Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

S. 2600

U.S. SenateIn Senate Committee

Summary

S. 2600, a bill to require a Defense Science Board study on optimal organizational structure for digital solutions, was introduced in the Senate on Jul 31, 2025 by Sen. Mike Rounds (R). It was referred to Armed Services, and last saw action on Jul 31, 2025: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.


Record

Text

S. 2600 has no co-sponsors and has not gone to a roll call.

s2600/introduced-in-senate.txt
119 S2600 IS: To require a Defense Science Board study on optimal organizational structure for digital solutions.
U.S. Senate
2025-07-31
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
II
119th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. 2600
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
July 31, 2025
Mr. Rounds introduced the following bill;
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services
A BILL
To require a Defense Science Board study on optimal organizational structure
for digital solutions.
1.
Defense Science Board study on optimal organizational structure for digital
engineering solutions
(a)
Study required
The Secretary of Defense shall direct the Defense Science Board to conduct a comprehensive study to evaluate and recommend the most optimal organizational structure within the Office of the Secretary of Defense to support digital solutions engineering activities across the Office of the Secretary of Defense and the military departments.
(b)
Elements
The study required under subsection (a) shall include the following elements:
(1)
An assessment of existing organizational structures and organizations supporting digital solutions engineering across the Office of the Secretary of Defense and the military departments, including—
(A)
current responsibilities, requirements, and deliverables of service-based software delivery organizations;
(B)
responsibilities or authorities imposed by statutory requirements;
(C)
limitations based on current enterprise data management platforms;
(D)
effectiveness and efficiency of current approaches;
(E)
optimization of resource allocation and utilization processes; and
(F)
integration challenges and opportunities with Department-wide digital initiatives.
(2)
An evaluation of potential organizational courses of action for supporting digital solutions engineering within the Office of the Secretary of Defense, including—
(A)
establishment of a new defense agency or Department of Defense field activity;
(B)
integration into an existing defense agency or Department of Defense field activity;
(C)
consolidation of digital development functions within existing Office of the Secretary of Defense staff organizations;
(D)
optimization of current organizational structures and authorities;
(E)
hybrid approaches combining elements of the options described in subparagraphs (A), (B), (C), and (D); and
(F)
any other organizational structures deemed appropriate by the Defense Science Board.
(3)
Recommendations on the selection of the optimal organizational structure, including—
(A)
analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of each course of action evaluated under paragraph (2);
(B)
assessment of capability requirements and gaps;
(C)
evaluation of cost-effectiveness and resource implications;
(D)
application of lessons from similar industry or academic entities performing similar work;
(E)
consideration of governance and execution framework requirements;
(F)
assessment of the implementation of and execution of governance structures, including artificial intelligence model management;
(G)
coordination mechanisms with existing Department components and combatant commands;
(H)
recommendations for unique hiring authorities to support digital solutions engineering workforce requirements; and
(I)
recommendations for unique acquisition authorities to support rapid digital solutions engineering and deployment.
(4)
Transition recommendations for implementing the selected organizational structure, including—
(A)
detailed implementation timeline and milestones;
(B)
organizational and personnel changes required;
(C)
resource requirements and funding mechanisms;
(D)
legislative or regulatory changes needed;
(E)
risk assessment and mitigation strategies; and
(F)
metrics for evaluating implementation success.
(c)
Report
(1)
Transmittal to Secretary
Not later than February 1, 2027, the Board shall transmit to the Secretary of Defense a final report on the study conducted pursuant to subsection (a).
(2)
Transmittal to Congress
Not later than 30 days after the date on which the Secretary receives the final report under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall submit the report to the congressional defense committees, together with such comments as the Secretary considers appropriate.
(d)
Definitions
In this section:
(1)
Congressional defense committees
The term congressional defense committees has the meaning given the term in section 101(a)(16) of title 10, United States Code.
(2)
Digital solutions engineering
The term digital solutions engineering means the development, deployment, and sustainment of artificial intelligence systems, software applications, data engineering solutions, data analytics platforms, and other digital technologies for operational and business purposes within the Department of Defense.
(3)
Software delivery organizations
The term software delivery organizations means organizational units within the military services dedicated to the rapid development, deployment, and sustainment of software applications and digital solutions.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2025-07-31
  2. Passed Senate
  3. Passed House
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

A bill to require a Defense Science Board study on optimal organizational structure for digital solutions.

Sponsors

Sen. Mike Rounds (R) sponsors S. 2600 alone.

Committees

S. 2600 went before 1 committee: Armed Services.

Armed Services
Armed Services
Referred To · Jul 31, 2025

Actions

S. 2600 has taken 2 actions since Jul 31, 2025.

ChamberAction
Jul 31, 2025
Senate
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.Armed Services Committee
Jul 31, 2025
Introduced in Senate

Votes

S. 2600 has not gone to a roll call.

1 bill is related to S. 2600.

Titles

S. 2600 goes by 2 titles.

  • A bill to require a Defense Science Board study on optimal organizational structure for digital solutions. — Official Title as Introduced
  • A bill to require a Defense Science Board study on optimal organizational structure for digital solutions. — Display Title

Lobbying

1 client hired 1 firm and 9 registered lobbyists who named S. 2600 in 4 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Animals, Budget/Appropriations, Education, Health Issues, Immigration, Medical/Disease Research/Clinical Labs, Medicare/Medicaid, Science/Technology.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGESDistrict of Columbia14

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

RegistrantClientsFilingsReported
ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES14

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill.

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGESASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES2026 second_quarter$821.4K2nd Quarter - Report
ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGESASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES2025 third_quarter$758.2K3rd Quarter - Report
ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGESASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES2025 fourth_quarter$708.4K4th Quarter - Report
ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGESASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES2026 first_quarter$577.7K1st Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files S. 2600 under Armed Forces and National Security, one of its 31 policy areas.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; S. 2600’s is Armed Forces and National Security.

s2600/policy-areas.txt
Armed Forces and National SecurityAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com