Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

SB 935

Missouri SenateIn Senate Committee

Summary

SB 935, which modifies provisions relating to ballot measures, was introduced in the Senate on Dec 1, 2025 by Sen. Mike Cierpiot (R). It was referred to Local Government, Elections and Pensions, and last saw action on Feb 2, 2026: Hearing Cancelled S Local Government, Elections and Pensions Committee.


Record

Text

SB 935 has no co-sponsors and has not gone to a roll call.

sb935/introduced.txt
SECOND REGULAR SESSION
SENATE BILL NO. 935
103RD GENERAL ASSEMBLY
INTRODUCED BY SENATOR CIERPIOT.
3347S.01I KRISTINA MARTIN, Secretary
AN ACT
To repeal sections 116.190 and 116.334, RSMo, and to enact in lieu thereof two new sections
relating to ballot measures.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Missouri, as follows:
Section A. Sections 116.190 and 116.334, RSMo, are
repealed and two new sections enacted in lieu thereof, to be
known as sections 116.190 and 116.334, to read as follows:
116.190. 1. Any citizen who wishes to challenge the
official ballot title or the fiscal note prepared for a
proposed constitutional amendment submitted by the general
assembly, by initiative petition, or by constitutional
convention, or for a statutory initiative or referendum
measure, may bring an action in the circuit court of Cole
County. The action shall be brought within ten days after
the official ballot title is certified by the secretary of
state in accordance with the provisions of this chapter, in
the case of an initiative petition and not later than the
twenty-second Tuesday prior to the general election at which
the ballot measure will be submitted to the voters, in the
case of all other statewide ballot measures.
2. The secretary of state shall be named as a party
defendant in any action challenging the official ballot
title prepared by the secretary of state. When the action
challenges the fiscal note or the fiscal note summary
EXPLANATION-Matter enclosed in bold-faced brackets [thus] in this bill is not enacted
and is intended to be omitted in the law.
SB 935 2
prepared by the auditor, the state auditor shall also be
named as a party defendant. The president pro tem of the
senate, the speaker of the house and the sponsor of the
measure and the secretary of state shall be the named party
defendants in any action challenging the official summary
statement, fiscal note or fiscal note summary prepared
pursuant to section 116.155.
3. The petition shall state the reason or reasons why
the summary statement portion of the official ballot title
is insufficient or unfair or, in the case of an initiative
petition, incomplete, unconcise, unclear, and inaccurate.
Alternatively, the petition shall state the reasons why the
fiscal note or the fiscal note summary portion of the
official ballot title is insufficient or unfair and shall
request a different fiscal note or fiscal note summary
portion of the official ballot title.
4. (1) The action shall be placed at the top of the
civil docket.
(2) (a) Insofar as the action challenges the summary
statement portion of the official ballot title, the court
shall consider the petition, hear arguments, and in its
decision certify the summary statement portion of the
official ballot title to the secretary of state as
originally written if the court finds the summary statement
to be sufficient and fair or, in the case of an initiative
petition, complete, concise, clear, and accurate. If the
court finds the summary statement to be insufficient or
unfair or, in the case of an initiative petition,
incomplete, unconcise, unclear, and inaccurate, the court
may offer suggested revisions for the summary statement to
remedy the legal flaws, but it shall, in its decision, order
the secretary of state to write a first revised summary
SB 935 3
statement that is sufficient and fair or, in the case of an
initiative petition, complete, concise, clear, and accurate.
(b) The secretary of state shall submit a first
revised summary statement to the court within seven days.
If, after submission to the court of a first revised summary
statement by the secretary of state, the court finds the
first revised summary statement to be sufficient and fair
or, in the case of an initiative petition, complete,
concise, clear, and accurate, the court shall certify to the
secretary of state that statement and order it to appear on
the ballot. If the court finds the first revised summary
statement to be insufficient or unfair or, in the case of an
initiative petition, incomplete, unconcise, unclear, or
inaccurate, the court may offer suggested revisions for the
statement to remedy the legal flaws, but it shall, in its
decision, order the secretary of state to write a second
revised summary statement that is sufficient and fair or, in
the case of an initiative petition, complete, concise,
clear, and accurate.
(c) The secretary of state shall submit a second
revised summary statement to the court within five days.
If, after submission to the court of a second revised
summary statement by the secretary of state, the court finds
the second revised summary statement to be sufficient and
fair or, in the case of an initiative petition, complete,
concise, clear, and accurate, the court shall certify to the
secretary of state that statement and order it to appear on
the ballot. If the court finds the second revised summary
statement to be insufficient or unfair or, in the case of an
initiative petition, incomplete, unconcise, unclear, and
inaccurate, the court may offer suggested revisions for the
statement to remedy the legal flaws, but it shall, in its
SB 935 4
decision, order the secretary of state to write a third
revised summary statement that is sufficient and fair or, in
the case of an initiative petition, complete, concise,
clear, and accurate.
(d) The secretary of state shall submit a third
revised summary statement to the court within three days.
If, after submission to the court of a third revised summary
statement by the secretary of state, the court finds the
third revised summary statement to be sufficient and fair
or, in the case of an initiative petition, complete,
concise, clear, and accurate, the court shall certify to the
secretary of state that statement and order it to appear on
the ballot. If the court finds the third revised summary
statement to be insufficient or unfair or, in the case of an
initiative petition, incomplete, unconcise, unclear, and
inaccurate, or if the secretary of state neglects or refuses
to submit any of the revised summary statements within the
times mandated by this subdivision when so ordered, the
court shall revise the summary statement in a manner that is
sufficient and fair or, in the case of an initiative
petition, complete, concise, clear, and accurate and order
the secretary of state to place that summary statement on
the ballot with the measure.
(e) During all revisions as provided in this
subdivision, the case shall remain open.
(f) Any nonprevailing party may make appeals as
provided by law only following:
a. The finding of the circuit court that a summary
statement was sufficient and fair or, in the case of an
initiative petition, complete, concise, clear, and accurate;
or
SB 935 5
b. The circuit court ordering its own summary
statement to be placed on the ballot pursuant to paragraph
(d) of this subdivision.
(g) Any action brought pursuant to this section
challenging a statewide ballot measure appearing on the
ballot at an election called by the governor pursuant to
Article XII, Section 2(b), Missouri Constitution, whether at
the primary election or at a special election, or at a
special election for a referendum petition measure called by
the general assembly pursuant to Article III, Section 52(b),
Missouri Constitution, shall be expedited by the court to
bring a resolution of the matter prior to the printing of
ballots. The court may shorten any timeframe under this
section to achieve this purpose.
(h) If at any time a court finds that a summary
statement for an initiative petition is not complete,
concise, clear, and accurate and that a complete, concise,
clear, and accurate statement cannot possibly be written in
one hundred or less words due to a violation of the single
subject requirement in Article III, Section 50, of the
Missouri Constitution, the court shall enjoin the measure
from being circulated for further signatures or, in the
event that the measure has been certified to be placed on
the ballot, the court shall enjoin the secretary of state
from certifying the measure and all other officers from
printing the measure on the ballot.
(3) Insofar as the action challenges the fiscal note
or the fiscal note summary portion of the official ballot
title, the court shall consider the petition, hear
arguments, and in its decision, either certify the fiscal
note or the fiscal note summary portion of the official
ballot title to the secretary of state or remand the fiscal
SB 935 6
note or the fiscal note summary to the auditor for
preparation of a new fiscal note or fiscal note summary
pursuant to the procedures set forth in section 116.175.
Any party to the suit may appeal to the supreme court within
ten days after a circuit court decision pursuant to this
subdivision.
5. Any action brought under this section that is not
fully and finally adjudicated within one hundred eighty days
of filing, and more than seventy days prior to election in
which the measure is to appear, including all appeals, shall
be extinguished, unless a court extends such period upon a
finding of good cause for such extension. Such good cause
shall consist only of court-related scheduling issues and
shall not include requests for continuance by the parties.
116.334. 1. If the petition form is approved, the
secretary of state shall make a copy of the sample petition
available on the secretary of state's website. For a period
of fifteen days after the petition is approved as to form,
the secretary of state shall accept public comments
regarding the proposed measure and provide copies of such
comments upon request. Within twenty-three days of receipt
of such approval, the secretary of state shall prepare and
transmit to the attorney general a summary statement of the
measure which shall be a complete, concise, clear, and
accurate statement not exceeding one hundred words. This
statement shall be in the form of a question using language
neither intentionally argumentative nor likely to create
prejudice either for or against the proposed measure. The
attorney general shall within ten days approve the legal
content and form of the proposed statement.
2. Signatures obtained prior to the date the official
ballot title is certified by the secretary of state shall
SB 935 7
not be counted. Once the secretary of state certifies the
official ballot title, signatures may be collected, even if
the ballot title is subject to an action in court
challenging the [sufficiency and fairness of the] ballot
title pursuant to section 116.190. If a court orders a
change that alters the content of the official ballot title,
then all signatures gathered before such change occurred
shall not be invalidated based upon the fact that one or
more signatures were gathered prior to the alteration of the
official ballot title, regardless of whether those
signatures were gathered on petition pages that displayed
what was previously the official ballot title as certified
by the secretary of state. Nothing in this subsection shall
prohibit the invalidation of a signature for a reason
otherwise allowed by this chapter.
3. Signatures for statutory initiative petitions shall
be filed not later than six months prior to the general
election during which the petition's ballot measure is
submitted for a vote, and shall also be collected not
earlier than the day after the day upon which the previous
general election was held.

Modifies provisions relating to ballot measures

Sponsors

Sen. Mike Cierpiot (R) sponsors SB 935 alone.

Committees

SB 935 went before 1 committee: Local Government, Elections and Pensions.

Local Government, Elections and Pensions
Local Government, Elections and Pensions
Referred to · Jan 8, 2026 · 49 Bills

History

SB 935 has taken 4 actions since Dec 1, 2025, the latest on Feb 2, 2026.

ChamberAction
Feb 2, 2026
Senate
Hearing Cancelled S Local Government, Elections and Pensions Committee
Jan 8, 2026
Senate
Second Read and Referred S Local Government, Elections and Pensions Committee
Jan 7, 2026
Senate
S First Read
Dec 1, 2025
Senate
Prefiled

Votes

SB 935 has not gone to a roll call.


Source: senate.mo.gov · legiscan.com