Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

H.R. 3592

U.S. HouseIn House Committee

Summary

H.R. 3592, the Protect LNG Act of 2025, was introduced in the House on May 23, 2025 by Rep. Wesley Hunt (R) with 14 co-sponsors. It last saw action on Sep 10, 2025: Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 14 - 9.


Record

Text

H.R. 3592 has 14 co-sponsors.

hb3592/introduced-in-house.txt
119 HR 3592 IH: Protect LNG Act of 2025
U.S. House of Representatives
2025-05-23
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 3592 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES May 23, 2025 Mr. Hunt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary , and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce , for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned A BILL
To address the effect of litigation on applications to export liquefied natural gas, and for other purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Protect LNG Act of 2025 .
2.
Definitions
In this Act:
(1)
Covered application
The term covered application means an application for—
(A)
an authorization to export natural gas under section 3(a) of the Natural Gas Act ( 15 U.S.C. 717b(a) ); or
(B)
an authorization to site, construct, expand, or operate a covered facility under section 3(e) of the Natural Gas Act ( 15 U.S.C. 717b(e) ).
(2)
Covered facility
The term covered facility means a liquefied natural gas facility for which a proposal to site, construct, expand, or operate is required to be approved by—
(A)
the Secretary; and
(B)
(i)
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission; or
(ii)
the Maritime Administration.
(3)
Secretary
The term Secretary means the Secretary of Energy.
3.
Effect of litigation on applications to export liquefied natural gas
(a)
Effect of litigation
A civil action relating to an environmental review under the Natural Gas Act ( 15 U.S.C. 717 et seq. ) or the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 ( 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq. ) with respect to a covered facility shall not affect the validity of a permit, license, or approval issued to the covered facility that is the subject of the civil action.
(b)
Remand; processing of covered applications
If, in a civil action described in subsection (a), the environmental review for a permit, license, or approval issued to the covered facility that is the subject of the civil action is found by the applicable court to violate the Natural Gas Act ( 15 U.S.C. 717 et seq. ) or the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 ( 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq. )—
(1)
notwithstanding chapter 5 or 7 of title 5, United States Code (commonly referred to as the Administrative Procedure Act ), the applicable court shall not set aside or vacate the permit, license, or approval issued to the covered facility but instead remand the matter to the relevant Federal agency to resolve the violation; and
(2)
the relevant Federal agency shall continue to process all covered applications.
4.
Action on covered applications
(a)
Judicial review
Except for review in the Supreme Court of the United States, the court of appeals of the United States for the circuit in which a covered facility is, or will be, located pursuant to a covered application shall have original and exclusive jurisdiction over any civil action for the review of an order issued by a Federal agency with respect to the covered application.
(b)
Expedited review
The applicable United States Court of Appeals under subsection (a) shall—
(1)
set any civil action brought under this subsection for expedited review; and
(2)
set the action on the docket as soon as practicable after the filing date of the initial pleading.
(c)
Transfer of existing actions
In the case of a covered application for which a petition for review has been filed as of the date of enactment of this Act, the petition shall be—
(1)
on a motion by the applicant, transferred to the court of appeals of the United States in which the covered facility that is the subject of the covered application is, or will be, located; and
(2)
adjudicated in accordance with this section.
(d)
Limitation on claims
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a claim arising under Federal law seeking judicial review of a permit, license, or approval issued by a Federal agency for a covered facility pursuant to a covered application shall be barred unless the claim is filed not later than 90 days after publication of a notice in the Federal Register announcing that the permit, license, or approval is final pursuant to the law under which the agency action is taken, unless a shorter time is specified in the Federal law pursuant to which judicial review is allowed.
(e)
Savings clause
Nothing in this section establishes a right to judicial review or places any limit on filing a claim that a person has violated the terms of a permit, license, or approval.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2025-05-23
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

To address the effect of litigation on applications to export liquefied natural gas, and for other purposes.

Sponsors

Rep. Wesley Hunt (R) sponsors H.R. 3592, and 14 members have co-sponsored it.

Committees

H.R. 3592 went before 2 committees: Energy and Commerce and Judiciary.

Energy and Commerce
Energy and Commerce
Referred To · May 23, 2025 · 1,636 Bills
Judiciary
Judiciary
Referred To · May 23, 2025 · 2,181 Bills

Actions

H.R. 3592 has taken 3 actions since May 23, 2025, the latest on Sep 10, 2025.

ChamberAction
Sep 10, 2025
House
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 14 - 9.Judiciary Committee
May 23, 2025
House
Introduced in House
May 23, 2025
House
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.Judiciary Committee

Votes

H.R. 3592 has not gone to a roll call.

1 bill is related to H.R. 3592, as Identical bill.

Titles

H.R. 3592 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.

  • Protect LNG Act of 2025 — Display Title
  • Protect LNG Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • To address the effect of litigation on applications to export liquefied natural gas, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced

Cost estimate

The Congressional Budget Office has filed 1 estimate for H.R. 3592, the latest on Oct 27, 2025.


Lobbying

2 clients hired 2 firms and 4 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 3592 in 9 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Energy/Nuclear, Taxation/Internal Revenue Code, Budget/Appropriations, Trade (domestic/foreign).

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
ALTERNATIVE FUELS & CHEMICALS COALITIONDistrict of Columbia16
WOODSIDE ENERGYGlobal energy companyTexas13$180K

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

RegistrantClientsFilingsReported
ALTERNATIVE FUELS & CHEMICALS COALITION16
SECOND CURVE STRATEGIES LLC13$180K

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill.

LobbyistFirmsClientsFilings
CJ EVANS116
DR RINA SINGH116
JENNIFER LINKER113
STEVE FORDE113

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
WOODSIDE ENERGYSECOND CURVE STRATEGIES LLC2026 first_quarter$60K1st Quarter - Report
WOODSIDE ENERGYSECOND CURVE STRATEGIES LLC2025 fourth_quarter$60K4th Quarter - Report
WOODSIDE ENERGYSECOND CURVE STRATEGIES LLC2025 third_quarter$60K3rd Quarter - Report
ALTERNATIVE FUELS & CHEMICALS COALITIONALTERNATIVE FUELS & CHEMICALS COALITION2026 second_quarter2nd Quarter - Report
ALTERNATIVE FUELS & CHEMICALS COALITIONALTERNATIVE FUELS & CHEMICALS COALITION2026 first_quarter1st Quarter - Report
ALTERNATIVE FUELS & CHEMICALS COALITIONALTERNATIVE FUELS & CHEMICALS COALITION2025 fourth_quarter4th Quarter - Report
ALTERNATIVE FUELS & CHEMICALS COALITIONALTERNATIVE FUELS & CHEMICALS COALITION2025 third_quarter3rd Quarter - Report
ALTERNATIVE FUELS & CHEMICALS COALITIONALTERNATIVE FUELS & CHEMICALS COALITION2025 second_quarter2nd Quarter - Report
ALTERNATIVE FUELS & CHEMICALS COALITIONALTERNATIVE FUELS & CHEMICALS COALITION2025 first_quarter1st Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 3592 under Law, one of its 31 policy areas, and gives it 5 legislative subjects.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 3592’s is Law.

hr3592/policy-areas.txt
LawAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Legislative Subjects

H.R. 3592 carries 5 of CRS’s legislative subjects, from Civil actions and liability to Oil and gas.

hr3592/subjects.txt
Civil actions and liabilityEnvironmental assessment, monitoring, researchJudicial review and appealsLicensing and registrationsOil and gas

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com