- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- Administration
- Agriculture
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry
- Appropriations
- Armed Services
- Banking, Housing, And Urban Affairs
- Budget
- Commerce, Science, And Transportation
- Education and Workforce
- Energy And Commerce
- Energy And Natural Resources
- Environment And Public Works
- Ethics
- Finance
- Financial Services
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Relations
- Health, Education, Labor, And Pensions
- Homeland Security
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…
- Indian Affairs
- Indian and Insular Affairs
- Intelligence
- Judiciary
- Natural Resources
- Oversight And Government Reform
- Permanent Select Intelligence
- Rules
- Rules And Administration
- Science, Space, And Technology
- Select Intelligence
- Small Business
- Small Business And Entrepreneurship
- Subcommittee on Aviation
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…
- Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…
- Subcommittee on Federal Lands
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…
- Subcommittee on Health
- Subcommittee on Highways and Transit
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…
- Transportation And Infrastructure
- Veterans' Affairs
- Ways And Means

S. 3336
U.S. Senate•In Senate Committee
Summary
S. 3336, the Reliable Artificial Intelligence Research Act of 2025, was introduced in the Senate on Dec 3, 2025 by Sen. Margaret Hassan (D) with 1 co-sponsor. It was referred to Homeland Security And Governmental Affairs, and last saw action on Dec 3, 2025: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Record
Text
S. 3336 has 1 co-sponsor.
sb3336/introduced-in-senate.txt119 S3336 IS: Reliable Artificial Intelligence Research Act of 2025U.S. Senate2025-12-03text/xmlENPursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.II 119th CONGRESS 1st Session S. 3336 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES December 3, 2025 Ms. Hassan (for herself and Mr. Banks ) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs A BILLTo require the Secretary of Homeland Security to carry out prize competitions to advance the science of interpretability and to develop adversarial robustness with respect to artificial intelligence products, and for other purposes.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Reliable Artificial Intelligence Research Act of 2025 .2.DefinitionsIn this Act:(1)Adversarial robustnessThe term adversarial robustness means the degree to which an artificial intelligence model is able to resist attacks that would induce it to produce incorrect, restricted, or harmful outputs, while maintaining integrity, reliability, and privacy.(2)Artificial intelligenceThe term artificial intelligence has the meaning given the term in section 5002 of the National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Act of 2020 ( 15 U.S.C. 9401 ).(3)InterpretabilityThe term interpretability means the degree to which humans are able to accurately understand how an artificial intelligence model makes decisions and considers inputs and how the outputs or behaviors of the model respond to a change in the inputs.(4)Red-teamingThe term red-teaming means a structured, interactive, and adversarial process to test an artificial intelligence system by simulating real-world actions to find vulnerabilities or flaws in the system.(5)SecretaryThe term Secretary means the Secretary of Homeland Security.3.Prize competition for artificial intelligence interpretability research(a)Prize competition requiredNot later than 270 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall commence carrying out at least 1 prize competition under section 24 of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 ( 15 U.S.C. 3719 ) to advance the science of interpretability in a manner relevant to commercially available or widely used artificial intelligence products.(b)ConsultationIn carrying out the prize competition required by subsection (a), the Secretary shall consult with—(1)the Secretary of Commerce;(2)the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology;(3)the National Cyber Director;(4)the Director of the National Science Foundation; and(5)any industry expert from the artificial intelligence sector in the United States that the Secretary considers relevant.(c)Structure and evaluation criteria(1)In generalThe Secretary shall develop the structure and evaluation criteria for a prize competition carried out under subsection (a) in accordance with the primary purpose described in that subsection.(2)Competition structureThe Secretary may—(A)structure a competition under subsection (a) into 1 or more phases, including submission of interpretability frameworks, submission of interpretable artificial intelligence models, and unique basic research; and(B)open these phases to the same, or to distinct, contestant pools.(3)Evaluation considerationsIn developing the evaluation criteria for the frameworks, models, or methods submitted for a prize competition under subsection (a), the Secretary shall consider—(A)the degree to which a submission advances broadly applicable principles of artificial intelligence interpretability;(B)the practical value of a submission in making artificial intelligence more understandable and reliable in high-risk, high-value use cases; and(C)the likelihood that the unique research submitted will create standards for artificial intelligence interpretability in the government or industry.(d)Program administrationThe Secretary may enter into contracts, cooperative agreements, or other agreements with for-profit or nonprofit entities or State, territorial, local, or Tribal agencies to design and administer any prize competition carried out under subsection (a).4.Prize competition for artificial intelligence adversarial robustness research(a)Prize competition requiredNot later than 270 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall commence carrying out at least 1 prize competition under section 24 of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 ( 15 U.S.C. 3719 ) to develop capable artificial intelligence models that are designed to exhibit adversarial robustness in circumstances necessary for at least 1 high-impact, high-risk application in government or industry.(b)ConsultationIn carrying out a prize competition required by subsection (a), the Secretary shall consult with—(1)the Secretary of Commerce;(2)the Director of the Institute of Standards and Technology;(3)the National Cyber Director;(4)the Director of the National Science Foundation;(5)any industry expert from the artificial intelligence sector in the United States that the Secretary considers relevant; and(6)the head of any Federal agency who has authority or expertise in a high-impact, high-risk application of artificial intelligence that could be an appropriate subject for a prize competition under subsection (a).(c)Structure and evaluation criteria(1)In generalThe Secretary shall develop the structure and evaluation criteria for a prize competition carried out under subsection (a) in accordance with the primary purpose described in that subsection.(2)Competition structureThe Secretary may—(A)structure a competition under subsection (a) into 1 or more phases, including submission of adversarial robustness frameworks, submission of artificial intelligence models, and red-teaming; and(B)open these phases to the same, or to distinct, contestant pools.(3)Evaluation considerationsIn developing the evaluation criteria for the frameworks, models, or methods submitted for a prize competition under subsection (a), the Secretary shall consider—(A)the degree to which a submission advances broadly applicable principles of artificial intelligence robustness; and(B)the practical value of the submission in reducing the risk of adversarial attacks in high-risk, high-value use cases of artificial intelligence.(d)Program administrationThe Secretary may enter into contracts, cooperative agreements, or other agreements with for-profit or nonprofit entities or State, territorial, local, or Tribal agencies to design and administer any prize competition carried out under subsection (a).5.Tracking and reporting(a)In generalNot later than 180 days after the date on which the first prize competition concludes, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that includes—(1)an evaluation of how the results of the competitions inform the fields of interpretability and adversarial robustness;(2)an assessment of any gaps in these fields identified by the Secretary over the course of the competitions; and(3)any suggested action that Congress should take to advance the fields of interpretability, adversarial robustness, and any related research.(b)Appropriate congressional committees definedIn this section, the term appropriate congressional committees means—(1)the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate; and(2)the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives.6.AppropriationsThere is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out this section $10,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 2026 through 2030.
Tracker
The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.
- Introduced2025-12-03
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- Conference
- To President
- Became Law
A bill to require the Secretary of Homeland Security to carry out prize competitions to advance the science of interpretability and to develop adversarial robustness with respect to artificial intelligence products, and for other purposes.
Sponsors
Sen. Margaret Hassan (D) sponsors S. 3336, and 1 member has co-sponsored it from the day it was introduced.
Committees
S. 3336 went before 1 committee: Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

Actions
S. 3336 has taken 2 actions since Dec 3, 2025.
| Chamber | Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 3, 2025 | Senate | Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee | ||
Dec 3, 2025 | — | Introduced in Senate |
Votes
S. 3336 has not gone to a roll call.
Titles
S. 3336 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.
- Reliable Artificial Intelligence Research Act of 2025 — Display Title
- Reliable Artificial Intelligence Research Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
- A bill to require the Secretary of Homeland Security to carry out prize competitions to advance the science of interpretability and to develop adversarial robustness with respect to artificial intelligence products, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced
Classification
The Congressional Research Service files S. 3336 under Science, Technology, Communications, one of its 31 policy areas.
CRS Subjects
CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; S. 3336’s is Science, Technology, Communications.
s3336/policy-areas.txtSource: congress.gov · legiscan.com