H.R. 4678

119 HR 4678 IH: Restoring Artistic Protection Act of 2025
 U.S. House of Representatives
 2025-07-23
 text/xml
 EN
 Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
 I  119th CONGRESS  1st Session  H. R. 4678  IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES   July 23, 2025   Mr. Johnson of Georgia  (for himself,  Ms. Kamlager-Dove ,  Mr. Carson ,  Mr. Casten ,  Ms. Chu ,  Ms. Crockett ,  Mr. Frost ,  Mr. Goldman of New York ,  Ms. Jayapal ,  Mrs. McIver ,  Mr. McGovern ,  Ms. Ocasio-Cortez ,  Ms. Pressley ,  Mrs. Ramirez ,  Ms. Sewell ,  Ms. Stansbury ,  Ms. Tlaib ,  Mr. Thanedar ,  Mr. Thompson of Mississippi ,  Ms. Williams of Georgia , and  Ms. Wilson of Florida ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the  Committee on the Judiciary    A BILL
To amend the Federal Rules of Evidence to limit the admissibility of evidence of a defendant’s creative or artistic expression against such defendant, and for other purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the   Restoring Artistic Protection Act of 2025   or the   RAP Act of 2025  .
2.
Limitation on admissibility of defendant’s creative or artistic expression
(a)
In general
Article IV of the Federal Rules of Evidence is amended by adding at the end the following:
Rule 416. Limitation on admissibility of defendant’s creative or artistic expression.
(a)
Creative and artistic expressions inadmissible
Except as provided in subsection (b), evidence of a defendant's creative or artistic expression, whether original or derivative, is not admissible against such defendant.
(b)
Exception
A court may admit evidence described in subsection (a) if the Government, in a hearing conducted outside the hearing of the jury, proves by clear and convincing evidence—
(1)
(A)
if the expression is original, that defendant intended a literal meaning, rather than figurative or fictional meaning; or
(B)
if the expression is derivative, that the defendant intended to adopt the literal meaning of the expression as the defendant's own thought or statement;
(2)
(A)
in a criminal case, that the creative expression refers to the specific facts of the crime alleged; or
(B)
in a civil case, that the creative expression refers to the specific facts alleged in the complaint;
(3)
that the expression is relevant to an issue of fact that is disputed; and
(4)
that the expression has distinct probative value not provided by other admissible evidence.
(c)
Ruling on the record
In any hearing under subsection (b), the court shall make its ruling on the record, and shall include its findings of fact essential to its ruling.
(d)
Redaction and limiting instructions
If the court admits any evidence described in subsection (a) pursuant to the exception under subsection (b), the court shall—
(1)
ensure that the expression is redacted in a manner to limit the evidence presented to the jury to that which is specifically excepted under subsection (b); and
(2)
provide appropriate limiting instructions to the jury.
(e)
Definition
In this section, the term  creative or artistic expression  means the expression or application of creativity or imagination in the production or arrangement of forms, sounds, words, movements or symbols, including music, dance, performance art, visual art, poetry, literature, film, and other such objects or media.
 .
(b)
Clerical amendment
The table of contents for the Federal Rules of Evidence is amended by inserting after the item relating to rule 415 the following:
416. Limitation on admissibility of defendant’s creative or artistic expression.
  .