Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

H.R. 6425

U.S. HouseIn House Committee

Summary

H.R. 6425, the National Strategy for Combating Scams Act of 2025, was introduced in the House on Dec 4, 2025 by Rep. Gabe Amo (D) with 12 co-sponsors. It was referred to Judiciary, and last saw action on Dec 4, 2025: Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Energy and Commerce, and Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.


Record

Text

H.R. 6425 has 12 co-sponsors.

hb6425/introduced-in-house.txt
119 HR 6425 IH: National Strategy for Combating Scams Act of 2025
U.S. House of Representatives
2025-12-04
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 6425 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES December 4, 2025 Mr. Amo (for himself, Mr. Schmidt , Ms. Norton , and Ms. McBride ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary , and in addition to the Committees on Energy and Commerce , and Financial Services , for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned A BILL
To establish a national strategy for combating scams, and for other purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the National Strategy for Combating Scams Act of 2025 .
2.
Findings
Congress finds the following:
(1)
More than 4 in 10 individuals in the United States, an estimated 141,500,000 adults, say they have lost money to scams or had sensitive information obtained and used fraudulently.
(2)
Consumers reported losing more than $12,000,000,000 to fraud in 2024, a 25 percent increase over the prior year, with imposter scams being the most commonly reported scam category.
(3)
Criminals are increasingly using Generative Artificial Intelligence to conduct scams, including hyper-realistic voice deepfakes to manipulate victims.
(4)
Scams harm all people of the United States, but can particularly affect older adults by harming their mental health and by forcing them to live with fewer resources.
(5)
The Government Accountability Office found that there are at least 13 agencies engaged in a range of activities relating to countering scams, all of which have their own mandate and authorities and are largely carrying out their activities independently.
(6)
To improve the ability of Federal agencies to coordinate and target efforts to counter scams, the Government Accountability Office has recommended that the Federal Bureau of Investigation lead an effort to develop a National Strategy for Combating Scams.
3.
National Strategy for Combating Scams
(a)
Establishment of working group
Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation shall assemble a working group to develop a National Strategy for Combating Scams, in coordination with the heads of each of the following:
(1)
The Federal Trade Commission.
(2)
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
(3)
The Department of Health and Human Services.
(4)
The Department of State.
(5)
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
(6)
The Federal Reserve Board.
(7)
The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network.
(8)
The Department of Homeland Security.
(9)
The National Credit Union Administration.
(10)
The Office of the Comptroller of Currency.
(11)
The Office of the United States Attorney.
(12)
The United States Secret Service.
(13)
The Department of the Treasury.
(14)
The Federal Communications Commission.
(15)
The Securities and Exchange Commission.
(16)
The Commodities Futures Trading Commission.
(17)
The Social Security Administration.
(18)
Any other Federal Department or agency, as determined appropriate.
(b)
Development of National Strategy for Combating Scams
The working group established pursuant to subsection (a) shall develop a National Strategy for Combating Scams that—
(1)
incorporates feedback from community stakeholders, including—
(A)
survivors of scams, and groups that represent survivors of scams;
(B)
older adults and groups that represent older adults;
(C)
individuals with disabilities and groups that represent individuals with disabilities;
(D)
Federal, State, and local prosecutors and law enforcement officials with expertise in scams, and groups that represent such prosecutors and law enforcement officials;
(E)
business and non-profit organizations that play a role in preventing and addressing scams, including telecommunications, financial, social media, retail, and technology companies, and groups that represent such businesses and non-profit organizations;
(F)
experts on human behavior and scam prevention;
(G)
Adult Protective Services agencies, and groups that represent them;
(H)
Area Agencies on Aging, and groups that represent them;
(I)
State, local, and Tribal government officials, and groups that represent State and local government officials; and
(J)
any other community stakeholders, as determined appropriate by the working group;
(2)
establishes a definition of scam , for use in the National Strategy and by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Federal Trade Commission, and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the establishment of which includes—
(A)
an analysis explaining the reasons the working group selected the definition; and
(B)
an evaluation of whether agencies other than the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Federal Trade Commission, and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau should adopt the definition, including an analysis of the barriers or unintended consequences of doing so;
(3)
evaluates the risks from scams, including an analysis of threats and vulnerabilities, health and financial risks to scam survivors, risks to national and economic security, and the proper Federal response to scams;
(4)
evaluates methods for preventing scams, including evidence-based best practices that can be implemented and measured by the Federal Government, State, local, and Tribal governments, businesses, non-profit organizations, community members, and family members of those at risk of being scammed;
(5)
defines agency roles, responsibilities, and authorities for preventing and combating scams;
(6)
analyzes maintaining a single, government-wide estimate of scams perpetrated and the dollar losses associated with them, including incidents not reported, including either—
(A)
a plan for developing and maintaining such an estimate; or
(B)
an analysis of the barriers preventing the development of such an estimate and the legislative, regulatory, or administrative changes that could eliminate those barriers;
(7)
formulates a plan to—
(A)
ensure coordinated, consistent, and accessible consumer complaint reporting for scams across Federal agencies, including complaint reporting that is accessible for individuals with disabilities;
(B)
identify duplication in tasks and responsibilities between agencies and establish deconfliction procedures for overlapping jurisdictional authorities to improve coordination and collaboration;
(C)
ensure harmonized, adequate, timely, and accurate data collection and data aggregation on scams across Federal agencies, including ways to—
(i)
better collect data and encourage reporting on scams;
(ii)
better identify scams;
(iii)
consistently collect data on the types of scams, dollar losses from scams, payment methods used for scams, and other data, as appropriate;
(iv)
promote Federal law enforcement data interoperability and intelligence gathering across data collection platforms; and
(v)
modernize law enforcement data and reporting, including through the use of artificial intelligence and other innovative technology to enhance data synthesis;
(D)
increase coordination between Federal and private sector efforts, including efforts by businesses and non-profits, to prevent scams by—
(i)
facilitating and coordinating the rapid sharing of data by private sector businesses (including technology companies, banks, and telecommunication companies) necessary to the investigation of scams by law enforcement officials;
(ii)
authenticating legitimate and blocking scam-related transactions and communications; and
(iii)
coordinating preemptive enforcement and takedown actions;
(E)
establish coordinated rapid response protocols that provide individuals with timely, accurate warnings and prevention guidance through trusted channels, ensuring that scam threats are identified quickly and communicated effectively to the public;
(F)
increase coordination between Federal, State, local, and Tribal government efforts to prevent and combat scams, including analyzing the feasibility of the creation of elder justice task forces within local governments;
(G)
coordinate efforts to address complex and multifaceted scams that cross jurisdictional boundaries; and
(H)
monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of the implementation of strategies recommended in the National Strategy for Combating Scams;
(8)
evaluate ways for the Federal Government to partner with State, local, and Tribal law enforcement agencies, financial institutions, telecom carriers, technology companies, and other entities determined appropriate to support victim recovery, including providing clear accessible resources for assistance and redress;
(9)
enhance coordination with foreign countries to combat large-scale scams originating abroad that target persons in the United States to improve cross-border enforcement;
(10)
analyzes the legislative, regulatory, or administrative changes needed to carry out the National Strategy for Combating Scams and enable a comprehensive and coordinated Federal response to scams;
(11)
identifies the resources needed to prevent and combat scams and implement the National Strategy for Combating Scams; and
(12)
addresses any other topic relating to the promotion of a coordinated national response to scams, as determined appropriate by the working group.
(c)
Submission and publication
Not later than 1 year after the establishment of the working group under subsection (a), the working group shall—
(1)
submit the National Strategy for Combating Scams developed under subsection (b) to the Special Committee on Aging of the Senate , the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate , and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives ; and
(2)
make the National Strategy for Combating Scams publicly available, including on a publicly accessible website.
(d)
Updates
(1)
In general
Following the publication of the National Strategy for Combating Scams under paragraph (c), not less frequently than once every 5 years, the working group established pursuant to subsection (a) shall update such publication, including by—
(A)
collecting and incorporating new feedback from community stakeholders; and
(B)
updating the definition of scam , as appropriate.
(2)
Submission and publication
Not later than 30 days after each update under paragraph (1), the working group established pursuant to subsection (a) shall—
(A)
submit the updated National Strategy for Combating Scams to the Special Committee on Aging of the Senate , the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate , and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives ; and
(B)
make the updated National Strategy for Combating Scams publicly available, including on a publicly accessible website.
4.
Adoption of common definition of scam
(a)
In general
Not later than 1 year after the publication of the National Strategy for Combating Scams under section 3(c), the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Federal Trade Commission, and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau shall adopt the common definition of scam recommended in the National Strategy for Combating Scams.
(b)
Updates to definition
If, pursuant to section 3(d), the working group updates the definition of scam in an updated National Strategy for Combating Scams, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Federal Trade Commission, and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau shall adopt the updated common definition of scam not later than 1 year after such update.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2025-12-04
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

To establish a national strategy for combating scams, and for other purposes.

Sponsors

Rep. Gabe Amo (D) sponsors H.R. 6425, and 12 members have co-sponsored it, 3 of them from the day it was introduced.

Committees

H.R. 6425 went before 3 committees: Financial Services, Energy and Commerce and Judiciary.

Financial Services
Financial Services
Referred To · Dec 4, 2025 · 559 Bills
Energy and Commerce
Energy and Commerce
Referred To · Dec 4, 2025 · 1,636 Bills
Judiciary
Judiciary
Referred To · Dec 4, 2025 · 2,181 Bills

Actions

H.R. 6425 has taken 2 actions since Dec 4, 2025.

ChamberAction
Dec 4, 2025
House
Introduced in House
Dec 4, 2025
House
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Energy and Commerce, and Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.Judiciary Committee

Votes

H.R. 6425 has not gone to a roll call.

1 bill is related to H.R. 6425, as Identical bill.

Titles

H.R. 6425 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.

  • National Strategy for Combating Scams Act of 2025 — Display Title
  • National Strategy for Combating Scams Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • To establish a national strategy for combating scams, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced

Lobbying

4 clients hired 4 firms and 38 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 6425 in 6 quarterly filings, 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Consumer Issues/Safety/Products, Science/Technology, Telecommunications, Budget/Appropriations, Computer Industry, Financial Institutions/Investments/Securities, Health Issues, Law Enforcement/Crime/Criminal Justice.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
TWILIOTwilio is a customer engagement communications platform.California13$120K
AARPDistrict of Columbia11
EARLY WARNING SERVICES, LLCArizona11
GOOGLE CLIENT SERVICES LLCDistrict of Columbia11

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

RegistrantClientsFilingsReported
HANBURY STRATEGY13$120K
AARP11
EARLY WARNING SERVICES, LLC11
GOOGLE CLIENT SERVICES LLC11

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill. The 20 named most often, of 38.

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
AARPAARP2026 first_quarter$3.8M1st Quarter - Report
GOOGLE CLIENT SERVICES LLCGOOGLE CLIENT SERVICES LLC2026 second_quarter$3.6M2nd Quarter - Report
EARLY WARNING SERVICES, LLCEARLY WARNING SERVICES, LLC2026 second_quarter$90K2nd Quarter - Report
TWILIOHANBURY STRATEGY2026 second_quarter$60K2nd Quarter - Report
TWILIOHANBURY STRATEGY2026 first_quarter$60K1st Quarter - Report
TWILIOHANBURY STRATEGY2026 first_quarterRegistration

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 6425 under Commerce, one of its 31 policy areas.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 6425’s is Commerce.

hr6425/policy-areas.txt
CommerceAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Constitutional authority

The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 6425, as entered in the Congressional Record.

[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 203 (Thursday, December 4, 2025)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Mr. AMO:H.R. 6425.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:Article I.[Page H5051]

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com