- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- Administration
- Agriculture
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry
- Appropriations
- Armed Services
- Banking, Housing, And Urban Affairs
- Budget
- Commerce, Science, And Transportation
- Education and Workforce
- Energy And Commerce
- Energy And Natural Resources
- Environment And Public Works
- Ethics
- Finance
- Financial Services
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Relations
- Health, Education, Labor, And Pensions
- Homeland Security
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…
- Indian Affairs
- Indian and Insular Affairs
- Intelligence
- Judiciary
- Natural Resources
- Oversight And Government Reform
- Permanent Select Intelligence
- Rules
- Rules And Administration
- Science, Space, And Technology
- Select Intelligence
- Small Business
- Small Business And Entrepreneurship
- Subcommittee on Aviation
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…
- Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…
- Subcommittee on Federal Lands
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…
- Subcommittee on Health
- Subcommittee on Highways and Transit
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…
- Transportation And Infrastructure
- Veterans' Affairs
- Ways And Means

H.R. 6996
U.S. House•In House Committee
Summary
H.R. 6996, the Full AI Stack Export Promotion Act, was introduced in the House on Jan 9, 2026 by Rep. Randy Fine (R) with 1 co-sponsor. It last saw action on Apr 22, 2026: Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 37 - 7.
Record
Text
H.R. 6996 has 1 co-sponsor.
hb6996/introduced-in-house.txt119 HR 6996 IH: Full AI Stack Export Promotion ActU.S. House of Representatives2026-01-09text/xmlENPursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.I 119th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 6996 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES January 9, 2026 Mr. Fine introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs A BILLTo facilitate the export of United States artificial intelligence systems, computing hardware, and standards globally.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Full AI Stack Export Promotion Act .2.FindingsCongress finds the following:(1)The United States is in a race to achieve global dominance in artificial intelligence, the winner of which will reap broad economic and military benefits.(2)Winning the AI race will usher in a new golden age of human flourishing, economic competitiveness, and national security for the American people.(3)Establishing United States AI as the gold standard for AI worldwide and ensuring our allies build AI on United States technology will help the United States win the AI race.(4)Advanced AI compute is essential to the AI era, enabling both economic dynamism and novel military capabilities. Denying our foreign adversaries access to this resource, then, is a matter of both geostrategic competition and national security.3.Statement of policyIt is the policy of the United States to—(1)maintain United States dominance in the global deployment of artificial intelligence;(2)drive adoption of the U.S. full AI stack by allies and partners;(3)ensure global deployment of artificial intelligence is based on United States-developed AI models, run by United States cloud operators, run by data centers owned or operated by United States firms, and functioning on United States-designed artificial intelligence semiconductors;(4)reduce the barriers faced by United States firms to export the U.S. full AI stack;(5)counter Chinese influence in international governance bodies and ensure the global deployment of the full AI stack strengthens United States values abroad;(6)prevent illicit foreign adversary access to the U.S. full AI stack deployed abroad;(7)ensure the global deployment of AI strengthens the qualitative military superiority of the United States and its allies over foreign adversaries; and(8)maintain a majority of globally deployed artificial intelligence computing capacity and memory bandwidth in the United States.4.Industry consortia for exporting the full AI stack(a)In generalThe Secretary of Commerce shall establish and carry out a program to identify and receive proposals that meet United States-approved security requirements and standards from industry consortia to facilitate the export of the U.S. full AI stack to allies and partners. An industry consortia shall be eligible to submit proposals under this subsection if the consortia is established only for the purposes of participating in the program under this subsection.(b)ReportNot later than 180 days after the date on which the program required by subsection (a) is established, the Secretary of Commerce shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the status and results of the program.5.Eliminating foreign barriers to the U.S. full AI stack(a)In generalThe Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of Commerce, shall work to increase efforts to eliminate foreign barriers to the export of the U.S. full AI stack, including—(1)carrying out activities such as holding regular industry listening sessions;(2)establishing a hotline for industry to communications barriers to exporting the U.S. full AI stack;(3)elevating appropriate diplomatic channels; and(4)carrying out other relevant actions.(b)Diplomatic strategyNot later than 180 days after the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State shall establish a diplomatic strategy outlining how the United States will address the following:(1)Easing United States AI companies’ access to foreign markets.(2)Communicating to foreign countries the importance and benefits of using the U.S. full AI stack to deploy artificial intelligence.(3)Leveraging the United States position in international diplomatic and standard-setting bodies to advocate for international AI governance approaches that promote innovation, reflect American values, and counter authoritarian influence.(c)ReportNot later than 180 days after the date on which the strategy required by subsection (c) is completed, the Secretary of Commerce shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees the strategy and an update on efforts to implement the strategy.6.Study on global AI deployment(a)In generalThe Secretary of State, in coordination with the Director of National Intelligence and the Secretary of Commerce, shall conduct a study on the benefits and impact of the global deployment of artificial intelligence.(b)Matters To be addressedThe study required by subsection (a) shall address the following:(1)The economic, diplomatic, and technological impact for the United States and its allies from the global deployment of the U.S. full AI stack.(2)The impact on U.S. economic, diplomatic, and technological leadership from the global deployment of the U.S. full AI stack.(3)How the global deployment of the U.S. full AI stack assists countries worldwide in achieving economic prosperity, improving quality of life, expanding healthcare and educational access for their citizens, and growing access to AI.(4)The competitive position of the U.S. full AI stack globally, compared to similar technology developed by foreign countries.(5)How the global deployment of the U.S. full AI stack enhances or affects United States and allied security, including the qualitative military superiority of the United States and its allies over foreign adversaries.(6)Priority regions and countries for exporting the U.S. full AI stack abroad.(c)Report(1)In generalNot later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State submit to appropriate congressional committees a report on the results of the study required by subsection (a).(2)FormThe report required by this subsection shall be submitted in unclassified form but may include a classified annex.7.Security of U.S. artificial intelligence semiconductor products(a)In generalThe Secretary of Commerce, in coordination with the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Defense, and the Secretary of Energy, shall work with foreign purchasers of the U.S. full AI stack to institute security measures to prevent illicit or unauthorized foreign adversary access to the U.S. full AI stack.(b)Report(1)In generalNot later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Commerce shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the development and implementation of the security measures described in subsection (a).(2)FormThe report required by this subsection shall be submitted in unclassified form but may include a classified annex.(c)Matters To be addressedThe report required by subsection (b) shall address the following:(1)Plans of the Secretary of Commerce, in coordination with the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Defense, and the Secretary of Energy, to increase the speed and security of the deployment of the U.S. full AI stack, such as creating standardized security requirements for the U.S. full AI stack deployed in third countries.(2)Agreements reached with countries designed to promote adoption of the U.S. full stack, including efforts to prevent illicit or unauthorized foreign adversary access to the U.S. full AI stack.(3)The security measures that foreign purchasers of the U.S. full AI stack must undertake to prevent transfer of the U.S. full AI stack to foreign adversaries, including by remote access.(4)The presence of foreign adversary hardware and software within the artificial intelligence supply chains of foreign purchasers of the U.S. full AI stack, and supply-chain security measures that foreign purchasers of the U.S. full AI stack take to eliminate that presence.(5)Any other relevant information regarding the security of the U.S. full AI stack.8.AI full stack confidence initiativeNot later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Commerce, in coordination with the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Energy, and the public, including the industry consortia identified in section 4, shall develop generally applicable practices, product offerings, or related standards to help demonstrate confidence and reassurance to major national purchasers of the U.S. full AI stack of the privacy, confidentiality, security, and effectiveness of the U.S. full AI stack for achieving the economic and security goals of major foreign purchasers.9.AI full stack export success tracker(a)In generalNot later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and biannually thereafter for five years, the Secretary of Commerce, in coordination with the Director of National Intelligence and the Secretary of State, shall complete an estimate of the success of the export of the U.S. full AI stack (in this section referred to as the AI export success tracker ).(b)ContentsThe AI export success tracker shall contain the following elements:(1)An estimate of each country’s installed artificial intelligence, measured by total national computing capacity and total national memory bandwidth.(2)An estimate of what proportion of globally installed artificial intelligence integrated circuits are designed by United States firms.(3)An estimate of what proportion of globally installed artificial intelligence is installed in data centers owned or operated by United States firms, with appropriate descriptive breakdowns for each region or country.(4)An estimate of the proportion of global artificial intelligence model usage, measured by tokens processed, that occurs for models owned or operated by United States firms, with appropriate descriptive breakdowns for each region or country.(5)An estimate of the proportion of global cloud computing services revenue and data-processing capacity is attributable to cloud operators owned or operated by United States firms.(c)Report(1)In generalThe Secretary of Commerce shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees and make available to the public a report that contains the findings of each estimate described under subsection (b).(2)FormThe report required by this subsection shall be submitted in unclassified form but may include a classified annex.10.DefinitionsIn this Act—(1)the term appropriate congressional committees means—(A)the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives; and(B)the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate;(2)the term artificial intelligence integrated circuits means any semiconductor device or integrated circuit architecture that is marketed to perform artificial intelligence model training, inference, or acceleration, including but not limited to graphics processing units;(3)the term foreign adversaries has the meaning given the term covered nation in section 4872(f) of title 10, United States Code;(4)the term full AI stack means the compute and data infrastructure that enable artificial intelligence research and development, including high-performance computing resources, data centers, the trained algorithms deployed on such infrastructure, cloud services and infrastructure, and the technical standards with which these facets operate;(5)the term national computing capacity means the aggregate maximum number of floating-point operations per second (FLOP/s) or equivalent operations available within a country from computing devices, processors, or systems configured for large-scale artificial intelligence training or inference. Computing capacity shall be calculated as the maximum number of floating-point operations per second (FLOP/s), normalized at a precision level determined by the Secretary of Commerce;(6)the term national memory bandwidth means the aggregate maximum rate, expressed in bytes per second, at which data can be transferred between processing elements and directly attached memory resources in all computing devices, processors, or systems that are configured for large-scale artificial intelligence training or inference within a country. National memory bandwidth shall be measured as the sum of the sustained aggregate data transfer rates of such systems under standard benchmark conditions;(7)the term U.S. artificial intelligence semiconductor products means any semiconductor device or integrated circuit architecture for which design activities were conducted in the United States and that is marketed to perform artificial intelligence model training, inference, or acceleration, including but not limited to graphics processing units;(8)the term U.S. full AI stack means those parts of the full AI stack with respect to which entities whose ultimate parent company is organized or headquartered in the United States are key developers, manufacturers, or providers across the relevant parts of the supply chain; and(9)the term token means a basic unit of text, code, or other data processed by an artificial intelligence model, typically corresponding to a word, part of a word, or symbol, used for the purpose of measuring the volume of model input or output.
Tracker
The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.
- Introduced2026-01-09
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- Conference
- To President
- Became Law
CRS Summary
The summaries are the Congressional Research Service’s, one per stage. Read them in full.
Introduced in House Jan 9, 2026
hb6996/introduced-in-house.mdShown Here:
Introduced in House (01/09/2026)
Full AI Stack Export Promotion Act
This bill requires specified departments to promote the export of the U.S. full artificial intelligence (AI) stack. Full AI stack refers to the compute and data infrastructure that enables AI research and development, including high-performance computing resources, data centers, trained algorithms deployed on such infrastructure, cloud services and infrastructure, and technical standards with which these facets operate.
Specifically, the Department of Commerce must establish and carry out a program to identify and receive proposals from industry consortia for exporting the U.S. full AI stack to allies and partners. (Commerce implemented this program following a July 2025 executive order.)
Additionally, Commerce must
- work with foreign purchasers of the U.S. full AI stack to institute security measures to prevent illicit or unauthorized foreign adversary (e.g., China) access to the U.S. full AI stack;
- develop practices and standards to demonstrate to potential purchasers the benefits of adopting the U.S. full AI stack; and
- complete, on a biannual basis for five years, an estimate of the success of exporting the U.S. full AI stack.
The bill directs the Department of State to
- increase efforts to eliminate foreign barriers to exporting the U.S. full AI stack;
- establish a diplomatic strategy outlining how the United States will address certain issues, such as communicating to foreign countries the importance and benefits of using the U.S. full AI stack to deploy AI; and
- study the benefits and impact of the global deployment of AI.
The bill also requires certain reports to Congress.
Sponsors
Rep. Randy Fine (R) sponsors H.R. 6996, and 1 member has co-sponsored it.
Committees
H.R. 6996 went before 1 committee: Foreign Affairs.
Actions
H.R. 6996 has taken 4 actions since Jan 9, 2026, the latest on Apr 22, 2026.
| Chamber | Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 22, 2026 | House | Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session HeldForeign Affairs Committee | ||
Apr 22, 2026 | House | Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 37 - 7.Foreign Affairs Committee | ||
Jan 9, 2026 | House | Introduced in House | ||
Jan 9, 2026 | House | Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.Foreign Affairs Committee |
Votes
H.R. 6996 has not gone to a roll call.
Titles
H.R. 6996 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.
- Full AI Stack Export Promotion Act — Display Title
- Full AI Stack Export Promotion Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
- To facilitate the export of United States artificial intelligence systems, computing hardware, and standards globally. — Official Title as Introduced
Cost estimate
The Congressional Budget Office has filed 1 estimate for H.R. 6996, the latest on May 21, 2026.
- H.R. 6996, Full AI Stack Export Promotion Act — 2026-05-21As ordered reported by the House Committee on Foreign Affairs on April 22, 2026
Lobbying
9 clients hired 10 firms and 49 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 6996 in 11 quarterly filings, 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.
Filed under Trade (domestic/foreign), Budget/Appropriations, Science/Technology, Defense, Education, Computer Industry, Labor Issues/Antitrust/Workplace, Taxation/Internal Revenue Code.
Clients
Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.
| Client | Business | State | Firms | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY COUNCIL | Advocacy and policy on behalf of innovation and technology companies | District of Columbia | 2 | 2 | $50K |
| LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. | Consumer electronics manufacturer | North Carolina | 1 | 2 | — |
| DELL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. | Provides technology solutions, services and support. | District of Columbia | 1 | 1 | $80K |
| DEMAND PROGRESS ACTION, INC | — | Maryland | 1 | 1 | — |
| FDD ACTION | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 1 | — |
| P STREET PROJECT, INC. | P Street advocates bold progressive solutions to the nations most pressing problems. | District of Columbia | 1 | 1 | — |
| SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 1 | — |
| SOFTWARE & INFORMATION INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 1 | — |
| SYNOPSYS, INC. | electronic design automation (EDA) and intellectual property (IP) | California | 1 | 1 | — |
Firms
Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.
| Registrant | Clients | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. | 1 | 2 | — |
| DEMAND PROGRESS ACTION, INC | 1 | 1 | — |
| FDD ACTION | 1 | 1 | — |
| GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP | 1 | 1 | $80K |
| INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY COUNCIL | 1 | 1 | — |
| P STREET PROJECT, INC. | 1 | 1 | — |
| SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION | 1 | 1 | — |
| SIGHTLINE ADVOCACY, LLC | 1 | 1 | $50K |
| SIIA | 1 | 1 | — |
| SYNOPSYS, INC. | 1 | 1 | — |
Lobbyists
Named on the filings that cite the bill. The 20 named most often, of 49.
| Lobbyist | Firms | Clients | Filings |
|---|---|---|---|
| ANDREW GINSBURG | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| HEATHER SMITH | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| JON BEAMER | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| JOSEPH DONOGHUE | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| LESLEY HILL | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| YELENA VAYNBERG | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| AARON STEPHENS | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| ALEXANDRIA PAOLOZZI MOORE | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| ANDREW GINSBERG | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| ANDREW ROLLO | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| ANTON VAN SEVENTER | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| BETHANY ABBATE | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| COLIN MCGLYNN | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| CONNOR PFEIFFER | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| DANIEL VAYNSHTEYN | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| DANNY BOUNDS | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| DAVID ISAACS | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| DEMETRIUS MCDANIEL | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| DIANE BLAGMAN | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| DUSTIN TODD | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Filings
The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.
| Client | Registrant | Period | Reported | Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOFTWARE & INFORMATION INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION | SIIA | 2026 second_quarter | $1.4M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY COUNCIL | INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY COUNCIL | 2026 second_quarter | $720K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. | LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. | 2026 second_quarter | $570K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. | LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. | 2026 first_quarter | $570K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION | SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION | 2026 second_quarter | $460K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| SYNOPSYS, INC. | SYNOPSYS, INC. | 2026 first_quarter | $370K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| FDD ACTION | FDD ACTION | 2026 second_quarter | $240K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| DELL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. | GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP | 2026 second_quarter | $80K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| DEMAND PROGRESS ACTION, INC | DEMAND PROGRESS ACTION, INC | 2026 second_quarter | $70K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY COUNCIL | SIGHTLINE ADVOCACY, LLC | 2026 second_quarter | $50K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| P STREET PROJECT, INC. | P STREET PROJECT, INC. | 2026 second_quarter | $10K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
Classification
The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 6996 under Foreign Trade and International Finance, one of its 31 policy areas, and gives it 6 legislative subjects.
CRS Subjects
CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 6996’s is Foreign Trade and International Finance.
hr6996/policy-areas.txtLegislative Subjects
H.R. 6996 carries 6 of CRS’s legislative subjects, from Advanced technology and technological innovations to Technology transfer and commercialization.
hr6996/subjects.txtConstitutional authority
The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 6996, as entered in the Congressional Record.
[Congressional Record Volume 172, Number 7 (Friday, January 9, 2026)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Mr. FINE:H.R. 6996.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:Commerce Clause, Article I, Section 8, Clause 3Necessary and Proper Clause, Article I, Section 8, Clause18.[Page H616]
Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com