Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

S. 2455

U.S. SenateIn Senate Committee

Summary

S. 2455, the TRAIN Act, was introduced in the Senate on Jul 24, 2025 by Sen. Peter Welch (D) with 3 co-sponsors. It was referred to Judiciary, and last saw action on Jul 24, 2025: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.


Record

Text

S. 2455 has 3 co-sponsors.

sb2455/introduced-in-senate.txt
119 S2455 IS: Transparency and Responsibility for Artificial Intelligence Networks Act
U.S. Senate
2025-07-24
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
II
119th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. 2455
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
July 24, 2025
Mr. Welch (for himself, Mrs. Blackburn , Mr.
Hawley , and Mr. Schiff )
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the
Committee on the
Judiciary
A BILL
To create an administrative subpoena process to assist copyright owners in
determining which of their copyrighted works have been used in the training of
artificial intelligence models.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Transparency and Responsibility for Artificial Intelligence Networks Act or the TRAIN Act .
2.
Subpoena for copies or records relating to artificial intelligence
models
(a)
In general
Chapter 5 of title 17, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
514.
Subpoena for copies or records relating to artificial intelligence
models
(a)
Definitions
In this section:
(1)
Artificial intelligence
The term artificial intelligence has the meaning given the term in section 5002 of the National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Act of 2020 ( 15 U.S.C. 9401 ).
(2)
Artificial intelligence model
The term artificial intelligence model means a component of an information system that implements artificial intelligence technology and uses computational, statistical, or machine-learning techniques to produce outputs from a given set of inputs.
(3)
Developer
The term developer —
(A)
means a person or State or local government agency that—
(i)
designs, codes, produces, owns, or substantially modifies a generative artificial intelligence model for use by—
(I)
the person or State or local government agency; or
(II)
a third party; and
(ii)
engages in or supervises, including as a third party training dataset curator—
(I)
the curation of the training dataset of the artificial intelligence model; or
(II)
the use of the training dataset to train the artificial intelligence model; and
(B)
does not include a noncommercial end user of a generative artificial intelligence model.
(4)
Generative artificial intelligence model
The term generative artificial intelligence model —
(A)
means an artificial intelligence model that emulates the structure and characteristics of input data in order to generate derived synthetic content, which may include images, videos, audio, text, and other digital content; and
(B)
includes any subsequent variation on an artificial intelligence model described in subparagraph (A), even if created by a third party.
(5)
Substantially modify
The term substantially modify , with respect to a generative artificial intelligence model, means to take 1 or more actions leading to a new version of, new release of, or other update to the generative artificial intelligence model that materially changes the functionality or performance of the generative artificial intelligence model, including by retraining or fine tuning the generative artificial intelligence model.
(6)
Training material
The term training material means individual works or components thereof used for the purpose of training a generative artificial intelligence model, including a combination of text, images, audio, or other categories of expressive materials, as well as annotations describing the material.
(b)
Request
(1)
In general
The legal or beneficial owner of an exclusive right under a copyright, or a person authorized to act on the owner's behalf, may request the clerk of any United States district court to issue a subpoena to a developer for disclosure of copies of, or records sufficient to identify with certainty, the copyrighted works, or any portion thereof, likely owned or controlled by the legal or beneficial owner that were used by the developer to train the generative artificial intelligence model, if the legal or beneficial owner or authorized person has a subjective good faith belief that the developer used some or all of 1 or more such copyrighted works to train the generative artificial intelligence model.
(2)
Subpoena limited to requester's own copyrighted
work
Nothing in paragraph (1) shall be construed to authorize a legal or beneficial owner of an exclusive right under a copyright, or a person authorized to act on the owner's behalf, to request a subpoena for disclosure of copies of, or records sufficient to identify with certainty, copyrighted works likely owned or controlled by any person other than the legal or beneficial owner.
(c)
Contents of request
A request under subsection (b) may be made by filing with the clerk—
(1)
a proposed subpoena; and
(2)
a sworn declaration to the effect that—
(A)
the legal or beneficial owner or authorized person has a subjective good faith belief that the developer used some or all of 1 or more of the copyrighted works owned or controlled by the legal or beneficial owner to train the generative artificial intelligence model;
(B)
the purpose for which the subpoena is sought is to obtain copies of the training material, or records sufficient to identify with certainty the training material, used to train the generative artificial intelligence model in order to determine whether the developer has used copyrighted works owned or controlled by the legal or beneficial owner in connection with the generative artificial intelligence model; and
(C)
the copies or records will only be used for the purpose of protecting the rights of the legal or beneficial owner.
(d)
Contents of subpoena
A subpoena issued pursuant to a request under subsection (b) shall authorize and order the developer receiving the subpoena to expeditiously disclose to the legal or beneficial owner or authorized person all records described in that subsection.
(e)
Basis for granting subpoena
If a proposed subpoena described in subsection (c)(1) is in proper form, and the accompanying declaration described in subsection (c)(2) is properly executed, the clerk shall expeditiously issue and sign the proposed subpoena and return it to the requester for delivery to the developer.
(f)
Actions of developer receiving subpoena
Upon receipt of a subpoena issued under subsection (e), a developer shall expeditiously disclose to the legal or beneficial owner or authorized person the copies or records requested by the subpoena.
(g)
Duty of confidentiality
A legal or beneficial owner or authorized person who receives copies or records from a developer under this section may not disclose the copies or records to any other person without proper authorization or consent.
(h)
Rules applicable to subpoena
Unless otherwise provided by this section or by applicable rules of the court, the procedure for issuance and delivery of a subpoena issued under subsection (e), and the remedies for noncompliance with the subpoena, shall be governed to the greatest extent practicable by the provisions of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure governing the issuance, service, and enforcement of a subpoena duces tecum.
(i)
Rebuttable presumption
If a developer fails to comply with a subpoena issued under subsection (e), that failure shall provide a rebuttable presumption that the developer made copies of the copyrighted work.
(j)
Sanctions for bad faith subpoena request
(1)
Motion
If the legal or beneficial owner of an exclusive right under a copyright, or a person authorized to act on the owner’s behalf, requests a subpoena under subsection (b) in bad faith, the court that issued the subpoena, upon motion of the recipient of the subpoena, may impose sanctions on the legal or beneficial owner or authorized person.
(2)
Implementation
Rule 11(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure shall apply to sanctions imposed under this subsection in the same manner as that rule applies to sanctions imposed for a violation of rule 11(b) of those Rules.
(k)
Effective date
This section shall take effect on the date of enactment of this section.
.
(b)
Technical and conforming amendment
The table of sections for chapter 5 of title 17, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
514. Subpoena for copies or records
relating to artificial intelligence models.
.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2025-07-24
  2. Passed Senate
  3. Passed House
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

A bill to create an administrative subpoena process to assist copyright owners in determining which of their copyrighted works have been used in the training of artificial intelligence models.

Sponsors

Sen. Peter Welch (D) sponsors S. 2455, and 3 members have co-sponsored it, all of them from the day it was introduced.

Committees

S. 2455 went before 1 committee: Judiciary.

Judiciary
Judiciary
Referred To · Jul 24, 2025

Actions

S. 2455 has taken 2 actions since Jul 24, 2025.

ChamberAction
Jul 24, 2025
Senate
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.Judiciary Committee
Jul 24, 2025
Introduced in Senate

Votes

S. 2455 has not gone to a roll call.

1 bill is related to S. 2455, as Identical bill.

Titles

S. 2455 goes by 4 titles, 2 of them short titles.

  • TRAIN Act — Display Title
  • TRAIN Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • Transparency and Responsibility for Artificial Intelligence Networks Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • A bill to create an administrative subpoena process to assist copyright owners in determining which of their copyrighted works have been used in the training of artificial intelligence models. — Official Title as Introduced

Lobbying

15 clients hired 11 firms and 32 registered lobbyists who named S. 2455 in 31 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Copyright/Patent/Trademark, Taxation/Internal Revenue Code, Trade (domestic/foreign), Telecommunications, Budget/Appropriations, Consumer Issues/Safety/Products, Labor Issues/Antitrust/Workplace, Law Enforcement/Crime/Criminal Justice.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
AMERICAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW ASSOCIATION (AIPLA)LOBBYINGVirginia14
NEWS MEDIA ALLIANCEVirginia14
BRIA ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE INC.Visual Generative AI for Commercial Use.New York13$120K
GETTY IMAGES INC.Provides visual and digital media content.Washington13$80K
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF INDEPENDENT MUSICTrade association that represents independent record labels in the United StatesNew York13$60K
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SCIENTIFIC, TECHNICAL & MEDICAL PUBLISHERS (STM)Trade association for academic and professional publishers.12$80K
INTERNATIONAL ALLIANCE OF THEATRICAL STAGE EMPLOYEESDistrict of Columbia12
RECORDING ACADEMYDistrict of Columbia12
RECORDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICADistrict of Columbia12
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF COMPOSERS, AUTHORS AND PUBLISHERS (ASCAP)Membership association of U.S. Composers, Songwriters, Lyricists, and Music PublishersNew York11$110K
AT&T SERVICES INC AND ITS AFFILIATESDistrict of Columbia11$50K
WRITERS GUILD OF AMERICA WESTUnionCalifornia11$45K
CAPITOL DOME ADVOCACY OBO AMERICAN SOCIETY OF COMPOSERS, AUTHORS, AND PUBLISHERSPerformance rights licensing organizationNew York11$30K
COPYRIGHT CLEARANCE CENTERCopyright licensing services.Massachusetts11$30K
DEPARTMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES AFL-CIODistrict of Columbia11

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill. The 20 named most often, of 32.

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
RECORDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICARECORDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA2026 first_quarter$2.2M1st Quarter - Report
RECORDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICARECORDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA2026 second_quarter$2.2M2nd Quarter - Report
NEWS MEDIA ALLIANCENEWS MEDIA ALLIANCE2025 third_quarter$520K3rd Quarter - Report
NEWS MEDIA ALLIANCENEWS MEDIA ALLIANCE2025 fourth_quarter$480K4th Quarter - Report
NEWS MEDIA ALLIANCENEWS MEDIA ALLIANCE2026 second_quarter$475K2nd Quarter - Report
NEWS MEDIA ALLIANCENEWS MEDIA ALLIANCE2026 first_quarter$330K1st Quarter - Report
INTERNATIONAL ALLIANCE OF THEATRICAL STAGE EMPLOYEESINTERNATIONAL ALLIANCE OF THEATRICAL STAGE EMPLOYEES2026 second_quarter$135K2nd Quarter - Report
INTERNATIONAL ALLIANCE OF THEATRICAL STAGE EMPLOYEESINTERNATIONAL ALLIANCE OF THEATRICAL STAGE EMPLOYEES2026 first_quarter$135K1st Quarter - Report
RECORDING ACADEMYRECORDING ACADEMY (FKA NATIONAL ACADEMY OF RECORDING ARTS AND SCIENCES)2026 second_quarter$120.8K2nd Quarter - Report
RECORDING ACADEMYRECORDING ACADEMY (FKA NATIONAL ACADEMY OF RECORDING ARTS AND SCIENCES)2026 first_quarter$120.8K1st Quarter - Report
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF COMPOSERS, AUTHORS AND PUBLISHERS (ASCAP)THORN RUN PARTNERS2026 second_quarter$110K2nd Quarter - Report
AT&T SERVICES INC AND ITS AFFILIATESMERCURY STRATEGIES, LLC2025 third_quarter$50K3rd Quarter - Report
WRITERS GUILD OF AMERICA WESTCUNEO GILBERT FLANNERY & LADUCA (FORMERLY KNOWN AS CUNEO GILBERT & LADUCA)2026 second_quarter$45K2nd Quarter - Amendme…
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SCIENTIFIC, TECHNICAL & MEDICAL PUBLISHERS (STM)RADIUS ADVOCACY, LLC2026 second_quarter$40K2nd Quarter - Report
BRIA ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE INC.RADIUS ADVOCACY, LLC2026 second_quarter$40K2nd Quarter - Report
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SCIENTIFIC, TECHNICAL & MEDICAL PUBLISHERS (STM)RADIUS ADVOCACY, LLC2026 first_quarter$40K1st Quarter - Report
BRIA ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE INC.RADIUS ADVOCACY, LLC2026 first_quarter$40K1st Quarter - Report
GETTY IMAGES INC.NVG, LLC2025 fourth_quarter$40K4th Quarter - Report
BRIA ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE INC.RADIUS ADVOCACY, LLC2025 fourth_quarter$40K4th Quarter - Report
COPYRIGHT CLEARANCE CENTERRADIUS ADVOCACY, LLC2026 second_quarter$30K2nd Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files S. 2455 under Commerce, one of its 31 policy areas.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; S. 2455’s is Commerce.

s2455/policy-areas.txt
CommerceAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com