Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

S. 3680

U.S. SenateIn Senate Committee

Summary

S. 3680, the Eliminating Bias in Algorithmic Systems Act of 2026, was introduced in the Senate on Jan 15, 2026 by Sen. Edward Markey (D) with 6 co-sponsors. It was referred to Homeland Security And Governmental Affairs, and last saw action on Jan 15, 2026: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.


Record

Text

S. 3680 has 6 co-sponsors.

sb3680/introduced-in-senate.txt
119 S3680 IS: Eliminating Bias in Algorithmic Systems Act of 2026
U.S. Senate
2026-01-15
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
II 119th CONGRESS 2d Session S. 3680 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES January 15, 2026 Mr. Markey (for himself, Mr. Merkley , Mr. Welch , Ms. Warren , Mr. Schiff , Mr. Wyden , and Mr. Booker ) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs A BILL
To require agencies that use, fund, or oversee algorithms to have an office of civil rights focused on bias, discrimination, and other harms of algorithms, and for other purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Eliminating Bias in Algorithmic Systems Act of 2026 .
2.
Definitions
In this Act:
(1)
Agency
The term agency has the meaning given the term in section 3502 of title 44, United States Code.
(2)
Covered agency
The term covered agency means an agency that—
(A)
uses, funds, or procures a covered algorithm, or funds or otherwise participates in the development of a covered algorithm; or
(B)
oversees, regulates, or advises on the development or use of a covered algorithm.
(3)
Covered algorithm
The term covered algorithm means a process that—
(A)
is—
(i)
a computational process that uses machine learning, natural language processing, artificial intelligence techniques, or other computational processing techniques of similar or greater complexity; or
(ii)
a computational process derived from a process described in clause (i); and
(B)
has the potential to have a material effect on the impact of, access to, availability of, eligibility for, cost of, terms of, or conditions of—
(i)
a program operated or funded by an agency;
(ii)
an economic opportunity regulated by an agency; or
(iii)
rights protected by an agency.
(4)
Protected characteristic
The term protected characteristic means any of the following actual or perceived traits of an individual or group of individuals:
(A)
Race.
(B)
Color.
(C)
Ethnicity.
(D)
National origin, nationality, or immigration status.
(E)
Religion.
(F)
Sex (including a sex stereotype, pregnancy, childbirth, or a related medical condition, sexual orientation or gender identity, and sex characteristics, including intersex traits).
(G)
Disability.
(H)
Limited English proficiency.
(I)
Biometric information.
(J)
Familial or marital status.
(K)
Source of income.
(L)
Income level (not including the ability to pay for a specific good or service being offered).
(M)
Age.
(N)
Veteran status.
(O)
Genetic information or medical conditions.
(P)
Any other classification protected by Federal law.
3.
Civil rights offices and reporting on ai bias, discrimination, and other harms
(a)
Offices of civil rights
The head of each covered agency shall ensure that the covered agency has an office of civil rights that employs experts and technologists focused on bias, discrimination, and other harms, including the effect or tendency to subject communities, groups, or individuals to bias based on, discrimination based on, or other harms attributable to possessing or being perceived as possessing a protected characteristic.
(b)
Bias, discrimination, and other harms reports
Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, and every 2 years thereafter, each office of civil rights of a covered agency established under subsection (a) shall submit to each congressional committee with jurisdiction over the covered agency a report that details—
(1)
the state of the field and technology of covered algorithms with respect to jurisdiction of the covered agency, including risks relating to bias based on, discrimination based on, and other harms attributable to possessing or being perceived as possessing a protected characteristic;
(2)
any relevant steps the covered agency has taken to mitigate harms from covered algorithms relating to bias based on, discrimination based on, and other harms attributable to possessing or being perceived as possessing a protected characteristic;
(3)
actions the covered agency has taken to engage with relevant stakeholders, including industry representatives, businesses, civil rights advocates, consumer protection organizations, other relevant civil society organizations, academic experts, individuals with technical expertise, organizations representing workers, and affected populations, regarding bias, discrimination, and other harms including the effect or tendency to subject communities, groups, or individuals to bias based on, discrimination based on, and other harms attributable to possessing or being perceived as possessing a protected characteristic; and
(4)
any relevant recommendations for legislation or administrative action to mitigate bias based on, discrimination based on, and other harms attributable to possessing or being perceived as possessing a protected characteristic from covered algorithms, as determined appropriate by the head of the office.
(c)
Interagency working group
Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice shall establish an interagency working group on covered algorithms and civil rights, of which each office of civil rights of a covered agency established under subsection (a) shall be a member.
(d)
Authorization of appropriations
There are authorized to be appropriated to each covered agency such sums as may be necessary to carry out this Act.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2026-01-15
  2. Passed Senate
  3. Passed House
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

A bill to require agencies that use, fund, or oversee algorithms to have an office of civil rights focused on bias, discrimination, and other harms of algorithms, and for other purposes.

Sponsors

Sen. Edward Markey (D) sponsors S. 3680, and 6 members have co-sponsored it, all of them from the day it was introduced.

Committees

S. 3680 went before 1 committee: Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
Referred To · Jan 15, 2026 · 444 Bills

Actions

S. 3680 has taken 2 actions since Jan 15, 2026.

ChamberAction
Jan 15, 2026
Senate
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee
Jan 15, 2026
Introduced in Senate

Votes

S. 3680 has not gone to a roll call.

1 bill is related to S. 3680, as Identical bill.

Titles

S. 3680 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.

  • Eliminating Bias in Algorithmic Systems Act of 2026 — Display Title
  • Eliminating Bias in Algorithmic Systems Act of 2026 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • A bill to require agencies that use, fund, or oversee algorithms to have an office of civil rights focused on bias, discrimination, and other harms of algorithms, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced

Lobbying

4 clients hired 4 firms and 19 registered lobbyists who named S. 3680 in 21 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Taxation/Internal Revenue Code, Health Issues, Budget/Appropriations, Consumer Issues/Safety/Products, Financial Institutions/Investments/Securities, Insurance, Retirement, Trade (domestic/foreign).

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATIONDistrict of Columbia18
AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERSDistrict of Columbia17
PATRIOT VOICESPatriot Voices is a 501(c)4 nonprofit organization.Pennsylvania13$10K
SOCIETY FOR HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENTVirginia13

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill.

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERSAMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERS2025 second_quarter$2.2M2nd Quarter - Report
AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERSAMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERS2025 fourth_quarter$1.9M4th Quarter - Report
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATIONALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION2025 second_quarter$1.8M2nd Quarter - Amendme…
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATIONALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION2025 second_quarter$1.8M2nd Quarter - Report
AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERSAMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERS2025 first_quarter$1.7M1st Quarter - Report
AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERSAMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERS2025 third_quarter$1.4M3rd Quarter - Report
AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERSAMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERS2026 first_quarter$1.1M1st Quarter - Report
AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERSAMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERS2026 second_quarter$1.1M2nd Quarter - Amendme…
AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERSAMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERS2026 second_quarter$1.1M2nd Quarter - Report
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATIONALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION2025 third_quarter$1.1M3rd Quarter - Report
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATIONALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION2025 first_quarter$560K1st Quarter - Amendme…
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATIONALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION2025 fourth_quarter$560K4th Quarter - Amendme…
SOCIETY FOR HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENTSOCIETY FOR HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT2025 second_quarter$560K2nd Quarter - Report
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATIONALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION2025 first_quarter$530K1st Quarter - Report
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATIONALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION2025 fourth_quarter$520K4th Quarter - Amendme…
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATIONALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION2025 fourth_quarter$520K4th Quarter - Report
SOCIETY FOR HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENTSOCIETY FOR HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT2025 third_quarter$310K3rd Quarter - Report
SOCIETY FOR HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENTSOCIETY FOR HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT2025 fourth_quarter$190K4th Quarter - Report
PATRIOT VOICESDGSR LLC2025 third_quarter$5K3rd Quarter - Report
PATRIOT VOICESDGSR LLC2025 second_quarter$5K2nd Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files S. 3680 under Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues, one of its 31 policy areas.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; S. 3680’s is Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues.

s3680/policy-areas.txt
Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com