- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- Administration
- Agriculture
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry
- Appropriations
- Armed Services
- Banking, Housing, And Urban Affairs
- Budget
- Commerce, Science, And Transportation
- Education and Workforce
- Energy And Commerce
- Energy And Natural Resources
- Environment And Public Works
- Ethics
- Finance
- Financial Services
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Relations
- Health, Education, Labor, And Pensions
- Homeland Security
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…
- Indian Affairs
- Indian and Insular Affairs
- Intelligence
- Judiciary
- Natural Resources
- Oversight And Government Reform
- Permanent Select Intelligence
- Rules
- Rules And Administration
- Science, Space, And Technology
- Select Intelligence
- Small Business
- Small Business And Entrepreneurship
- Subcommittee on Aviation
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…
- Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…
- Subcommittee on Federal Lands
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…
- Subcommittee on Health
- Subcommittee on Highways and Transit
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…
- Transportation And Infrastructure
- Veterans' Affairs
- Ways And Means

S. 2199
U.S. Senate•In Senate Committee
Summary
S. 2199, a bill to require the Secretary of Defense to issue regulations requiring that optional combat boots worn by members of the Armed Forces wear be made in the United States, and for other purposes, was introduced in the Senate on Jun 26, 2025 by Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D) with 2 co-sponsors. It was referred to Armed Services, and last saw action on Jun 26, 2025: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Record
Text
S. 2199 has 2 co-sponsors.
sb2199/introduced-in-senate.txt119 S2199 IS: To require the Secretary of Defense to issue regulations requiring that optional combat boots worn by members of the Armed Forces wear be made in the United States, and for other purposes.U.S. Senate2025-06-26text/xmlENPursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.II 119th CONGRESS 1st Session S. 2199 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES June 26 (legislative day, June 24), 2025 Ms. Duckworth (for herself, Mr. King , and Ms. Collins ) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services A BILLTo require the Secretary of Defense to issue regulations requiring that optional combat boots worn by members of the Armed Forces wear be made in the United States, and for other purposes.1.Regulations applicable to combat footwear of members of all branches of the ArmedForces(a)In generalNot later than two years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall issue regulations prohibiting any member of the Armed Forces from wearing optional combat boots as part of a required uniform unless the optional combat boots are entirely manufactured in the United States and entirely made of—(1)materials grown, reprocessed, reused, or produced in the United States; and(2)components that are manufactured entirely in the United States and entirely made of materials described in paragraph (1).(b)Availability exemption(1)In generalA Secretary concerned may make a determination described in subsection (c) of section 4862 of title 10, United States Code, with respect to optional combat boots designed for a specific use and a specific need of the Department of Defense in the same manner as an article or item under subsection (a) of such section.(2)ApplicabilityIf a Secretary concerned makes a determination described in paragraph (1) with respect to optional combat boots designed for a specific use and a specific need of the Department of Defense, the Secretary concerned may waive the prohibition under subsection (a) with respect to such optional combat boots designed for a specific use to the extent necessary to meet such need.(c)Medical exemptionThe prohibition under subsection (a) shall not apply to the wearing of optional combat boots by a member of the Armed Forces if such optional combat boots are medically necessary to meet a unique physiological need of such member of the Armed Forces.(d)DefinitionsIn this section:(1)Armed forces; Secretary concernedThe terms Armed Forces and Secretary concerned have the meanings given such terms, respectively, in section 101(a) of title 10, United States Code.(2)Optional combat bootsThe term optional combat boots , with respect to a member of the Armed Forces, means combat boots not furnished to such member of the Armed Forces by the Secretary of Defense.(3)Required uniformThe term required uniform means a uniform a member of the Armed Forces is required to wear as a member of the Armed Forces.
Tracker
The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.
- Introduced2025-06-26
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- Conference
- To President
- Became Law
A bill to require the Secretary of Defense to issue regulations requiring that optional combat boots worn by members of the Armed Forces wear be made in the United States, and for other purposes.
Sponsors
Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D) sponsors S. 2199, and 2 members have co-sponsored it, all of them from the day it was introduced.
Committees
S. 2199 went before 1 committee: Armed Services.
Actions
S. 2199 has taken 2 actions since Jun 26, 2025.
| Chamber | Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 26, 2025 | Senate | Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.Armed Services Committee | ||
Jun 26, 2025 | — | Introduced in Senate |
Votes
S. 2199 has not gone to a roll call.
Related bills
1 bill is related to S. 2199, as Identical bill.
Titles
S. 2199 goes by 2 titles.
- A bill to require the Secretary of Defense to issue regulations requiring that optional combat boots worn by members of the Armed Forces wear be made in the United States, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced
- A bill to require the Secretary of Defense to issue regulations requiring that optional combat boots worn by members of the Armed Forces wear be made in the United States, and for other purposes. — Display Title
Lobbying
2 clients hired 2 firms and 9 registered lobbyists who named S. 2199 in 5 quarterly filings, 2025. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.
Filed under Apparel/Clothing Industry/Textiles, Environment/Superfund, Trade (domestic/foreign), Copyright/Patent/Trademark, Consumer Issues/Safety/Products, Defense, Labor Issues/Antitrust/Workplace, Small Business.
Clients
Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.
| Client | Business | State | Firms | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMERICAN APPAREL & FOOTWEAR ASSOCIATION | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 3 | — |
| FOOTWEAR DISTRIBUTORS & RETAILERS OF AMERICA | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 2 | — |
Firms
Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.
| Registrant | Clients | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMERICAN APPAREL & FOOTWEAR ASSOCIATION | 1 | 3 | — |
| FOOTWEAR DISTRIBUTORS & RETAILERS OF AMERICA | 1 | 2 | — |
Lobbyists
Named on the filings that cite the bill.
| Lobbyist | Firms | Clients | Filings |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDREY CLARK | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| BETH HUGHES | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| CHELSEA MURTHA | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| CONOR O'BRIEN | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| JENNIFER HANKS | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| NATE HERMAN | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| STEVE LAMAR | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| RICHARD PRIEST | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| THOMAS CROCKETT | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Filings
The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.
| Client | Registrant | Period | Reported | Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMERICAN APPAREL & FOOTWEAR ASSOCIATION | AMERICAN APPAREL & FOOTWEAR ASSOCIATION | 2025 fourth_quarter | $343.6K | 4th Quarter - Report |
| FOOTWEAR DISTRIBUTORS & RETAILERS OF AMERICA | FOOTWEAR DISTRIBUTORS & RETAILERS OF AMERICA | 2025 fourth_quarter | $310K | 4th Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN APPAREL & FOOTWEAR ASSOCIATION | AMERICAN APPAREL & FOOTWEAR ASSOCIATION | 2025 second_quarter | $306.6K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN APPAREL & FOOTWEAR ASSOCIATION | AMERICAN APPAREL & FOOTWEAR ASSOCIATION | 2025 third_quarter | $231.1K | 3rd Quarter - Report |
| FOOTWEAR DISTRIBUTORS & RETAILERS OF AMERICA | FOOTWEAR DISTRIBUTORS & RETAILERS OF AMERICA | 2025 third_quarter | $130K | 3rd Quarter - Report |
Classification
The Congressional Research Service files S. 2199 under Armed Forces and National Security, one of its 31 policy areas.
CRS Subjects
CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; S. 2199’s is Armed Forces and National Security.
s2199/policy-areas.txtSource: congress.gov · legiscan.com
