Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

S. 2199

U.S. SenateIn Senate Committee

Summary

S. 2199, a bill to require the Secretary of Defense to issue regulations requiring that optional combat boots worn by members of the Armed Forces wear be made in the United States, and for other purposes, was introduced in the Senate on Jun 26, 2025 by Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D) with 2 co-sponsors. It was referred to Armed Services, and last saw action on Jun 26, 2025: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.


Record

Text

S. 2199 has 2 co-sponsors.

sb2199/introduced-in-senate.txt
119 S2199 IS: To require the Secretary of Defense to issue regulations requiring that optional combat boots worn by members of the Armed Forces wear be made in the United States, and for other purposes.
U.S. Senate
2025-06-26
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
II 119th CONGRESS 1st Session S. 2199 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES June 26 (legislative day, June 24), 2025 Ms. Duckworth (for herself, Mr. King , and Ms. Collins ) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services A BILL
To require the Secretary of Defense to issue regulations requiring that optional combat boots worn by members of the Armed Forces wear be made in the United States, and for other purposes.
1.
Regulations applicable to combat footwear of members of all branches of the Armed
Forces
(a)
In general
Not later than two years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall issue regulations prohibiting any member of the Armed Forces from wearing optional combat boots as part of a required uniform unless the optional combat boots are entirely manufactured in the United States and entirely made of—
(1)
materials grown, reprocessed, reused, or produced in the United States; and
(2)
components that are manufactured entirely in the United States and entirely made of materials described in paragraph (1).
(b)
Availability exemption
(1)
In general
A Secretary concerned may make a determination described in subsection (c) of section 4862 of title 10, United States Code, with respect to optional combat boots designed for a specific use and a specific need of the Department of Defense in the same manner as an article or item under subsection (a) of such section.
(2)
Applicability
If a Secretary concerned makes a determination described in paragraph (1) with respect to optional combat boots designed for a specific use and a specific need of the Department of Defense, the Secretary concerned may waive the prohibition under subsection (a) with respect to such optional combat boots designed for a specific use to the extent necessary to meet such need.
(c)
Medical exemption
The prohibition under subsection (a) shall not apply to the wearing of optional combat boots by a member of the Armed Forces if such optional combat boots are medically necessary to meet a unique physiological need of such member of the Armed Forces.
(d)
Definitions
In this section:
(1)
Armed forces; Secretary concerned
The terms Armed Forces and Secretary concerned have the meanings given such terms, respectively, in section 101(a) of title 10, United States Code.
(2)
Optional combat boots
The term optional combat boots , with respect to a member of the Armed Forces, means combat boots not furnished to such member of the Armed Forces by the Secretary of Defense.
(3)
Required uniform
The term required uniform means a uniform a member of the Armed Forces is required to wear as a member of the Armed Forces.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2025-06-26
  2. Passed Senate
  3. Passed House
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

A bill to require the Secretary of Defense to issue regulations requiring that optional combat boots worn by members of the Armed Forces wear be made in the United States, and for other purposes.

Sponsors

Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D) sponsors S. 2199, and 2 members have co-sponsored it, all of them from the day it was introduced.

Committees

S. 2199 went before 1 committee: Armed Services.

Armed Services
Armed Services
Referred To · Jun 26, 2025

Actions

S. 2199 has taken 2 actions since Jun 26, 2025.

ChamberAction
Jun 26, 2025
Senate
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.Armed Services Committee
Jun 26, 2025
Introduced in Senate

Votes

S. 2199 has not gone to a roll call.

1 bill is related to S. 2199, as Identical bill.

Titles

S. 2199 goes by 2 titles.

  • A bill to require the Secretary of Defense to issue regulations requiring that optional combat boots worn by members of the Armed Forces wear be made in the United States, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced
  • A bill to require the Secretary of Defense to issue regulations requiring that optional combat boots worn by members of the Armed Forces wear be made in the United States, and for other purposes. — Display Title

Lobbying

2 clients hired 2 firms and 9 registered lobbyists who named S. 2199 in 5 quarterly filings, 2025. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Apparel/Clothing Industry/Textiles, Environment/Superfund, Trade (domestic/foreign), Copyright/Patent/Trademark, Consumer Issues/Safety/Products, Defense, Labor Issues/Antitrust/Workplace, Small Business.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
AMERICAN APPAREL & FOOTWEAR ASSOCIATIONDistrict of Columbia13
FOOTWEAR DISTRIBUTORS & RETAILERS OF AMERICADistrict of Columbia12

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill.

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
AMERICAN APPAREL & FOOTWEAR ASSOCIATIONAMERICAN APPAREL & FOOTWEAR ASSOCIATION2025 fourth_quarter$343.6K4th Quarter - Report
FOOTWEAR DISTRIBUTORS & RETAILERS OF AMERICAFOOTWEAR DISTRIBUTORS & RETAILERS OF AMERICA2025 fourth_quarter$310K4th Quarter - Report
AMERICAN APPAREL & FOOTWEAR ASSOCIATIONAMERICAN APPAREL & FOOTWEAR ASSOCIATION2025 second_quarter$306.6K2nd Quarter - Report
AMERICAN APPAREL & FOOTWEAR ASSOCIATIONAMERICAN APPAREL & FOOTWEAR ASSOCIATION2025 third_quarter$231.1K3rd Quarter - Report
FOOTWEAR DISTRIBUTORS & RETAILERS OF AMERICAFOOTWEAR DISTRIBUTORS & RETAILERS OF AMERICA2025 third_quarter$130K3rd Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files S. 2199 under Armed Forces and National Security, one of its 31 policy areas.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; S. 2199’s is Armed Forces and National Security.

s2199/policy-areas.txt
Armed Forces and National SecurityAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com