Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

H.R. 4458

U.S. HouseIn House Committee

Summary

H.R. 4458, the COUNTER Act of 2025, was introduced in the House on Jul 16, 2025 by Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D) with 3 co-sponsors. It was referred to Foreign Affairs, and last saw action on Jul 16, 2025: Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select), for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.


Record

Text

H.R. 4458 has 3 co-sponsors.

hb4458/introduced-in-house.txt
119 HR 4458 IH: Combating PRC Overseas and Unlawful Networked Threats through Enhanced Resilience Act of 2025
U.S. House of Representatives
2025-07-16
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 4458 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES July 16, 2025 Mr. Krishnamoorthi (for himself and Mr. LaHood ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs , and in addition to the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence , for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned A BILL
To require the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense to develop a strategy in response to the global basing intentions of the People’s Republic of China.
1.
Short titles
This Act may be cited as the Combating PRC Overseas and Unlawful Networked Threats through Enhanced Resilience Act of 2025 or the COUNTER Act of 2025 .
2.
Findings
According to multiple sources, including the 2024 annual report to Congress, titled Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China and known informally as the China Military Power Report —
(1)
the PRC is seeking to expand its overseas logistics and basing infrastructure to allow the PLA to project and sustain military power at greater distances;
(2)
a global PLA logistics network could give the PRC increased capabilities to surveil or disrupt United States military operations;
(3)
in August 2017, the PRC officially opened the first overseas PLA military base near the commercial port of Doraleh in Djibouti;
(4)
in 2019, the PRC also attempted to acquire strategically important port infrastructure at Subic Bay in the Philippines, but was stopped by the Government of the United States, the Philippines, and Japan, and by private investors;
(5)
in April 2025, officials from the PRC and Cambodia officially inaugurated the China-Cambodia Ream Naval Base Joint Support and Training Center and celebrated the expansion of port facilities at Ream Naval Base, some of which appear to have been reserved for the use of PRC ships that have been continuously stationed at Ream Naval Base since December 2023; and
(6)
in addition to the base in Djibouti and the PRC's access to the port at the Ream Naval Base in Cambodia, the PRC is likely pursuing access to additional military facilities to support naval, air, and ground forces projection in many countries.
3.
Sense of Congress
While the executive branch has undertaken case-by-case efforts to forestall the establishment of new PRC permanent military presence in several countries, it is the sense of Congress that future efforts to counter the PRC's global basing intentions must—
(1)
proceed with the urgency required to address the strategic implications of the PRC’s actions;
(2)
reflect sufficient interagency coordination with respect to a problem that necessitates a whole-of-government approach;
(3)
ensure that the United States Government maintains a proactive posture rather than a reactive posture in order to maximize strategic decision space;
(4)
identify a comprehensive menu of actions that would be influential in shaping a partner’s decision making regarding giving the PRC military access to its sovereign territory;
(5)
appropriately prioritize the subject of the PRC's global basing intentions within the context of the overall United States strategic competition with the PRC;
(6)
consider how the PRC uses commercial and scientific cooperation as a guise for establishing access for the PLA and other PRC security forces in foreign countries;
(7)
factor in the potential contributions of key allies and partners to help respond to the PRC's pursuit of global basing, many of which—
(A)
have historic ties and influence in many of the geographic areas the PRC is targeting for potential future bases; and
(B)
rely on the same basic intelligence picture to form our baseline understanding of the PRC’s global intentions;
(8)
establish and ensure sufficient resourcing for enduring organizational structures and security and foreign assistance and cooperation efforts to effectively address the issue of PRC global basing intentions; and
(9)
ensure that future force posture, freedom of movement, and other interests of the United States and our allies are not jeopardized by the continued expansion of PRC bases.
4.
Definitions
In this Act:
(1)
Appropriate congressional committees
The term appropriate congressional committees means—
(A)
the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate ;
(B)
the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate ;
(C)
the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate ;
(D)
the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate ;
(E)
the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives ;
(F)
the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives ;
(G)
the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives ; and
(H)
the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives .
(2)
PLA
The term PLA means the People's Liberation Army of the PRC.
(3)
PRC
The term PRC means the People's Republic of China.
(4)
PRC global basing
The term PRC global basing means the establishment of physical locations outside the geographic boundaries of the PRC where the PRC maintains some element of the People’s Liberation Army, PRC intelligence or security forces, or infrastructure designed to support the presence of PRC military, intelligence, or security forces, for the purposes of potential power projection.
5.
Assessment of executive branch's C–PRC global basing strategy
(a)
Assessment
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of National Intelligence shall submit an intelligence assessment, in classified form, if needed, to the appropriate congressional committees. The assessment shall analyze the risk posed by PRC global basing to the United States or to any United States allies with respect to their ability to project power, maintain freedom of movement, and protect other interests as a function of the PRC's current or potential locations identified pursuant to subsection (b)(2)(A).
(b)
Strategy
(1)
In general
Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense and other appropriate senior Federal officials, shall submit a strategy to the appropriate congressional committees that contains the information described in paragraph (2).
(2)
Contents
The strategy required under paragraph (1) shall—
(A)
identify not fewer than 5 locations that pose the greatest potential risks, as identified in the assessment required under subsection (a), where the PRC maintains a physical presence, or is suspected to be seeking a physical presence, which could ultimately transition into a PRC global base;
(B)
include a comprehensive listing of executive branch entities currently involved in addressing aspects of PRC global basing, including estimated programmatic and personal resource requirements on an agency-by-agency basis to effectively address the issue of PRC global basing intentions, and any relevant resource constraints;
(C)
describe in detail all executive branch efforts to mitigate the impacts to the national interests of the United States and partner countries of the locations referred to in subparagraph (A) and prevent the PRC from establishing new global bases, including with resources described in subparagraph (B); and
(D)
for each of the locations referred to in subparagraph (A), identify the actions by the United States or its allies that would be most effective in ensuring the respective foreign governments terminate plans for hosting a PRC base.
(c)
Task force
Not later than 90 days after submitting the strategy described in subsection (b), the Secretary of State, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense and other appropriate senior Federal officials, shall establish an interagency task force—
(1)
to implement the strategy described in section (b) to counter the PRC’s efforts at the locations of chief concern; and
(2)
to identify mitigation measures that would prevent the PRC from establishing new bases in locations beyond the locations of chief concern identified pursuant to subsection (b)(2)(A).
(d)
Quadrennial reviews and reports
Not later than 4 years after the submission of the strategy required under subsection (b), and not less frequently than once every 4 years thereafter, the Secretary of State, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, the Director of National Intelligence, and other appropriate senior Federal officials, shall—
(1)
conduct a review of the Executive Branch’s strategy and overall approach in response to the PRC global basing intentions; and
(2)
submit the results of such review, including the information described in subsection (b)(2), to the appropriate congressional committees.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2025-07-16
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

To require the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense to develop a strategy in response to the global basing intentions of the People's Republic of China.

Sponsors

Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D) sponsors H.R. 4458, and 3 members have co-sponsored it, 1 of them from the day it was introduced.

Committees

H.R. 4458 went before 2 committees: Intelligence (Permanent Select) and Foreign Affairs.

Intelligence (Permanent Select)
Intelligence (Permanent Select)
Referred To · Jul 16, 2025 · 6 Bills
Foreign Affairs
Foreign Affairs
Referred To · Jul 16, 2025 · 658 Bills

Actions

H.R. 4458 has taken 2 actions since Jul 16, 2025.

ChamberAction
Jul 16, 2025
House
Introduced in House
Jul 16, 2025
House
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select), for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.Foreign Affairs Committee

Votes

H.R. 4458 has not gone to a roll call.

1 bill is related to H.R. 4458, as Identical bill.

Titles

H.R. 4458 goes by 4 titles, 2 of them short titles.

  • COUNTER Act of 2025 — Display Title
  • COUNTER Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • Combating PRC Overseas and Unlawful Networked Threats through Enhanced Resilience Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • To require the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense to develop a strategy in response to the global basing intentions of the People's Republic of China. — Official Title as Introduced

Lobbying

1 client hired 1 firm and 7 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 4458 in 1 quarterly filing, 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Banking, Defense, Education, Foreign Relations, Homeland Security, Intelligence, Science/Technology, Trade (domestic/foreign).

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
FDD ACTIONDistrict of Columbia11

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

RegistrantClientsFilingsReported
FDD ACTION11

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill.

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
FDD ACTIONFDD ACTION2026 first_quarter$270K1st Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 4458 under International Affairs, one of its 31 policy areas.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 4458’s is International Affairs.

hr4458/policy-areas.txt
International AffairsAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com