- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- Administration
- Agriculture
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry
- Appropriations
- Armed Services
- Banking, Housing, And Urban Affairs
- Budget
- Commerce, Science, And Transportation
- Education and Workforce
- Energy And Commerce
- Energy And Natural Resources
- Environment And Public Works
- Ethics
- Finance
- Financial Services
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Relations
- Health, Education, Labor, And Pensions
- Homeland Security
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…
- Indian Affairs
- Indian and Insular Affairs
- Intelligence
- Judiciary
- Natural Resources
- Oversight And Government Reform
- Permanent Select Intelligence
- Rules
- Rules And Administration
- Science, Space, And Technology
- Select Intelligence
- Small Business
- Small Business And Entrepreneurship
- Subcommittee on Aviation
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…
- Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…
- Subcommittee on Federal Lands
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…
- Subcommittee on Health
- Subcommittee on Highways and Transit
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…
- Transportation And Infrastructure
- Veterans' Affairs
- Ways And Means

S. 1837
U.S. Senate•Engrossed
Summary
S. 1837, the DEFIANCE Act of 2025, was introduced in the Senate on May 21, 2025 by Sen. Richard Durbin (D) with 8 co-sponsors. It last saw action on Jan 13, 2026: Held at the desk.
Record
Text
S. 1837 has 8 co-sponsors.
sb1837/engrossed-in-senate.txt119 S1837 ES: Disrupt Explicit Forged Images And Non-Consensual Edits Act of 2025U.S. Senatetext/xmlENPursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.119th CONGRESS 2d Session S. 1837 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES AN ACTTo improve rights to relief for individuals affected by non-consensual activities involving intimate digital forgeries, and for other purposes.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Disrupt Explicit Forged Images And Non-Consensual Edits Act of 2025 or the DEFIANCE Act of 2025 .2.FindingsCongress finds the following:(1)Digital forgeries, often called deepfakes, are synthetic images and videos that look realistic. The technology to create digital forgeries is now ubiquitous and easy to use. Hundreds of apps are available that can quickly generate digital forgeries without the need for any technical expertise.(2)Digital forgeries can be wholly fictitious but can also manipulate images of real people to depict sexually intimate conduct that did not occur. For example, some digital forgeries will paste the face of an individual onto the body of a real or fictitious individual who is nude or who is engaging in sexual activity. Another example is a photograph of an individual that is manipulated to digitally remove the clothing of the individual so that the person appears to be nude.(3)The individuals depicted in such digital forgeries are profoundly harmed when the content is produced with intent to disclose, disclosed, or obtained without the consent of those individuals. These harms are not mitigated through labels or other information that indicates that the depiction is fake.(4)It can be destabilizing to victims whenever those victims are depicted in intimate digital forgeries against their will, as the privacy of those victims is violated and the victims lose control over their likeness and identity.(5)Victims can feel helpless because the victims—(A)may not be able to determine who has created the content; and(B)do not know how to prevent further disclosure of the intimate digital forgery or how to prevent more forgeries from being made.(6)Victims may be fearful of being in public out of concern that individuals the victims encounter have seen the digital forgeries. This leads to social rupture through the loss of the ability to trust, stigmatization, and isolation.(7)Victims of non-consensual, sexually intimate digital forgeries may experience depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation. These victims may also experience the silencing effect in which the victims withdraw from online spaces and public discourse to avoid further abuse.(8)Digital forgeries are often used to—(A)harass victims, interfering with their employment, education, reputation, or sense of safety; or(B)commit extortion, sexual assault, domestic violence, and other crimes.(9)Because of the harms caused by non-consensual, sexually intimate digital forgeries, such digital forgeries are considered to be a form of image-based sexual abuse.3.Civil action relating to disclosure of intimate images(a)DefinitionsSection 1309 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022 ( 15 U.S.C. 6851 ) is amended—(1)in the section heading, by insertingor nonconsensual activity involving digital forgeries afterintimate images ; and(2)in subsection (a)—(A)in paragraph (2), by inserting competent, after conscious, ;(B)by striking paragraph (3);(C)by redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph (3);(D)by redesignating paragraphs (5) and (6) as paragraphs (6) and (7), respectively;(E)by inserting after paragraph (3) the following:(4)Identifiable individualThe term identifiable individual means an individual whose body appears in whole or in part in an intimate visual depiction or intimate digital forgery and who is identifiable by virtue of the individual’s face, likeness, or other distinguishing characteristic, such as a unique birthmark or other recognizable feature, or from information displayed in connection with the intimate visual depiction or intimate digital forgery.(5)Intimate digital forgery(A)In generalThe term intimate digital forgery means any intimate visual depiction of an identifiable individual that—(i)falsely represents, in whole or in part—(I)the identifiable individual; or(II)the conduct or content that makes the visual depiction intimate;(ii)is created through the use of software, machine learning, artificial intelligence, or any other computer-generated or technological means, including by adapting, modifying, manipulating, or altering an authentic visual depiction; and(iii)is indistinguishable from an authentic visual depiction of the identifiable individual when viewed as a whole by a reasonable person.(B)Labels, disclosure, and contextAny visual depiction described in subparagraph (A) constitutes an intimate digital forgery for purposes of this paragraph regardless of whether a label, information disclosed with the visual depiction, or the context or setting in which the visual depiction is disclosed states or implies that the visual depiction is not authentic.; and(F)in paragraph (6)(A), as so redesignated—(i)in clause (i), by striking or at the end;(ii)in clause (ii)—(I)in subclause (I), by striking individual; and inserting individual; or ; and(II)by striking subclause (III); and(iii)by adding at the end the following:(iii)an identifiable individual engaging in sexually explicit conduct; and.(b)Civil actionSection 1309(b) of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022 ( 15 U.S.C. 6851(b) ) is amended—(1)in paragraph (1)—(A)by striking subparagraph (A) and inserting the following:(A)In generalExcept as provided in paragraph (5)—(i)an identifiable individual whose intimate visual depiction is disclosed, in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce or using any means or facility of interstate or foreign commerce, without the consent of the identifiable individual, where such disclosure was made by a person who knows or recklessly disregards that the identifiable individual has not consented to such disclosure, may bring a civil action against that person in an appropriate district court of the United States for relief as set forth in paragraph (3);(ii)an identifiable individual who is the subject of an intimate digital forgery may bring a civil action in an appropriate district court of the United States for relief as set forth in paragraph (3) against any person that knowingly produced or possessed the intimate digital forgery with intent to disclose it, knowingly disclosed the intimate digital forgery, or knowingly solicited and received the intimate digital forgery, if—(I)the identifiable individual did not consent to such production or possession with intent to disclose, disclosure, or solicitation and receipt;(II)the person knew or recklessly disregarded that the identifiable individual did not consent to such production or possession with intent to disclose, disclosure, or solicitation and receipt; and(III)such production or possession with intent to disclose, disclosure, or solicitation and receipt, is in or affects interstate or foreign commerce or uses any means or facility of interstate or foreign commerce; and(iii)an identifiable individual who is the subject of an intimate digital forgery may bring a civil action in an appropriate district court of the United States for relief as set forth in paragraph (3) against any person that knowingly produced the intimate digital forgery if—(I)the identifiable individual did not consent to such production;(II)the person knew or recklessly disregarded that the identifiable individual—(aa)did not consent to such production; and(bb)was harmed, or was reasonably likely to be harmed, by the production; and(III)such production is in or affects interstate or foreign commerce or uses any means or facility of interstate or foreign commerce.; and(B)in subparagraph (B)—(i)in the subparagraph heading, by insertingidentifiable beforeindividuals ; and(ii)by striking an individual who is under 18 years of age, incompetent, incapacitated, or deceased, the legal guardian of the individual and inserting an identifiable individual who is under 18 years of age, incompetent, incapacitated, or deceased, the legal guardian of the identifiable individual ;(2)in paragraph (2)—(A)in subparagraph (A)—(i)by inserting identifiable before individual ;(ii)by striking depiction and inserting intimate visual depiction or intimate digital forgery ; and(iii)by striking distribution and inserting disclosure, solicitation, or possession ; and(B)in subparagraph (B)—(i)by inserting identifiable before individual ;(ii)by inserting or intimate digital forgery after depiction each place it appears; and(iii)by inserting , solicitation, or possession after disclosure ;(3)by redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph (5);(4)by striking paragraph (3) and inserting the following:(3)Relief(A)In generalIn a civil action filed under this section, an identifiable individual may recover—(i)damages as provided under subparagraph (C); and(ii)the cost of the action, including reasonable attorney fees and other litigation costs reasonably incurred.(B)Punitive damages and other reliefThe court may, in addition to any other relief available at law, award punitive damages or order equitable relief, including a temporary restraining order, a preliminary injunction, or a permanent injunction ordering the defendant to delete, destroy, or cease to display or disclose the intimate visual depiction or intimate digital forgery.(C)DamagesFor purposes of subparagraph (A)(i), the identifiable individual may recover—(i)liquidated damages in the amount of—(I)$150,000; or(II)$250,000 if the conduct at issue in the claim was—(aa)committed in relation to actual or attempted sexual assault, stalking, or harassment of the identifiable individual by the defendant; or(bb)the direct and proximate cause of actual or attempted sexual assault, stalking, or harassment of the identifiable individual by any person; or(ii)actual damages sustained by the individual, which shall include any profits of the defendant that are attributable to the conduct at issue in the claim that are not otherwise taken into account in computing the actual damages.(D)Calculation of defendant’s profitFor purposes of subparagraph (C)(ii), to establish the defendant’s profits, the identifiable individual shall be required to present proof only of the gross revenue of the defendant, and the defendant shall be required to prove the deductible expenses of the defendant and the elements of profit attributable to factors other than the conduct at issue in the claim.(4)Preservation of privacyIn a civil action filed under this section, the court may issue an order to protect the privacy of a plaintiff, including by—(A)permitting the plaintiff to use a pseudonym;(B)requiring the parties to redact the personal identifying information of the plaintiff from any public filing, or to file such documents under seal; and(C)issuing a protective order for purposes of discovery, which may include an order indicating that any intimate visual depiction or intimate digital forgery shall remain in the care, custody, and control of the court.;(5)in paragraph (5)(A), as so redesignated—(A)by striking image and inserting visual depiction or intimate digital forgery ; and(B)by striking depicted and inserting identifiable ; and(6)by adding at the end the following:(6)Statute of limitationsAny action commenced under this section shall be barred unless the complaint is filed not later than 10 years from the later of—(A)the date on which the identifiable individual reasonably discovers the violation that forms the basis for the claim; or(B)the date on which the identifiable individual reaches 18 years of age.(7)Duplicative recovery barredNo relief may be ordered under paragraph (3) against a person who is subject to a judgment under section 2255 of title 18, United States Code, for the same conduct involving the same identifiable individual and the same intimate visual depiction or intimate digital forgery..(c)Continued applicability of Federal, State, and Tribal law(1)In generalThis Act shall not be construed to impair, supersede, or limit a provision of Federal, State, or Tribal law.(2)No preemptionNothing in this Act shall prohibit a State or Tribal government from adopting and enforcing a provision of law governing disclosure of intimate images or nonconsensual activity involving an intimate digital forgery, as defined in section 1309(a) of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022 ( 15 U.S.C. 6851(a) ), as amended by this Act, that is at least as protective of the rights of a victim as this Act.4.Severability; rule of construction(a)SeverabilityIf any provision of this Act, an amendment made by this Act, or the application of such a provision or amendment to any person or circumstance, is held to be unconstitutional, the remaining provisions of and amendments made by this Act, and the application of the provision or amendment held to be unconstitutional to any other person or circumstance, shall not be affected thereby.(b)Rule of constructionNothing in this Act, or an amendment made by this Act, shall be construed to limit or expand any law pertaining to intellectual property.Passed the Senate January 13, 2026. Secretary
Tracker
The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.
- Introduced2025-05-21
- Passed Senate2026-01-13
- Passed House
- Conference
- To President
- Became Law
CRS Summary
The summaries are the Congressional Research Service’s, one per stage. Read them in full.
Passed Senate Jan 13, 2026
sb1837/passed-senate.mdShown Here:
Passed Senate (01/13/2026)
Disrupt Explicit Forged Images And Non-Consensual Edits Act of 2025 or the DEFIANCE Act of 2025
This bill expands civil remedies for the nonconsensual disclosure of intimate images (i.e., nonconsensual pornography). The bill also establishes a new federal civil action for nonconsensual conduct involving intimate digital forgeries (i.e., deepfakes). The term intimate digital forgery means any intimate visual depiction of an identifiable individual created using software, machine learning, artificial intelligence, or other computer-generated or technological means that looks authentic.
With respect to the nonconsensual disclosure of intimate images, current law allows an identifiable individual to recover civil remedies, including litigation costs, damages, and injunctive relief. This bill increases the available damages by allowing the individual to recover punitive damages and by including, as part of actual damages, profits of the defendant that are attributable to the conduct at issue.
The bill also allows an identifiable individual who is the subject of an intimate digital forgery to file a federal civil action against anyone who knowingly discloses, produces or possesses with intent to disclose, or solicits and receives the intimate digital forgery without the individual's consent. Under the bill, the identifiable individual may recover the same expanded civil remedies that are available for the nonconsensual disclosure of intimate images.
Finally, the bill establishes a 10-year statute of limitations for filing civil actions involving nonconsensual intimate digital forgeries or nonconsensual disclosure of intimate images. The statute begins to run when the individual discovers the violation or turns 18, whichever is later.
Sponsors
Sen. Richard Durbin (D) sponsors S. 1837, and 8 members have co-sponsored it, all of them from the day it was introduced.

Sen. · D–IL · Sponsor
Introduced May 21, 2025

Sen. · R–SC · Co-sponsor
Joined May 21, 2025 · Original

Sen. · R–MO · Co-sponsor
Joined May 21, 2025 · Original

Sen. · D–NM · Co-sponsor
Joined May 21, 2025 · Original

Sen. · I–ME · Co-sponsor
Joined May 21, 2025 · Original

Sen. · D–MN · Co-sponsor
Joined May 21, 2025 · Original

Sen. · R–UT · Co-sponsor
Joined May 21, 2025 · Original

Sen. · D–NY · Co-sponsor
Joined May 21, 2025 · Original

Sen. · D–VT · Co-sponsor
Joined May 21, 2025 · Original
Committees
S. 1837 went before 1 committee: Judiciary.
Actions
S. 1837 has taken 8 actions since May 21, 2025, the latest on Jan 13, 2026.
| Chamber | Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 13, 2026 | Senate | Senate Committee on the Judiciary discharged by Unanimous Consent.Judiciary Committee | ||
Jan 13, 2026 | Senate | Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S143-147; text: CR S145-146) | ||
Jan 13, 2026 | Senate | Message on Senate action sent to the House. | ||
Jan 13, 202618:21 | House | Received in the House. | ||
Jan 13, 202618:23 | House | Held at the desk. |
Votes
S. 1837 has not gone to a roll call.
Related bills
1 bill is related to S. 1837, as Identical bill.
Titles
S. 1837 goes by 6 titles, 4 of them short titles.
- DEFIANCE Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Passed Senate
- Disrupt Explicit Forged Images And Non-Consensual Edits Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Passed Senate
- DEFIANCE Act of 2025 — Display Title
- DEFIANCE Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
- Disrupt Explicit Forged Images And Non-Consensual Edits Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
- A bill to improve rights to relief for individuals affected by non-consensual activities involving intimate digital forgeries, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced
Lobbying
8 clients hired 8 firms and 41 registered lobbyists who named S. 1837 in 19 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.
Filed under Telecommunications, Taxation/Internal Revenue Code, Budget/Appropriations, Copyright/Patent/Trademark, Computer Industry, Consumer Issues/Safety/Products, Education, Science/Technology.
Clients
Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.
| Client | Business | State | Firms | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 5 | $100K |
| VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC AND VARIOUS SUBSIDIARIES | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 5 | — |
| SOFTWARE & INFORMATION INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 3 | — |
| BUMBLE TRADING LLC | Online application for dating, friendship, or business relationships | Texas | 1 | 2 | $100K |
| ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA | A professional scientific society for entomologists. | Maryland | 1 | 1 | $30K |
| COMPUTER & COMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION | CCIA is an international, not-for-profit trade association representing a broad cross sect | District of Columbia | 1 | 1 | $20K |
| ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION | not-for-profit advocacy and litigation organization | California | 1 | 1 | — |
| UNITED STATES TELECOM ASSN | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 1 | — |
Firms
Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.
| Registrant | Clients | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| MERCURY STRATEGIES, LLC | 1 | 5 | $100K |
| VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND VARIOUS SUBSIDIARIES | 1 | 5 | — |
| SIIA | 1 | 3 | — |
| AVOQ, LLC | 1 | 2 | $100K |
| ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION | 1 | 1 | — |
| KELSAY STRATEGIES LLC | 1 | 1 | $20K |
| LEWIS-BURKE ASSOCIATES, LLC | 1 | 1 | $30K |
| UNITED STATES TELECOM ASSN | 1 | 1 | — |
Lobbyists
Named on the filings that cite the bill. The 20 named most often, of 41.
| Lobbyist | Firms | Clients | Filings |
|---|---|---|---|
| ANDREW FIELDS | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| ANNE-MARIE KELLEY | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| BROOKS BRUNSON-PITTS | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| CHRISTINA MASON | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| HANK KILGORE | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| JAMES GREEN | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| JOSHUA LYNCH | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| MARCELA ZAMORA | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| MARK MULLET | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| ROBERT FISHER | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| SYDNEY PETTIT | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| ANNALEE KAIN | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| DANIEL BUTHERUS | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| PATRICK TRUEMAN | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| ANTON VAN SEVENTER | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| BETHANY ABBATE | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| DANNY BOUNDS | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| MORTEN SKROEJER | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| NATHANAEL ANDREWS | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| PAUL LEKAS | 1 | 1 | 3 |
Filings
The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.
| Client | Registrant | Period | Reported | Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC AND VARIOUS SUBSIDIARIES | VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND VARIOUS SUBSIDIARIES | 2026 first_quarter | $3.4M | 1st Quarter - Report |
| VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC AND VARIOUS SUBSIDIARIES | VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND VARIOUS SUBSIDIARIES | 2025 fourth_quarter | $3.4M | 4th Quarter - Report |
| VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC AND VARIOUS SUBSIDIARIES | VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND VARIOUS SUBSIDIARIES | 2026 second_quarter | $3.1M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC AND VARIOUS SUBSIDIARIES | VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND VARIOUS SUBSIDIARIES | 2025 second_quarter | $3M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC AND VARIOUS SUBSIDIARIES | VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. AND VARIOUS SUBSIDIARIES | 2025 third_quarter | $3M | 3rd Quarter - Report |
| SOFTWARE & INFORMATION INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION | SIIA | 2026 second_quarter | $1.4M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| SOFTWARE & INFORMATION INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION | SIIA | 2026 first_quarter | $1.4M | 1st Quarter - Report |
| SOFTWARE & INFORMATION INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION | SIIA | 2025 fourth_quarter | $1.3M | 4th Quarter - Report |
| UNITED STATES TELECOM ASSN | UNITED STATES TELECOM ASSN | 2026 second_quarter | $620K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| BUMBLE TRADING LLC | AVOQ, LLC | 2026 second_quarter | $50K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| BUMBLE TRADING LLC | AVOQ, LLC | 2026 first_quarter | $50K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION | ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION | 2025 second_quarter | $30K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA | LEWIS-BURKE ASSOCIATES, LLC | 2025 second_quarter | $30K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES | MERCURY STRATEGIES, LLC | 2026 second_quarter | $20K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| COMPUTER & COMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION | KELSAY STRATEGIES LLC | 2026 second_quarter | $20K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES | MERCURY STRATEGIES, LLC | 2026 first_quarter | $20K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES | MERCURY STRATEGIES, LLC | 2025 fourth_quarter | $20K | 4th Quarter - Report |
| VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES | MERCURY STRATEGIES, LLC | 2025 third_quarter | $20K | 3rd Quarter - Report |
| VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES | MERCURY STRATEGIES, LLC | 2025 second_quarter | $20K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
Classification
The Congressional Research Service files S. 1837 under Crime and Law Enforcement, one of its 31 policy areas, and gives it 11 legislative subjects.
CRS Subjects
CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; S. 1837’s is Crime and Law Enforcement.
s1837/policy-areas.txtLegislative Subjects
S. 1837 carries 11 of CRS’s legislative subjects, from Advanced technology and technological innovations to Sex offenses.
s1837/subjects.txtSource: congress.gov · legiscan.com
