Search

Search bills, members, committees and pages...

H.R. 2788

U.S. HouseIn House Committee

Summary

H.R. 2788, the End DWI Act of 2025, was introduced in the House on Apr 9, 2025 by Rep. Tracey Mann (R) with 14 co-sponsors. It was referred to Subcommittee on Highways and Transit, and last saw action on Apr 9, 2025: Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.


Record

Text

H.R. 2788 has 14 co-sponsors.

hb2788/introduced-in-house.txt
119 HR 2788 IH: End Driving While Intoxicated Act of 2025
U.S. House of Representatives
2025-04-09
text/xml
EN
Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
I 119th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 2788 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES April 9, 2025 Mr. Mann (for himself, Mr. Pappas , Mr. Smith of New Jersey , and Mr. Raskin ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure A BILL
To amend title 23, United States Code, to provide for a national standard to prevent driving while intoxicated by requiring ignition interlocks for DWI offenders, and for other purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the End Driving While Intoxicated Act of 2025 or the End DWI Act of 2025 .
2.
Findings
Congress finds the following:
(1)
According to Mothers Against Drunk Driving, there has been a historic increase in alcohol-impaired driving fatalities since 2019 resulting in one person dying in a driving while intoxicated crash in the United States every 39 minutes.
(2)
According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, between 2020 and 2021, driving while intoxicated deaths increased 14 percent and 13,384 people were killed, a level not seen since 2006.
(3)
Studies show that ignition interlocks reduce recidivism, by up to 70 percent, among first-time, repeat and high-risk driving while intoxicated offenders while they are installed.
(4)
Ignition interlocks are required for people who have been convicted for driving while intoxicated in 31 States and the District of Columbia, according to the National Conference of State Legislators.
(5)
The rise in polysubstance impaired driving significantly increases the crash risk on our nation’s roads.
(6)
One 2018 study from Washington State revealed that polysubstance impairment was the most common type of impairment found among drivers involved in fatal crashes between 2008 and 2016 and among drivers involved in fatal crashes during this timeframe, 44 percent tested positive for 2 or more substances with alcohol and THC being the most common combination.
3.
National standard for ignition interlocks for DWI offenders
(a)
In general
Chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
180.
National standard for ignition interlocks for DWI offenders
(a)
Withholding of apportionments for non-Compliance
(1)
Fiscal year 2027
The Secretary shall withhold 3 percent of the amount required to be apportioned to any State under each of paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 104(b) on October 1, 2026, if the State does not meet the requirements of paragraph (3) on such date.
(2)
Subsequent fiscal years
The Secretary shall withhold 5 percent of the amount required to be apportioned to any State under each of paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 104(b) on October 1, 2027, and on October 1 of each fiscal year thereafter, if the State does not meet the requirements of paragraph (3) on such date.
(3)
Requirements
(A)
In general
A State meets the requirements of this paragraph if the State has enacted and is enforcing a law mandating a restriction on driving privileges for a driving while intoxicated offender that limits the individual to operating only motor vehicles with an ignition interlock device installed, unless a special exception applies (as determined by the respective State), for a minimum period of 180 days and remain without a violation for a minimum period (as determined by the respective State) that precedes the date of the removal of the restriction.
(B)
Interlock period
The interlock period described in subparagraph (A) may be served by the individual during an administrative license suspension period, post-conviction, or a combination of both, as determined by the respective State.
(b)
Period of availability; effect of compliance and non-Compliance
(1)
Period of availability of withheld funds
(A)
Funds withheld on or before September 30, 2028
Any funds withheld under subsection (a) from apportionment to any State on or before September 30, 2028, shall remain available until the end of the third fiscal year following the fiscal year for which the funds are authorized to be appropriated.
(B)
Funds withheld after September 30, 2028
No funds withheld under this section from apportionment to any State after September 30, 2028, shall be available for apportionment to the State.
(2)
Apportionment of withheld funds after compliance
If, before the last day of the period for which funds withheld under subsection (a) from apportionment are to remain available for apportionment to a State under paragraph (1)(A), the State meets the requirements of subsection (a)(3), the Secretary shall, on the first day on which the State meets the requirements, apportion to the State the funds withheld under subsection (a) that remain available for apportionment to the State.
(3)
Period of availability of subsequently apportioned funds
(A)
In general
Any funds apportioned under paragraph (2) shall remain available for obligation until the end of the third fiscal year following the fiscal year in which the funds are so apportioned.
(B)
Treatment of certain funds
Sums not obligated at the end of the period referred to in subparagraph (A) shall lapse.
(4)
Effect of non-compliance
If, at the end of the period for which funds withheld under subsection (a) from apportionment are available for apportionment to a State under paragraph (1)(A) of this subsection, the State does not meet the requirements of subsection (a)(3), the funds shall lapse.
(c)
Definitions
In this section:
(1)
Driving while intoxicated
The term driving while intoxicated has the meaning given such term in section 164 and section 405.
(2)
Ignition interlock
The term ignition interlock has the meaning given the term ignition interlock system in section 1275.3 of title 23, Code of Federal Regulations.
(3)
Motor vehicle
The term motor vehicle has the meaning given such term in section 32101 of title 49.
(4)
Special exception
The term special exception has the meaning defined by a State in law or regulation with respect to an ignition interlock device that may include that the individual is required to operate an employer’s motor vehicle in the course and scope of employment and the business entity that owns the vehicle is not owned by the individual.
(5)
Violation
The term violation has the meaning defined by a State in law or regulation with respect to an ignition interlock device that may include failing a breath test, failing to take or pass a re-test, circumventing an ignition interlock, tampering with an ignition interlock, or a combinations of the actions described in this paragraph.
.
(b)
Clerical amendment
The analysis for chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 179 the following:
180. National standard for ignition interlocks for DWI offenders.
.
(c)
Conforming amendments
(1)
Minimum penalties for repeat offenders
Section 164(a)(6) of title 23, United States Code, is amended by striking or controlled .
(2)
National priority safety programs
Section 405(d)(6) of title 23, United States Code, is amended—
(A)
in subparagraph (A)(ii) by striking registered, owned, or leased for operation and inserting operated ; and
(B)
in subparagraph (F)(i) by striking or controlled .

Tracker

The tracker indicates the progress of this legislation as it moves through the legislative process.

  1. Introduced2025-04-09
  2. Passed House
  3. Passed Senate
  4. Conference
  5. To President
  6. Became Law

To amend title 23, United States Code, to provide for a national standard to prevent driving while intoxicated by requiring ignition interlocks for DWI offenders, and for other purposes.

Sponsors

Rep. Tracey Mann (R) sponsors H.R. 2788, and 14 members have co-sponsored it, 3 of them from the day it was introduced.

Committees

H.R. 2788 went before 2 committees: Highways and Transit Subcommittee and Transportation and Infrastructure.

Highways and Transit Subcommittee
Highways and Transit Subcommittee
Referred to · Apr 9, 2025 · 174 Bills
Transportation and Infrastructure
Transportation and Infrastructure
Referred To · Apr 9, 2025 · 156 Bills

Actions

H.R. 2788 has taken 3 actions since Apr 9, 2025.

ChamberAction
Apr 9, 2025
House
Introduced in House
Apr 9, 2025
House
Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.Transportation and Infrastructure Committee
Apr 9, 2025
House
Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.Highways and Transit Subcommittee

Votes

H.R. 2788 has not gone to a roll call.

Titles

H.R. 2788 goes by 4 titles, 2 of them short titles.

  • End DWI Act of 2025 — Display Title
  • End DWI Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • End Driving While Intoxicated Act of 2025 — Short Title(s) as Introduced
  • To amend title 23, United States Code, to provide for a national standard to prevent driving while intoxicated by requiring ignition interlocks for DWI offenders, and for other purposes. — Official Title as Introduced

Lobbying

5 clients hired 5 firms and 36 registered lobbyists who named H.R. 2788 in 18 quarterly filings, 2025 to 2026. Reported under the Lobbying Disclosure Act; a filing’s income covers everything its registrant worked that quarter, so the amounts below are the filings’, not this bill’s.

Filed under Transportation, Taxation/Internal Revenue Code, Trade (domestic/foreign), Agriculture, Automotive Industry, Consumer Issues/Safety/Products, Financial Institutions/Investments/Securities, Banking.

Clients

Who paid to be heard, by how many filings named the bill.

ClientBusinessStateFirmsFilingsReported
1A SMART START LLCSmart Start, Inc. is an American manufacturer of alcohol-monitoring technology to stop DUITexas16
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIESDistrict of Columbia15
NOVELIS INC.Georgia13
SAFETY AND ADVOCACY FOR EMPOWERMENT (SAFE)Advocating for safety and rehabilitation through the use of ignition interlocksFlorida12$60K
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERSDistrict of Columbia12

Firms

Registrants who filed on the bill, by filings.

Lobbyists

Named on the filings that cite the bill. The 20 named most often, of 36.

Filings

The documents themselves, on the Senate’s Lobbying Disclosure site, largest reported first.

ClientRegistrantPeriodReportedDocument
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERSNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS2025 second_quarter$1.9M2nd Quarter - Report
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERSNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS2025 first_quarter$1.7M1st Quarter - Report
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIESNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIES2026 second_quarter$540K2nd Quarter - Report
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIESNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIES2026 first_quarter$506.4K1st Quarter - Report
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIESNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIES2025 fourth_quarter$465.8K4th Quarter - Report
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIESNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIES2025 third_quarter$442.1K3rd Quarter - Report
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIESNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANIES2025 second_quarter$435.7K2nd Quarter - Report
NOVELIS INC.NOVELIS INC.2025 first_quarter$280K1st Quarter - Report
NOVELIS INC.NOVELIS INC.2025 third_quarter$240K3rd Quarter - Report
NOVELIS INC.NOVELIS INC.2025 second_quarter$180K2nd Quarter - Report
SAFETY AND ADVOCACY FOR EMPOWERMENT (SAFE)ALPINE GROUP PARTNERS, LLC.2026 second_quarter$60K2nd Quarter - Report
1A SMART START LLC1A SMART START LLC2026 second_quarter$40K2nd Quarter - Report
1A SMART START LLC1A SMART START LLC2026 first_quarter$40K1st Quarter - Report
1A SMART START LLC1A SMART START LLC2025 fourth_quarter$40K4th Quarter - Report
1A SMART START LLC1A SMART START LLC2025 third_quarter$40K3rd Quarter - Report
1A SMART START LLC1A SMART START LLC2025 second_quarter$40K2nd Quarter - Report
1A SMART START LLC1A SMART START LLC2025 first_quarter$40K1st Quarter - Report
SAFETY AND ADVOCACY FOR EMPOWERMENT (SAFE)ALPINE GROUP PARTNERS, LLC.2026 second_quarterRegistration

Classification

The Congressional Research Service files H.R. 2788 under Transportation and Public Works, one of its 31 policy areas.

CRS Subjects

CRS assigns every bill one policy area from its 31; H.R. 2788’s is Transportation and Public Works.

hr2788/policy-areas.txt
Transportation and Public WorksAgriculture and FoodAnimalsArmed Forces and National SecurityArts, Culture, ReligionCivil Rights and Liberties, Minority IssuesCommerceCongressCrime and Law EnforcementEconomics and Public FinanceEducationEmergency ManagementEnergyEnvironmental ProtectionFamiliesFinance and Financial SectorForeign Trade and International FinanceGovernment Operations and PoliticsHealthHousing and Community DevelopmentImmigrationInternational AffairsLabor and EmploymentLawNative AmericansPublic Lands and Natural ResourcesScience, Technology, CommunicationsSocial WelfareSports and RecreationTaxationWater Resources Development

Constitutional authority

The clause the sponsor cites as Congress’s power to enact H.R. 2788, as entered in the Congressional Record.

[Congressional Record Volume 171, Number 64 (Wednesday, April 9, 2025)][House]From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]By Mr. MANN:H.R. 2788.Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following:Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuantto the following--Article 1, Section 8 of the U.S.Constitution.[Page H1563]

Source: congress.gov · legiscan.com