- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- Administration
- Agriculture
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry
- Appropriations
- Armed Services
- Banking, Housing, And Urban Affairs
- Budget
- Commerce, Science, And Transportation
- Education and Workforce
- Energy And Commerce
- Energy And Natural Resources
- Environment And Public Works
- Ethics
- Finance
- Financial Services
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Relations
- Health, Education, Labor, And Pensions
- Homeland Security
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…
- Indian Affairs
- Indian and Insular Affairs
- Intelligence
- Judiciary
- Natural Resources
- Oversight And Government Reform
- Permanent Select Intelligence
- Rules
- Rules And Administration
- Science, Space, And Technology
- Select Intelligence
- Small Business
- Small Business And Entrepreneurship
- Subcommittee on Aviation
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…
- Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…
- Subcommittee on Federal Lands
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…
- Subcommittee on Health
- Subcommittee on Highways and Transit
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…
- Transportation And Infrastructure
- Veterans' Affairs
- Ways And Means

S. 2455
U.S. Senate•In Senate Committee
Summary
S. 2455, the TRAIN Act, was introduced in the Senate on Jul 24, 2025 by Sen. Peter Welch (D) with 3 co-sponsors. It was referred to Judiciary, and last saw action on Jul 24, 2025: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Record
Text
S. 2455 has 3 co-sponsors.
sb2455/introduced-in-senate.txt119 S2455 IS: Transparency and Responsibility for Artificial Intelligence Networks ActU.S. Senate2025-07-24text/xmlENPursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.II119th CONGRESS1st SessionS. 2455IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATESJuly 24, 2025Mr. Welch (for himself, Mrs. Blackburn , Mr.Hawley , and Mr. Schiff )introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to theCommittee on theJudiciaryA BILLTo create an administrative subpoena process to assist copyright owners indetermining which of their copyrighted works have been used in the training ofartificial intelligence models.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Transparency and Responsibility for Artificial Intelligence Networks Act or the TRAIN Act .2.Subpoena for copies or records relating to artificial intelligencemodels(a)In generalChapter 5 of title 17, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:514.Subpoena for copies or records relating to artificial intelligencemodels(a)DefinitionsIn this section:(1)Artificial intelligenceThe term artificial intelligence has the meaning given the term in section 5002 of the National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Act of 2020 ( 15 U.S.C. 9401 ).(2)Artificial intelligence modelThe term artificial intelligence model means a component of an information system that implements artificial intelligence technology and uses computational, statistical, or machine-learning techniques to produce outputs from a given set of inputs.(3)DeveloperThe term developer —(A)means a person or State or local government agency that—(i)designs, codes, produces, owns, or substantially modifies a generative artificial intelligence model for use by—(I)the person or State or local government agency; or(II)a third party; and(ii)engages in or supervises, including as a third party training dataset curator—(I)the curation of the training dataset of the artificial intelligence model; or(II)the use of the training dataset to train the artificial intelligence model; and(B)does not include a noncommercial end user of a generative artificial intelligence model.(4)Generative artificial intelligence modelThe term generative artificial intelligence model —(A)means an artificial intelligence model that emulates the structure and characteristics of input data in order to generate derived synthetic content, which may include images, videos, audio, text, and other digital content; and(B)includes any subsequent variation on an artificial intelligence model described in subparagraph (A), even if created by a third party.(5)Substantially modifyThe term substantially modify , with respect to a generative artificial intelligence model, means to take 1 or more actions leading to a new version of, new release of, or other update to the generative artificial intelligence model that materially changes the functionality or performance of the generative artificial intelligence model, including by retraining or fine tuning the generative artificial intelligence model.(6)Training materialThe term training material means individual works or components thereof used for the purpose of training a generative artificial intelligence model, including a combination of text, images, audio, or other categories of expressive materials, as well as annotations describing the material.(b)Request(1)In generalThe legal or beneficial owner of an exclusive right under a copyright, or a person authorized to act on the owner's behalf, may request the clerk of any United States district court to issue a subpoena to a developer for disclosure of copies of, or records sufficient to identify with certainty, the copyrighted works, or any portion thereof, likely owned or controlled by the legal or beneficial owner that were used by the developer to train the generative artificial intelligence model, if the legal or beneficial owner or authorized person has a subjective good faith belief that the developer used some or all of 1 or more such copyrighted works to train the generative artificial intelligence model.(2)Subpoena limited to requester's own copyrightedworkNothing in paragraph (1) shall be construed to authorize a legal or beneficial owner of an exclusive right under a copyright, or a person authorized to act on the owner's behalf, to request a subpoena for disclosure of copies of, or records sufficient to identify with certainty, copyrighted works likely owned or controlled by any person other than the legal or beneficial owner.(c)Contents of requestA request under subsection (b) may be made by filing with the clerk—(1)a proposed subpoena; and(2)a sworn declaration to the effect that—(A)the legal or beneficial owner or authorized person has a subjective good faith belief that the developer used some or all of 1 or more of the copyrighted works owned or controlled by the legal or beneficial owner to train the generative artificial intelligence model;(B)the purpose for which the subpoena is sought is to obtain copies of the training material, or records sufficient to identify with certainty the training material, used to train the generative artificial intelligence model in order to determine whether the developer has used copyrighted works owned or controlled by the legal or beneficial owner in connection with the generative artificial intelligence model; and(C)the copies or records will only be used for the purpose of protecting the rights of the legal or beneficial owner.(d)Contents of subpoenaA subpoena issued pursuant to a request under subsection (b) shall authorize and order the developer receiving the subpoena to expeditiously disclose to the legal or beneficial owner or authorized person all records described in that subsection.(e)Basis for granting subpoenaIf a proposed subpoena described in subsection (c)(1) is in proper form, and the accompanying declaration described in subsection (c)(2) is properly executed, the clerk shall expeditiously issue and sign the proposed subpoena and return it to the requester for delivery to the developer.(f)Actions of developer receiving subpoenaUpon receipt of a subpoena issued under subsection (e), a developer shall expeditiously disclose to the legal or beneficial owner or authorized person the copies or records requested by the subpoena.(g)Duty of confidentialityA legal or beneficial owner or authorized person who receives copies or records from a developer under this section may not disclose the copies or records to any other person without proper authorization or consent.(h)Rules applicable to subpoenaUnless otherwise provided by this section or by applicable rules of the court, the procedure for issuance and delivery of a subpoena issued under subsection (e), and the remedies for noncompliance with the subpoena, shall be governed to the greatest extent practicable by the provisions of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure governing the issuance, service, and enforcement of a subpoena duces tecum.(i)Rebuttable presumptionIf a developer fails to comply with a subpoena issued under subsection (e), that failure shall provide a rebuttable presumption that the developer made copies of the copyrighted work.(j)Sanctions for bad faith subpoena request(1)MotionIf the legal or beneficial owner of an exclusive right under a copyright, or a person authorized to act on the owner’s behalf, requests a subpoena under subsection (b) in bad faith, the court that issued the subpoena, upon motion of the recipient of the subpoena, may impose sanctions on the legal or beneficial owner or authorized person.(2)ImplementationRule 11(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure shall apply to sanctions imposed under this subsection in the same manner as that rule applies to sanctions imposed for a violation of rule 11(b) of those Rules.(k)Effective dateThis section shall take effect on the date of enactment of this section..(b)Technical and conforming amendmentThe table of sections for chapter 5 of title 17, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:514. Subpoena for copies or recordsrelating to artificial intelligence models..
Tracker
The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.
- Introduced2025-07-24
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- Conference
- To President
- Became Law
A bill to create an administrative subpoena process to assist copyright owners in determining which of their copyrighted works have been used in the training of artificial intelligence models.
Sponsors
Sen. Peter Welch (D) sponsors S. 2455, and 3 members have co-sponsored it, all of them from the day it was introduced.
Committees
S. 2455 went before 1 committee: Judiciary.
Actions
S. 2455 has taken 2 actions since Jul 24, 2025.
| Chamber | Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 24, 2025 | Senate | Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.Judiciary Committee | ||
Jul 24, 2025 | — | Introduced in Senate |
Votes
S. 2455 has not gone to a roll call.
Related bills
1 bill is related to S. 2455, as Identical bill.
Titles
S. 2455 goes by 4 titles, 2 of them short titles.
- TRAIN Act — Display Title
- TRAIN Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
- Transparency and Responsibility for Artificial Intelligence Networks Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
- A bill to create an administrative subpoena process to assist copyright owners in determining which of their copyrighted works have been used in the training of artificial intelligence models. — Official Title as Introduced
Lobbying
15 clients hired 11 firms and 32 registered lobbyists who named S. 2455 in 31 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.
Filed under Copyright/Patent/Trademark, Taxation/Internal Revenue Code, Trade (domestic/foreign), Telecommunications, Budget/Appropriations, Consumer Issues/Safety/Products, Labor Issues/Antitrust/Workplace, Law Enforcement/Crime/Criminal Justice.
Clients
Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.
| Client | Business | State | Firms | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMERICAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW ASSOCIATION (AIPLA) | LOBBYING | Virginia | 1 | 4 | — |
| NEWS MEDIA ALLIANCE | — | Virginia | 1 | 4 | — |
| BRIA ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE INC. | Visual Generative AI for Commercial Use. | New York | 1 | 3 | $120K |
| GETTY IMAGES INC. | Provides visual and digital media content. | Washington | 1 | 3 | $80K |
| AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF INDEPENDENT MUSIC | Trade association that represents independent record labels in the United States | New York | 1 | 3 | $60K |
| INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SCIENTIFIC, TECHNICAL & MEDICAL PUBLISHERS (STM) | Trade association for academic and professional publishers. | — | 1 | 2 | $80K |
| INTERNATIONAL ALLIANCE OF THEATRICAL STAGE EMPLOYEES | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 2 | — |
| RECORDING ACADEMY | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 2 | — |
| RECORDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 2 | — |
| AMERICAN SOCIETY OF COMPOSERS, AUTHORS AND PUBLISHERS (ASCAP) | Membership association of U.S. Composers, Songwriters, Lyricists, and Music Publishers | New York | 1 | 1 | $110K |
| AT&T SERVICES INC AND ITS AFFILIATES | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 1 | $50K |
| WRITERS GUILD OF AMERICA WEST | Union | California | 1 | 1 | $45K |
| CAPITOL DOME ADVOCACY OBO AMERICAN SOCIETY OF COMPOSERS, AUTHORS, AND PUBLISHERS | Performance rights licensing organization | New York | 1 | 1 | $30K |
| COPYRIGHT CLEARANCE CENTER | Copyright licensing services. | Massachusetts | 1 | 1 | $30K |
| DEPARTMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES AFL-CIO | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 1 | — |
Firms
Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.
Lobbyists
Named on the filings that cite the bill. The 20 named most often, of 32.
| Lobbyist | Firms | Clients | Filings |
|---|---|---|---|
| BENJAMIN STAUB | 1 | 4 | 7 |
| CARLYLE THORSEN | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| JOSHUA HURVITZ | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| DANIELLE COFFEY | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| EMILY EMERY | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| GREG ORLANDO | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| HOLLY LUBART | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| NEIL QUINTER | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| VINCENT GARLOCK | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| ALICE ALEXEEVA | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| EDEN SHIFERAW | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| ERINN MARTIN | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GEORGE YORK | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| JACKSON REES | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| JESSICA RICHARD | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| KIMBERLEY ALTON | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| MICHELE BALLANTYNE | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| MITCH GLAZIER | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| MONTANA MILLER | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| MORNA WILLENS | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Filings
The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.
| Client | Registrant | Period | Reported | Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECORDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA | RECORDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA | 2026 first_quarter | $2.2M | 1st Quarter - Report |
| RECORDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA | RECORDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA | 2026 second_quarter | $2.2M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| NEWS MEDIA ALLIANCE | NEWS MEDIA ALLIANCE | 2025 third_quarter | $520K | 3rd Quarter - Report |
| NEWS MEDIA ALLIANCE | NEWS MEDIA ALLIANCE | 2025 fourth_quarter | $480K | 4th Quarter - Report |
| NEWS MEDIA ALLIANCE | NEWS MEDIA ALLIANCE | 2026 second_quarter | $475K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| NEWS MEDIA ALLIANCE | NEWS MEDIA ALLIANCE | 2026 first_quarter | $330K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| INTERNATIONAL ALLIANCE OF THEATRICAL STAGE EMPLOYEES | INTERNATIONAL ALLIANCE OF THEATRICAL STAGE EMPLOYEES | 2026 second_quarter | $135K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| INTERNATIONAL ALLIANCE OF THEATRICAL STAGE EMPLOYEES | INTERNATIONAL ALLIANCE OF THEATRICAL STAGE EMPLOYEES | 2026 first_quarter | $135K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| RECORDING ACADEMY | RECORDING ACADEMY (FKA NATIONAL ACADEMY OF RECORDING ARTS AND SCIENCES) | 2026 second_quarter | $120.8K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| RECORDING ACADEMY | RECORDING ACADEMY (FKA NATIONAL ACADEMY OF RECORDING ARTS AND SCIENCES) | 2026 first_quarter | $120.8K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN SOCIETY OF COMPOSERS, AUTHORS AND PUBLISHERS (ASCAP) | THORN RUN PARTNERS | 2026 second_quarter | $110K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| AT&T SERVICES INC AND ITS AFFILIATES | MERCURY STRATEGIES, LLC | 2025 third_quarter | $50K | 3rd Quarter - Report |
| WRITERS GUILD OF AMERICA WEST | CUNEO GILBERT FLANNERY & LADUCA (FORMERLY KNOWN AS CUNEO GILBERT & LADUCA) | 2026 second_quarter | $45K | 2nd Quarter - Amendme… |
| INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SCIENTIFIC, TECHNICAL & MEDICAL PUBLISHERS (STM) | RADIUS ADVOCACY, LLC | 2026 second_quarter | $40K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| BRIA ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE INC. | RADIUS ADVOCACY, LLC | 2026 second_quarter | $40K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SCIENTIFIC, TECHNICAL & MEDICAL PUBLISHERS (STM) | RADIUS ADVOCACY, LLC | 2026 first_quarter | $40K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| BRIA ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE INC. | RADIUS ADVOCACY, LLC | 2026 first_quarter | $40K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| GETTY IMAGES INC. | NVG, LLC | 2025 fourth_quarter | $40K | 4th Quarter - Report |
| BRIA ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE INC. | RADIUS ADVOCACY, LLC | 2025 fourth_quarter | $40K | 4th Quarter - Report |
| COPYRIGHT CLEARANCE CENTER | RADIUS ADVOCACY, LLC | 2026 second_quarter | $30K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
Classification
The Congressional Research Service files S. 2455 under Commerce, one of its 31 policy areas.
CRS Subjects
CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; S. 2455’s is Commerce.
s2455/policy-areas.txtSource: congress.gov · legiscan.com
