- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- Administration
- Agriculture
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry
- Appropriations
- Armed Services
- Banking, Housing, And Urban Affairs
- Budget
- Commerce, Science, And Transportation
- Education and Workforce
- Energy And Commerce
- Energy And Natural Resources
- Environment And Public Works
- Ethics
- Finance
- Financial Services
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Relations
- Health, Education, Labor, And Pensions
- Homeland Security
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…
- Indian Affairs
- Indian and Insular Affairs
- Intelligence
- Judiciary
- Natural Resources
- Oversight And Government Reform
- Permanent Select Intelligence
- Rules
- Rules And Administration
- Science, Space, And Technology
- Select Intelligence
- Small Business
- Small Business And Entrepreneurship
- Subcommittee on Aviation
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…
- Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…
- Subcommittee on Federal Lands
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…
- Subcommittee on Health
- Subcommittee on Highways and Transit
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…
- Transportation And Infrastructure
- Veterans' Affairs
- Ways And Means

S. 3016
U.S. Senate•In Senate Committee
Summary
S. 3016, the Advancing Research in Nuclear Fuel Recycling Act of 2025, was introduced in the Senate on Oct 16, 2025 by Sen. Ted Cruz (R) with 1 co-sponsor. It was referred to Energy And Natural Resources, and last saw action on Oct 16, 2025: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Record
Text
S. 3016 has 1 co-sponsor.
sb3016/introduced-in-senate.txt119 S3016 IS: Advancing Research in Nuclear Fuel Recycling Act of 2025U.S. Senate2025-10-16text/xmlENPursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.II119th CONGRESS1st SessionS. 3016IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATESOctober 16, 2025Mr. Cruz (for himself and Mr. Heinrich ) introduced the following bill; whichwas read twice and referred to the Committeeon Energy and Natural ResourcesA BILLTo require the Secretary of Energy to study new technologies andopportunities for recycling spent nuclear fuel.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Advancing Research in Nuclear Fuel Recycling Act of 2025 .2.Study on new technologies to recycle spent nuclear fuel(a)DefinitionsIn this section:(1)National laboratoryThe term National Laboratory has the meaning given the term in section 2 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 ( 42 U.S.C. 15801 ).(2)Nuclear wasteThe term nuclear waste means spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste (as defined in section 2 of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 ( 42 U.S.C. 10101 )).(3)RecyclingThe term recycling means the recovery of valuable radionuclides, including fissile materials, from nuclear waste, and any subsequent processes, such as enrichment and fuel fabrication, necessary for reuse in nuclear reactors or other commercial applications.(4)SecretaryThe term Secretary means the Secretary of Energy.(5)Spent nuclear fuelThe term spent nuclear fuel has the meaning given the term in section 2 of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 ( 42 U.S.C. 10101 ).(b)StudyNot later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary, acting through the Assistant Secretary for Nuclear Energy, shall carry out a study—(1)to analyze the practicability, potential benefits, costs, and risks, including proliferation, of using dedicated recycling facilities to convert spent nuclear fuel, including spent high-assay low-enriched uranium fuel, into useable nuclear fuels, such as those for—(A)commercial light water reactors;(B)advanced nuclear reactors; and(C)medical, space-based, advanced-battery, and other non-reactor applications, as determined by the Secretary;(2)(A)to analyze the practicability, potential benefits, costs, and risks of recycling spent nuclear fuel, which is taken from temporary storage sites throughout the United States, and using it as fuel or input for advanced nuclear reactors, existing reactors, or commercial applications;(B)to compare such practicability, potential benefits, costs, and risks of recycling spent nuclear fuel with the practicability, potential benefits, costs, and risks of the once-through fuel cycle, including temporary and permanent storage requirements; and(C)to analyze the practicability, potential benefits, costs, and risks of aqueous (such as PUREX and the derivatives of PUREX) recycling processes with the practicability, potential benefits, costs, and risk of non-aqueous (such as pyro-electrochemistry) recycling processes;(3)to analyze the technical and economic feasibility of utilizing nuclear waste processing to extract certain isotopes needed for domestic and international use, including medical, industrial, space-based power source, and advanced-battery applications;(4)to analyze the practicability, potential benefits, costs, risks, and potential approaches for coupling or collocating recycling facilities with other pertinent facilities, such as advanced nuclear reactors (that can use the recycled fuel), interim storage, and fuel-fabrication facilities, including through—(A)relevant analyses, such as capital and operating cost estimates, public-private partnerships to encourage investment, infrastructure requirements, timeline to full-scale commercial deployment, and distinguishing characteristics or requirements of such facilities;(B)input from interested private technology developers and relevant assumptions regarding cost; and(C)comparison with the practicability, potential benefits, costs, and risks of the once-through fuel cycle, including temporary and permanent storage requirements;(5)to identify parties, including individuals, communities, businesses, and local and Tribal governments, that are impacted economically, or through health, safety, or environmental risks, by the current practice of indefinite temporary storage of spent nuclear fuel, and assess potential risks and benefits for those parties should spent nuclear fuel be removed from their sites for the purposes of nuclear waste recycling;(6)to assess different approaches for siting and sizing nuclear waste recycling facilities, including a centralized national facility, regional facilities, on-site facilities where spent nuclear fuel is currently stored, and on-site facilities where newly recycled fuel can be used by an on-site reactor, and recommend one or more approaches that consider environmental, transportation, infrastructure, capital, and other risks;(7)to identify tracking and accountability methods for new recycled fuel and radioactive waste streams for byproducts of the recycling process;(8)(A)to identify any regulatory gaps related to nuclear waste management and recycling, including accuracy and consistency of relevant definitions for radioactive waste (including high-level radioactive waste , spent nuclear fuel , low-level radioactive waste , reprocessing , recycling , and vitrification ) and classifications of radioactive waste that exist in Federal law on the date of enactment of this Act;(B)to compare such definitions to those used by other nations that manage radioactive waste; and(C)to make recommendations for modernizing such definitions; and(9)to evaluate—(A)potential Federal and State-level policy changes to support development and deployment of recycling and waste-utilizing reactor technologies; and(B)impacts of spent nuclear fuel recycling on requirements for domestic nuclear waste storage.(c)ReportNot later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary, acting through the Assistant Secretary for Nuclear Energy, shall submit to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate, the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives, the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives, a report that complies with each of the following:(1)Describes the results of the study carried out under subsection (b).(2)Is released to the public.(3)Totals not more than 120 pages (excluding Front Matter, References, and Appendices) written and formatted to facilitate review by a nonspecialist readership, including the following sections:(A)A Front Matter section that includes a cover page with identifying information, tables of contents, figures, and tables.(B)An Executive Summary section.(C)An Introductory section that includes a historical overview that also explains why recycling is not performed in the United States today, such as economic, political, or technological obstacles.(D)Results and Findings sections that summarize the results and findings of the study carried out under subsection (b).(E)A Key Remaining Challenges and Barriers section that identifies key technical and nontechnical (such as economic) challenges and barriers that need to be addressed to enable scale-up and commercial adoption of spent nuclear fuel recycling, with preference given to secure, proliferation resistant, environmentally safe, and economical recycling methods.(F)A Policy Recommendations section that—(i)lists policy recommendations to address remaining technical and nontechnical (such as economic) challenges and barriers to enable scale-up and commercial adoption of spent nuclear fuel recycling, including with government support;(ii)contrasts the potential benefits and risks of each policy; and(iii)compares benefits to current or past policies.(G)An Other section in which other relevant information may be added.(H)A References section.(I)An Appendices section.
Tracker
The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.
- Introduced2025-10-16
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- Conference
- To President
- Became Law
A bill to require the Secretary of Energy to study new technologies and opportunities for recycling spent nuclear fuel.
Sponsors
Sen. Ted Cruz (R) sponsors S. 3016, and 1 member has co-sponsored it from the day it was introduced.
Committees
S. 3016 went before 1 committee: Energy and Natural Resources.
Actions
S. 3016 has taken 2 actions since Oct 16, 2025.
| Chamber | Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 16, 2025 | Senate | Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.Energy and Natural Resources Committee | ||
Oct 16, 2025 | — | Introduced in Senate |
Votes
S. 3016 has not gone to a roll call.
Related bills
1 bill is related to S. 3016.
Titles
S. 3016 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.
- Advancing Research in Nuclear Fuel Recycling Act of 2025 — Display Title
- Advancing Research in Nuclear Fuel Recycling Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
- A bill to require the Secretary of Energy to study new technologies and opportunities for recycling spent nuclear fuel. — Official Title as Introduced
Lobbying
4 clients hired 4 firms and 14 registered lobbyists who named S. 3016 in 9 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.
Filed under Budget/Appropriations, Energy/Nuclear, Taxation/Internal Revenue Code, Trade (domestic/foreign), Waste (hazardous/solid/interstate/nuclear), Environment/Superfund, Homeland Security, Transportation.
Clients
Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.
| Client | Business | State | Firms | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XCEL ENERGY INC | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 3 | — |
| CORPORATE ENERGY BUYERS ASSOCIATION | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 2 | — |
| NUCLEAR ENERGY INSTITUTE, INC | No change in address. Just a lobbyist update | District of Columbia | 1 | 2 | — |
| PINNACLE WEST CAPITAL CORPORATION | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 2 | — |
Firms
Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.
| Registrant | Clients | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| XCEL ENERGY, INC | 1 | 3 | — |
| CORPORATE ENERGY BUYERS ASSOCIATION | 1 | 2 | — |
| NUCLEAR ENERGY INSTITUTE, INC. | 1 | 2 | — |
| PINNACLE WEST CAPITAL CORPORATION | 1 | 2 | — |
Lobbyists
Named on the filings that cite the bill.
| Lobbyist | Firms | Clients | Filings |
|---|---|---|---|
| MARTIN DOERN | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| MARY ZIMPRICH | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| STEPHEN PLEVNIAK | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| ANDREW NEILL | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| CAROL BERRIGAN | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| IAN HARRISON | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| JOSHUA ST. PIERRE | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| KYLE DAVIS | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| MELODY RODRIGUEZ | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| MICHAEL FLANNIGAN | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| RICHARD ENGLAND | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| ROBERT AIKEN | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| ROBERT POWERS | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| TOMAS GREEN | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Filings
The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.
| Client | Registrant | Period | Reported | Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XCEL ENERGY INC | XCEL ENERGY, INC | 2026 first_quarter | $960K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| NUCLEAR ENERGY INSTITUTE, INC | NUCLEAR ENERGY INSTITUTE, INC. | 2026 second_quarter | $560K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| NUCLEAR ENERGY INSTITUTE, INC | NUCLEAR ENERGY INSTITUTE, INC. | 2026 first_quarter | $470K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| XCEL ENERGY INC | XCEL ENERGY, INC | 2025 fourth_quarter | $380K | 4th Quarter - Report |
| XCEL ENERGY INC | XCEL ENERGY, INC | 2026 second_quarter | $370K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| CORPORATE ENERGY BUYERS ASSOCIATION | CORPORATE ENERGY BUYERS ASSOCIATION | 2025 fourth_quarter | $210K | 4th Quarter - Report |
| PINNACLE WEST CAPITAL CORPORATION | PINNACLE WEST CAPITAL CORPORATION | 2026 first_quarter | $200K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| CORPORATE ENERGY BUYERS ASSOCIATION | CORPORATE ENERGY BUYERS ASSOCIATION | 2026 first_quarter | $200K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| PINNACLE WEST CAPITAL CORPORATION | PINNACLE WEST CAPITAL CORPORATION | 2025 fourth_quarter | $190K | 4th Quarter - Report |
Classification
The Congressional Research Service files S. 3016 under Energy, one of its 31 policy areas.
CRS Subjects
CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; S. 3016’s is Energy.
s3016/policy-areas.txtSource: congress.gov · legiscan.com
