- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- Administration
- Agriculture
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry
- Appropriations
- Armed Services
- Banking, Housing, And Urban Affairs
- Budget
- Commerce, Science, And Transportation
- Education and Workforce
- Energy And Commerce
- Energy And Natural Resources
- Environment And Public Works
- Ethics
- Finance
- Financial Services
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Relations
- Health, Education, Labor, And Pensions
- Homeland Security
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…
- Indian Affairs
- Indian and Insular Affairs
- Intelligence
- Judiciary
- Natural Resources
- Oversight And Government Reform
- Permanent Select Intelligence
- Rules
- Rules And Administration
- Science, Space, And Technology
- Select Intelligence
- Small Business
- Small Business And Entrepreneurship
- Subcommittee on Aviation
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…
- Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…
- Subcommittee on Federal Lands
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…
- Subcommittee on Health
- Subcommittee on Highways and Transit
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…
- Transportation And Infrastructure
- Veterans' Affairs
- Ways And Means

H.Res. 572
U.S. House•In House Committee
Summary
H.Res. 572, “Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Naval Air Station Oceana in Virginia Beach, Virginia, should remain a critical component of the future carrier-based strike fighter capability of the Navy and receive F-35C squadrons as part of the modernization strategy of the Navy”, was introduced in the House on Jul 10, 2025 by Rep. Jennifer Kiggans (R) with 4 co-sponsors. It was referred to Armed Services, and last saw action on Jul 10, 2025: Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
Record
Text
H.Res. 572 has 4 co-sponsors.
hr572/introduced-in-house.txt119 HRES 572 IH: Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Naval Air Station Oceana in Virginia Beach, Virginia, should remain a critical component of the future carrier-based strike fighter capability of the Navy and receive F–35C squadrons as part of the modernization strategy of the Navy.U.S. House of Representatives2025-07-10text/xmlENPursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.IV 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. RES. 572 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES July 10, 2025 Mrs. Kiggans of Virginia (for herself and Mr. Wittman ) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services RESOLUTIONExpressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Naval Air Station Oceana in Virginia Beach, Virginia, should remain a critical component of the future carrier-based strike fighter capability of the Navy and receive F–35C squadrons as part of the modernization strategy of the Navy.Whereas Naval Air Station (NAS) Oceana in Virginia Beach, Virginia, has served as the East Coast Master Jet Base of the Navy for more than 70 years, supporting the training, readiness, and deployment of carrier-based tactical aviation;Whereas NAS Oceana provides critical support to Atlantic Fleet carrier strike groups, including squadrons embarked aboard nuclear-powered aircraft carriers based at Naval Station Norfolk, the largest naval base globally;Whereas the F/A–18 Super Hornet squadrons currently based at NAS Oceana are nearing the end of their service life and must be replaced by next-generation aircraft to maintain operational effectiveness and readiness;Whereas the F–35C Lightning II, the carrier-variant of the Joint Strike Fighter, represents the future of naval aviation, providing advanced stealth, sensor fusion, and survivability capabilities;Whereas the future strike fighter basing plan of the Navy must ensure a geographically balanced posture that supports fleet operations from both coasts and aligns with national defense strategy requirements;Whereas the consolidation of F–35C squadrons solely at Naval Air Station Lemoore, California, would leave the east coast of the United States without fifth-generation carrier-based strike capability and strain deployment timelines and logistics for Atlantic Fleet air wings; andWhereas NAS Oceana possesses the infrastructure, airspace access, proximity to carrier home ports, and regional workforce necessary to support F–35C operations effectively: Now, therefore, be itThat is the sense of the House of Representatives that—(1)the Secretary of the Navy should maintain a dual-coast basing strategy for F–35C Lightning II squadrons to support global naval operations and ensure redundancy, responsiveness, and readiness;(2)NAS Oceana should be designated to receive F–35C squadrons as part of the strike fighter modernization plan of the Navy;(3)the Secretary of the Navy should provide to Congress a detailed timeline and implementation plan for the integration of F–35C squadrons at NAS Oceana, including necessary military construction, training pipelines, and transition support; and(4)the Secretary of the Navy should ensure that future military construction and programmatic decisions do not result in disproportionate consolidation on the west coast of the United States that undermines the operational flexibility and strategic value of aviation infrastructure on the east coast of the United States.
Tracker
The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.
- Introduced2025-07-10
- Passed House
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Naval Air Station Oceana in Virginia Beach, Virginia, should remain a critical component of the future carrier-based strike fighter capability of the Navy and receive F-35C squadrons as part of the modernization strategy of the Navy.
Sponsors
Rep. Jennifer Kiggans (R) sponsors H.Res. 572, and 4 members have co-sponsored it, 1 of them from the day it was introduced.

Rep. · R–VA-2 · Sponsor
Introduced Jul 10, 2025

Rep. · R–VA-1 · Co-sponsor
Joined Jul 10, 2025 · Original

Rep. · R–VA-6 · Co-sponsor
Joined Jul 14, 2025

Rep. · R–VA-5 · Co-sponsor
Joined Jul 14, 2025

Rep. · D–NJ-1 · Co-sponsor
Joined Jul 14, 2025
Committees
H.Res. 572 went before 1 committee: Armed Services.
Actions
H.Res. 572 has taken 2 actions since Jul 10, 2025.
| Chamber | Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 10, 2025 | House | Submitted in House | ||
Jul 10, 2025 | House | Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.Armed Services Committee |
Votes
H.Res. 572 has not gone to a roll call.
Titles
H.Res. 572 goes by 2 titles.
- Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Naval Air Station Oceana in Virginia Beach, Virginia, should remain a critical component of the future carrier-based strike fighter capability of the Navy and receive F-35C squadrons as part of the modernization strategy of the Navy. — Official Title as Introduced
- Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Naval Air Station Oceana in Virginia Beach, Virginia, should remain a critical component of the future carrier-based strike fighter capability of the Navy and receive F-35C squadrons as part of the modernization strategy of the Navy. — Display Title
Classification
The Congressional Research Service files H.Res. 572 under Armed Forces and National Security, one of its 31 policy areas.
CRS Subjects
CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.Res. 572’s is Armed Forces and National Security.
hres572/policy-areas.txtSource: congress.gov · legiscan.com