- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- Administration
- Agriculture
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry
- Appropriations
- Armed Services
- Banking, Housing, And Urban Affairs
- Budget
- Commerce, Science, And Transportation
- Education and Workforce
- Energy And Commerce
- Energy And Natural Resources
- Environment And Public Works
- Ethics
- Finance
- Financial Services
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Relations
- Health, Education, Labor, And Pensions
- Homeland Security
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…
- Indian Affairs
- Indian and Insular Affairs
- Intelligence
- Judiciary
- Natural Resources
- Oversight And Government Reform
- Permanent Select Intelligence
- Rules
- Rules And Administration
- Science, Space, And Technology
- Select Intelligence
- Small Business
- Small Business And Entrepreneurship
- Subcommittee on Aviation
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…
- Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…
- Subcommittee on Federal Lands
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…
- Subcommittee on Health
- Subcommittee on Highways and Transit
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…
- Transportation And Infrastructure
- Veterans' Affairs
- Ways And Means

S. 2799
U.S. Senate•In Senate Committee
Summary
S. 2799, the Forced Arbitration Injustice Repeal Act, was introduced in the Senate on Sep 15, 2025 by Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D) with 34 co-sponsors. It was referred to Judiciary, and last saw action on Sep 15, 2025: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Record
Text
S. 2799 has 34 co-sponsors.
sb2799/introduced-in-senate.txt119 S2799 IS: Forced Arbitration Injustice Repeal ActU.S. Senate2025-09-15text/xmlENPursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.II119th CONGRESS1st SessionS. 2799IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATESSeptember 15, 2025Mr. Blumenthal (for himself, Ms. Baldwin , Mr.Bennet , Ms. Blunt Rochester ,Mr. Booker , Ms.Cantwell , Mr. Coons ,Ms. Cortez Masto , Ms. Duckworth , Mr.Durbin , Mrs. Gillibrand ,Ms. Hassan , Mr.Heinrich , Ms. Hirono ,Mr. Kaine , Ms.Klobuchar , Mr. Luján ,Mr. Markey , Mr.Murphy , Mrs. Murray ,Mr. Padilla , Mr.Peters , Mr. Reed , Ms. Rosen , Mr.Sanders , Mr. Schatz ,Mr. Schiff , Mrs.Shaheen , Ms. Smith , Mr. Van Hollen , Mr.Warnock , Ms. Warren ,Mr. Welch , Mr.Whitehouse , and Mr. Wyden )introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to theCommittee on theJudiciaryA BILLTo amend title 9 of the United States Code with respect toarbitration.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Forced Arbitration Injustice Repeal Act .2.PurposesThe purposes of this Act are to—(1)prohibit predispute arbitration agreements that force arbitration of future employment, consumer, antitrust, or civil rights disputes; and(2)prohibit agreements and practices that interfere with the right of individuals, workers, and small businesses to participate in a joint, class, or collective action related to an employment, consumer, antitrust, or civil rights dispute.3.Arbitration of employment, consumer, antitrust, and civil rightsdisputes(a)In generalTitle 9 of the United States Code is amended by adding at the end the following:5Arbitration of Employment, Consumer, Antitrust, and Civil RightsDisputesSec.501. Definitions.502. No validity or enforceability.501.DefinitionsIn this chapter—(1)the term antitrust dispute means a dispute—(A)arising from an alleged violation of the antitrust laws (as defined in subsection (a) of the first section of the Clayton Act ( 15 U.S.C. 12(a) )) or State antitrust laws; and(B)in which the plaintiffs seek certification as a class under rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or a comparable rule or provision of State law;(2)the term civil rights dispute means a dispute—(A)arising from an alleged violation of—(i)the Constitution of the United States or the constitution of a State; or(ii)any Federal, State, or local law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, sex, age, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, religion, national origin, or any legally protected status in education, employment, credit, housing, public accommodations and facilities, voting, veterans or servicemembers, health care, or a program funded or conducted by the Federal Government or a State government, including any law referred to or described in section 62(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, including parts of such law not explicitly referenced in such section but that relate to protecting individuals on any such basis; and(B)in which at least 1 party alleging a violation described in subparagraph (A) is an individual (or an authorized representative of an individual), including an individual seeking certification as a class under rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or a comparable rule or provision of State law;(3)the term consumer dispute means a dispute between—(A)1 or more individuals, including an individual who seeks certification as a class under rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or a comparable rule or provision of State law, who seek or acquire real or personal property, services (including services related to digital technology), securities or other investments, money, or credit for personal, family, or household purposes; and(B)(i)the seller or provider of such property, services, securities or other investments, money, or credit; or(ii)a third party involved in the selling, providing of, payment for, receipt or use of information about, or other relationship to any such property, services, securities or other investments, money, or credit;(4)the term employment dispute —(A)means a dispute between 1 or more individuals (or their authorized representative) and a person arising out of or related to the work relationship or prospective work relationship between them, including a dispute regarding the terms of or payment for, advertising of, recruiting for, referring of, arranging for, or discipline or discharge in connection with, such work, regardless of whether the individual is or would be classified as an employee or an independent contractor with respect to such work; and(B)includes—(i)a dispute arising under any law referred to or described in section 62(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, including parts of such law not explicitly referenced in such section but that relate to protecting individuals on any such basis; and(ii)a dispute in which an individual seeks certification as a class under rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or as a collective action under section 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act ( 29 U.S.C. 216(b) ), or a comparable rule or provision of State law;(5)the term predispute arbitration agreement means an agreement to arbitrate a dispute that has not yet arisen at the time of the making of the agreement; and(6)the term predispute joint-action waiver means an agreement, whether or not part of a predispute arbitration agreement, that would prohibit, or waive the right of, one of the parties to the agreement to participate in a joint, class, or collective action in a judicial, arbitral, administrative, or other forum, concerning a dispute that has not yet arisen at the time of the making of the agreement.502.No validity or enforceability(a)In generalNotwithstanding any other provision of this title, no predispute arbitration agreement or predispute joint-action waiver shall be valid or enforceable with respect to an employment dispute, consumer dispute, antitrust dispute, or civil rights dispute.(b)Applicability(1)In generalAn issue as to whether this chapter applies with respect to a dispute shall be determined under Federal law. The applicability of this chapter to an agreement to arbitrate and the validity and enforceability of an agreement to which this chapter applies shall be determined by a court, rather than an arbitrator, irrespective of whether the party resisting arbitration challenges the arbitration agreement specifically or in conjunction with other terms of the contract containing such agreement, and irrespective of whether the agreement purports to delegate such determinations to an arbitrator.(2)Collective bargaining agreementsNothing in this chapter shall apply to any arbitration provision in a contract between an employer and a labor organization or between labor organizations, except that no such arbitration provision shall have the effect of waiving the right of a worker to seek judicial enforcement of a right arising under a provision of the Constitution of the United States, a State constitution, or a Federal or State statute, or public policy arising therefrom..(b)Technical and conforming amendments(1)In generalTitle 9 of the United States Code is amended—(A)in section 1, by striking of seamen, and all that follows through interstate commerce and inserting of individuals, regardless of whether the individuals are designated as employees or independent contractors for other purposes ;(B)in section 2, by inserting or 5 before the period at the end;(C)in section 208, in the second sentence, by inserting or 5 before the period at the end; and(D)in section 307, in the second sentence, by inserting or 5 before the period at the end.(2)Table of chaptersThe table of chapters of title 9, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:5.Arbitration of employment, consumer,antitrust, and civil rights disputes501.4.Effective dateThis Act, and the amendments made by this Act, shall take effect on the date of enactment of this Act and shall apply with respect to any dispute or claim that arises or accrues on or after such date.
Tracker
The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.
- Introduced2025-09-15
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- Conference
- To President
- Became Law
CRS Summary
The summaries are the Congressional Research Service’s, one per stage. Read them in full.
Introduced in Senate Sep 15, 2025
sb2799/introduced-in-senate.mdShown Here:
Introduced in Senate (09/15/2025)
Forced Arbitration Injustice Repeal Act
This bill prohibits a predispute arbitration agreement from being valid or enforceable if it requires arbitration of an employment, consumer, antitrust, or civil rights dispute.
Sponsors
Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D) sponsors S. 2799, and 34 members have co-sponsored it, all of them from the day it was introduced.

Sen. · D–CT · Sponsor
Introduced Sep 15, 2025

Sen. · D–WI · Co-sponsor
Joined Sep 15, 2025 · Original

Sen. · D–CO · Co-sponsor
Joined Sep 15, 2025 · Original

Sen. · D–DE · Co-sponsor
Joined Sep 15, 2025 · Original

Sen. · D–NJ · Co-sponsor
Joined Sep 15, 2025 · Original

Sen. · D–WA · Co-sponsor
Joined Sep 15, 2025 · Original

Sen. · D–DE · Co-sponsor
Joined Sep 15, 2025 · Original

Sen. · D–NV · Co-sponsor
Joined Sep 15, 2025 · Original

Sen. · D–IL · Co-sponsor
Joined Sep 15, 2025 · Original

Sen. · D–IL · Co-sponsor
Joined Sep 15, 2025 · Original
Committees
S. 2799 went before 1 committee: Judiciary.
Actions
S. 2799 has taken 2 actions since Sep 15, 2025.
| Chamber | Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep 15, 2025 | Senate | Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.Judiciary Committee | ||
Sep 15, 2025 | — | Introduced in Senate |
Votes
S. 2799 has not gone to a roll call.
Related bills
1 bill is related to S. 2799.
Titles
S. 2799 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.
- Forced Arbitration Injustice Repeal Act — Display Title
- Forced Arbitration Injustice Repeal Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
- A bill to amend title 9 of the United States Code with respect to arbitration. — Official Title as Introduced
Lobbying
2 clients hired 2 firms and 14 registered lobbyists who named S. 2799 in 5 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.
Filed under Consumer Issues/Safety/Products, Automotive Industry, Aviation/Airlines/Airports, Financial Institutions/Investments/Securities, Government Issues, Health Issues, Labor Issues/Antitrust/Workplace, Marine/Maritime/Boating/Fisheries.
Clients
Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.
| Client | Business | State | Firms | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 4 | — |
| CENTER FOR RESPONSIBLE LENDING A SUPPORTING CORP OF CTR FOR COMMUNITY SELF-HELP | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 1 | — |
Firms
Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.
| Registrant | Clients | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE | 1 | 4 | — |
| CENTER FOR RESPONSIBLE LENDING, A SUPPORTING CORP OF CTR FOR COMMUNITY SELF-HELP | 1 | 1 | — |
Lobbyists
Named on the filings that cite the bill.
| Lobbyist | Firms | Clients | Filings |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHARLOTTE MCBIRNEY | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| DANIEL HINKLE | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| ELIZABETH FARRAR | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| HEATHER SAGER | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| JULIA DUNCAN | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| LINDA LIPSEN | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| STEPHEN COFFEY | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| SUSAN STEINMAN | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| VICTOR DIAZ | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| ELLI SCHANK | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| JUSTICE ESTRADA | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| THEODORE NASTASE | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| DAVID FERREIRA | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| MOLLY CAREY | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Filings
The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.
| Client | Registrant | Period | Reported | Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE | AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE | 2026 second_quarter | $1.8M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE | AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE | 2025 fourth_quarter | $1.8M | 4th Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE | AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE | 2026 first_quarter | $1.5M | 1st Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE | AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE | 2025 third_quarter | $1.4M | 3rd Quarter - Report |
| CENTER FOR RESPONSIBLE LENDING A SUPPORTING CORP OF CTR FOR COMMUNITY SELF-HELP | CENTER FOR RESPONSIBLE LENDING, A SUPPORTING CORP OF CTR FOR COMMUNITY SELF-HELP | 2025 fourth_quarter | $80K | 4th Quarter - Report |
Classification
The Congressional Research Service files S. 2799 under Law, one of its 31 policy areas.
CRS Subjects
CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; S. 2799’s is Law.
s2799/policy-areas.txtSource: congress.gov · legiscan.com
