H.R. 2783

119 HR 2783 IH: Infrastructure Project Acceleration Act
 U.S. House of Representatives
 2025-04-09
 text/xml
 EN
 Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.
 I  119th CONGRESS  1st Session  H. R. 2783  IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES   April 9, 2025   Mr. Langworthy  (for himself,  Mr. Collins ,  Mr. Lawler ,  Mr. Mannion ,  Ms. Malliotakis ,  Mr. Riley of New York , and  Ms. Tenney ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the  Committee on Natural Resources , and in addition to the Committee on  Transportation and Infrastructure , for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned   A BILL
To expedite the environmental review process and approval of priority manufacturing projects, and for other purposes.
1.
Short title
This Act may be cited as the   Infrastructure Project Acceleration Act  .
2.
Expedited approval of priority manufacturing projects
(a)
Definition of priority manufacturing project
In this section, the term  priority manufacturing project  means the construction or expansion of a manufacturing facility in the United States—
(1)
the cost of which is at least $1,000,000,000; and
(2)
which requires one or more Federal approvals described in subsection (c).
(b)
Findings
Congress finds that—
(1)
the timely completion of priority manufacturing projects will strengthen the economy and industrial manufacturing capacity of the United States, enhance the technological competitiveness of the United States, and reduce the reliance of the United States on foreign manufacturing; and
(2)
priority manufacturing projects will support critical sectors, including sectors related to defense, healthcare, and communications, while fostering economic growth and job creation in the United States.
(c)
Exclusions
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a priority manufacturing project shall not be required to obtain any permit that would otherwise be required pursuant to—
(1)
section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act ( 33 U.S.C. 1344 ); or
(2)
section 7, 9, or 10 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 ( 16 U.S.C. 1536 , 1538, or 1539).
(d)
Scope of review under NEPA
Section 106(a) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 ( 42 U.S.C. 4336(a) ) is amended—
(1)
in paragraph (3), by striking  or ;
(2)
in paragraph (4), by striking  action.  and inserting  action; or ; and
(3)
by adding at the end of the following:
(5)
the proposed agency action relates to a project or action that is subject to a State or Tribal environmental review statute that the lead agency determines is the functional equivalent of this Act. A lead agency shall determine the functional equivalence of this Act is satisfied if the State or Tribal agency considered relevant environmental information and the public has been informed regarding the decision-making process.
  .
(e)
Judicial review of certain approvals
(1)
No judicial review of certain approvals
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no court shall have jurisdiction to review any action or inaction taken by a Federal agency or a State administrative agency acting pursuant to Federal law that approves the construction or expansion of a priority manufacturing project.
(2)
Jurisdiction over certain claims
The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit shall have original and exclusive jurisdiction over any claim alleging the invalidity of this section or that an action described in paragraph (1) is beyond the scope of authority conferred by this section.