- H.R. 10171August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10156August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10172August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10160August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10181August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10176August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1496August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10164August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10170August 27, 2026
- H.Res. 1494August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10163August 27, 2026
- H.R. 10157August 27, 2026
- Administration
- Agriculture
- Agriculture, Nutrition, And Forestry
- Appropriations
- Armed Services
- Banking, Housing, And Urban Affairs
- Budget
- Commerce, Science, And Transportation
- Education and Workforce
- Energy And Commerce
- Energy And Natural Resources
- Environment And Public Works
- Ethics
- Finance
- Financial Services
- Foreign Affairs
- Foreign Relations
- Health, Education, Labor, And Pensions
- Homeland Security
- Homeland Security And Governmental Affa…
- Indian Affairs
- Indian and Insular Affairs
- Intelligence
- Judiciary
- Natural Resources
- Oversight And Government Reform
- Permanent Select Intelligence
- Rules
- Rules And Administration
- Science, Space, And Technology
- Select Intelligence
- Small Business
- Small Business And Entrepreneurship
- Subcommittee on Aviation
- Subcommittee on Border Security and Enf…
- Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritim…
- Subcommittee on Commodity Markets, Digi…
- Subcommittee on Conservation, Research,…
- Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and In…
- Subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infra…
- Subcommittee on Disability Assistance a…
- Subcommittee on Economic Development, P…
- Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
- Subcommittee on Emergency Management an…
- Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Reso…
- Subcommittee on Federal Lands
- Subcommittee on Forestry and Horticultu…
- Subcommittee on General Farm Commoditie…
- Subcommittee on Health
- Subcommittee on Highways and Transit
- Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy, and P…
- Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign A…
- Subcommittee on Oversight and Investiga…
- Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigatio…
- Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, a…
- Subcommittee on Transportation and Mari…
- Subcommittee on Water Resources and Env…
- Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fis…
- Transportation And Infrastructure
- Veterans' Affairs
- Ways And Means

S. 1692
U.S. Senate•In Senate Committee
Summary
S. 1692, the Radiology Outpatient Ordering Transmission (ROOT) Act, was introduced in the Senate on May 8, 2025 by Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R) with 4 co-sponsors. It was referred to Finance, and last saw action on May 8, 2025: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Record
Text
S. 1692 has 4 co-sponsors.
sb1692/introduced-in-senate.txt119 S1692 IS: Radiology Outpatient Ordering Transmission (ROOT) ActU.S. Senate2025-05-08text/xmlENPursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.II 119th CONGRESS 1st Session S. 1692 IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES May 8, 2025 Mrs. Blackburn (for herself andMs. Cortez Masto ) introduced the followingbill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance A BILLTo amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to modify data collectionrequirements for appropriate use criteria for applicable imaging services, and for otherpurposes.1.Short titleThis Act may be cited as the Radiology Outpatient Ordering Transmission (ROOT) Act .2.Modification of appropriate use criteria data collection for applicable imagingservices(a)In generalSection 1834(q) of the Social Security Act ( 42 U.S.C. 1395m(q) ) is amended—(1)in paragraph (3)(B)(ii)—(A)in subclause (IV), by striking generates and provides to the ordering professional a certification or documentation that ; and(B)by adding at the end the following new subclause:(VIII)Beginning with January 1, 2026, the mechanism provides to the Secretary—(aa)the information described in subclauses (III) and (IV);(bb)the information described in paragraph (4)(B); and(cc)such other information as the Secretary determines to be appropriate, at such time, and in such form and manner, as the Secretary may specify.;(2)in paragraph (4)—(A)in subparagraph (A), by striking clause (ii) and inserting the following:(ii)beginning January 1, 2026, comply with such requirements as the Secretary may establish.;(B)in subparagraph (B)—(i)in the heading, by strikingfurnishing professional and insertingqualified clinical decision support mechanism ;(ii)in the matter preceding clause (i)—(I)by striking January 1, 2017 and inserting January 1, 2026 ; and(II)by striking payment for such service may only be made if the claim for the service includes and inserting the qualified decision support mechanism shall maintain and report to the Secretary under subparagraph (F) ; and(iii)in clause (iii), by striking (if different from the furnishing professional) ;(C)in subparagraph (C), by adding at the end the following new clauses:(iv)Clinical trialsAn applicable imaging service that is ordered for an individual as part of a clinical trial.(v)Small and rural practicesAn applicable imaging service ordered by an ordering professional practicing in a small practice (consisting of 15 or fewer ordering professionals), or a practice in a health professional shortage area (as designated under section 332(a)(1)(A) of the Public Health Service Act) located in a rural area.(vi)Specified exemptionsThe following types of applicable imaging services:(I)A mammography.(II)A lung cancer screening performed using computed tomography.(III)A colonography performed using computed tomography.(IV)Such other preventive or screening imaging services as the Secretary determines appropriate.;(D)in subparagraph (D), by adding at the end the following new clause:(iv)Any other payment system determined appropriate by the Secretary.; and(E)by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs:(E)Furnishing professional requirementBeginning January 1, 2026, with respect to an applicable imaging service furnished in an applicable setting and paid for under an applicable payment system (as defined in subparagraph (D)), the furnishing professional shall include the national provider identifier of the ordering professional (if different from the furnishing professional) on the claim for the service.(F)Reporting requirementsThe Secretary shall provide, through guidance or rulemaking, information on appropriate ways that each qualified clinical decision support mechanism may report the information maintained under subparagraph (B) to the Secretary to support the Secretary in implementing paragraphs (5) and (6).;(3)in paragraph (5)—(A)in the heading, by strikingoutlier and insertinglow compliant ;(B)by striking subparagraphs (A) and (B) and inserting the following:(A)In generalWith respect to applicable imaging services furnished on or after January 1, 2026, the Secretary shall determine on an annual basis the total number of ordering professionals who are designated as low compliant ordering professionals under subparagraph (B).(B)Low compliant ordering professionalsThe Secretary shall designate ordering professionals with a compliance rate (as determined under subparagraph (D)) lower than an amount determined by the Secretary as low compliant ordering professionals.;(C)in paragraph (C), by striking outlier and inserting low compliant ;(D)by striking subparagraph (D) and inserting the following:(D)Determination of compliance rate(i)In general(I)Compliance ratesFor applicable imaging services furnished on or after January 1, 2026, the Secretary shall determine a compliance rate (as defined in clause (ii)) for each ordering professional for a period specified by the Secretary.(II)Use of dataIn determining a compliance rate for an ordering professional under subclause (I), the Secretary shall use data made available to the Secretary by qualified clinical decision support mechanisms published in the list under paragraph (3)(C) that were consulted by the ordering professional for the period specified by the Secretary under subclause (I).(ii)Definition of compliance rate(I)In generalIn this subparagraph, the term compliance rate means, with respect to the requirement that an ordering professional consult with a qualified decision support mechanism when ordering an applicable imaging service under paragraph (4)(A)(i), the ratio (expressed as a percentage) of—(aa)the number of claims for orders for an applicable imaging service from such ordering professional during the period specified by the Secretary under clause (i)(I) that provided the qualified decision support mechanism consulted by such ordering professional; and(bb)the total number of orders for an applicable imaging service from such ordering professional during such period.(II)Exclusion of excepted ordersIn calculating the compliance rate for an ordering professional under subclause (I), the Secretary shall exclude from the total number of orders in item (bb) of such subclause any order for an applicable imaging service described in paragraph (4)(C).; and(E)in subparagraph (E), by striking outlier and inserting low compliant ;(4)by striking paragraph (6) and inserting the following:(6)Study and report on low compliant ordering professionals and utilization of applicable imaging services(A)In generalNot later than January 1, 2031, and every 5 years thereafter, the Secretary shall conduct a study regarding the compliance rates calculated under paragraph (5) and submit a report to Congress that—(i)discusses—(I)such rates and compliance with this subsection;(II)the impact this subsection has on the utilization of applicable imaging services; and(III)potential mechanisms for improving compliance with this subsection, including—(aa)prior authorization for applicable imaging services ordered by low compliant ordering professionals;(bb)any payment adjustment related to the services, or a subset of services, that the Secretary may designate under the fee schedule under section 1848; or(cc)other mechanisms determined appropriate by the Secretary; and(ii)proposes alternative compliance rate thresholds for low compliant ordering professionals for purposes of paragraph (5)(B).; and(5)by adding at the end the following new paragraph:(8)Specialty society endorsementIn specifying applicable appropriate use criteria for applicable imaging services under paragraph (2) and qualified clinical decision support mechanisms under paragraph (3), the Secretary shall substantially adhere to the approach described in section 414.94 of title 42, Code of Federal Regulations (as in effect on January 1, 2023)..(b)Effective dateThe amendments made by subsection (a) shall take effect on January 1, 2026.
Tracker
The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.
- Introduced2025-05-08
- Passed Senate
- Passed House
- Conference
- To President
- Became Law
A bill to amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to modify data collection requirements for appropriate use criteria for applicable imaging services, and for other purposes.
Sponsors
Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R) sponsors S. 1692, and 4 members have co-sponsored it, 1 of them from the day it was introduced.
Committees
S. 1692 went before 1 committee: Finance.
Actions
S. 1692 has taken 2 actions since May 8, 2025.
| Chamber | Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
May 8, 2025 | Senate | Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.Finance Committee | ||
May 8, 2025 | — | Introduced in Senate |
Votes
S. 1692 has not gone to a roll call.
Related bills
2 bills are related to S. 1692.
Titles
S. 1692 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.
- Radiology Outpatient Ordering Transmission (ROOT) Act — Display Title
- Radiology Outpatient Ordering Transmission (ROOT) Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
- A bill to amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to modify data collection requirements for appropriate use criteria for applicable imaging services, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced
Lobbying
3 clients hired 3 firms and 33 registered lobbyists who named S. 1692 in 12 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.
Filed under Health Issues, Medicare/Medicaid, Budget/Appropriations, Education, Immigration, Medical/Disease Research/Clinical Labs, Taxation/Internal Revenue Code, Indian/Native American Affairs.
Clients
Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.
| Client | Business | State | Firms | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATION | Organization of radiologists, radiologist oncologists & clinical medical physicists i… | Virginia | 1 | 5 | $250K |
| AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | — | District of Columbia | 1 | 5 | — |
| AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY | Health Trade Association | Maryland | 1 | 2 | $45K |
Firms
Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.
| Registrant | Clients | Filings | Reported |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 1 | 5 | — |
| FORBES-TATE | 1 | 5 | $250K |
| SUMMIT HEALTH CARE CONSULTING | 1 | 2 | $45K |
Lobbyists
Named on the filings that cite the bill. The 20 named most often, of 33.
| Lobbyist | Firms | Clients | Filings |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALEXIS PIERCE | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| ANDREW WANKUM | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| ASHLEY DELOSH | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| BRYAN HULL | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| CHRISTOPHER SHERIN | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| DANA LICHTENBERG | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| DERRICK WHITE | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| GEORGE COX | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| JASON MARINO | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| JEFFREY COUGHLIN | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| JEFFREY FORBES | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| JENNIFER HANANOKI | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| KATHERINE DAPPER | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| KORYN RUBIN | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| KRISTINA DUNKLIN | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| LINDSEY BRILL | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| LISA MYERS | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| MARGARET GARIKES | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| MATTHEW REID | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| MICHAEL WILLIAMS | 1 | 1 | 5 |
Filings
The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.
| Client | Registrant | Period | Reported | Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2026 first_quarter | $8M | 1st Quarter - Amendme… |
| AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2026 first_quarter | $8M | 1st Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2025 fourth_quarter | $5.5M | 4th Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2025 second_quarter | $5M | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2025 third_quarter | $4.6M | 3rd Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATION | FORBES-TATE | 2026 second_quarter | $50K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATION | FORBES-TATE | 2026 first_quarter | $50K | 1st Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATION | FORBES-TATE | 2025 fourth_quarter | $50K | 4th Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATION | FORBES-TATE | 2025 third_quarter | $50K | 3rd Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATION | FORBES-TATE | 2025 second_quarter | $50K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY | SUMMIT HEALTH CARE CONSULTING | 2026 second_quarter | $22.5K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
| AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY | SUMMIT HEALTH CARE CONSULTING | 2025 second_quarter | $22.5K | 2nd Quarter - Report |
Classification
The Congressional Research Service files S. 1692 under Health, one of its 31 policy areas.
CRS Subjects
CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; S. 1692’s is Health.
s1692/policy-areas.txtSource: congress.gov · legiscan.com
