Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

HB 3082

Missouri HouseIntroduced

Summary

HB 3082, the Establishes the Missouri Entrepreneurial Freedom Restoration Act, was introduced in the House on Jan 22, 2026 by Rep. Michael Davis (R). It was referred to Emerging Issues, and last saw action on May 15, 2026: Referred: Emerging Issues(H).


Record

Text

HB 3082 has no co-sponsors and has not gone to a roll call.

hb3082/introduced.txt
SECOND REGULAR SESSION
HOUSE BILL NO. 3082
103RD GENERAL ASSEMBLY
INTRODUCED BY REPRESENTATIVE DAVIS.
6749H.01I JOSEPH ENGLER, Chief Clerk
AN ACT
To amend chapter 1, RSMo, by adding thereto one new section relating to government
restrictions on the ability of a person to earn a living.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the state of Missouri, as follows:
Section A. Chapter 1, RSMo, is amended by adding thereto one new section, to be
known as section 1.340, to read as follows:
1.340. 1. This section shall be known and cited as the "Missouri Entrepreneurial
Freedom Restoration Act".
2. The general assembly finds and declares the following:
(1) The right of individuals to pursue a chosen business interest, occupation,
trade, or profession free from arbitrary, unreasonable, or excessive government
interference is a fundamental right;
(2) The original public meaning of Article I, Section 2 and Article I, Section 10 of
the Constitution of Missouri enshrined the right to earn a living as a fundamental right.
These constitutional provisions recognized that the right to earn a living is deeply rooted
in the history and tradition of Missouri and of this nation, the common law, and natural
law;
(3) Nevertheless, in Williamson v. Lee Optical, Inc., 348 U.S. 483 (1955) and the
Slaughter-house Cases, 83 U.S. 36 (1872), the U.S. Supreme Court virtually eliminated
the requirement that the government justify burdens on the right to earn a living despite
its enshrinement in the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
This state’s courts have largely followed suit in interpreting the right to earn a living
under the Constitution of Missouri, thereby leaving it unprotected;
EXPLANATION — Matter enclosed in bold-faced brackets [thus] in the above bill is not enacted and is
intended to be omitted from the law. Matter in bold-face type in the above bill is proposed language.
HB 3082 2
(4) Overly burdensome restrictions on the right to earn a living impede
economic growth, hinder job creation, and limit consumer choices without promoting
public health, safety, or welfare;
(5) Heightened judicial review requiring the government to justify the burdens it
imposes on the right to earn a living provides a workable test for striking sensible
balances between the right to earn a living and competing government interests in
public health, safety, and welfare; and
(6) Economic protectionism is never a valid government interest and cannot
justify burdens on the right to earn a living.
3. The purposes of this section are:
(1) To restore judicial protection of the right to earn a living by requiring courts
to apply heightened judicial review to government restrictions that unnecessarily
burden the right to earn a living;
(2) To promote economic opportunity, competition, and individual freedom by
removing unnecessary restrictions on pursuing a livelihood in businesses, occupations,
professions, and trades; and
(3) To provide a claim or defense to individuals when the government
unnecessarily burdens their right to earn a living.
4. The provisions of this section apply to all state and local laws, and
implementation of those laws, whether statutory or otherwise, and whether adopted
before or after the enactment of this section. State and local laws adopted after the
enactment of this section are subject to this section unless such law explicitly excludes
such application by reference to this section.
5. The right to earn a living in the businesses, professions, occupations, and
trades of life is the very essence of personal freedom and opportunity. The state of
Missouri recognizes it as a fundamental right and nothing in this section shall be
construed to authorize any governmental body to burden the right to earn a living.
6. State and local governments, including their branches, departments, agencies,
instrumentalities, and officials, or other persons acting under the color of state or local
law, shall not burden a person’s exercise of their right to earn a living unless the
requirements of subsection 7 of this section are met. Government restrictions that
burden the right to earn a living without satisfying subsection 7 of this section constitute
a violation of this section, making the governmental body liable for legal and equitable
relief.
7. Government restrictions that burden the right to earn a living do not violate
this section if the governmental body demonstrates through clear and convincing
evidence that:
HB 3082 3
(1) Applying the burden to the person is necessary to protect public health,
safety, or welfare;
(2) Applying the burden to the person is the least restrictive means to achieve the
law’s stated purpose; and
(3) Alternative mechanisms, such as voluntary certification or less restrictive
regulatory measures, could not achieve the stated government interest without
unnecessarily restricting entry into the occupation.
As used in this subsection, the term "welfare" shall be narrowly construed to mean only
the protection of the public against fraud or physical or psychological harm. "Welfare"
shall not mean the protection of businesses or agencies, whether publicly or privately
owned, against competition.
8. A person whose right to earn a living has been burdened in violation of this
section may assert that violation as a claim for relief in a court of competent jurisdiction
in this state and as a defense in any judicial or administrative proceeding. A court may
issue declaratory, injunctive, or other equitable relief and nominal damages to any
person who proves a violation of this section.
9. A person intending to engage in a specific business, profession, occupation, or
trade but hindered from working by a burden on the right to earn a living, whether
currently engaged in a specific business, profession, occupation, or trade, shall have
standing to bring a claim or defense asserting a violation of this section without being
required to first apply for, obtain, or be denied a relevant occupational license or
certification.
10. A person asserting a claim for nominal damages for a violation of this section
has standing to challenge restrictions alleged to burden the right to earn a living
protected by this section. The asserted harm shall arise directly from the lawful practice
of the occupation itself, and not from independent criminal or unlawful conduct by third
parties.
11. A regulation shall not be justified on the basis of moral disapproval,
generalized psychological impact, or the desire to discourage lawful but disfavored
conduct. Evidence offered by the government to justify a regulation shall demonstrate a
substantial causal relationship, and not mere correlation or statistical association,
between the regulation and the prevention of the asserted harm.
12. A regulation shall not be deemed necessary if the asserted harm is already
addressed through existing criminal, civil, or administrative law unless the government
proves by clear and convincing evidence that such existing law is inadequate.
HB 3082 4
13. The court shall award reasonable attorney's fees and costs to any person who
proves the government violated this section.
14. Nothing in this section supersedes or preempts any existing cause of action
that a person may have under the federal or state constitutions, any statute, or the
common law. This section instead provides an additional layer of protection for the
right to earn a living.
15. If any provision of this section or its application to any person or
circumstances is held invalid, the invalidity does not affect other provisions or
applications of this section that can be given effect without the invalid provision or
application.
16. The state of Missouri hereby waives sovereign immunity as to nominal
damages up to one dollar for each claim for any act by a state or local government
official that violates this section by unlawfully burdening the right to earn a living.
Further, any government official who, through act or omission, unlawfully burdens the
right to earn a living by enforcing restrictions found to violate this section is liable for
nominal damages up to one dollar for each claim and is not entitled to qualified
immunity or any other type of immunity for nominal damages.

Establishes the Missouri Entrepreneurial Freedom Restoration Act

Sponsors

Rep. Michael Davis (R) sponsors HB 3082 alone.

Committees

HB 3082 went before 1 committee: Emerging Issues.

Emerging Issues
Emerging Issues
Referred to · May 15, 2026 · 1,249 Bills

History

HB 3082 has taken 3 actions since Jan 22, 2026, the latest on May 15, 2026.

ChamberAction
May 15, 2026
House
Referred: Emerging Issues(H)
Jan 27, 2026
House
Read Second Time (H)
Jan 22, 2026
House
Introduced and Read First Time (H)

Votes

HB 3082 has not gone to a roll call.


Source: house.mo.gov · legiscan.com