- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- AdministrationU.S. House
- AgricultureU.S. House
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And ForestryU.S. House
- AppropriationsU.S. House
- Armed ServicesU.S. House
- Banking, Housing, And Urban AffairsU.S. House
- BudgetU.S. House
- Commerce, Science, And TransportationU.S. House
- Education and WorkforceU.S. House
- Energy And CommerceU.S. House
- Energy And Natural ResourcesU.S. House
- Environment And Public WorksU.S. House
- EthicsU.S. House
- FinanceU.S. House
- Financial ServicesU.S. House
- Foreign AffairsU.S. House
- Foreign RelationsU.S. House
- Health, Education, Labor, And PensionsU.S. House
- Homeland SecurityU.S. House
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…U.S. House
- Indian AffairsU.S. House
- Indian and Insular AffairsU.S. House
- IntelligenceU.S. House
- JudiciaryU.S. House
- Natural ResourcesU.S. House
- Oversight And Government ReformU.S. House
- Permanent Select IntelligenceU.S. House
- RulesU.S. House
- Rules And AdministrationU.S. House
- Science, Space, And TechnologyU.S. House
- Select IntelligenceU.S. Senate
- Small BusinessU.S. House
- Small Business And EntrepreneurshipU.S. House
- Subcommittee on AviationU.S. House
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Economic OpportunityU.S. House
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Federal LandsU.S. House
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on HealthU.S. House
- Subcommittee on Highways and TransitU.S. House
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…U.S. House
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…U.S. House
- Transportation And InfrastructureU.S. House
- Veterans' AffairsU.S. House
- Ways And MeansU.S. House

S. 2600
U.S. Senate•In Senate Committee
Summary
S. 2600, a bill to require a Defense Science Board study on optimal organizational structure for digital solutions, was introduced in the Senate on Jul 31, 2025 by Sen. Mike Rounds (R). It was referred to Armed Services, and last saw action on Jul 31, 2025: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Record
Text
S. 2600 has no co-sponsors and has not gone to a roll call.
s2600/introduced-in-senate.txt119 S2600 IS: To require a Defense Science Board study on optimal organizational structure for digital solutions.U.S. Senate2025-07-31text/xmlENPursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.II119th CONGRESS1st SessionS. 2600IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATESJuly 31, 2025Mr. Rounds introduced the following bill;which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed ServicesA BILLTo require a Defense Science Board study on optimal organizational structurefor digital solutions.1.Defense Science Board study on optimal organizational structure for digitalengineering solutions(a)Study requiredThe Secretary of Defense shall direct the Defense Science Board to conduct a comprehensive study to evaluate and recommend the most optimal organizational structure within the Office of the Secretary of Defense to support digital solutions engineering activities across the Office of the Secretary of Defense and the military departments.(b)ElementsThe study required under subsection (a) shall include the following elements:(1)An assessment of existing organizational structures and organizations supporting digital solutions engineering across the Office of the Secretary of Defense and the military departments, including—(A)current responsibilities, requirements, and deliverables of service-based software delivery organizations;(B)responsibilities or authorities imposed by statutory requirements;(C)limitations based on current enterprise data management platforms;(D)effectiveness and efficiency of current approaches;(E)optimization of resource allocation and utilization processes; and(F)integration challenges and opportunities with Department-wide digital initiatives.(2)An evaluation of potential organizational courses of action for supporting digital solutions engineering within the Office of the Secretary of Defense, including—(A)establishment of a new defense agency or Department of Defense field activity;(B)integration into an existing defense agency or Department of Defense field activity;(C)consolidation of digital development functions within existing Office of the Secretary of Defense staff organizations;(D)optimization of current organizational structures and authorities;(E)hybrid approaches combining elements of the options described in subparagraphs (A), (B), (C), and (D); and(F)any other organizational structures deemed appropriate by the Defense Science Board.(3)Recommendations on the selection of the optimal organizational structure, including—(A)analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of each course of action evaluated under paragraph (2);(B)assessment of capability requirements and gaps;(C)evaluation of cost-effectiveness and resource implications;(D)application of lessons from similar industry or academic entities performing similar work;(E)consideration of governance and execution framework requirements;(F)assessment of the implementation of and execution of governance structures, including artificial intelligence model management;(G)coordination mechanisms with existing Department components and combatant commands;(H)recommendations for unique hiring authorities to support digital solutions engineering workforce requirements; and(I)recommendations for unique acquisition authorities to support rapid digital solutions engineering and deployment.(4)Transition recommendations for implementing the selected organizational structure, including—(A)detailed implementation timeline and milestones;(B)organizational and personnel changes required;(C)resource requirements and funding mechanisms;(D)legislative or regulatory changes needed;(E)risk assessment and mitigation strategies; and(F)metrics for evaluating implementation success.(c)Report(1)Transmittal to SecretaryNot later than February 1, 2027, the Board shall transmit to the Secretary of Defense a final report on the study conducted pursuant to subsection (a).(2)Transmittal to CongressNot later than 30 days after the date on which the Secretary receives the final report under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall submit the report to the congressional defense committees, together with such comments as the Secretary considers appropriate.(d)DefinitionsIn this section:(1)Congressional defense committeesThe term congressional defense committees has the meaning given the term in section 101(a)(16) of title 10, United States Code.(2)Digital solutions engineeringThe term digital solutions engineering means the development, deployment, and sustainment of artificial intelligence systems, software applications, data engineering solutions, data analytics platforms, and other digital technologies for operational and business purposes within the Department of Defense.(3)Software delivery organizationsThe term software delivery organizations means organizational units within the military services dedicated to the rapid development, deployment, and sustainment of software applications and digital solutions.
Tracker
The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.
- Introduced2025-07-31
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- Conference
- To President
- Became Law
A bill to require a Defense Science Board study on optimal organizational structure for digital solutions.
Sponsors
Sen. Mike Rounds (R) sponsors S. 2600 alone.
Committees
S. 2600 went before 1 committee: Armed Services.
Actions
S. 2600 has taken 2 actions since Jul 31, 2025.
| Chamber | Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 31, 2025 | Senate | Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.Armed Services Committee | ||
Jul 31, 2025 | — | Introduced in Senate |
Votes
S. 2600 has not gone to a roll call.
Related bills
1 bill is related to S. 2600.
Titles
S. 2600 goes by 2 titles.
- A bill to require a Defense Science Board study on optimal organizational structure for digital solutions. — Official Title as Introduced
- A bill to require a Defense Science Board study on optimal organizational structure for digital solutions. — Display Title
Lobbying
1 client hired 1 firm and 9 registered lobbyists who named S. 2600 in 4 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.
Filed under Animals, Budget/Appropriations, Education, Health Issues, Immigration, Medical/Disease Research/Clinical Labs, Medicare/Medicaid, Science/Technology.
Clients
Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.
| Client | Business | State | Firms | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 4 | — |
Firms
Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.
| Registrant | Clients | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES | 1 | 4 | — |
Lobbyists
Named on the filings that cite the bill.
| Lobbyist | Firms | Clients | Filings |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALLYSON PERLEONI | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| ANDREA PRICE-CARTER | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| DANIELLE TURNIPSEED | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| DEVAN O'TOOLE | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| EMILY PREST | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| LEONARD MARQUEZ | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| SINEAD HUNT | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| TANNAZ RASOULI | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| ANDREW HERRIN | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Filings
The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.
| Client | Registrant | Period | Reported | Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES | ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES | 2026 second_quarter | $821.4K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES | ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES | 2025 third_quarter | $758.2K | 3rd Quarter - Report |
| ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES | ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES | 2025 fourth_quarter | $708.4K | 4th Quarter - Report |
| ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES | ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES | 2026 first_quarter | $577.7K | 1st Quarter - Report |
Classification
The Congressional Research Service files S. 2600 under Armed Forces and National Security, one of its 31 policy areas.
CRS Subjects
CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; S. 2600’s is Armed Forces and National Security.
s2600/policy-areas.txtSource: congress.gov · legiscan.com