Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

H.Res. 1003

U.S. HouseIn House Committee

Summary

H.Res. 1003, “Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that corporations should commit to utilizing the benefits of women in boards of directors and other senior management positions”, was introduced in the House on Jan 15, 2026 by Rep. Don Beyer (D). It was referred to Education and Workforce, and last saw action on Jan 15, 2026: Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.


Record

Text

H.Res. 1003 has no co-sponsors and has not gone to a roll call.

hr1003/introduced-in-house.txt
119 HRES 1003 IH: Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that corporations should commit to utilizing the benefits of women in boards of directors and other senior management positions.
U.S. House of Representatives
2026-01-15
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
IV 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. RES. 1003 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES January 15, 2026 Mr. Beyer submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce RESOLUTION
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that corporations should commit to utilizing the benefits of women in boards of directors and other senior management positions.
Whereas Catalyst, a non-profit and non-partisan organization, found in their 2020 report entitled Women on Corporate Boards that women are 56 percent of the labor force, yet only account for 30 percent of board directors of S&P 500 companies, and another Catalyst report entitled Women CEOs of the S&P 500 found that women accounted for only 6 percent of all CEOs in 2020;
Whereas a McKinsey report entitled Women in the Workplace published in 2021, found that women of color continue to have even lower representation at every level of corporate employment and leadership;
Whereas the Sadie Collective’s paper titled Why are Black Women Missing from Corporate Leadership? published in November 2020 showed that the number of Black women completing degrees in economics, finance, accounting, and math fields is declining, which are often fields associated with corporate leadership;
Whereas such study found that measures to remove barriers to the pipeline of corporate leadership for Black women in male-dominated fields include access to information, earlier education, and exposure to female mentors;
Whereas The American Economic Association’s study entitled AEA Profession Climate Survey: Final Report published in September 2019 found that women, especially Black women, had to take the most measures to avoid possible harassment, discrimination and unfair treatment, hindering efforts to climb the corporate ladder;
Whereas an Egon Zehnder study entitled Global Board Diversity Tracker: Who’s Really on Board? published in December 2020, showed that companies with women on executive teams and boards of directors perform better financially;
Whereas such study showed that women directors contribute to important corporate-level outcomes because they play roles as leaders and mentors, as well as indirect roles as symbols of opportunity for other women, and inspire those women to achieve and stay with their corporations;
Whereas such study found that more recognition of the valuable contribution of women directors to corporation value is needed;
Whereas such study showed that corporations need a critical mass of at least 3 women serving on boards of directors with average membership of 11 individuals to access the benefits of women in powerful positions for overall organizational performance and prevent the negative impacts of tokenism on leadership teams; and
Whereas such study found that corporations with women serving as directors tend to be somewhat risk-averse and carry less debt, on average, compared to corporations with no women directors, and that net income growth for such corporations was also higher: Now, therefore, be it
That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that—
(1)
the citizens of the United States have a significant stake in promoting robust, sustainable economic growth;
(2)
such growth will be strengthened and accelerated by the ever-fuller inclusion of women in the United States workforce, at all levels of corporate management; and
(3)
corporations in the United States should undertake a commitment to ever-fuller utilization of the talents, skills, and work ethic of women on boards of directors and in other senior management positions.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2026-01-15
  2. Passed House

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that corporations should commit to utilizing the benefits of women in boards of directors and other senior management positions.

Sponsors

Rep. Don Beyer (D) sponsors H.Res. 1003 alone.

Committees

H.Res. 1003 went before 1 committee: Education and Workforce.

Education and Workforce
Education and Workforce
Referred To · Jan 15, 2026 · 824 Bills

Actions

H.Res. 1003 has taken 2 actions since Jan 15, 2026.

ChamberAction
Jan 15, 2026
House
Submitted in House
Jan 15, 2026
House
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.Education and Workforce Committee

Votes

H.Res. 1003 has not gone to a roll call.

Titles

H.Res. 1003 goes by 2 titles.

  • Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that corporations should commit to utilizing the benefits of women in boards of directors and other senior management positions. — Official Title as Introduced
  • Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that corporations should commit to utilizing the benefits of women in boards of directors and other senior management positions. — Display Title

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files H.Res. 1003 under Finance and Financial Sector, one of its 31 policy areas.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.Res. 1003’s is Finance and Financial Sector.

hres1003/policy-areas.txt
Finance and Financial SectorAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com