Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

S. 1569

U.S. SenateIn Senate Committee

Summary

S. 1569, the Fairness in Higher Education Accreditation Act, was introduced in the Senate on May 1, 2025 by Sen. Jim Banks (R) with 2 co-sponsors. It was referred to Health, Education, Labor, And Pensions, and last saw action on May 1, 2025: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.


Record

Text

S. 1569 has 2 co-sponsors.

sb1569/introduced-in-senate.txt
119 S1569 IS: Fairness in Higher Education Accreditation Act
U.S. Senate
2025-05-01
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
II
119th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. 1569
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
May 1, 2025
Mr. Banks introduced the following bill;
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and
Pensions
A BILL
To modify the criteria for recognition of accrediting agencies or
associations for institutions of higher education.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the Fairness in Higher Education Accreditation Act .
2.
Criteria for recognition of accrediting agencies or associations
Section 496 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 ( 20 U.S.C. 1099b ) is amended—
(1)
in subsection (a)—
(A)
in paragraph (5)—
(i)
in subparagraph (I), by striking and after the semicolon;
(ii)
in subparagraph (J), by inserting and after the semicolon; and
(iii)
by inserting after subparagraph (J), and before the flush text, the following:
(K)
except in the case of an institution described in subsection (r)(2), success in ensuring a right of free inquiry (as defined in subsection (r)(1));
;
(B)
in paragraph (7), by striking and after the semicolon;
(C)
in paragraph (8), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and ; and
(D)
by adding at the end the following:
(9)
the accrediting agency or association will not impose requirements, establish standards, conduct investigations, or make recommendations concerning—
(A)
the race, color, sex, or national origin composition of the student body, faculty, or staff;
(B)
the race, color, sex, or national origin of the students, faculty members, or staff members who are in leadership roles; or
(C)
the race, color, sex, or national origin of the students, faculty members, or staff members who receive honors or special commendations;
(10)
an accrediting agency or association may only be determined to be a reliable authority as to the quality of education or training offered for the purposes of this Act or for other Federal purposes if the agency or association permits each institution of higher education that the agency or association accredits (and each component or subpart of each institution of higher education that the agency or association accredits) to adopt any lawful policy with regard to the factors described in subparagraphs (A) through (C) of paragraph (9), notwithstanding the particular mission of an institution of higher education (or component or subpart thereof); and
(11)
as part of the accrediting process, an accrediting agency or association may not consider any factor described in subparagraphs (A) through (C) of paragraph (9).
;
(2)
in subsection (p), by striking Nothing in subsection (a)(5) and inserting Subject to subsection (a)(9), nothing in subsection (a)(5) ; and
(3)
by adding at the end the following:
(r)
Free inquiry
(1)
Free inquiry
In this section, the term free inquiry means—
(A)
in the case of a public institution of higher education that is legally required to abide by the First Amendment to the Constitution, compliance with—
(i)
the First Amendment to the Constitution, including protections for freedom of speech, association, press, religion, assembly, and petition; and
(ii)
the institution’s own written policies regarding academic freedom; or
(B)
in the case of a private institution of higher education, adherence to the institution’s written institutional policies concerning freedom of speech, association, press, religion, assembly, petition, and academic freedom.
(2)
Religious exemption
An institution described in any of subparagraphs (A) through (F) shall not be subject to the free inquiry requirements of subsection (a)(5)(K). Such exempt institutions shall include an institution—
(A)
that is a school or department of divinity;
(B)
that requires its faculty, students, or employees to be members of, or otherwise engage in religious practices of, or espouse a personal belief in, the religion of the organization by which it claims to be controlled;
(C)
that in its charter or catalog, or other official publication, contains an explicit statement that it is controlled by a religious organization or an organ thereof, or is committed to the doctrines or practices of a particular religion, and the members of its governing body are appointed by the controlling religious organization or an organ thereof, and it receives a significant amount of financial support from the controlling religious organization or an organ thereof;
(D)
that has a doctrinal statement or a statement of religious practices, along with a statement that members of the institution community must engage in the religious practices of, or espouse a personal belief in, the religion, its practices, or the doctrinal statement or statement of religious practices;
(E)
that has a published institutional mission that is approved by the governing body of an educational institution and that includes, refers to, or is predicated upon religious tenets, beliefs, or teachings; or
(F)
with respect to which there is other evidence sufficient to establish that the institution is controlled by a religious organization, pursuant to section 901(a)(3) of the Education Amendments of 1972 ( 20 U.S.C. 1681(a)(3) ).
.
3.
Civil action
An institution of higher education (as defined in section 102 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 ( 20 U.S.C. 1002 ), and including both public and private institutions as so defined) that is subject to a denial, withdrawal, or termination, or imminent threat of denial, withdrawal, or termination, of accreditation as a result of an accrediting agency or association’s violation of the prohibition established in section 496(a)(10) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 ( 20 U.S.C. 1099b(a) ), as added by section 2 of this Act, may pursue a civil action in accordance with subsections (e) and (f) of such section 496.

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2025-05-01
  2. Passed Senate
  3. Passed House
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

A bill to modify the criteria for recognition of accrediting agencies or associations for institutions of higher education.

Sponsors

Sen. Jim Banks (R) sponsors S. 1569, and 2 members have co-sponsored it.

Committees

S. 1569 went before 1 committee: Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
Referred To · May 1, 2025 · 747 Bills

Actions

S. 1569 has taken 2 actions since May 1, 2025.

ChamberAction
May 1, 2025
Senate
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee
May 1, 2025
Introduced in Senate

Votes

S. 1569 has not gone to a roll call.

1 bill is related to S. 1569.

Titles

S. 1569 goes by 3 titles, 1 of them short titles.

  • Fairness in Higher Education Accreditation Act — Display Title
  • Fairness in Higher Education Accreditation Act — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • A bill to modify the criteria for recognition of accrediting agencies or associations for institutions of higher education. — Official Title as Introduced

Lobbying

1 client hired 1 firm and 1 registered lobbyist who named S. 1569 in 1 quarterly filing, 2025. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Education.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
M.B.WESTPublic Relations Industry Ethical Practices Advocate.Tennessee11

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

RegistrantClientsFilingsReported
LOCKE LOBBYING CO., LLC11

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill.

LobbyistFirmsClientsFilings
W. LOCKE111

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
M.B.WESTLOCKE LOBBYING CO., LLC2025 fourth_quarter4th Quarter - Report

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files S. 1569 under Education, one of its 31 policy areas.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; S. 1569’s is Education.

s1569/policy-areas.txt
EducationAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationTransportation and Public WorksWater Resources Development

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com