Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

H.R. 7140

U.S. HouseIn House Committee

Summary

H.R. 7140, the CLEAR Act, was introduced in the House on Jan 16, 2026 by Rep. Laurel Lee (R) with 1 co-sponsor. It was referred to Judiciary, and last saw action on Jan 16, 2026: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.


Record

Text

H.R. 7140 has 1 co-sponsor.

hb7140/introduced-in-house.txt
119 HR 7140 IH: Customer Legal Ease and Relief Act
U.S. House of Representatives
2026-01-16
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
I 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 7140 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES January 16, 2026 Ms. Lee of Florida (for herself and Ms. Lofgren ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary A BILL
To protect main street retailers and end users in secondary patent actions, and for other purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Customer Legal Ease and Relief Act or the CLEAR Act .
2.
Stay of action against retailer or end user
(a)
Amendment
Chapter 29 of title 35, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
299A.
Stay of action against retailer or end user
(a)
Entry of stay
In a civil action in which a party asserts a claim for relief for infringement of a patent, the court shall grant a motion to stay at least the portion of the action against a retailer or end user of an accused instrumentality if—
(1)
the manufacturer of the accused instrumentality is a party to the action or a separate action involving the patent and the accused instrumentality;
(2)
the retailer or end user does not manufacture, assemble, integrate, or transform the accused instrumentality or a relevant part thereof;
(3)
the retailer or end user agrees that if a final judgment on the merits is entered in the action to which the manufacturer is a party, for any future action involving the same accused instrumentality supplied by the same manufacturer, the retailer or end user—
(A)
waives all defenses under section 282(b); and
(B)
is bound by any issue decided in the action to which the manufacturer is a party; and
(4)
the retailer or end user agrees to be bound by any injunction issued with respect to the accused instrumentality in the action to which the manufacturer is a party.
(b)
Lift of stay
A stay entered under this section shall be lifted upon a showing that the manufacturer cannot be made to satisfy a damages judgment.
(c)
Bond or escrow
The court may conduct an initial hearing or inquiry to determine if the manufacturer can be made to satisfy a damages judgment. If the court determines that there is a substantial likelihood that the manufacturer will not satisfy a damages judgment, the court may require the retailer or end user to post a bond or place funds or other property in escrow.
(d)
Stipulation as To use of accused instrumentality
The court may, as necessary in view of an infringement claim against the manufacturer, require the end user or retailer to stipulate as to the extent of the use of the accused instrumentality and allow limited discovery as to such use.
(e)
Time limit
A motion for a stay under this section shall be filed not later than the later of—
(1)
six months after the service of the first pleading or paper in the action that specifically identifies the accused instrumentality and how the accused instrumentality is alleged to infringe the patent;
(2)
six months after the date on which the manufacturer becomes a party to an action involving the patent and the accused instrumentality; or
(3)
the entry of the first scheduling order in the case.
(f)
Rule of construction
Nothing in this section may be construed to limit the discretion of a court to enter a stay under other authority.
(g)
Definitions
In this section:
(1)
Accused instrumentality
The term accused instrumentality means a product, or an instrumentality that implements a process, that is a material part of the claimed invention.
(2)
Affiliate
The term affiliate means any entity that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control of another entity.
(3)
End user
The term end user means an entity that does not use the accused instrumentality other than for the ordinary and intended purpose of the instrumentality and that does not direct, obligate, or induce the manufacturer to make the accused instrumentality.
(4)
Manufacturer
The term manufacturer means an entity that makes, assembles, integrates, transforms, or supplies the accused instrumentality.
(5)
Retailer
The term retailer means an entity that generates revenues predominantly through the sale to the public of consumer goods or services, or an affiliate of such entity.
.
(b)
Technical and conforming amendment
The table of sections for chapter 29 of title 35, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new item:
Sec. 299A. Stay of action against retailer or end user.
.
(c)
Effective date
The amendments made by this Act shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and shall apply to any action for which a complaint is served on and after such effective date.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2026-01-16
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

To protect main street retailers and end users in secondary patent actions, and for other purposes.

Sponsors

Rep. Laurel Lee (R) sponsors H.R. 7140, and 1 member has co-sponsored it from the day it was introduced.

Committees

H.R. 7140 went before 1 committee: Judiciary.

Judiciary
Judiciary
Referred To · Jan 16, 2026 · 2,181 Bills

Actions

H.R. 7140 has taken 2 actions since Jan 16, 2026.

ChamberAction
Jan 16, 2026
House
Introduced in House
Jan 16, 2026
House
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.Judiciary Committee

Votes

H.R. 7140 has not gone to a roll call.

Titles

H.R. 7140 goes by 4 titles, 2 of them short titles.

  • CLEAR Act — Display Title
  • CLEAR Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • Customer Legal Ease and Relief Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • To protect main street retailers and end users in secondary patent actions, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced

Lobbying

3 clients hired 3 firms and 14 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 7140 in 6 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Copyright/Patent/Trademark, Computer Industry, Consumer Issues/Safety/Products, Education, Science/Technology, Communications/Broadcasting/Radio/TV, Torts, Health Issues.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
SOFTWARE & INFORMATION INDUSTRY ASSOCIATIONDistrict of Columbia13
AMERICAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW ASSOCIATION (AIPLA)LOBBYINGVirginia12
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH & MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA INCDistrict of Columbia11$450K

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill.

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
SOFTWARE & INFORMATION INDUSTRY ASSOCIATIONSIIA2026 second_quarter$1.4M2nd Quarter - Report
SOFTWARE & INFORMATION INDUSTRY ASSOCIATIONSIIA2026 first_quarter$1.4M1st Quarter - Report
SOFTWARE & INFORMATION INDUSTRY ASSOCIATIONSIIA2025 fourth_quarter$1.3M4th Quarter - Report
PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH & MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA INCCOVINGTON & BURLING LLP2026 first_quarter$450K1st Quarter - Report
AMERICAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW ASSOCIATION (AIPLA)AMERICAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW ASSOCIATION (AIPLA)2026 second_quarter$10K2nd Quarter - Report
AMERICAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW ASSOCIATION (AIPLA)AMERICAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW ASSOCIATION (AIPLA)2026 first_quarter$10K1st Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 7140 under Commerce, one of its 31 policy areas.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 7140’s is Commerce.

hr7140/policy-areas.txt
CommerceAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com