in front of an
administrative law judge. At least 30 days before the date
set for an initial hearing, the Panel must, in writing,
notify the law enforcement officer subject to the
complaint of the following:
(i) the allegations against the law enforcement
officer, the time and place for the hearing, and
whether the law enforcement officer's certification
has been temporarily suspended under Section 8.3;
(ii) the right to file a written answer to the
complaint with the Panel within 30 days after service
of the notice;
(iii) if the law enforcement officer fails to
comply with the notice of the default order in
paragraph (2), the Panel shall enter a default order
against the law enforcement officer along with a
finding that the allegations in the complaint are
deemed admitted, and that the law enforcement
officer's certification may be revoked as a result;
and
(iv) the law enforcement officer may request an
informal conference to surrender the officer's
certification.
(2) The Board shall send the law enforcement officer
notice of the default order. The notice shall state that
the officer has 30 days to notify the Board in writing of
SB3564 - 24 - LRB104 19623 RTM 33072 b
their desire to have the order vacated and to appear
before the Board. If the law enforcement officer does not
notify the Board within 30 days, the Board may set the
matter for hearing. If the matter is set for hearing, the
Board shall send the law enforcement officer the notice of
the date, time and location of the hearing. If the law
enforcement officer or counsel for the officer does
appear, at the Board's discretion, the hearing may proceed
or may be continued to a date and time agreed upon by all
parties. If on the date of the hearing, neither the law
enforcement officer nor counsel for the officer appears,
the Board may proceed with the hearing for default in
their absence.
(3) If the law enforcement officer fails to comply
with paragraph (2), all of the allegations contained in
the complaint shall be deemed admitted and the law
enforcement officer shall be decertified if, by a majority
vote of the panel, the conduct charged in the complaint is
found to constitute sufficient grounds for decertification
under this Act. Notice of the decertification decision may
be served by personal delivery, by mail, or, at the
discretion of the Board, by electronic means as adopted by
rule to the address or email address specified by the law
enforcement officer in the officer's last communication
with the Board. Notice shall also be provided to the law
enforcement officer's employing law enforcement agency.
SB3564 - 25 - LRB104 19623 RTM 33072 b
(4) The Board, at the request of the law enforcement
officer subject to the Formal Complaint, may suspend a
hearing on a Formal Complaint for no more than one year if
a concurrent criminal matter is pending. If the law
enforcement officer requests to have the hearing
suspended, the law enforcement officer's certification
shall be deemed inactive until the law enforcement
officer's Formal Complaint hearing concludes. The Board or
the law enforcement officer may request to have the
hearing suspended for up to 6 additional months for good
cause. This request may be renewed. For purposes of this
paragraph (4), "good cause" means an incident or
occurrence that is beyond the control of the requester and
that prevents the hearing from occurring, or holding the
hearing would impose an undue hardship or prejudice on the
requester.
(5) Surrender of certification or waiver. Upon the
Board's issuance of a complaint, and prior to hearing on
the matter, a law enforcement officer may choose to
surrender the officer's certification or waiver by
notifying the Board in writing of the officer's decision
to do so. Upon receipt of such notification from the law
enforcement officer, the Board shall immediately decertify
the officer, or revoke any waiver previously granted. In
the case of a surrender of certification or waiver, the
Board's proceeding shall terminate.
SB3564 - 26 - LRB104 19623 RTM 33072 b
(6) Appointment of administrative law judges. The
Board shall retain any attorney licensed to practice law
in the State of Illinois to serve as an administrative law
judge in any action involving a law enforcement officer
under this Act. The administrative law judge shall be
retained to a term of no greater than 4 years. If more than
one judge is retained, the terms shall be staggered. The
administrative law judge has full authority to conduct the
hearings.
Administrative law judges will receive initial and
annual training that is adequate in quality, quantity,
scope, and type, and will cover, at minimum the following
topics:
(i) constitutional and other relevant law on
police-community encounters, including the law on the
use of force and stops, searches, and arrests;
(ii) police tactics;
(iii) investigations of police conduct;
(iv) impartial policing;
(v) policing individuals in crisis;
(vi) Illinois police policies, procedures, and
disciplinary rules;
(vii) procedural justice; [and]
(viii) community outreach; and [.]
(ix) technological tools that law enforcement
officers use in criminal procedures and the biases and
SB3564 - 27 - LRB104 19623 RTM 33072 b
possible inaccurate results generated by those tools.
The Board shall determine the content and extent of
the training within the scope provided for by this
subsection.
(7) Hearing. At the hearing, the administrative law
judge will hear the allegations alleged in the complaint.
The law enforcement officer, the counsel of the officer's
choosing, and the Board, or the officer's counsel, shall
be afforded the opportunity to present any pertinent
statements, testimony, evidence, and arguments. The law
enforcement officer shall be afforded the opportunity to
request that the Board compel the attendance of witnesses
and production of related documents. After the conclusion
of the hearing, the administrative law judge shall report
any findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommended
disposition to the Panel. If the law enforcement officer
objects to any procedural or substantive legal portion of
the report, the officer may do so by written brief filed
with the Panel within 14 days after receipt of the report.
The Panel may grant reasonable extensions for good cause
shown or when mutually agreed upon by the parties.
No later than 28 days before the hearing, a party
shall disclose the following:
(i) The name and, if known, the address and
telephone number of each individual likely to have
information relevant to the hearing that the
SB3564 - 28 - LRB104 19623 RTM 33072 b
disclosing party may use to support its claims or
defenses. This includes, but is not limited to, any
name that has previously been held as confidential by
the Board.
(ii) A copy of any documents and videos that are in
the possession, custody, or control of the party, and
that the disclosing party may use to support its
claims or defenses.
(8) Certification Review Meeting. Upon receipt of the
administrative law judge's findings of fact, conclusions
of law, and recommended disposition, and any submitted
objections from the law enforcement officer, the Panel
shall call for a certification review meeting.
In such a meeting, the Panel may adjourn into a closed
conference for the purposes of deliberating on the
evidence presented during the hearing. In closed
conference, the Panel shall consider the hearing officer's
findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommended
disposition and may deliberate on all evidence and
testimony received and may consider the weight and
credibility to be given to the evidence received. No new
or additional evidence may be presented to the Panel.
After concluding its deliberations, the Panel shall
convene in open session for its consideration of the
matter. If a simple majority of the Panel finds that no
allegations in the complaint supporting one or more
SB3564 - 29 - LRB104 19623 RTM 33072 b
charges of misconduct are proven by clear and convincing
evidence, then the Panel shall recommend to the Board that
the complaint be dismissed. If a simple majority of the
Panel finds that the allegations in the complaint
supporting one or more charges of misconduct are proven by
clear and convincing evidence, then the Panel shall
recommend to the Board to decertify the officer. The Panel
shall prepare a summary report as soon as practicable
after the completion of the meeting including the
following: the hearing officer's findings of fact,
conclusions of law, recommended disposition, and the
Panel's order.
(9) Final action by the Board. After receiving the
Panel's recommendations and any objections by the law
enforcement officer, and after due consideration of the
Panel's recommendations, the Board, by majority vote,
shall issue a final decision to decertify the law
enforcement officer or take no action in regard to the law
enforcement officer. No new or additional evidence may be
presented to the Board. If the Board makes a final
decision contrary to the recommendations of the Panel, the
Board shall set forth in its final written decision the
specific written reasons for not following the Panel's
recommendations. A copy of the Board's final decision
shall be served upon the law enforcement officer by the
Board, either personally or as provided in this Act for
SB3564 - 30 - LRB104 19623 RTM 33072 b
the service of a notice of hearing. A copy of the Board's
final decision also shall be delivered to the last
employing law enforcement agency, the complainant, and the
Panel.
(10) Reconsideration of the Board's Decision. Within
30 days after service of the Board's final decision, the
Panel or the law enforcement officer may file a written
motion for reconsideration with the Review Committee. The
motion for reconsideration shall specify the particular
grounds for reconsideration. The non-moving party may
respond to the motion for reconsideration. The Review
Committee shall only address the issues raised by the
parties.
The Review Committee may deny the motion for
reconsideration, or it may grant the motion in whole or in
part and issue a new final decision in the matter. The
Review Committee must notify the law enforcement officer
and their last employing law enforcement agency within 14
days of a denial and state the reasons for denial.
(i) This Section applies to conduct by a full-time or
part-time law enforcement officer in violation of subsection
(b) that occurred before, on, or after the effective date of
this amendatory Act of the 102nd General Assembly.
(j) Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary,
the changes made to this Section by this amendatory Act of the
102nd General Assembly and Public Act 101-652 take effect July
SB3564 - 31 - LRB104 19623 RTM 33072 b
1, 2022.
(Source: P.A. 101-652, eff. 1-1-22; 102-694, eff. 1-7-22.)
Section 905. The Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 is
amended by changing Section 108-3 and by adding Section
107-9.5 as follows:
(725 ILCS 5/107-9.5 new)
Sec. 107-9.5. Facial recognition technology. Results
generated by facial recognition technology shall not serve as
the sole basis to establish probable cause for a warrant of
arrest. Results generated by facial recognition technology may
be provided as additional material along with independently
gained evidence that itself provides probable cause for a
warrant of arrest.
(725 ILCS 5/108-3) (from Ch. 38, par. 108-3)
Sec. 108-3. Grounds for search warrant.
(a) Except as provided in subsection (b), upon the written
complaint of any person under oath or affirmation which states
facts sufficient to show probable cause and which particularly
describes the place or person, or both, to be searched and the
things to be seized, any judge may issue a search warrant for
the seizure of the following:
(1) Any instruments, articles or things designed or
intended for use or which are or have been used in the
SB3564 - 32 - LRB104 19623 RTM 33072 b
commission of, or which may constitute evidence of, the
offense in connection with which the warrant is issued; or
contraband, the fruits of crime, or things otherwise
criminally possessed.
(2) Any person who has been kidnaped in violation of
the laws of this State, or who has been kidnaped in another
jurisdiction and is now concealed within this State, or
any human fetus or human corpse.
(b) When the things to be seized are the work product of,
or used in the ordinary course of business, and in the
possession, custody, or control of any person known to be
engaged in the gathering or dissemination of news for the
print or broadcast media, no judge may issue a search warrant
unless the requirements set forth in subsection (a) are
satisfied and there is probable cause to believe that:
(1) such person has committed or is committing a
criminal offense; or
(2) the things to be seized will be destroyed or
removed from the State if the search warrant is not
issued.
(c) Results generated by facial recognition technology
shall not serve as the sole basis to establish probable cause
for a search warrant. Results generated by facial recognition
technology may be provided as additional material along with
independently gained evidence that itself provides probable
cause for a search warrant.
SB3564 - 33 - LRB104 19623 RTM 33072 b
(Source: P.A. 89-377, eff. 8-18-95.)
Section 99. Effective date. This Act takes effect upon
becoming law.
SB3564 - 34 - LRB104 19623 RTM 33072 b
INDEX
Statutes amended in order of appearance
New Act
50 ILCS 705/6 from Ch. 85, par. 506
50 ILCS 705/6.3
725 ILCS 5/107-9.5 new
725 ILCS 5/108-3 from Ch. 38, par. 108-3

Creates the Facial Recognition Technology in Law Enforcement Act. Provides that a law enforcement agency that uses facial recognition technology shall conduct a compliance audit regarding implementation of the policies established under the Act. Requires the Illinois State Police to publish a report that may contain recommendations for updates in local policies regarding the use of facial recognition technology, overall rates of implementation of policies outlined in the Act, and an assessment of the accuracy and reliability of facial recognition technology used by law enforcement agencies in this State. Provides that facial recognition technology shall not be used by law enforcement agencies or law enforcement officers to analyze an image or recording of individuals (1) engaged in activity that is protected under the United States Constitution or the Illinois Constitution unless there is reasonable suspicion that the individual is actively committing a crime, is about to commit a crime, or has already committed a crime; (2) for the purpose of real or live-time identification of an image or recording; or (3) solely based on an individual's political or social beliefs, the individual's engagement in lawful activities, or the individual's race, color, religious beliefs, sexual orientation, gender, disability, national origin, or housing status. Amends the Illinois Police Training Act. Requires the Law Enforcement Training Standards Board to publish a model statewide policy and curriculum regarding the use of facial recognition technology and other emerging technologies. In provisions concerning the decertification of law enforcement officers, requires administrative law judges presiding over decertification hearings to be trained in, among other things, technological tools that law enforcement officers use in criminal procedures. Amends the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963. Provides that results generated by facial recognition technology shall not serve as the sole basis to establish probable cause for a warrant for arrest or a search warrant. Effective immediately.

Sponsors

Sen. Adriane Johnson (D) sponsors SB 3564 alone.

Committees

SB 3564 went before 1 committee: Assignments.

Assignments
Assignments
Referred to · Feb 5, 2026

History

SB 3564 has taken 3 actions since Feb 5, 2026.

ChamberAction
Feb 5, 2026
Senate
Filed with Secretary by Sen. Adriane L. Johnson
Feb 5, 2026
Senate
First Reading
Feb 5, 2026
Senate
Referred to Assignments

Votes

SB 3564 has not gone to a roll call.


Source: ilga.gov · legiscan.com